RESUMEN
Background Despite the excellent prognosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, recurrence remains a major concern. However, the persistence of thyroid cancer post-thyroidectomy is not uncommon. We aimed to characterise patients who underwent re-operative surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma and analyse the percentage of re-operations that truly were for "recurrent" disease versus the management of persistent disease. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of the hospital database, analysing patients who visited the nuclear medicine department at Mediclinic City Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, between 2015 and 2022. The study included patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who underwent re-operations after total thyroidectomy. Recurrence was defined as the development of disease after a patient had undetectable thyroglobulin and negative radiological scans within one year of the first surgery. Cases were categorised as "recurrent", "persistent", or "unable to classify" in the event of missing data. Results Out of 836 patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who visited the nuclear medicine department, 71 underwent re-operations. The mean age of these patients was 44.4 years (CI 41.7-47.0), of whom 78.9% were females. Almost half (46.5%) underwent re-operations within the first year, and 98.6% were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma. We were able to classify 63.4% of cases (n=45) as persistent disease, while 24 cases were categorised as "unable to classify". Only two cases met the criteria for recurrent disease. Conclusion The majority of cases previously classified as "recurrent" in differentiated thyroid carcinoma were found to be a persistent disease, possibly indicating inadequate therapy. Further research may be required to explore the reasons behind this eye-opening rate of disease persistence. This highlights an area for improvement in the management and future outcomes of differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema of the external genitalia is a rare condition characterized by swelling of the scrotal skin and subcutaneous tissue, resulting from a pathology in lymphatic drainage. Over time, the development of fibrosis leads to a considerable impairment in the patient's quality of life. While conservative management is generally the first-line approach, surgical cases may necessitate surgical intervention to achieve comprehensive and lasting improvements. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 43-year-old obese male patient who presented to the clinic with a complaint of persistent bilateral scrotal swelling for three months. Clinical examination revealed a pressure-indolent, soft, and massively enlarged swelling of the scrotum on both sides. Ultrasound findings confirmed a diffusely thickened edematous scrotal wall. The patient was advised to start physiotherapy and adhere to conservative management. Due to the debilitating size of the mass, the patient opted for excision of the scrotal swelling followed by scrotoplasty. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report explores the presentation, signs and symptoms, impact on patients' lives, and various management options for scrotal lymphedema. It underscores the intricacies involved in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process, emphasizing the need for a tailored and multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSION: It is imperative to initially rule out life-threatening causes of scrotal lymphedema to ensure optimal patient care. The integration of surgical interventions should be carefully considered in the overall management strategy for optimal and comprehensive results. Scrotoplasty, in the context of scrotal lymphedema, not only improves the quality of life but also positively influences sexual function. COMPETENCIES: Interpersonal and communication skills, Medical knowledge, Patient care, Practice-based learning and improvement.