Retrospective study evaluating association of colorectal tumors and hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies. Limited studies have shown an association between colorectal adenomas and HCV populations. AIM: To study the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in patients with HCV compared to the general population and to evaluate if it is an independent risk factor for colorectal adenomas. METHODS: Patients were divided into HCV and non-HCV based on their HCV RNA titers. Patients with alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B infection, and inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables using χ 2 with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The significant covariates (independent variables) were matched in both groups by propensity score matching, followed by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 415 patients screened, 109 HCV patients and 97 non-HCV patients with colonoscopy results were included in the study. HCV patients were older, had a smoking history, had less frequent aspirin use, and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05). The HCV cohort had a significantly increased number of patients with adenomas (adenoma detection rate of 53.2% vs 34%. P = 0.006). We performed a propensity-matched multivariate analysis where HCV infection was significantly associated with colorectal adenoma (OR: 2.070, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Our study shows a significantly higher rate of adenomas in HCV patients compared to the general population. Prospective studies would help determine if the increase in adenoma detection lowers the risk for colorectal cancer.

Use of Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT 2) inhibitor is associated with reduced emergency room visits and hospitalizations in patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a class of anti-diabetic medications that confer cardio-renal-metabolic (CRM) benefits. Emerging evidence also suggests that these agents provide better benefits for chronic pulmonary conditions, especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESEARCH QUESTION: We aimed to assess the association between SGLT2i use and outcomes in patients with COPD and concomitant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adults with T2DM and COPD in a primary care clinic from January 01, 2019 to 01/01//2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on SGLT2i use. We collected demographic information and outcomes such as emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations secondary to COPD exacerbation over the period of four years and time to hospitalization and ER visits. Chi-square analysis was used for categorical variables, whereas an unpaired t-test was used for continuous variables. Cox regression was performed to identify significant prognostic factors of hospitalization and ER visits. A Kaplan-Meir analysis was used to visualize the probability of non-hospitalization and the probability of not visiting the ER. Statistical significance was set at p-value <0.05. RESULTS: Of the 220 patients screened, 94 met the inclusion criteria, of which 20 patients (21.3 %) had SGLT2i use at admission, and 74 (78.7 %) did not. Baseline demographic information were well-matched between the two groups. SGLT2i use was associated with a significant reduction in ER visits (70 % vs. 97.3 %, p-0.001) and the number of hospitalizations (55 % vs 87.8 %, p-0.001). Further multivariate analysis showed lower hazards of hospitalization (adjusted HR-0.156; CI:0.073 to 0.331) and ER visits (HR)-0.232; CI:0.118 to 0.453) in patients on SGLT2i. INTERPRETATION: In patients with T2DM with COPD, SGLT2i use was associated with reduced ER visits and hospitalizations related to COPD. This protective effect of SGLT2i could be explained by reduced systemic proinflammatory markers and increased anti-inflammatory markers via inhibition of Node like receptor protein 3(NLRP3) inflammasome activation in multiple tissues, including the lungs.

Case-control analysis of venous thromboembolism risk in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis diagnosed by transient elastography.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Studies have shown a strong association between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Specifically, there is paucity of data on the association of NASH and venous thromboembolism (VTE), with one such study predicting a 2.5-fold increased risk for VTE compared to other liver diseases in hospitalized patients. The mechanism is believed to be a hepatocellular injury, which causes a chronic inflammatory state leading to the unregulated activation of procoagulant factors. There has been no prior analysis of the degree of steatosis and fibrosis (measured using transient elastography, commonly known as FibroScan) in NASH and its association with VTE. AIM: To examine the association between the degree of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, quantified by transient elastography, and the incidence of VTE in patients with NASH. METHODS: In our case-control study, we included patients with a documented diagnosis of NASH. We excluded patients with inherited thrombophilia, hemoglobinopathy, malignancy, alcohol use disorder, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis. The collected data included age, demographics, tobacco use, recreational drug use, medical history, and vibration controlled transient elastography scores. VTE-specific data included the location, type of anticoagulant, need for hospital stay, and history of VTE recurrence. Steatosis was categorized as S0-S1 (mild) and S2-S3 (moderate to severe) based on the controlled attenuation parameter score. Fibrosis was classified based on the kilopascal score and graded as F0-F1 (Metavir stage), F2, F3, and F4 (cirrhosis). χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the qualitative and quantitative variable analyses, respectively. Furthermore, we performed a logistic regression using VTE as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 415 patients were analyzed, and 386 met the inclusion criteria. 51 and 335 patients were included in the VTE and non-VTE groups, respectively. Patients with VTE had a mean age of 60.63 years compared to 55.22 years in the non-VTE group (P < 0.014). Patients with VTE had a higher body mass index (31.14 kg/m² vs 29.30 kg/m²) and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (29.4% vs 13.1%). The history of NASH was significantly higher in the VTE group (45.1% vs 30.4%, P < 0.037). Furthermore, moderate-to-severe steatosis was significantly higher in the VTE group (66.7% vs 47.2%, P < 0.009). Similarly, the F2-F4 fibrosis grade had a prevalence of 58.8% in the VTE group compared to 38.5% in the non-VTE group (P < 0.006). On logistic regression, using VTE as a dependent variable, diabetes mellitus had an odds ratio (OR) =1.702 (P < 0.015), and F2-F4 fibrosis grade had an OR = 1.5 (P < 0.033). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that NASH is an independent risk factor for VTE, especially deep vein thrombosis. There was a statistically significant association between the incidence of VTE, moderate-to-severe steatosis, and fibrosis. All hospitalized patients should be considered for medical thromboprophylaxis, particularly those with NASH.

