Validity evidence for the coping strategy indicator-short version (CSI-S) among psychology students.

The abbreviated measurement of coping strategies is useful for monitoring and identifying the effects of stress. The Coping strategy indicator-Short version (CSI-S, including the dimensions of seeking support, problem solving and avoidance strategies) is a new adaptation of the full version of this indicator, and additional evidence of its validity is needed. Psychology students (n = 125) from a public university in Lima, Peru, were recruited to help provide such evidence of validity in terms of internal structure, reliability and associations with other variables (perceived stress and general efficacy in cope with difficulties), which were evaluated using nonparametric item response theory procedures. Support-seeking and problem-solving items from the Mokken scale and the avoidance scale exhibited limitations. The correlations between the scales were moderate or low and exhibited theoretical consistency, and the relationship with perceived stress highlighted the predictive capacity of avoidance and problem-solving strategies. In general, the CSI-S exhibits suitable psychometric properties; however, the avoidance score requires further examination or reconstruction of its items.

Caregiving Role and Psychosocial and Individual Factors: A Systematic Review.

Taking care of a person with a physical disability can become a challenge for caregivers as they must combine the task of caring with their personal and daily needs. The aim of this study was to assess the impact that taking care of a person who needs support has on caregivers and to analyze certain characteristics they present, such as self-esteem and resilience. To that end, a bibliographic review was carried out from 1985, when the first article of taking care of a person who needs support was published, to 2020 (inclusive), in the databases of Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Pubmed, Eric, Psycinfo, and Embase. The search yielded a total of (n = 37) articles subject to review, following the guidelines established in the PRISMA declaration. The results show that caregiving was highly overburdening and negatively affected the physical condition and the psychological and mental states of caregivers. In addition, certain psychological characteristics present in caregivers such as having high self-esteem and being resilient were found to act as protective factors against the caregiving burden.

Evidencias psicométricas del inventario ansiedad estado-rasgo: IDARE en universitarios de Lima en tiempos de COVID-19 / Psychometric evidence of the state-Trait anxiety inventory: IDARE In University Students from Lima in times of Covid-19

Resumen 420 universitarios de Psicología y Derecho fueron evaluados con el objetivo de actualizar las evidencias psicométricas del Inventario ansiedad estado-rasgo: IDARE en tiempos de pandemia por COVID-19. La muestra estuvo compuesta por hombres y mujeres, siendo mayor el grupo de mujeres, con un rango de edad de entre 18 a 57 años. Las pruebas de validación con jueces expertos permiten obtener una "V" de Aiken mayor a 0.80, y los valores de la prueba binomial fueron significativos con una p <.05. Las pruebas de análisis discriminativo ítem-test obtuvieron puntajes para todo el Inventario que van entre 0.334 a 0.679, eliminando el ítem 34 por no cumplir los criterios esperados. Para la validez convergente, su correlación con el Cuestionario CASO A30 obtuvo para A-E una "r" de .320 y para A-R de .522; ambas con una p <.05. La validez de constructo fue evaluada mediante el análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, hallándose 4 escalas independientes: ansiedad estado, bienestar estado, ansiedad rasgo y bienestar rasgo. La confiabilidad se obtuvo calculando el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach = 0.86 y el coeficiente omega de McDonald = 0.89. Asimismo, en la confiabilidad por mitades de Guttman encontraron valores entre 0.76 a 0.89. Se establecieron baremos por sexo y por edad para la población total. La prevalencia de la ansiedad en universitarios de Lima fue de 29.4 %, se aproxima a los datos de China y Colombia, pero es más alta que en Inglaterra, todos en tiempos de COVID-19.

Abstract 420 university students of Psychology and Law were evaluated in order to update the psychometric evidence of the State Anxiety Inventory - trait: STAI in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of men and women, the group of women being the largest, with an age range between 18 to 57 years old. The validation tests with expert judges allow obtaining an Aiken "V" greater than 0.80 and the values of the binomial test were significant with a p <.05. The item-test discriminative analysis tests obtained scores for the entire Inventory ranging from 0.334 to 0.679, with item 34 eliminated for not meeting the expected criteria. For convergent validity, its correlation with the CASE A30 questionnaire obtained for A-E an "r" of .320 and for A-R of .522, both with a p <.05. The construct validity was evaluated by means of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, finding 4 independent scales: state anxiety, state well-being, trait anxiety and trait well-being. Reliability was obtained by calculating Cronbach's Alpha coefficient = 0.86 and McDonald's Omega coefficient = 0.89. Likewise, in the reliability by Guttman halves, values between 0.76 and 0.89 were found. Scales were established by sex and by age for the total population. The prevalence of anxiety in university students in Lima was 29.4 %, which is close to the data from China and Colombia, but it is higher than in England all in the time of COVID-19.

Resumo Foram avaliados 420 universitários de Psicologia e Direito para atualização das evidências psicométricas do Inventário de Ansiedade do Estado - traço: IDARE em tempos de pandemia do COVID-19. A amostra foi composta por homens e mulheres, sendo o maior grupo de mulheres, com faixa etária entre 18 e 57 anos. Os testes de validação com juízes especialistas permitiram obter um Aiken "V" maior que 0.80 e os valores do teste binomial foram significativos com p <0.05. Os testes de análise discriminativa do teste item-teste obtiveram escores para todo o Inventário variando de 0.334 a 0.679, sendo o item 34 eliminado por não atender aos critérios esperados. Para a validade convergente, sua correlação com o questionário CASE A30 obteve para A-E um "r" de .320 e para A-R de .522, ambos com p <0.05. A validade de construto foi avaliada por meio da análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória, encontrando 4 escalas independentes: ansiedade-estado, bem-estar-estado, ansiedade-traço e bem-estar-traço. A confiabilidade foi obtida calculando o coeficiente alfa de Cronbach = 0.86 e o coeficiente ômega de McDonald = 0.89. Da mesma forma, na confiabilidade pelas metades de Guttman, foram encontrados valores entre 0.76 e 0.89. As escalas foram estabelecidas por sexo e por idade para a população total. A prevalência de ansiedade em estudantes universitários em Lima foi de 29.4 %, o que se aproxima dos dados da China e da Colômbia, mas é mais alta do que na Inglaterra durante toda a época de COVID-19.