Nepalese version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire for detection of neuropathic pain signs and symptoms: Translation and psychometric properties.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to translate the DN4 questionnaire into Nepalese version and assess its psychometric properties: diagnostic accuracy, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. METHODS: An observational study was conducted in a tertiary level teaching hospital of Kathmandu, Nepal. We included 166 patients with chronic pain visiting a pain clinic over a period of one year. The Nepalese version of the DN4 questionnaire was used for detecting signs and symptoms of neuropathic pain. The English version of the questionnaire was translated into Nepali in accordance with the standard guideline with the help of linguistic experts. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were examined and interviewed twice in an interval of two weeks. The association between the index test and the reference test was analyzed using Chi-square test. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, and positive and negative predictive values. We calculated internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha (∝), and test-retest reliability using Cohen's kappa and Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The study showed a significant association between the result of DN4 questionnaire and the gold standard (physician's diagnosis) (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity values for the DN4 questionnaire were 75% and 95.3% respectively. Similarly, positive and negative predictive values were 93.8% and 80.4% respectively. Our study showed adequate internal consistency (∝ = 0.710) and a good test-retest reliability (kappa = 0.872, ICC = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS: The Nepalese version of DN4 questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for the identification of signs and symptoms of neuropathic pain. This can be used for screening neuropathic pain signs and symptoms in clinical as well as research settings.

Post-operative analgesic effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine with or without tramadol in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetics has been shown to minimise post-operative pain after laparoscopic surgery. This study was aimed to evaluate the post-operative effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine with and without tramadol in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised into two groups. Group R received 0.5% ropivacaine 18 mL with normal saline (NS) 2 mL and Group RT received 0.5% ropivacaine 18 mL with tramadol (100 mg, 2 mL) at the end of surgery intraperitoneally through the port. The pain score was monitored using a numerical rating scale (NRS) every 30 min till 4 h post-operatively and then at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. The primary objective of the study was to compare the severity of pain between the groups. The secondary objectives were to compare the total dose of rescue analgesic and the time tofirst rescue analgesia between the groups Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for the social sciences. Chi-square test and Mann Whitney U test were used for analysis. RESULTS: The pain score in Group RT was significantly lower than Group R at 2.5 h to 24 h (P = 0.005). Only 42.5% in Group RT demanded rescue analgesia as compared to 75% in Group R (P = 0.003). Total analgesic consumption of fentanyl was also reduced in the tramadol group (785 µg vs 1800 µg). No significant adverse effects were found. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine with tramadol reduces the post-operative pain and analgesic requirement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to ropivacaine alone.