RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Accurately predicting new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) can improve counseling about RN vs partial nephrectomy. Split renal function (SRF)-based models are optimal, and differential parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) is more accurate than nuclear renal scans (NRS) for this purpose. However, there are minimal data regarding the limitations of PVA. Our objective was to identify patient-/tumor-related factors associated with PVA inaccuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and ninety-eight RN patients (2006-2021) with preoperative CT/MRI were retrospectively analyzed, with 235 also having NRS. Our SRF-based model to predict NBGFR was: 1.25 × (GlobalGFRPre-RN × SRFContralateral), where GFR indicates glomerular filtration rate, with SRF determined by PVA or NRS, and with 1.25 representing the median renal functional compensation in adults. Accuracy of predicted NBGFR within 15% of observed was evaluated in various patient/tumor cohorts using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: PVA and NRS accuracy were 73%/52% overall, and 71%/52% in patients with both studies (n = 235, P < .001), respectively. PVA inaccuracy independently associated with pyelonephritis, hydronephrosis, renal vein thrombosis, and infiltrative features (all P < .03). Ipsilateral hydronephrosis and renal vein thrombosis associated with PVA underprediction, while contralateral hydronephrosis and increased age associated with PVA overprediction (all P < .01). NRS inaccuracy was more common and did not associate with any of these conditions. Even among cohorts where PVA inaccuracy was observed (22% of our patients), there was no significant difference in the accuracies of NRS- and PVA-based predictions. CONCLUSIONS: PVA was more accurate for predicting NBGFR after RN than NRS. Inaccuracy of PVA correlated with factors that distort the parenchymal volume/function relationship or alter renal functional compensation. NRS inaccuracy was more common and unpredictable, likely reflecting the inherent inaccuracy of NRS. Awareness of cohorts where PVA is less accurate can help guide clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Neoplasias Renales , Riñón , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Anciano , Riñón/fisiopatología , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tamaño de los ÓrganosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current AUA guidelines mandate a risk-stratified approach for the evaluation of microhematuria. Urine genomic tests with high negative predictive value could further reduce unnecessary diagnostic testing and morbidity, but the economic impact is unknown. This study modeled the financial impact of Cxbladder Detect on microhematuria evaluations. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was constructed by Coreva Scientific comparing 1-year costs of the standard microhematuria evaluation using the AUA guidelines vs an algorithm incorporating Cxbladder Detect. Cxbladder Detect-positive patients had cystoscopy and imaging, whereas patients with negative tests were reevaluated in 6 months. Patients with positive diagnostic testing underwent cystoscopy, and positive cystoscopies led to transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Test performance was based on published literature, and costs were based on Medicare allowable fees. RESULTS: Using the decision tree model, the average savings of using Cxbladder Detect was $559 compared with the standard of care, with an average reduction of 0.38 procedures per patient. Probabilistic analysis showed statistical significance with a median reduction in the total cost of $498 per patient (95% CrI [-1356, -2]) and a significant median reduction in diagnostic procedures per patient of 0.36 (95% CrI [-0.52, -0.16]) without impact on the number of cancers diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: This model-based study demonstrates the potential economic value of using a Cxbladder-driven protocol for microhematuria evaluations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Sistema Urinario , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Anciano , Medicare , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Sistema Urinario/patología , Cistoscopía , Biomarcadores de Tumor/orinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is generally preferred for localized renal masses due to strong functional outcomes. Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after PN may facilitate preoperative counseling because NBGFR may affect long-term survival, particularly for patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease. Methods for predicting parenchymal volume preservation, and by extension NBGFR, have been proposed, including those based on contact surface area (CSA) or direct measurement of tissue likely to be excised/devascularized during PN. We previously reported that presuming 89% of global GFR preservation (the median value saved from previous, independent analyses) is as accurate as the more subjective/labor-intensive CSA and direct measurement approaches. More recently, several promising complex/multivariable predictive algorithms have been published, which typically include tumor, patient, and surgical factors. In this study, we compare our conceptually simple approach (NBGFRPost-PN = 0.90 × GFRPre-PN) with these sophisticated algorithms, presuming that an even 90% of the global GFR is saved with each PN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 631 patients with bilateral kidneys who underwent PN at Cleveland Clinic (2012-2014) for localized renal masses with available preoperative/postoperative GFR were analyzed. NBGFR was defined as the final GFR 3-12 months post-PN. Predictive accuracies were assessed from correlation coefficients (r) and mean squared errors (MSE). RESULTS: Our conceptually simple approach based on uniform 90% functional preservation had equivalent r values when compared with complex, multivariable models, and had the lowest degree of error when predicting NBGFR post-PN. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple formula performs equally well as complex algorithms when predicting NBGFR after PN. Strong anchoring by preoperative GFR and minimal functional loss (≈ 10%) with the typical PN likely account for these observations. This formula is practical and can facilitate counseling about expected postoperative functional outcomes after PN.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Riñón/cirugía , Riñón/patología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the reference standard for renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), although factors determining functional recovery in this setting remain poorly defined. PATIENTS/METHODS: Single center, retrospective analysis of 841 RMSK patients (1975-2022) managed with PN with functional data, including 361/435/45 with cold/warm/zero ischemia, respectively. A total of 155 of these patients also had necessary studies for detailed analysis of parenchymal volume preserved. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was classified by RIFLE (Risk/Injury/Failure/Loss/Endstage). Recovery-from-ischemia (Rec-Ischemia) was defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) saved normalized by parenchymal volume saved. Logistic regression identified predictive factors for AKI and predictors of Rec-Ischemia were analyzed by multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, median preoperative GFR was 56.7 ml/min/1.73m2 and new-baseline and 5-year GFRs were 43.1 and 44.5 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. Median follow-up was 55 months; 5-year dialysis-free survival was 97%. In the detailed analysis cohort, a primary focus of this study, median warm (nâ¯=â¯70)/cold (nâ¯=â¯85) ischemia times were 25/34 minutes, respectively; and median preoperative, new-baseline and 5-year GFRs were 57.8, 45.0, and 41.7 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. Functional recovery correlated strongly with parenchymal volume preserved (râ¯=â¯0.84, p < 0.001). Parenchymal volume loss accounted for 69% of the total median GFR decline associated with PN, leaving only 3 to 4 ml/min/1.73m2 attributed to ischemia and other factors. AKI occurred in 52% of patients and the only independent predictor of AKI was ischemia time. Independent predictors of reduced Rec-Ischemia were increased age, warm ischemia, and AKI. CONCLUSION: The main determinant of functional recovery after PN in RMSK is parenchymal volume preservation. Type/duration of ischemia, AKI, and age also correlated, although altogether their contributions were less impactful. Our findings suggest multiple opportunities for optimizing functional outcomes although preservation of parenchymal volume remains predominant. Long-term function generally remains stable with dialysis only occasionally required.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Neoplasias Renales , Riñón Único , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Riñón Único/complicaciones , Riñón Único/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nefrectomía , Isquemia Tibia , Isquemia , Tasa de Filtración GlomerularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a micro-ultrasound risk score that predicts the likelihood of significant prostate cancer in the anterior zone. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from three expert institutions familiar with micro-ultrasound. The study was conducted in two phases. First, the PRI-MUS anterior score was developed by assessing selected prostate videos from patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Second, seven urology readers with varying levels of experience in micro-ultrasound examination evaluated prostate loops according to the PRI-MUS anterior score. Each reader watched the videos and recorded the likelihood of the presence of significant cancer in the anterior part of the prostate in a three-point scale. The coherence among the readers was calculated using the Fleiss kappa and the Cronbach alpha. RESULTS: A total of 102 selected prostate scans were used to develop the risk assessment for anterior zone cancer in the prostate. The score comprised three categories: likely, equivocal, and unlikely. The median (IQR) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the seven readers were 72% (68-84), 68% (64-84), 75% (72-81), and 73% (71-80), respectively. The mean SD ROC AUC was 0.75 ± 2%, while the Fleiss kappa and the Cronbach alpha were 0.179 and 0.56, respectively. CONCLUSION: Micro-ultrasound can detect cancerous lesions in the anterior part of the prostate. When combined with the PRI-MUS protocol to assess the peripheral part, it enables an assessment of the entire prostate gland. Pending external validation, the PRI-MUS anterior score developed in this study might be implemented in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Pelvis , Medición de Riesgo , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is preferred for a renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), although tumors with high complexity can be challenging. Objective: To evaluate the evolution of RMSK management with a focus on achievement of PN. Design setting and participants: Patients with nonmetastatic RMSK (n = 499) were retrospectively reviewed; 133 had high tumor complexity, including 80 in the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era (1999-2008) and 53 in the TKI era (2009-2022). After 2009, 23/53 patients received neoadjuvant TKI and 30/53 had immediate-surgery. