RESUMEN
Aim: Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding alpha-pinene (a herbal terpenoid) to quadruple therapy compared to a placebo in improving symptoms and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates in Functional dyspepsia (FD) patients. Background: FD is a prevalent upper gastrointestinal condition, and no definitive pharmacological treatment is available for its management. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial on FD patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection. We collected baseline demographic data and assessed FD symptoms in the participants. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either standard quadruple therapy with α-pinene capsules (0.25 mg/day) or quadruple therapy with a placebo for two weeks. We employed a validated questionnaire, the Short Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ), to evaluate FD symptoms. The eradication rate of H. pylori was compared between the two groups one month after completing the treatment regimens. Any reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were documented throughout the trial. Results: Over four months, a total of 66 patients completed the trial. Notably, there were no significant differences in baseline SF-LDQ scores between the two groups (p=0.83); however, a significant divergence emerged at the trial's conclusion (p=0.03). The H. pylori eradication rates did not show notable differences between the two treatment arms (p=0.43). Importantly, there were no dropouts from the trial due to ADRs. Among reported ADRs, participants experienced abdominal pain, headache, diarrhea, and a metallic taste, with no significant variance in incidence rates observed between the two groups (p=0.62). Conclusion: These findings suggest that α-pinene could be an effective and safe agent for reducing FD symptoms.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors are frequently used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, but their effect is restricted. The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of sublingual melatonin to omeprazole was effective in the treatment of gastro gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind clinical trial. A total of 78 patients with gastro gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomly allocated to either omeprazole 20 mg/d plus sublingual melatonin (3 mg/d) or omeprazole 20 mg/d plus placebo for 4 weeks. The selected patients had histories of heartburn and regurgitation and a score ≤32 on the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG). The outcome measures for the assessment of treatment efficacy were heartburn, epigastric pain and the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease score. Safety and quality of life were evaluated in the patients as the secondary outcomes too. RESULTS: Seventy-two out of 78 eligible patients completed this trial (35 in the melatonin group and 37 in the placebo group). Heartburn, epigastric pain, and Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease score declined significantly in the melatonin group compared to the placebo group (P = .04, P = .03, and P = .0001, respectively). Moreover, the quality of life score was significantly higher in the melatonin group compared with the placebo group (P = .0001). Adverse events were similarly observed in the 2 groups (P = .55), and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of sublingual melatonin (3 mg/day) with omeprazole (20 mg/day) may be more effective than omeprazole (20 mg/day) alone in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Melatonina , Humanos , Omeprazol/efectos adversos , Pirosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirosis/etiología , Melatonina/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/complicaciones , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
Aim: This study aimed to examine the environmental factors associated in Iranian patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Background: The role of environmental factors in the development of IBD remains uncertain. Methods: In this case-control study, the patients with IBD referred to the Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were recruited from 2017 to 2019. Controls were matched by sex. Data were collected using the designed questionnaire and also valid questionnaire such Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for sleep quality and anxiety/depression, respectively. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Results: The study population included 200 individuals: 100 (50%) IBD patients and 100 (50%) controls. Age under 50, marital status, sleep difficulties, vitamin D insufficiency, anxiety/depression, dietary fiber deficit, post-menopausal hormone treatment, oral contraceptives, and antibiotics were all prognostic factors for IBD on the univariate analysis (P< 0.005). In multivariate analysis, the risk of IBD was significantly increased with 50 years (OR: 6.699, 95%CI: 3.271-8.662, P=0.017), abnormal sleep status (OR: 6.383, 95%CI: 3.389-7.19, P=0.001), and using oral contraceptive (OR: 7.426, 95%CI: 5.327-9.865, P=0.001). However, the risk of IBD was significantly decreased with older age (OR: 0.795, 95%CI: 0.697-0.907, P=0.001) and married status (OR: 0.008, 95%CI: 0.001-0.438, P=0.018). Conclusion: Data suggest that the environmental factors play a significant role in the etiology of IBD and probably on the disease course. While the evidence for some factors is strong, many factors require further supportive data.