Outpatient Treatment of Confirmed COVID-19: Living, Rapid Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2).

DESCRIPTION: Evidence for the use of outpatient treatments in adults with confirmed COVID-19 continues to evolve with new data. This is version 2 of the American College of Physicians (ACP) living, rapid practice points focusing on 22 outpatient treatments for COVID-19, specifically addressing the dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. METHODS: The Population Health and Medical Science Committee (formerly the Scientific Medical Policy Committee) developed this version of the living, rapid practice points on the basis of a living, rapid review done by the ACP Center for Evidence Reviews at Cochrane Austria at the University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems). This topic will be maintained as living and rapid by continually monitoring and assessing the impact of new evidence. PRACTICE POINT 1: Consider molnupiravir to treat symptomatic patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at a high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 2: Consider nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat symptomatic patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at a high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 3: Do not use ivermectin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 4: Do not use sotrovimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting.

Hyperglycemia in COVID-19 infection without diabetes mellitus: Association with inflammatory markers.

BACKGROUND: New onset hyperglycemia is common in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 infection is an essential etiology for new-onset hyperglycemia, but factors like direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced pancreatic ß-cell failure have also been postulated to play a role. AIM: We plan to investigate further the mechanisms underlying SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced hyperglycemia, particularly the rationale of the cytokine-induced hyperglycemia hypothesis, by evaluating the association between inflammatory markers and new onset hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study on adults without diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. The serum levels of glucose and inflammatory markers at presentation before initiation of corticosteroid were collected. Hyperglycemia was defined as glucose levels ≥ 140 mg/dL. C-Reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 100 mg/L, ferritin ≥ 530 ng/mL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 590 U/L, and D-dimer ≥ 0.5 mg/L were considered elevated. We used the χ 2 test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and calculated the logistic regression for hyperglycemia. RESULTS: Of the 520 patients screened, 248 met the inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics were equally distributed between patients with hyperglycemia and those who were normoglycemic. Serum inflammatory markers in patients with or without new-onset hyperglycemia were elevated as follows: CRP (58.1% vs 65.6%, P = 0.29), ferritin (48.4% vs 34.9%, P = 0.14), D-dimer (37.1% vs 37.1%, P = 0.76) and LDH (19.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis showed LDH odds ratio (OR) = 1.623 (P = 0.256). We observed significantly higher mortality (24.2% vs 9.1%, P = 0.001; OR = 2.528, P = 0.024) and length of stay (8.89 vs 6.69, P = 0.026) in patients with hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: Our study showed no association between CRP, ferritin, LDH, D-dimer levels, and new-onset hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients with COVID-19 infection. It also shows an increased mortality risk and length of stay in patients with hyperglycemia. With new-onset hyperglycemia being closely associated with poor prognostic indices, it becomes pivotal to understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms behind the SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced hyperglycemia. We conclude that the stress hyperglycemia hypothesis is not the only mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced hyperglycemia but rather a multicausal pathogenesis leading to hyperglycemia that requires further research and understanding. This would help us improve not only the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 disease and inpatient hyperglycemia management but also understand the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and further management.

