Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Features Between Men and Women With Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Specialized Center in Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the frequency of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in women and to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences with respect to men at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of axSpA admitted to the "Reumacheck" SpA program were included between 2017 and 2022. At baseline, all patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and human leukocyte antigen B27, and imaging (plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints, and ultrasound of heel entheses). All evaluators were blinded to the results of the other evaluations. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with a diagnosis of axSpA were included. The frequency at diagnosis in women was 61.55%. In the univariate analysis, the significant differences between women and men at diagnosis of axSpA were good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, elevated C-reactive protein, New York Criteria (+), enthesis ultrasound (+), years of education, number of swollen joints, erythrosedimentation rate, and the very low frequency of bone bridges in the magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints. In the logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable was "men," and the only feature that was independently associated was having radiographic compromise according to the New York criteria (odds ratio, 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of axSpA in women was 61.55%; clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences were observed. Women experienced less radiographic compromise.

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Does MRI training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists on the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más de 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuestas correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuestas correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct).

¿Permiten los entrenamientos de resonancia magnética en espondiloartritis mejorar la performance de los reumatólogos para el reconocimiento de secuencias y lesiones? / Do magnetic resonance training in spondyloarthritis improve the performance of rheumatologists for the recognition of sequences and lesions?

Introducción: La resonancia magnética (RM) es una herramienta diagnóstica fundamental en la espondiloartritis (EspA) axial. Objetivo: Estimar el porcentaje de aciertos en el reconocimiento de lesiones en RM de EspA y conocimientos teóricos, antes y después de realizar una intervención educativa. Estimar si la buena performance en los test se asocia a características individuales de los médicos. Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, con intervención activa, se midieron los resultados antes y después de un test con 10 preguntas antes y después del desarrollo de un taller de imágenes de RM en EspA en ciudades distintas de Argentina. Se consideró buena performance a quienes lograron más e 12 puntos entre las dos evaluaciones. Resultados: Se evaluaron en total 106 médicos. Los resultados de los test (total 10 preguntas) antes y después del taller fueron 53% de respuesta correctas y 68% respectivamente (p: 0.000). El 65% de los médicos alcanzaron una buena performance (más de 12 respuesta correctas). Conclusión: El porcentaje de aciertos fue mayor después del taller en forma general, la buena performance no se asoció a ninguna característica especifica de los médicos evaluados.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic tool in axial spondyloarthritis, it has allowed us, unlike radiography, to diagnose this pathology much earlier. Objective: To estimate the percentage of correct answers in the recognition of SpA MRI lesions and theoretical knowledge, before and after performing an educational intervention. Estimate if the good performance in the tests is associated with individual characteristics of the doctors. Methods: A test was carried out with 10 questions (7 for image recognition and 3 for theoretical knowledge) before and after the development of an MRI image workshop in EspA in diferents cities in Argentina. The correct response number was considered before and after the workshop, and those who achieved more than 12 points between the two evaluations were considered good performance. The following physician characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 106 physicians were evaluated. The results of the tests (total 10 questions) before and after the workshop were 53% and 68% correct, respectively (p:0.000). 65% of the physicians achieved a good performance (more than 12 correct)