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Functional outcomes, adverse events and complications, dialysis-free survival, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were the measures evaluated. Mann-Whitney and χ2 tests were used to compare cohorts, and the log-rank test was applied for survival analyses. Results and limitations: Overall, the median RENAL score was 10 and the median tumor diameter was 5.2 cm. Demographic characteristics, tumor diameter, and RENAL scores were similar between the pre-TKI-era and TKI-era groups. In the TKI era, 23/53 patients (43%) with clear-cell histology were selected for neoadjuvant TKI. These 23 patients had a greater median tumor diameter (7.1 vs 4.4 cm; p = 0.02) and RENAL score (11 vs 10; p = 0.07). After TKI treatment, the median tumor diameter decreased to 5.6 cm and the RENAL score to 9, and tumor volume was reduced by 59% (all p < 0.05). PN was accomplished in 21/23 (91%) the TKI-treated cases and in 27/30 (90%) of the immediate-surgery cases (2009-2022). PN was only accomplished in 52/80 (65%) of the patients from the pre-TKI era (p < 0.01). The 5-yr dialysis-free survival rate was 59% in the pre-TKI-era group and 91% in the TKI-era group. The 5-yr RFS rate was lower in the TKI-era group (59% vs 74%; p = 0.21), which was mostly related to more aggressive tumor biology, as reflected by a predominance of systemic rather than local recurrences. Conclusions: Management of RMSK with high tumor complexity is challenging. Selective use of TKI therapy was associated with greater use of PN, although a randomized study is needed. RFS mostly reflected aggressive tumor biology rather than failure of local management. Patient summary: For complex kidney tumors in patients with a single kidney, management is challenging. Use of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors before surgery was associated with reductions in tumor size and greater ability to achieve partial kidney removal for cancer control. Most recurrences were metastatic, which reflects aggressive tumor biology rather than failure of surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether we can surpass the traditional R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (H-score) prediction ability of pathologic outcomes by creating artificial intelligence (AI)-generated R.E.N.A.L.+ score (AI+ score) with continuous rather than ordinal components. We also assessed the AI+ score components' relative importance with respect to outcome odds. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 300 consecutive patients with preoperative computed tomography scans showing suspected renal cancer at a single institution from 2010 to 2018. H-score was tabulated by three trained medical personnel. Deep neural network approach automatically generated kidney segmentation masks of parenchyma and tumor. Geometric algorithms were used to automatically estimate score components as ordinal and continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression of continuous R.E.N.A.L. components was used to generate AI+ score. Predictive utility was compared between AI+, AI, and H-scores for variables of interest, and AI+ score components' relative importance was assessed. RESULTS: Median age was 60years (interquartile range 51-68), and 40% were female. Median tumor size was 4.2 cm (2.6-6.12), and 92% were malignant, including 27%, 37%, and 23% with high-stage, high-grade, and necrosis, respectively. AI+ score demonstrated superior predictive ability over AI and H-scores for predicting malignancy (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69 vs 0.67 vs 0.64, respectively), high stage (AUC 0.82 vs 0.65 vs 0.71, respectively), high grade (AUC 0.78 vs 0.65 vs 0.65, respectively), pathologic tumor necrosis (AUC 0.81 vs 0.72 vs 0.74, respectively), and partial nephrectomy approach (AUC 0.88 vs 0.74 vs 0.79, respectively). Of AI+ score components, the maximal tumor diameter ("R") was the most important outcomes predictor. CONCLUSION: AI+ score was superior to AI-score and H-score in predicting oncologic outcomes. Time-efficient AI+ score can be used at the point of care, surpassing validated clinical scoring systems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with longitudinal ipsilateral functional decline after partial nephrectomy (PN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1140 patients managed with PN (2012-2014), 349 (31%) had imaging/serum creatinine levels pre-PN, 1-12 months post-PN (new baseline), and >3 years later necessary for inclusion. Parenchymal-volume analysis was used to determine split renal function. Patients were grouped as having significant renal comorbidity (CohortSRC : diabetes mellitus with insulin-dependence or end-organ damage, refractory hypertension, or severe pre-existing chronic kidney disease) vs not having significant renal comorbidity (CohortNoSRC ) preoperatively. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of annual ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy and functional decline relative to new baseline values post-PN, after the kidney had healed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.3 years with 87/226/36 patients having cold/warm/zero ischaemia. The median cold/warm ischaemia times were 32/22 min. Overall, the median tumour size was 3.0 cm. The preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and new baseline GFR (NBGFR) were 81 and 71 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. After establishment of the NBGFR, the median loss of global and ipsilateral function was 0.7 and 0.