Hypertension and Severe Hypokalemia Associated With Oral Ingestion of Topical Hydrocortisone Cream.

Background: Topical use of corticosteroids causes systemic effects, but systemic toxicity by ingesting topical corticosteroid cream has not been reported. We describe a patient admitted with ingestion of over-the-counter (OTC) hydrocortisone cream. Case Report: A 64-year-old woman presented with 2-weeks of generalized weakness. She had a history of hypertension, anxiety, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome, but medical records were unavailable and she was not on any medications. She reported taking prednisone 7.5 mg daily for several years, which was discontinued 5 months ago. Due to worsening symptoms, she started ingesting OTC topical hydrocortisone as replacement and admitted to consuming 2 squirts of 1% hydrocortisone cream twice daily over the previous month leading up to hospitalization. Her pulse rate was 77/min, blood pressure was 232/110 mmHg. There was no pedal edema, elevated jugular venous pressure, hirsutism, muscle wasting, or purplish skin striae. Labs revealed potassium 1.5 mg/dL (3.6-5.4), serum cortisol 61.5 µg/dL (2.3-19.4), Creatine Kinase 1864 IU/L (24-173), undetectable adrenocorticotropic hormone. She received potassium, labetalol, and intravenous fluids. Her serum cortisol level decreased to 11 µg/dL and potassium to 4.1 mg/dL within 24 hours. She left the hospital against medical advice on Day 2. Discussion: Although both prednisone and hydrocortisone have glucocorticoid properties, only hydrocortisone has mineralocorticoid properties. Hydrocortisone 20 mg provides a mineralocorticoid effect equivalent to 0.1 mg fludrocortisone. Conclusion: Hydrocortisone cream was confirmed as the source of exogenous corticosteroid by an undetectable adrenocorticotropic hormone and rapid decrease in cortisol following discontinuation. Incorrect use of OTC medications can lead to life-threatening side effects.

Outpatient Treatment of Confirmed COVID-19: Living, Rapid Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1).

DESCRIPTION: Strategies to manage COVID-19 in the outpatient setting continue to evolve as new data emerge on SARS-CoV-2 variants and the availability of newer treatments. The Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) of the American College of Physicians (ACP) developed these living, rapid practice points to summarize the best available evidence on the treatment of adults with confirmed COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. These practice points do not evaluate COVID-19 treatments in the inpatient setting or adjunctive COVID-19 treatments in the outpatient setting. METHODS: The SMPC developed these living, rapid practice points on the basis of a living, rapid review done by the ACP Center for Evidence Reviews at Cochrane Austria at the University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems). The SMPC will maintain these practice points as living by monitoring and assessing the impact of new evidence. PRACTICE POINT 1: Consider molnupiravir to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 2: Consider nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 3: Consider remdesivir to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 7 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 4: Do not use azithromycin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 5: Do not use chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 6: Do not use ivermectin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 7: Do not use nitazoxanide to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 8: Do not use lopinavir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 9: Do not use casirivimab-imdevimab combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 10: Do not use regdanvimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 11: Do not use sotrovimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 12: Do not use convalescent plasma to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 13: Do not use ciclesonide to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 14: Do not use fluvoxamine to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting.

Oral Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir in Nonhospitalized Vaccinated Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NMV-r) in high-risk nonhospitalized unvaccinated patients reduced the risk of progression to severe disease. However, the potential benefits of NMV-r among vaccinated patients are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a comparative retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX research network. Patients ≥18 years of age who were vaccinated and subsequently developed COVID-19 between 1 December 2021 and 18 April 2022 were included. Cohorts were developed based on the use of NMV-r within 5 days of diagnosis. The primary composite outcome was all-cause emergency room (ER) visit, hospitalization, or death at a 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of primary outcomes, multisystem symptoms, COVID-19-associated complications, and diagnostic test utilization. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1130 patients remained in each cohort. A primary composite outcome of all-cause ER visits, hospitalization, or death in 30 days occurred in 89 (7.87%) patients in the NMV-r cohort compared with 163 (14.4%) patients in the non-NMV-r cohort (odds ratio: .5; 95% confidence interval: .39-.67; P < .005) consistent with 45% relative risk reduction. A significant reduction in multisystem symptom burden and subsequent complications, such as lower respiratory tract infection, cardiac arrhythmia, and diagnostic radiology testing, were noted in NMV-r-treated patients. There was no apparent increase in serious complications between days 10 and 30. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with NMV-r in nonhospitalized vaccinated patients with COVID-19 was associated with a reduced likelihood of ER visits, hospitalization, or death. Complications and overall resource utilization were also decreased.

