Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients: the additional value depends on preoperative data.

AIM: In intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients, to avoid extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), the updated Briganti nomogram is recommended with the cost of missing 1.5 % of patients with lymph node invasion (LNI). Is it possible to reduce the percentage of unexpected LNI patients (nomogram false negative)? We used the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique systematically associated with laparoscopic ePLND to assess the potential value of isotopic SLN method to adress this point. METHODS: Two hundred and two consecutive patients had procedures with isotopic SLN detection associated with laparoscopic ePLND for high or intermediate risk of PC. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to quantify the accuracy of different models as: the updated Briganti nomogram, the percentage of positive cores, and an equation of the best predictors of LNI. We tested the model cutoffs associated with an optimal negative predictive value (NPV) and the best cutoff associated with avoiding false negative SLN detection, in order to assist the clinician's decision of when to spare ePLND. RESULTS: LNI was detected in 35 patients (17.2 %). Based on preoperative primary Gleason grade and percentage of positive cores, a bivariate model was built to calculate a combined score reflecting the risk of LNI. For the Briganti nomogram, the 5 % probability cutoff avoided ePLND in 53 % (108/202) of patients, missing three LNI patients (8.6 %), but all were detected by the SLN technique. For our bivariate model, the best cutoff was <10, leaving no patient with LNI due to positive SLN detection (four patients = 11.4 %), and avoiding ePLND in 52 % (105/202) of patients. CONCLUSION: For patients with a low risk of LNI determined using the updated Briganti nomogram or bivariate model, SLN technique could be used alone for lymph node staging in intermediate- or high-risk PC patients.

Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node versus hyperextensive pelvic dissection for staging clinically localized prostate carcinoma: a prospective study of 200 patients.

UNLABELLED: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this prospective study was to validate, through laparoscopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique correlated with hyperextensive pelvic resection (extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection) in patients with localized PC, candidates for local curative treatment. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection of (99m)Tc-sulfur rhenium colloid (0.3 mL/100 MBq) in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. Detection was performed intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe, followed by extensive resection. SLN counts were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. Histologic analysis was performed by hematoxylin-phloxine-safran staining, followed by immunohistochemistry if the SLN was free of metastasis. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients with PC at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases were included. The intraoperative detection rate was 96% (195/203). Thirty-five patients had lymph node metastases, 19 only in the SLN. The false-negative rate was 8.5% (3/35). Unilateral surgical SLN detection did not validate bilateral pelvic lymph node status, and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy dissection was necessary on the opposite side of detection to minimize the false-negative rate (2.8% [1/35]). A significant metastatic sentinel invasion in the common iliac region existed (9.3%) but was always associated with other metastatic node areas. The internal iliac region was the primary metastatic site (40.7%). Finally, this series invalidated any justification for a standard or limited dissection, which would have missed 51.9% and 74.1% of lymph node metastases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The radioisotope SLN identification method up to the common iliac region is successful to identify sentinel nodes during laparoscopic surgery per hemipelvis to be acceptably considered as an isolated procedure and should be validated for intermediate- and high-risk patients.

Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extirpative quality of an open radical prostatectomy (RP) technique by first categorising and mapping all intraprostatic incisions into benign tissue and then determining a cumulative technical error rate given by all intraprostatic incisions into benign and malignant tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data relating to 1065 men with clinically localised prostate cancer who underwent open retropubic RP (70.6% nerve-sparing surgery [NSS]) by a single surgeon (January 2005 to December 2011). We recorded all intraprostatic incisions: (i) iatrogenic positive surgical margins (PSMs), (ii) deep or superficial benign capsular incisions (BCIs), (iii) incisions into benign prostate glands at the prostate apex or bladder neck (benign glandular tissue incisions [BGTIs]), and determined incision location, length and nature (solitary/multiple). We evaluated: (i) associations between benign incisions, NSS and PSMs, (ii) significant predictors for PSM risk by multivariate analysis, (iii) postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS: Intraprostatic incision rates were 2.3% pT2 PSMs, 6.0% BCIs and 5.4% BGTIs. There were slight variations in rate over time and with NSS technique. Benign incisions were located as follows: 46.8% right posterolateral, 37.5% left posterolateral, and 15.7% bilateral for BCIs; 58.6% bladder neck and 41.4% apical for BGTIs. The median (range) incision length, for solitary and multiple incisions respectively, was 4 (1-13) and 9 (2-25) mm for BCIs and 1 (1-5) and 2 (2-6) mm for BGTIs. BCI rate, but not BGTI rate, was significantly associated with NSS (P = 0.004) and PSM (P = 0.005), and increased PSM risk 3.6-fold. A PSM increased BCR risk two-fold (odds ratio 2.078, 95% confidence interval 1.383-3.122). BCR-free survival decreased significantly even for short PSMs (<1 mm; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the pT2 PSM rate was low (2.3%), the cumulative technical error rate (patients with at least one pT2 PSM, BCI or BGTI) was five-fold higher (12.5%). Categorising and mapping intraprostatic incisions is a tool surgeons can use in self-audits to identify areas of potential improvement, reduce errors, and improve surgical skills.

A new sign for detection of extracapsular extension of prostatic adenocarcinoma: sum of positive sextants per lobe combining interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy results.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the possibility of improving the reliability of preoperative detection of extracapsular extension (ECE) in each prostate lobe by using a new sign called sum of positive sextants per lobe (SPS-L), combining interpretation of MRI and prostate biopsy results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 590 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2002 and 2007. All patients were assessed by preoperative 1.5 Tesla MRI using an integrated endorectal and pelvic phased array coil. A sextant was defined as "positive" when tumor infiltration was observed on a biopsy sample or a pathologic image was observed on MRI (0 = absent, 1 = present). A score, called sum of positive sextants per lobe (SPS-L), was defined as the sum of positive sextants on biopsy samples and positive sextants on MRI (MRI-L) for each lobe. A second score taking into account the presence or absence of ECE visualized on MRI (T3 MRI-L + SPS-L) was also tested for the detection of ECE per lobe. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the SPS-L and T3 MRI-L + SPS-L scores were significantly higher in the presence of ECE and extensive ECE (P < .0001). The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were significantly greater for the T3 MRI-L + SPS-L score than for the positive biopsy result per lobe (PB(+)/L) rate (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The use of indirect signs (SPS-L) associated with direct signs (T3 MRI) allows the preoperative detection of ECE per lobe by endorectal 1.5 Tesla MRI with high sensitivity.

Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) versus extensive pelvic dissection for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy by laparoscopy in staging locoregional patients with clinically localized PC. METHODS: A transrectal ultrasound-guided injection of 0.3 ml/100 MBq (99m)Tc-sulphur rhenium colloid in each prostatic lobe was performed the day before surgery. Detection was performed intraoperatively with a laparoscopic probe (Gamma Sup CLERAD) followed by extensive resection. SLN counts were performed in vivo and confirmed ex vivo. Histological analysis was performed by haematoxylin-phloxine-saffron staining, followed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) if the SLN was free of metastasis. RESULTS: The study included 93 patients with PC at intermediate or high risk of lymph node metastases. The intraoperative detection rate was 93.5% (87/93). Nineteen patients had lymph node metastases, nine only in SLN. The false-negative rate was 10.5% (2/19). The internal iliac region was the primary metastatic site (43.3%). Metastatic sentinel nodes in the common iliac region beyond the ureteral junction were present in 13.3%. Limited or standard lymph node resection would have ignored 73.2 and 56.6% of lymph node metastases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is suitable for broad identification of SLN metastasis, and targeted resection of these lymph nodes significantly limits the risk of extended surgical resection whilst maintaining the accuracy of the information.