Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutrients ; 12(11)2020 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33171964

RESUMEN

Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners (NNSs) may have the ability to change the gut microbiota, which could potentially alter glucose metabolism. This study aimed to determine the effect of sucralose and aspartame consumption on gut microbiota composition using realistic doses of NNSs. Seventeen healthy participants between the ages of 18 and 45 years who had a body mass index (BMI) of 20-25 were selected. They undertook two 14-day treatment periods separated by a four-week washout period. The sweeteners consumed by each participant consisted of a standardized dose of 14% (0.425 g) of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame and 20% (0.136 g) of the ADI for sucralose. Faecal samples collected before and after treatments were analysed for microbiome and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). There were no differences in the median relative proportions of the most abundant bacterial taxa (family and genus) before and after treatments with both NNSs. The microbiota community structure also did not show any obvious differences. There were no differences in faecal SCFAs following the consumption of the NNSs. These findings suggest that daily repeated consumption of pure aspartame or sucralose in doses reflective of typical high consumption have minimal effect on gut microbiota composition or SCFA production.


Asunto(s)
Aspartame/farmacología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Salud , Edulcorantes no Nutritivos/farmacología , Sacarosa/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Biodiversidad , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Ácidos Grasos Volátiles/metabolismo , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metabolómica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Filogenia , Análisis de Componente Principal , Sacarosa/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Nutr Rev ; 78(9): 725-746, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32065635

RESUMEN

Non-nutritive sweeteners are thought to be useful replacements for caloric sweeteners in sweet food and beverages, since the reduction in energy and carbohydrate intake may lead to health benefits stemming from weight management and glycemic control. However, the potential effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on glucose metabolism and gut hormones have not been determined definitively. Here, the available evidence of the effects of aspartame and sucralose consumption on glucose metabolism and gut hormones is reviewed. A majority of studies have found that consumption of aspartame or sucralose has no effect on concentrations of blood glucose, insulin, or gut hormones; however, 2 trials have shown that aspartame consumption affects glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations, while only a few trials have shown that sucralose consumption affects glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations. One study found higher glucose concentrations after sucralose consumption, while 3 studies found lower concentrations and 33 studies found no change in glucose concentrations. Moreover, only 4 studies reported increased concentrations of glucagon-like peptide 1. Three studies reported decreased insulin sensitivity following sucralose consumption, while 1 trial reported an increase in insulin sensitivity. In summary, the evidence from the clinical trials conducted to date is contradictory because of the different protocols used.


Asunto(s)
Aspartame/farmacología , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/metabolismo , Glucosa/metabolismo , Insulina/metabolismo , Edulcorantes no Nutritivos/farmacología , Sacarosa/análogos & derivados , Animales , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sacarosa/farmacología
3.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ; 45(6): 606-612, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31697573

RESUMEN

This study aimed to determine the effect of pure forms of sucralose and aspartame, in doses reflective of common consumption, on glucose metabolism. Healthy participants consumed pure forms of a non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) that were mixed with water and standardized to doses of 14% (0.425 g) of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame and 20% (0.136 g) of the ADI for sucralose every day for 2 weeks. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for glucose, insulin, active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and leptin. Seventeen participants (10 females and 7 males; age, 24 ± 6.8 years; body mass index, 22.9 ± 2.5 kg/m2) participated in the study. The total area under the curve values of glucose, insulin, active GLP-1 and leptin were similar for the aspartame and sucralose treatment groups compared with the baseline values in healthy participants. There was no change in insulin sensitivity after NNS treatment compared with the baseline values. These findings suggest that daily repeated consumption of pure sucralose or aspartame for 2 weeks had no effect on glucose metabolism among normoglycaemic adults. However, these results need to be tested in studies with longer durations. Novelty Daily consumption of pure aspartame or sucralose for 2 weeks had no effect on glucose metabolism. Daily consumption of pure aspartame or sucralose for 2 weeks had no effect on insulin sensitivity among healthy adults.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Metabolismo de los Hidratos de Carbono/efectos de los fármacos , Edulcorantes/farmacología , Adolescente , Adulto , Aspartame/farmacología , Glucemia/análisis , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Masculino , Sacarosa/análogos & derivados , Sacarosa/farmacología , Adulto Joven
4.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care ; 22(4): 278-283, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033578

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: By replacing sugar, nonnutritive sweeteners (NNSs) are thought to aid in weight management and decrease insulin resistance. We reviewed the latest randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effects NNSs on glycaemic control. RECENT FINDINGS: Six RCTs addressed this topic between 2017 and 2018; the majority tested artificial NNS (sucralose or aspartame), with only one testing natural NNS (stevia and monk fruit extract). Most found no effect of NNS on blood glucose, insulin, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels; however, two trials showed an effect of sucralose on the acute insulin response. SUMMARY: We are still incapable of reaching a definite judgement on which types of NNS, if any, impact glycaemic control. There is a need for more research to overcome the limitations of recent RCTs, related to sample size, intervention duration, dose, form of NNSs used, and inclusion of males or female participants only. Future studies should also compare different NNS types with each other, and include the increasingly popular 'natural' NNS.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Edulcorantes no Nutritivos/farmacología , Aspartame/farmacología , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Stevia , Sacarosa/análogos & derivados , Sacarosa/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...