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Distal esophageal spasm is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder presenting with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia. The main goal of therapy is symptom relief with pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical therapies. Pharmacologic treatment is less invasive and is the preferred method of choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diltiazem versus fluoxetine in the treatment of distal esophageal spasm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 125 patients with distal esophageal spasm diagnosed using endoscopy, barium esophagogram, and manometry were evaluated. Patients were divided into diltiazem and fluoxetine groups and received a 2-month trial of diltiazem + omeprazole or fluoxetine + omeprazole, respectively. Of 125 patients, 55 were lost to follow up and 70 were eligible for final analysis. Clinical signs and symptoms were assessed before and after therapy using four validated questionnaires: Eckardt score, short form-36, heartburn score, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Both regimens significantly relieved symptoms (a decrease in mean Eckardt score of 2.57 and 3.18 for diltiazem and fluoxetine groups, respectively; and a decrease in mean heartburn score by 0.89 and 1.03 for diltiazem and fluoxetine groups, respectively). Patients' quality of life improved based on short form-36 (an increase in mean score of 2.37 and 3.95 for fluoxetine and diltiazem groups, respectively). There was no relationship between patients' improvement and severity of symptoms. Psychological findings based on the hospital anxiety and depression scale were inconsistent (a decrease in mean of 0.143 and 0.57 for fluoxetine and diltiazem groups, respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine and diltiazem were effective for clinical symptom relief in patients with distal esophageal spasm, but were not promising for improving psychological symptoms. Neither regimen was superior in terms of efficacy. Consequently, it is key to consider side effects and comorbidities when choosing a therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of keratoconus in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Employees and the related risk factors including oxidative stress biomarkers. METHODS: 2546 subjects' mean age ± SD, 40.35 ± 6.70 (46% male) were recruited. All participants underwent objective refraction using auto-refractometer and retinoscopy, followed by subjective refraction, and bio-microscopy. Pentacam imaging was performed for the detected keratoconus patients. The prevalence of keratoconus and frequency of the visual impairment among keratoconus cases were evaluated. Potential risk factors of sex, age, family history of keratoconus, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, serum levels of glucose ≥ 100 mg/d, low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL) ≥ 110 mg/dL, high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ≤ 40 mg/d, and triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL in the blood were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of keratoconus at least in one eye was 0.98% (95% CI: 0.6- 1.4%). The best corrected visual acuity in the keratoconus group was 0.06 ± 0.1 and the rest of the population was 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR (p < 0.001). The frequency of visual impairment in the keratoconus group was zero. Odds ratios of the family history of keratoconus (21.00, 95% CI: 9.00-48.00, p < 0.001) and LDL ≥ 110 mg/dL (3.00, 95% CI: 1.20-6.40, p = 0.01) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoconus is rare and is not considered a risk factor for visual impairment. A family history of keratoconus and elevated serum LDL levels are contributing risk factors, suggesting an inflammatory background for the disease. Serum levels of LDL ≥ 110 mg/dL in the blood increased the risk of keratoconus three folds.
Asunto(s)
Queratocono , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Queratocono/diagnóstico , Queratocono/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevalencia , Irán/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Triglicéridos , Colesterol , Lipoproteínas , Trastornos de la VisiónRESUMEN
Aim: To evaluate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) supplementation in cirrhotic patients. Background: Chronic hepatic inflammation leads to fibrosis and cirrhosis through various mechanisms such as oxidative stress. NAC is one of the intracellular precursors of glutathione that can degrade most reactive oxygen species. Recently, the beneficial effects of NAC in animal and human studies on preventing liver injury progression and improving liver function have been examined. However, more studies on human subjects are still required. Methods: Well-known cirrhotic patients with a specific etiology and aged 18 to 70 years who referred to the gastrointestinal clinic of Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled in the present randomized double-blind controlled trial. Patients in the intervention group received NAC tablets at a dose of 600 mg daily, and the control group received a placebo. Demographic data, medical characteristics, and Child-Pugh and MELD scores evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Results: Totally, 60 patients completed the present study (30 patients in the intervention group, and 30 patients in the control group). Hematological and biochemical parameters were normal in both groups with no significant differences at baseline and 6 months after intervention values. Moreover, the renal function indicators including serum creatinine (Cr) and urea (BUN) decreased significantly after intervention. Hepatic parameters also decreased significantly 6 months after intervention. Decreases in the renal and hepatic parameters 6 months after baseline in the control group were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that NAC improved hepatic and renal function by decreasing serum urea and creatinine levels but had no significant effect on hematological and biochemical parameters. Furthermore, NAC significantly improved hepatic profiles by decreasing ALT, AST, and ALP in the liver enzymes between the intervention and control groups. Moreover, NAC caused a significant decrease in Child-Pugh and MELD scores.
RESUMEN
In recent decades, the number of cases developing drug-induced esophagitis (DIE) has reportedly been growing, which indicates the significance of detecting medicines capable of causing this adverse reaction. This study aims to provide an updated review on recent case reports of DIE, to evaluate the possible mechanism of this side effect, and to provide helpful management. Data was gathered through searches of three databases, namely PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane. Seven drug categories were evaluated: antibiotics, bisphosphonates, cardiovascular medicines, chemotherapeutic agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), other medications, and supplements. According to the findings, retrosternal pain, heartburn, odynophagia, and dysphagia are typical symptoms of DIE, and in most cases, DIE is a self-limiting side effect which can be resolved by removing the causative agent and providing supportive therapy.