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 /year, respectively, consistent with the natural ageing process. Overall, the median ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy was 1.2 cm3 /year and accounted for a median of 53% of the annual functional decline. Significant renal comorbidity, age, and warm ischaemia were independently associated with ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy (all P < 0.01). Significant renal comorbidity and ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy were independently associated with annual ipsilateral functional decline (both P < 0.01). Annual median ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy and functional decline were both significantly increased for CohortSRC compared to CohortNoSRC (2.8 vs 0.9 cm3 , P < 0.01 and 0.90 vs 0.30 mL/min/1.73 m2 /year, P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal renal function following PN generally follows the normal ageing process. Significant renal comorbidities, age, warm ischaemia, and ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy were the most important predictors of ipsilateral functional decline following establishment of NBGFR.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Riñón/cirugía , Isquemia Tibia/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Atrofia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To provide a more rigorous assessment of factors affecting functional recovery after partial nephrectomy (PN) using novel tools that allow for analysis of more patients and improved accuracy for assessment of parenchymal volume loss, thereby revealing the potential impact of secondary factors such as ischaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1140 patients managed with PN (2012-2014), 670 (59%) had imaging and serum creatinine levels measured before and after PN necessary for inclusion. Recovery from ischaemia was defined as the ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate (GFR) saved normalised by parenchymal volume saved. Acute kidney injury was assessed through Spectrum Score, which quantifies the degree of acute ipsilateral renal dysfunction due to exposure to ischaemia that would otherwise be masked by the contralateral kidney. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of Spectrum Score and Recovery from Ischaemia. RESULTS: In all, 409/189/72 patients had warm/cold/zero ischaemia, respectively, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) ischaemia times for cold and warm ischaemia of 30 (25-42) and 22 (18-28) min, respectively. The median (IQR) global preoperative GFR and new baseline GFR (NBGFR) were 78 (63-92) and 69 (54-81) mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. The median (IQR) ipsilateral preoperative GFR and NBGFR were 40 (33-47) and 31 (24-38) mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. Functional recovery correlated strongly with parenchymal volume preserved (r = 0.83, P < 0.01). The median (IQR) decline in ipsilateral GFR associated with PN was 7.8 (4.5-12) mL/min/1.73 m2 with loss of parenchyma accounting for 81% of this loss. The median (IQR) recovery from ischaemia was similar across the cold/warm/zero ischaemia groups at 96% (90%-102%), 95% (89%-101%), and 97% (91%-102%), respectively. Independent predictors of Spectrum Score were ischaemia time, tumour complexity, and preoperative global GFR. Independent predictors of recovery from ischaemia were insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, refractory hypertension, warm ischaemia, and Spectrum Score. CONCLUSIONS: The main determinant of functional recovery after PN is parenchymal volume preservation. A more robust and rigorous evaluation allowed us to identify secondary factors including comorbidities, increased tumour complexity, and ischaemia-related factors that are also independently associated with impaired recovery, although altogether these were much less impactful.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Riñón/patología , Isquemia Tibia/métodos , Isquemia/cirugía , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Accurate prediction of new baseline GFR (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) can inform clinical management and patient counseling whenever RN is a strong consideration. Preoperative global GFR, split renal function (SRF), and renal functional compensation (RFC) are fundamentally important for the accurate prediction of NBGFR post-RN. While SRF has traditionally been obtained from nuclear renal scans (NRS), differential parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) via software analysis may be more accurate. A simplified approach to estimate parenchymal volumes and SRF based on length/width/height measurements (LWH) has also been proposed. We compare the accuracies of these three methods for determining SRF, and, by extension, predicting NBGFR after RN. All 235 renal cancer patients managed with RN (2006-2021) with available preoperative CT/MRI and NRS, and relevant functional data were analyzed. PVA was performed on CT/MRI using semi-automated software, and LWH measurements were obtained from CT/MRI images. RFC was presumed to be 25%, and thus: Predicted NBGFR = 1.25 × Global GFRPre-RN × SRFContralateral. Predictive accuracies were assessed by mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficients (r). The r values for the LWH/NRS/software-derived PVA approaches were 0.72/0.71/0.86, respectively (p < 0.05). The PVA-based approach also had the most favorable MSE, which were 120/126/65, respectively (p < 0.05). Our data show that software-derived PVA provides more accurate and precise SRF estimations and predictions of NBGFR post-RN than NRS/LWH methods. Furthermore, the LWH approach is equivalent to NRS, precluding the need for NRS in most patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/cirugía , Riñón/fisiología , Nefrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Focal therapy for prostate cancer is increasingly recognized as an acceptable therapeutic option in well-selected men. A focal therapy multidisciplinary tumor board geared toward improving patient selection is a novel concept which has not been reported. We describe our institution's initial experience with a multidisciplinary tumor board for focal therapy and its outcomes in terms of patient selection. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective study of patients referred to a multidisciplinary tumor board. All prostate MRIs were re-reviewed by a single radiologist with >10 years of experience, and the number, size, location, and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System scores of lesions visible on MRI were recorded and compared to the original report. Outside histopathology, when requested, was also re-reviewed for cancer grade groups and adverse pathological features. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were presented at our multidisciplinary tumor board (January-October 2022). Sixty-seven patients were treatment naïve, while 7 had prior radiation±androgen deprivation therapy. MRI overread was performed on all treatment-naïve patients (67/74 [91%]), while pathology overreads were performed on 14/74 (19.9%). Following multidisciplinary tumor board, 19 patients (25.6%) were deemed suitable candidates for focal therapy. A total of 24 patients (35.8%) were not deemed candidates for high intensity focused ultrasound focal therapy based exclusively on findings identified at MRI overread. Pathology re-review changed management for 3/14 patients, with two-thirds being downgraded to grade group 1 disease and opting for active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary tumor board for focal therapy is feasible. MRI overread is an essential component of this process and demonstrates significant findings that alter eligibility or management in over a third of patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Antígeno Prostático EspecíficoRESUMEN
Knowledge of functional recovery after partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy for renal cancer has advanced considerably, with PN now established as the reference standard for most localized renal masses. However, it is still unclear whether PN provides an overall survival benefit in patients with a normal contralateral kidney. While early studies seemingly demonstrated the importance of minimizing warm-ischemia time during PN, multiple new investigations over the last 10 years have proven that parenchymal mass lost is the most important predictor of new baseline renal function. Minimizing loss of parenchymal mass during resection and reconstruction is the most important controllable aspect of long-term post-operative renal function preservation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Riñón/fisiología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Isquemia Tibia/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess how IsoPSA, a structure-based serum assay which has been prospectively validated in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), can help the biopsy decision process when combined with the prostate imaging reporting and data systems (PI-RADS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients receiving IsoPSA testing for elevated PSA (>4.0ng/mL). Patients were included if they had received an IsoPSA test and prostate MRI within 1 year of IsoPSA testing, and subsequently underwent prostate biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of (csPCa, ie, GG ≥ 2) on biopsy. Predictive probabilities for csPCa at biopsy were generated using IsoPSA and various PI-RADS scores. RESULTS: Two hundred and 7 patients were included. Twenty-two percent had csPCa. Elevated IsoPSA ratio (defined as ≥6.0) (OR: 5.06, P = .015) and a PI-RADS 4-5 (OR: 6.37, P <.001) were significant predictors of csPCa. The combination of elevated IsoPSA ratio and PI-RADS 4-5 lesion had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC: 0.83, P <.001). The predicted probability of csPCa when a patient had a negative or equivocal MRI (PI-RADS 1-3) and a low IsoPSA ratio (≤6) was <5%. CONCLUSION: The combination of PI-RADS with IsoPSA ratios may help refine the biopsy decision-making process. In our cohort, a negative or equivocal MRI with a low IsoPSA may provide a low enough predicted probability to omit biopsy in such patients.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Sistemas de Datos , Biopsia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toma de Decisiones , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether variance in kidney cancer surgery quality indicators (QIs) is most impacted by surgeon-level or hospital-level factors in order to inform quality improvement initiatives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ICES and Veterans Affairs (VA) databases were queried for patients undergoing surgery for localized kidney cancer. Kidney cancer surgery QIs were defined within each cohort. Quality of care was benchmarked at a surgeon- vs. hospital-level to identify statistical outliers, using available clinicopathological data to adjust for differences in case-mix. Variance between surgeons and hospitals was calculated for each QI using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The QI with the greatest amount of variance explained by hospital and surgeon-level factors was proportion of cases performed with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The majority of this variance was due to surgeon-level factors for both the VA and ICES cohorts. The proportion of cases performed using an MIS approach was also the QI with the greatest number of outlier hospitals and surgeons compared to the average performance. The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed for patients at risk of chronic kidney disease was the QI with the greatest amount of variance due to hospital-level factors for the ICES cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of localized kidney cancer cases performed using an MIS approach is the QI requiring the greatest attention. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on surgeon-level factors to increase the number of MIS cases being performed for patients with localized renal masses.