Use of inflammatory markers as predictor for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients with stages IIIb-V chronic kidney disease?

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Its utility is unknown in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), who have elevated baseline CRP levels due to chronic inflammation and reduced renal clearance. AIM: To assess whether an association exists between elevated inflammatory markers and MV rate in patients with stages IIIb-V CKD and COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with COVID-19 and stages IIIb-V CKD. The primary outcome was the rate of invasive MV, the rate of noninvasive MV, and the rate of no MV. Statistical analyses used unpaired t-test for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables. Cutoffs for variables were CRP: 100 mg/L, ferritin: 530 ng/mL, D-dimer: 0.5 mg/L, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): 590 U/L. RESULTS: 290 were screened, and 118 met the inclusion criteria. CRP, D-dimer, and ferritin were significantly different among the three groups. On univariate analysis for invasive MV (IMV), CRP had an odds ratio (OR)-5.44; ferritin, OR-2.8; LDH, OR-7.7; D-dimer, OR-3.9, (P < 0.05). The admission CRP level had an area under curve-receiver operator characteristic (AUROC): 0.747 for the IMV group (sensitivity-80.8%, specificity-50%) and 0.663 for the non-IMV (NIMV) group (area under the curve, sensitivity-69.2%, specificity-53%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a positive correlation between CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer levels and MV and NIMV rates in CKD patients. The AUROC demonstrates a good sensitivity for CRP levels in detecting the need for MV in patients with stages IIIb-V CKD. This may be because of the greater magnitude of increased inflammation due to COVID-19 itself compared with increased inflammation and reduced clearance due to CKD alone.

Assessment of Predictive Factors of Hepatic Steatosis Diagnosed by Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients.

This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of moderate/severe hepatic steatosis diagnosed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). It included 158 adult patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) evaluated by VCTE in an outpatient setting of a community-based teaching hospital. Patients with significant alcohol consumption, oral contraceptive use, hepatitis B disease, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis were excluded. Steatosis was categorized as S0-S1 (mild) and S2-S3 (moderate/severe) based on the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score. Results demonstrated the mean values of BMI (p = 0.001), kiloPascals [kPa] (fibrosis) raw score (p = 0.009), obesity (p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus [DM] (p = 0.014), and comorbidities status [chronic hepatitis C(HCV), DM, obesity, HCV+DM] (p = 0.028) were significantly different between the two arms of the study viz. S0-S1 (mild) and S2-S3 (moderate/severe). A multinomial logistic regression analysis of the comorbidities associated with hepatic steatosis revealed a good level of prediction (R2-0.584) for hepatic steatosis. Of all the variables analyzed, obesity was the most impactful vavriable. Furthermore, the -2 log-likelihood of the regressed model in patients with HCV and hepatic steatosis did not show a significant correlation when adjusted for obesity. Obesity had a significant independent association with steatosis (chi-square value = 52, df = 12). Interestingly, DM independently predicted a weak association with steatosis (chi-square value = 0.825, df = 3). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that hepatic steatosis is independently associated with metabolic parameters like obesity and DM. Management of these risk factors in patients with HCV may be vital to reducing the risk of steatosis and progression to fibrosis.

A Case-Control Study of Distinguishing Between Stroke Mimics and True Strokes.

This study was conducted with the primary aim to distinguish patients with a true stroke versus a stroke mimic based on clinical features and imaging. We conducted a retrospective case-control study on 116 adult patients who received alteplase (tPA) to treat acute stroke at our hospital. We further analyzed 79 patients with a normal computed tomography angiography (CTA). Based on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, they were divided into cases (stroke mimics) and controls (true strokes). Data were collected retrospectively by reviewing individual medical charts on the electronic medical record (EMR), including age, gender, history of stroke, seizure, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, presenting NIH Stroke Scale/Score, hemorrhagic conversion, history of migraine, history of depression, sidedness of symptoms and aphasia. Data were categorized to separate those who were later diagnosed to be stroke mimics by being-postictal, encephalopathic, in acute migraine, suffered post-stroke recrudescence (PSR) due to metabolic insult, or had conversion disorder when symptoms could not be attributed to any medical condition or mental illness. Of the 79 study subjects, 48 (60%) were stroke mimics. The mean age of the cohort was 68.67 years, and 46.8% of the study subjects were females. Based on the multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with being a stroke mimic were older age, history of migraine, and a history of prior stroke. In conclusion, increased attention to history and clinical examination as the first step can aid in the proper diagnosis of strokes versus stroke mimics. Identifying stroke mimics early could help expedite hospital workup and prevent inadvertent investigations, reducing hospital occupancy during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We could potentially avoid the administration of tPA to such patients, reducing both the cost and adverse effects of it. Every stroke can cause neurological deficits, but every deficit need not be a stroke.

