RESUMEN
Importance: The association of diet with atopic dermatitis (AD) remains poorly understood and could help explain heterogeneity in disease course. Objective: To determine the extent to which a higher level of dietary sodium intake, estimated using urine sodium as a biomarker, is associated with AD in a large, population-based cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of adult participants (aged 37-73 years) from the UK Biobank examined 24-hour urine sodium excretion, which was estimated using a single spot urine sample collected between March 31, 2006, and October 1, 2010, and calculations from the sex-specific International Cooperative Study on Salt, Other Factors, and Blood Pressure equation, incorporating body mass index; age; and urine concentrations of potassium, sodium, and creatinine. The data were analyzed between February 23, 2022, and March 20, 2024. Exposure: The primary exposure was 24-hour urinary sodium excretion. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was AD or active AD based on diagnostic and prescription codes from linked electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, Townsend Deprivation Index, and education were used to measure the association. Results: The analytic sample comprised 215â¯832 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.52 [8.06] years; 54.3% female). Mean (SD) estimated 24-hour urine sodium excretion was 3.01 (0.82) g per day, and 10â¯839 participants (5.0%) had a diagnosis of AD. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that a 1-g increase in estimated 24-hour urine sodium excretion was associated with increased odds of AD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14), increased odds of active AD (AOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28), and increased odds of increasing severity of AD (AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15). In a validation cohort of 13â¯014 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a 1 g per day higher dietary sodium intake estimated using dietary recall questionnaires was associated with a higher risk of current AD (AOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.47). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that restriction of dietary sodium intake may be a cost-effective and low-risk intervention for AD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Sodio en la Dieta , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/orina , Anciano , Sodio en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Sodio en la Dieta/efectos adversos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Sodio/orina , Biomarcadores/orina , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Epidermis , Pérdida Insensible de Agua , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/fisiopatología , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Dermatitis Atópica/metabolismo , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/fisiología , Epidermis/metabolismo , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Agua Corporal/metabolismo , Adulto Joven , Agua/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Importance: Rates of physician-diagnosed eczema have been increasing among older adults, but little is known regarding the pathophysiologic processes and best treatments in this subgroup. Preliminary data suggest that medications-antihypertensive medications in particular-may contribute to eczematous dermatitis; however, there are limited population-based data on the proportion of eczematous dermatitis diagnoses among older adults that may be attributed to antihypertensive drugs. Objectives: To determine whether antihypertensive drug use is associated with eczematous dermatitis in older adults. Design, Settings, and Participants: This was a longitudinal cohort study of a population-based sample of individuals 60 years and older without a diagnosis of eczematous dermatitis at baseline. It was conducted at primary care practices participating in The Health Improvement Network in the United Kingdom from January 1, 1994, to January 1, 2015. Data analyses were performed from January 6, 2020, to February 6, 2024. Exposure: Exposure date by first prescription for an antihypertensive drug within each drug class. Main outcome measures: Newly active eczematous dermatitis was based on the first date for 1 of the 5 most common eczema codes used in a previously validated algorithm. Results: Among the total study sample of 1â¯561â¯358 older adults (mean [SD] age, 67 [9] years; 54% female), the overall prevalence of eczematous dermatitis was 6.7% during a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 6 (3-11) years. Eczematous dermatitis incidence was higher among participants receiving antihypertensive drugs than those who did not (12 vs 9 of 1000 person-years of follow-up). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models found that participants who received any antihypertensive drugs had a 29% increased hazard rate of any eczematous dermatitis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.26-1.31). When assessing each antihypertensive drug class individually, the largest effect size was observed for diuretic drugs (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24) and calcium channel blockers (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14-1.18), and the smallest effect sizes were for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04) and ß-blockers (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that antihypertensive drugs were associated with a small increased rate of eczematous dermatitis, with effect sizes largest for calcium channel blockers and diuretic drugs, and smallest for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ß-blockers. Although additional research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the association, these data could be helpful to clinicians to guide management when a patient presents with eczematous dermatitis in older age.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Eccema , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Objectives: We aim to estimate geographic variability in total numbers of infections and infection fatality ratios (IFR; the number of deaths caused by an infection per 1,000 infected people) when the availability and quality of data on disease burden are limited during an epidemic. Methods: We develop a noncentral hypergeometric framework that accounts for differential probabilities of positive tests and reflects the fact that symptomatic people are more likely to seek testing. We demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and precision of this framework, and apply it to the United States (U.S.) COVID-19 pandemic to estimate county-level SARS-CoV-2 IFRs. Results: The estimators for the numbers of infections and IFRs showed high accuracy and precision; for instance, when applied to simulated validation data sets, across counties, Pearson correlation coefficients between estimator means and true values were 0.996 and 0.928, respectively, and they showed strong robustness to model misspecification. Applying the county-level estimators to the real, unsimulated COVID-19 data spanning April 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020 from across the U.S., we found that IFRs varied from 0 to 44.69, with a standard deviation of 3.55 and a median of 2.14. Conclusions: The proposed estimation framework can be used to identify geographic variation in IFRs across settings.
RESUMEN
Atopic dermatitis (AD), the most burdensome skin condition worldwide, is influenced by climatic factors and air pollution; however, the impact of increasing climatic hazards on AD remains poorly characterized. Leveraging an existing framework for 10 climatic hazards related to greenhouse gas emissions, we identified 18 studies with evidence for an impact on AD through a systematic search. Most climatic hazards had evidence for aggravation of AD the impact ranged from direct effects like particulate matter-induced AD exacerbations from wildfires to the potential for indirect effects like drought-induced food insecurity and migration. We then created maps comparing the past, present, and future projected burden of climatic hazards to global AD prevalence data. Data are lacking, especially from those regions most likely to experience more climatic hazards. We highlight gaps important for future research: understanding the synergistic impacts of climatic hazards on AD, long-term disease activity, the differential impact on vulnerable populations, and how basic mechanisms explain population-level trends.
Asunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.