RESUMEN
Antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates have become a global concern. The standard triple or quadruple therapies have recently become the most effective protocol for eradicating H. pylori in the gastrointestinal tract. There is evidence regarding the impact of different complementary or dietary supplements on H. pylori eradication. This review article intended to search electronic bibliographic databases for any clinical studies that evaluated the use of any herbal or dietary supplements to eradicate H. pylori up to June 2021. A total of 20 human studies met our criteria and were reviewed. Although some herbal medicines have shown their efficacy and safety in eradicating H. pylori in different clinical trials, more randomized blind, placebo-controlled human trials with a large sample size must be performed to extend our knowledge.
RESUMEN
Statins have been used as adjuvants to standard treatment in order to increase the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori infection. This study aimed to summarize the results of the efficacy of adding statins to standard treatments used for the eradication of H. pylori infection. We conducted a systematic search using a comprehensive combination of keywords in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus to retrieve relevant studies from 1990 to 2020. The estimate of pooled relative risk (RR), as the effect measure, was calculated using random effects meta-analyses in Stata 14. We finally included 5 studies (all of them were randomized controlled trials). The meta-analysis of all studies showed that the pooled RR (95% confidence interval) was 1.03 (0.64-1.68) in the random effects model, which was not statistically significant. In other words, based on our meta-analysis, the addition of statins as an adjuvant therapy to the standard treatment regimens does not increase the rate of H. pylori eradication. However, further evidence is needed to confirm this result as the number of available studies was small.
As estatinas têm vindo a ser usadas como adjuvantes à terapêutica convencional para aumentar a taxa de erradicação da infeção por Helicobacter pylori. Este estudo sumariza os resultados da eficácia de adicionar estatinas à terapêutica convencional na erradicação da infeção por Helicobacter pylori. Usando uma combinação compreensiva de palavras-chave, efetuamos uma revisão sistemática da PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science e Scopus de forma a encontrar estudos relevantes na área de 1990 a 2020. A estimativa do risco relativo (RR) global, como medida de eficácia, foi calculada usando o random effects meta-analyses no Stata 14. No final incluímos 5 estudos (todos ensaios randomizados e controlados). A meta-análise de todos os estudos mostrou um RR global (Intervalo confiança (IC) 95%) de 1.03 (0.641.68) no random effects model, que não foi estatisticamente significativo. Portanto, baseado nesta meta-análise, a adição de estatinas às duas terapêuticas convencionais mais utilizadas não aumenta a taxa de erradicação de Helicobacter pylori. Contudo, mais evidência é necessária para confirmar estes resultados já que o número de estudos disponíveis é pequeno.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Bowel preparation affects the quality of colonoscopy. Reaching the optimal preparation has been a challenge for years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the sole FDA-approved substance for this purpose. However, patients find it unpleasant and often complain about its adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to reduce these complaints by lowering the amount of PEG and adding senna which is an herbal stimulant laxative. Methods: Four hundred and eighty-six patients were admitted for colonoscopy. Finally, 382 patients were enrolled in the study and we divided them into two groups; 186 patients were placed in which conventional high volume PEG-alone regimen was consumed and 196 patients in which low volume PEG plus senna regimen was offered. The quality of colon preparation was compared between the two groups by independent two samples t-test (or its corresponding nonparametric test), Fisher's exact, or χ 2 test in SPSS software version 22. Results: The colon preparation quality was equally efficient in the two groups as 69.36% in the high volume PEG group and 71.94% in PEG plus senna group had adequate bowel preparation (p = 0.58). Adverse effects, like nausea, bloating, headache, and sleeplessness were significantly less in the low volume PEG plus senna group. Conclusion: Besides the fact that bowel preparation by low volume PEG plus senna combination was noninferior to the conventional high volume PEG-alone regimen, the side effects were much less common with the low volume PEG plus senna regimen.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) is one of the causes of chronic constipation. Laxative-based therapies are not very effective in treating this type of constipation. The therapeutic effectiveness of three therapeutic strategies, including biofeedback (BOF) alone, BOF+ fiber laxative (psyllium), and BOF +osmotic laxative (polyethylene glycol; [PEG]), was assessed in patients with constipation secondary to PFD. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with constipation were included during a period from 2017 to 2018. Thirty-two patients were treated with BOF alone, 25 patients received BOF+ fiber laxative (psyllium), and 31 patients received BOF+ osmotic laxative (PEG) for 2 to 3 months. A checklist was used to compare outcomes before and after the interventions. RESULTS: Satisfaction rates from the treatments were 60.83%, 46.88%, and 41.32% in the BOF, BOF + psyllium, and BOF + PEG groups, respectively. Women had a higher satisfaction rate compared to men. Defecation quality improved, and the frequency of enema usage decreased (p <0.05) in all the groups after intervention. Difficulty in evacuation, need for digitation, and return to the toilet after defecation significantly improved in the BOF alone group. Using laxatives reduced straining during evacuation and increased the duration of defecation. All the three regimens reduced rectal bleeding (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of laxatives with BOF did not offer significant therapeutic benefit. As laxatives may cause dissatisfaction and incomplete/prolonged defecations in patients with PFD, adding laxatives to the BOF regimen is not recommended for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Laxativos , Psyllium , Ataxia , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Defecación , Fibras de la Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Laxativos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Diafragma Pélvico , PolietilenglicolesRESUMEN
Context: The relationship between olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (OGD) and COVID-19 infection severity is still unclear. Aim: To investigate the correlation between OGD in COVID-19-infected individuals and RT-PCR results, chest CT scan abnormality, lymphocyte counts, hospital admission units, age, body temperature, and blood oxygen saturation. Setting and Design: Case-control study. Materials and Methods: The sample was composed of laboratory and chest X-ray confirmed COVID-19-infected patients from four hospitals. The patients were divided into case and control groups based on the presence of OGD symptoms. The predictor variable was OGD. The outcome variable was gender, hospital admission unit, chest CT scan abnormality, PCR, lymphocyte counts, age, body temperature, and blood oxygen saturation. Statistical Analysis Used: Bivariate statistics were computed and the P value was set at 0.05. Results: The sample consisted of 189 patients. Smell and taste disorders were found in 31.7% and 24.3% of patients, respectively. OGD was significantly correlated with positive PCR results (P < 0.001) and general unit admission (P < 0.05) during hospitalization. Additionally, patients with OGD had significantly lower mean age (P < 0.001), higher body temperature (P < 0.01), and blood oxygen saturation (P < 0.01). However, OGD was not correlated with gender, chest CT scan abnormality, or lymphocyte counts (P > 0.05). Conclusions: OGD symptoms can be used to detect COVID-19-infected patients. OGD can be used to predict less severe disease mainly by its correlation with the less amount of hospital care, more negative PCR results, higher body temperature, and higher blood oxygen saturation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) is associated with food indigestion. Efficacy of drugs used against PDS is limited whereas dietary modifications were shown to have important beneficial effects. Traditional Persian Medicine (TPM) sages suggested a dietary regimen known as Persian metabolic diet (PMD) for the management of PDS patients. In this study, the efficacy of PMD in alleviating the symptoms of PDS was explored. METHODS: This single-center, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial included 56 patients whom were randomly allocated to PMD group (29 participants) and Optional diet (OD) group (27 participants). They were instructed to follow the protocol for two weeks. Using a standard validated questionnaire, all outcomes were evaluated at baseline, end of the intervention period, and end of follow-up time. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention period, comparing the changes of severity scores between the groups showed a statistically significant difference in week 2 (p-value<0.001) and week 8 (p-value<0.001) follow-up comparing to the baseline. Similarly, at the end of the follow-up period, epigastric fullness, epigastric discomfort, and bloating were significantly improved in the PMD group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This diet prepared based on Persian medicine seems to be effective in relieving the symptoms of patients with PDS.
Asunto(s)
Dispepsia , Dolor Abdominal , Dispepsia/complicaciones , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Periodo Posprandial , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Melatonin is the "clock factor" produced from the pineal gland dominating regular circadian rhythm in mammalians. It is an indoleamine with potent multifunctional pharmacological effects, both receptor dependent and non-receptor dependent effects, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The aim of this review is to summarize clinical evidence related to melatonin's effectiveness in the treatment of liver and pancreas diseases. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochran Library were searched up to November 2020.Finally, this review has summarized up-to-date clinical evidence to investigate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for the management of liver and pancreas diseases. Melatonin has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects on the management of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), sleep disturbance of cirrhotic patients, prevention of drug/poison induced liver toxicity,and prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP);more data is needed to recommend melatonin administration in the treatment of mentioned disorders.
