Retrospective review of intermittent and continuous infusion vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

PURPOSE: Vancomycin is commonly administered as an intermittent infusion (IIV), although vancomycin's stability at room temperature permits administration continuously over 24 h (CIV). At our institution, CIV has been the preferred infusion method for over 20 years due to ease of administration and simplicity of therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes associated with IIV compared to CIV. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who received vancomycin for MRSA bacteremia. The primary outcomes were the time to therapeutic goal and frequency of adverse drug reactions on IIV compared to CIV. Secondary outcomes evaluated all-cause readmission, relapse, and mortality 30 days after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included. Significantly fewer patients were able to achieve a therapeutic goal on IIV compared to CIV (52.4% vs. 82.5%, p < 0.01). Patients on IIV took 3.6 days, on average, to reach the target goal, compared to 1.9 days when patients were switched to CIV (95% confidence interval, 0.48-3.04, p < 0.01). Six patients experienced adverse events on IIV, and 15 patients experienced adverse events on CIV (IIV 9.5%, CIV 23.8%, p = 0.035). One patient experienced relapse of infection, and six patients (9.5%) were readmitted 30 days after completion of therapy. There were no deaths in the cohort. CONCLUSION: For MRSA bacteremia, CIV enabled patients to achieve the AUC/MIC goal significantly faster than when patients received IIV. Furthermore, patients who were unable to achieve a therapeutic trough on IIV became therapeutic once switched to CIV.

Revisiting ß-Lactams for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections: Assessing Clinical Outcomes of Twice-Daily Cephalexin for Empiric Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections.

The 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) recommend non-ß-lactam antibiotics for empiric therapy. However, increasing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. resistance to first-line antibiotic therapies has necessitated the need for alternative agents. Based on local antibiogram data, cephalexin has become the preferred oral antibiotic for empiric treatment of UTIs at our institution. The purpose of this single-center retrospective review was to assess clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) who received cephalexin for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with clinical success 30 days after discharge from the ED. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, received ≥10 days of cephalexin, received antibiotics for any indication other than uncomplicated UTI, received antibiotics within 60 days of their ED visit, or had structural abnormalities. A total of 264 patients were included for evaluation, and 214 patients (81.1%) met the criteria for clinical success. Overall, 28 (10.6%) patients required a change in antibiotics based on cultures and sensitivities, 18 (6.8%) patients returned for nonresolving or worsening symptoms, and 4 (1.5%) patients required both a change in antibiotics and returned for nonresolving or worsening symptoms. Short courses of twice-daily cephalexin appear to be a safe and effective option for the empiric treatment of uncomplicated UTIs.