Survival and outcomes for co-infection of chronic hepatitis C with and without cirrhosis and COVID-19: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease, particularly cirrhosis, is associated with worse outcomes in patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To assess outcomes of COVID-19 infection among patients with pre-existing hepatitis C with or without liver cirrhosis. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included all cases of confirmed co-infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and chronic hepatitis C with or without liver cirrhosis who were admitted to six hospitals (Al-Sahel Hospital, Al-Matareya Hospital, Al-Ahrar Hospital, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Al-Gomhoreya Hospital, and the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute) affiliated with the General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes in Egypt. Patients were recruited from May 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020. Demographic, laboratory, imaging features, and outcomes were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to detect factors affecting mortality. RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study included 125 patients with chronic hepatitis C and COVID-19 co-infection, of which 64 (51.20%) had liver cirrhosis and 40 (32.00%) died. Fever, cough, dyspnea, and fatigue were the most frequent symptoms in patients with liver cirrhosis. Cough, sore throat, fatigue, myalgia, and diarrhea were significantly more common in patients with liver cirrhosis than in non-cirrhotic patients. There was no difference between patients with and without cirrhosis regarding comorbidities. Fifteen patients (23.40%) with liver cirrhosis presented with hepatic encephalopathy. Patients with liver cirrhosis were more likely than non-cirrhotic patients to have combined ground-glass opacities and consolidations in CT chest scans: 28 (43.75%) vs 4 (6.55%), respectively (P value < 0.001). These patients also were more likely to have severe COVID-19 infection, compared to patients without liver cirrhosis: 29 (45.31%) vs 11 (18.04%), respectively (P value < 0.003). Mortality was higher in patients with liver cirrhosis, compared to those with no cirrhosis: 33 (51.56%) vs 9 (14.75%), respectively (P value < 0.001). All patients in Child-Pugh class A recovered and were discharged. Cirrhotic mortality occurred among decompensated patients only. A multivariate regression analysis revealed the following independent factors affecting mortality: Male gender (OR 7.17, 95%CI: 2.19-23.51; P value = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 4.03, 95%CI: 1.49-10.91; P value = 0.006), and liver cirrhosis (OR 1.103, 95%CI: 1.037-1.282; P value < 0.0001). We found no differences in liver function, COVID-19 disease severity, or outcomes between patients who previously received direct-acting antiviral therapy (and achieved sustained virological response) and patients who did not receive this therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with liver cirrhosis are susceptible to higher severity and mortality if infected with COVID-19. Male gender, diabetes mellitus, and liver cirrhosis are independent factors associated with increased mortality risk.

Weekend and evening planned colonoscopy activity: a safe and effective way to meet demands.

Background and study aims Colonoscopy is the "gold standard" investigation for assessment of the large bowel that detects and prevents colorectal cancer, as well as non-neoplastic conditions. The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends monitoring key performance indicators such as cecal intubation rate (CIR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We aimed to investigate the quality of colonoscopies carried out during evening and Saturday lists in our unit and compare them against JAG standards of quality for colonoscopies. Patients and methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed demographical and procedure-related data for non-screening colonoscopies performed between January 2016 and November 2018. Evenings and Saturdays were defined as the out-of-hour (OOH) period. We compared the outcomes of the procedures done in these against the working hours of the weekdays. We also wanted to explore whether the outcomes were different among certain endoscopists. Other factors that could affect the KPIs, such as endoscopist experience and bowel preparation, were also analyzed. Results There were a total of 17634 colonoscopies carried out; 56.9 % of the patients (n = 10041) < 70 years old. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of weekday, evening, and Saturday colonoscopies regarding the CIR and ADR met the JAG standards as they were above 93 % and 24 %, respectively. Advanced colonoscopists had better KPIs when compared to the non-advanced colonoscopists, with CIR at 97.6 % vs. 93.2 % and ADR at 40.8 % vs. 26 %, respectively. Conclusions JAG standards were maintained during colonoscopies done on weekdays, evenings, and Saturdays. Advanced colonoscopists had higher CIR and ADRs.

Clinical Effect of Combined Mutations in DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, and NPM1 Among Egyptian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

BACKGROUND: Genotypic mutation of fms like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), Nucleophosmin (NPM1), and DNA-methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) has been involved in the leukemogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with the well known poor prognostic role of FLT3 and DNMT3A and favorable role for the NPM1 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 123 patients with AML treated at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University were examined for mutations in DNMT3A, FLT3, and NPM1 using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) and allele-specific PCR to detect DNMT3A and NPM1A mutations. Two-way direct sequencing and Gene Mapper version 4.0 software (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) sequencing were used as confirmatory tests for DNMT3A and NPM1A mutations, respectively. RESULTS: DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, and NPM1A gene mutations were detected in 22 (17.9%), 22 (17.9%), and 24 (19.5%) patients, respectively. DNMT3A/FLT3, NPM1A/FLT3, and DNMT3A/NPM1A combined mutant genotypes were detected in 5 (4.1%), 9 (7.3%), and 3 (2.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients (1.6%) had triple mutant genotypes (DNMT3A/FLT3/NPM1A). FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations had a significant negative effect on complete response (CR) rates (P = .016). FLT3-ITD mutation was significantly associated with older age (P = .029), and lower overall survival (OS) rates (P = .046). DNMT3A/FLT3 combined mutant genotypes were significantly associated with a lower OS rate (P = .016). Mutant NPM1/wild type FLT3, wild type DNMT3A/FLT3, and mutant NPM1A/wild type DNMT3A combinations were significantly associated with higher CR rates (P = .006, P = .006, and P = .023, respectively). CONCLUSION: DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, and NPM1A are frequent mutations in Egyptian AML. FLT3-ITD mutations are frequent in older patients. DNMT3A and FLT3-ITD mutations were associated with an unfavorable prognosis, but the NPM1A mutation has tendency to indicate a good prognosis.

Age at diagnosis in women with non-metastatic breast cancer: Is it related to prognosis?

OBJECTIVE: Primary objective was to verify whether breast cancer patients aged less than 40 years at diagnosis have poorer prognosis than older patients. Secondary to assess prognostic factors influencing disease free survival. METHODS: 941 women were diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer at NCI, Cairo in 2003. Epidemiologic, clinico-pathological characteristics, treatment modalities and disease free survival were compared among the two age groups. Prognostic factors were evaluated for association with disease-free survival. RESULTS: One hundred-eighty-one patients (19.2%) were younger than 40 years and 760 (80.8%) were older. Older women presented with higher rates of comorbidities and younger women presented with more hormone non-responsive tumors. Young women presented with larger tumors pT4=13.8% compared to 8.6% in older women, yet not significant. Young women were treated with more conservative surgery, more adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy while older women with more radical mastectomies and more hormonal treatment. Recurrence rates were significantly higher among young women 44.2% compared to 34.5% in older women. Five year disease free survival in young women was 38.9% ± 4.6% compared to 48.6% ± 2.5% with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.22 95% CI (0.91-1.64), p=0.19. Multivariate analyses identified positive axillary lymph nodes (pN2-pN3), larger tumor size (pT3-pT4), hypertension, lobular carcinoma type and lack of adjuvant systemic treatment as independent factors associated with poor DFS. CONCLUSION: Young women were not found to have poorer prognosis, yet they presented with more ER negative tumors. Most of women presented with advanced stage and young women had higher recurrence rates.