Cardiovascular Drug Interactions With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients With COVID-19: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMVr) is used to treat symptomatic, nonhospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) who are at high risk of progression to severe disease. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease are at a high risk of developing adverse events from COVID-19 and as a result have a higher likelihood of receiving NMVr. Ritonavir, the pharmaceutical enhancer used in NMVr, is an inhibitor of the enzymes of CYP450 pathway, particularly CYP3A4 and to a lesser degree CYP2D6, and affects the P-glycoprotein pump. Co-administration of NMVr with medications commonly used to manage cardiovascular conditions can potentially cause significant drug-drug interactions and may lead to severe adverse effects. It is crucial to be aware of such interactions and take appropriate measures to avoid them. In this review, we discuss potential drug-drug interactions between NMVr and commonly used cardiovascular medications based on their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties.

Harms and Contributors of Leaving Against Medical Advice in Patients With Infective Endocarditis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) are commonly encountered in hospital medicine. The problem is prevalent worldwide and across all fields of medicine. A retrospective study of 47,583 patients reported a 3.3% AMA rate in 2015. OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective study, we aimed (1) to study the demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters of infective endocarditis (IE) patients leaving AMA. We also compared (2) the various risk factors and outcomes of these patients with IE patients who completed treatment. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients diagnosed with IE were recruited for 36 months. Of the 74 patients with available details, 32 patients (29%) left AMA during their treatment. The mean age of patients leaving AMA was 39, and among those who left AMA, 66% were females. As compared with patients completing therapy, patients leaving AMA tend to have higher comorbidities, including injection drug use (68.1% versus 31.9%), prior IE (83.3% versus 16.7%), and chronic hepatitis C (72.4% versus 27.8%). Rates of consumption of substances of abuse were higher among those who left AMA. Patients leaving AMA also had higher psychiatric comorbidities (63% versus 37.5%), history of leaving AMA (70.5% versus 29.5%), and consumption of more than 2 substances of abuse. Morbidity was higher in patients leaving AMA. There was a statistically significant association between the development of distal embolus ( P < 0.001), the need for recurrent admissions ( P = 0.002), recurrent bacteremia ( P < 0.001), developing new embolus ( P < 0.001), and overall morbidity ( P = 0.002) among IE patients leaving AMA. CONCLUSIONS: Infective endocarditis patients leaving AMA tend to be younger females. These patients have prior comorbidities of injection drug use, prior IE, multiple psychiatric comorbidities, drug use, and multiple socioeconomic issues. Patients leaving AMA tend to develop further non-Central nervous system embolic events, recurrent bacteremia, and require frequent admissions. Morbidity in these patients was higher.

What Is the Antibody Response and Role in Conferring Natural Immunity After SARS-CoV-2 Infection? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2).

DESCRIPTION: The Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) of the American College of Physicians (ACP) developed these living, rapid practice points to summarize the current best available evidence on the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. This is version 2 of the ACP practice points, which serves to update version 1, published on 16 March 2021. These practice points do not evaluate vaccine-acquired immunity or cellular immunity. METHODS: The SMPC developed this version of the living, rapid practice points based on an updated living, rapid, systematic review conducted by the Portland VA Research Foundation and funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PRACTICE POINT 1: Do not use SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PRACTICE POINT 2: Do not use SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests to predict the degree or duration of natural immunity conferred by antibodies against reinfection, including natural immunity against different variants. RETIREMENT FROM LIVING STATUS: Although natural immunity remains a topic of scientific interest, this topic is being retired from living status given the availability of effective vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 and widespread recommendations for and prevalence of their use. Currently, vaccination is the best clinical recommendation for preventing infection, reinfection, and serious illness from SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.