Perioperative Respiratory Outcome of Patients with Eosinophilia: A Cohort Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background: A respiratory adverse event is one of the main causes of critical events in the perioperative period. Perioperative distress symptoms like cough and stridor have been reported to occur in patients with hyperreactive airways. Objective: This study was conducted to determine the relationship between blood eosinophil count and perioperative adverse respiratory events among different age groups of patients who require general anesthesia for different types of surgeries. Methods: A cohort study was conducted on 197 patients of either gender, aged 3 years and above, belonging to ASA classes I-II, who were scheduled to undergo surgery requiring general anesthesia and intubation. Patients were stratified according to absolute eosinophil count into two groups: Group A (AEC 0 to 499/mm3) and Group B (AEC 500 to 1000/mm3). Patients were monitored for 24 hours in the perioperative period for adverse respiratory events such as bronchospasm, laryngospasm, a fall in SPO2 < 95%, and cough and stridor. Results: A total of 197 patients were evaluated, with a median age of 37 ± 14.4 years. The percentage range of adverse respiratory events across different age groups was 35% in adults to 60% in children. Major complications noted were a fall in SPO2 < 95% (62.5%) and cough (27.7%) as per CTCAE v5.0 (November 27, 2017). The Naranjo score of adverse respiratory events was categorized as possible with mild level 1 severity. Adverse respiratory events were managed with humidified oxygen, antitussives, and bronchodilators. Conclusions: Eosinophilia is seen in one-third of the patients undergoing surgical interventions. Patients with a blood eosinophil count of ≥400/mm3 had an increased risk of exacerbations of respiratory adverse events in the perioperative period.

Lactobacillus GG for treatment of acute childhood diarrhoea: an open labelled, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials in developed countries have reported benefits of Lactobacillus GG (LGG) in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea, but there is paucity of such data from India. The study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus GG in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children from a semi-urban city in north India. METHODS: In this open labelled, randomized controlled trial 2000 children with acute watery diarrhoea, aged between 6 months to 5 years visiting outpatient department and emergency room of a teaching hospital in north India were enrolled. The children were randomized into receiving either Lactobacillus GG in dose of 10 billion cfu/day for five days or no probiotic medication in addition to standard WHO management of diarrhoea. Primary outcomes were duration of diarrhoea and time to change in consistency of stools. RESULTS: Median (inter quartile range) duration of diarrhoea was significantly shorter in children in LGG group [60 (54-72) h vs. 78 (72-90) h; P<0.001]. Also, there was faster improvement in stool consistency in children receiving Lactobacillus GG than control group [36 (30-36) h vs. 42 (36-48) h; P<0.001]. There was significant reduction in average number of stools per day in LGG group (P<0.001) compared to the control group. These benefits were seen irrespective of rotavirus positivity in stool tests. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the use of Lactobacillus GG in children with acute diarrhoea resulted in shorter duration and faster improvement in stool consistency as compared to the control group.

Effect of oil massage on growth in preterm neonates less than 1800 g: a randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of oil massage on growth in preterm babies less than 1800 g. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was conducted in Neonatal intensive care unit of a level II hospital. Neonates with birth weight < 1800 g, gestation < 35 wk and < 48 h of age at enrolment were included in the studies. Eligible neonates were randomized to one of the two groups (a) Oil massage along with standard care of low birth weight (b) Standard care of low birth weight without massage. Weight, length and head circumference was measured in the two groups at 7 d intervals. Serum triglyceride levels were measured at enrolment and at completion of study. Primary outcome variable was weight gain at 28 d after enrolment. RESULTS: A total of forty-eight neonates were randomisd to either oil massage group (n = 25) or standard care of low birth weight without massage group (n = 23). Mean (SD) weight of babies in the two groups was 1466.4 ± 226.8 g in oil massage group and 1416.6 ± 229.9 g in the control group. At 28 d, weight gain in the oil massage group (476.76 ± 47.9 g) was higher compared to the control group (334.96 ± 46.4 g) (p < 0.05). At 7 d, less weight loss (7.80 ± 9.8 g) was observed in babies in oil massage group compared to control group (21.52 ± 19.4 g) (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in serum triglycerides and other anthropometric parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Oil application has a potential to improve weight gain and cause less weight loss in first 7 d in low birth weight neonates.