RESUMEN
Background: Skin testing is an important step in evaluation of penicillin allergic reactions. It includes testing to the following: amoxicillin, benzyl penicillin, and products generated in vivo after penicillin administration, the major determinant hapten penicilloyl-polylysine (PPL) and the minor determinant mixture (MDM). Although PPL and MDM are available as a commercial kit, their supply and cost remain problematic. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the performance and utility of PPL and MDM in penicillin allergy testing. Methods: A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was undertaken for those with penicillin testing in a tertiary immunology unit. Results: In all, 214 patients were identified. Of those patients, 151 (70.6%) were female and the average age was 58 years. Unspecified penicillin was the most common index drug (n = 127 [59.3%]), followed by amoxicillin (n =3 [24.8%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (n = 21 [9.7%]). The result of skin testing was positive in 23 patients (10.7%); skin prick testing was positive in 10 patients (4.7%), and intradermal testing (IDT) was positive in 13 patients (6.1%), the majority of whom had identified amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug (n = 22 [95.7%]). The result of testing to PPL and/or MDM was positive with IDT only (n=5 [23.8%]). PPL and MDM positivity coexisted with a positive reaction to amoxicillin IDT in 2 patients, 1 of whom passed an amoxicillin challenge. Additionally, 2 positive tests to PPL were present with a negative result for MDM; of these 2 positive results, 1 was positive to amoxicillin IDT. In only 1 case were the results of testing for MDM and PPL both positive, with negative results to all native ß-lactams tested; the patient tolerated an amoxicillin challenge. Overall, the negative predictive value for both skin prick testing and IDT was 89.5%. Conclusion: Benzyl penicillin and amoxicillin alone may be sufficient for in vivo testing in suspected individuals with penicillin allergy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients who suffer from acute IgE-mediated allergy to a cephalosporin antibiotic are frequently assumed to be at high risk of allergy to other cephalosporins and penicillins. AIM: To define cross-reactivity patterns in patients with confirmed allergy to a cephalosporin. METHODS: Subjects presenting with a history of immediate allergy to a cephalosporin-family antibiotic between March 2009 and July 2017 were investigated with specific IgE testing to penicillin, amoxycillin and cefaclor, followed by skin prick testing, intradermal testing and drug provocation testing with a panel of penicillins and cephalosporins. RESULTS: Out of 564 subjects with a reported beta-lactam allergy, 90 identified a cephalosporin as their index drug. Fifty-five (61.1%) of the 90 subjects tested had a history consistent with an IgE-mediated reaction, of whom 24 (43.6%) were proven to be allergic to their index cephalosporin. Twenty (83.3%) of the 24 were allergic only to their index cephalosporin. Of the four remaining subjects, two were co-sensitised to another beta-lactam with a similar side chain, while the other two had no specific cross-reactivity pattern. Major and minor penicillin determinants were negative for all cephalosporin-allergic individuals. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, cephalosporin allergy does not appear to be a class effect, with most cases found allergic only to their index cephalosporin. Co-sensitisation to other cephalosporins or penicillins was uncommon, and when it occurred, was usually consistent with side chain cross-reactivity.