RESUMEN
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by recurring episodes of inflammation limited to the mucosal layer of the colon. The exact etiology of UC is unknown, but the role of autoimmunity and activated inflammatory cascade is quite clear. Melatonin possesses anti-inflammatory and immune-modulative properties in animal and clinical trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral melatonin as an adjudicative therapy in clinical, biochemical, and quality of life in UC patients. Thirty patients diagnosed with mild to moderate UC, were randomly allocated to either receive melatonin (3 mg/d) or the placebo group for three months. Simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), fecal calprotectin (FC), C-reactive protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and Sf-36 questionnaire have been used for assessment at the baseline and the end of the trial. Melatonin significantly improve SCCAI score, FC, role-emotional, energy and general health relative to placebo (p = 0.03, 0.05, 0.002, 0.032, 0.004 respectively). Regarding CRP, ESR, and the other components of SF-36 there is not any significant difference between melatonin and placebo group. Melatonin supplementation over a three-month period is effective and safe in improving clinical index, FC, and some quality of life in patients with mild to moderate UC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Decision-making on allocating scarce medical resources is crucial in the context of a strong health system reaction to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Therefore, understanding the risk factors related to a high mortality rate can enable the physicians for a better decision-making process. METHODS: Information was collected regarding clinical, demographic, and epidemiological features of the definite COVID-19 cases. Through Cox regression and statistical analysis, the risk factors related to mortality were determined. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate survival function and measure the mean length of living time in the patients. RESULTS: Among about 3000 patients admitted in the Taleghani hospital as outpatients with suspicious signs and symptoms of COVID-19 in 2 months, 214 people were confirmed positive for this virus using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Median time to death was 30 days. In this population, 24.29% of the patients died and 24.76% of them were admitted to the ICU (intensive care unit) during hospitalization. The results of Multivariate Cox regression Analysis showed that factors including age (HR, 1.031; 95% CI, 1.001-1.062; P value=0.04), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.000-1.015; P value=0.04) could independently predict mortality. Furthermore, the results showed that age above 59 years directly increased mortality rate and decreased survival among our study population. CONCLUSION: Predictor factors play an important role in decisions on public health policy-making. Our findings suggested that advanced age and CRP were independent mortality rate predictors in the admitted patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chronic functional constipation (CFC) is the most prevalent type of constipation. Considering the proven effect of pelvic floor muscles dysfunction in these patients' symptom and the fascial connection between pelvic floor and abdominal and lumbopelvic muscles, this study aimed to examine the possible relationship between this muscles and CFC. METHOD: We conveniently selected 100 patients with CFC and 100 healthy participants based on the Rome IV criteria. Two groups were asked to complete the international physical activity questionnaire and food frequency questionnaire. Then both groups were assessed for the presence of trigger points in more prevalent pain sites for each muscle by pressure algometer with 50% of their caught pressure pain threshold. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between two groups in the intake of calories, carbohydrates, proteins, sugar, fiber, vegetables, and wheat products. Patients had a higher consumption of fat and dairy products. for the physical activity level, a statistical difference showed that patients were less physically active. The comparison of the presence and the number of trigger points for each muscle in patients and control groups indicated more than 50% impairment, and there was a significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the relationship between myofascial trigger points of abdominal and lumbopelvic muscles and constipation. In addition to that, it seems that a sedentary life may influence CFC patients' condition. Moreover, it seems that the results of the dietary condition in patients could be because of conscious consumption of some certain foods.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial , Puntos Disparadores , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/epidemiología , Umbral del DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Several studies have focused on the alterations of hematological parameters for a better understanding of the COVID-19 pathogenesis and also their potential for predicting disease prognosis and severity. Although some evidence has indicated the prognostic values of thrombocytopenia, neutrophilia, and lymphopenia, there are conflicting results concerning the leukocyte and monocyte count. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective Double Centre study, we reviewed the results of WBC and monocyte counts of 1320 COVID-19 patients (243 of whom (18.4%) had severe disease) both on admission and within a 7-day follow-up. RESULTS: We found that both the number of monocytes and the percentage of monocytosis were higher in the severe group; however, it was not statistically significant. On the other hand, we found that not only the mean number of WBCs was significantly higher in the severe cases also leukocytosis was a common finding in this group; indicating that an increased number of WBC may probably predict a poor prognosis. Also, the monocyte count was not affected by age; however, univariate analysis showed that the percentage of leukocytosis was significantly greater in the older group (>50) with an odds ratio of 1.71 (P: 0.003). CONCLUSION: Alteration of monocytes either on admission or within hospitalization would not provide valuable data about the prediction of COVID-19 prognosis. Although the rapidly evolving nature of COVID-19 is the major limitation of the present study, further investigations in the field of laboratory biomarkers will pave the way to manage patients with severe disease better.