Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Public Health ; 113(12): 1254-1257, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824811

RESUMEN

We used a collective impact model to form a statewide diabetes quality improvement collaborative to improve diabetes outcomes and advance diabetes health equity. Between 2020 and 2022, in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Medicaid, Medicaid Managed Care Plans, and Ohio's seven medical schools, we recruited 20 primary care practices across the state. The percentage of patients with hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% improved from 25% to 20% over two years. Applying our model more broadly could accelerate improvement in diabetes outcomes. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(12):1254-1257. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307410).


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Medicaid , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Ohio , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia
2.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 41(2): 62-74, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25976892

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sedation management, delirium monitoring, and mobility programs have been addressed in evidence-based critical care guidelines and care bundles, yet implementation in the ICU remains variable. As critically ill patients occupy higher percentages of hospital beds in the United States and beyond, it is increasingly important to determine mechanisms to deliver better care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Rethinking Critical Care (IHI-RCC) program was established to reduce harm of critically ill patients by decreasing sedation, increasing monitoring and management of delirium, and increasing patient mobility. Case studies of a convenience sample of five participating hospitals/health systems chosen in advance of the determination of their clinical outcomes are presented in terms of how they got started and process improvements in sedation management, delirium management, and mobility. METHODS: The IHI-RCC program involved one live case study and five iterations of an in-person seminar in a 33-month period (March 2011-November 2013) that emphasized interdisciplinary teamwork and culture change. RESULTS: Qualitative descriptions of the changes tested at each of the five case study sites demonstrate improvements in teamwork, processes, and reliability of daily work. Improvement in ICU length of stay and length of stay on the ventilator between the pre- and postimplementation periods varied from slight to substantial. CONCLUSION: Changing critical care practices requires an interdisciplinary approach addressing cultural, psychological, and practical issues. The key lessons of the IHI-RCC program are as follows: the importance of testing changes on a small scale, feeding back data regularly and providing sufficient education, and building will through seeing the work in action.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Delirio/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Caminata , Delirio/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Tiempo de Internación , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...