Burden of care in primary caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury in Iran: its association with sociodemographic factors.

STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: The burden of care among primary caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) is affected by different factors. We aimed to evaluate the level of burden among caregivers and the association between the caregiver burden and sociodemographic factors of SCI individuals and their caregivers. SETTING: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. METHODS: The Zarit caregiver burden interview was used to evaluate the level of burden in caregivers through structured face-to-face interviews with 163 individuals with SCI, who were referred to receive outpatient rehabilitation, and their caregivers. RESULTS: The mean of caregivers' burden score was 38.9±15.2 and 11.7% reported no or little burden, 43.6% reported 'mild-to-moderate' burden, 33.1% reported 'moderate-to-severe' burden and 11.7% reported 'severe' burden of care. There was relationship between the level of injury (P=0.010) and occupational status (P=0.041) in SCI individuals and caregiver burden score. There was also a positive relationship between the caregiver burden score and duration of injury (r=0.176, P=0.025), the caregivers' age (r=0.350, P<0.001), and length of time that the current caregiver providing care (r=0.253, P=0.001). There was a negative relationship between the burden and caregiver's educational level (r=-0.235, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of care among the caregivers of SCI individuals is a multidimensional issue. The sociodemographic characteristics of individuals with SCI and their caregivers can affect the caregiver's burden. Many of these factors can be modified to reduce the burden of care.

Association of pain, social support and socioeconomic indicators in patients with spinal cord injury in Iran.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: Pain is a prevalent complication of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Our objective was to examine the association between social support, socioeconomic factors and psychosocial factors and pain to develop more effective management strategies. SETTING: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research (BASIR) Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. METHODS: The Persian version of the Brief Pain Inventory was used to measure the pain, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support was used to measure social support through structured face-to-face interviews in SCI individuals. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of pain was 50.7%; 79.3% of individuals had bilateral pain, with lower limbs and back being the most common location. The quality of pain was described as aching (41.4%), tingling (32.9%), pressure (15.7%), coldness (5.7%) and feeling electric shock sensations (4.3%). The frequency of pain in individuals with paraplegia (60.9% vs 45.7%) and incomplete (53.5% vs 52.5%) SCI was higher than with other types of neurological injuries. Patients with a medium level of education had the least pain and those with good economic situation reported higher frequency of having pain (P=0.034). There was no significant relationship between pain and social support. There was a positive correlation between pain and impairment of mood, normal work, relations with other people and lack of sleep (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: These novel findings will inform the development of strategies to manage pain by improving access to health-care facilities and supplies.