Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A SNO and ASCO consensus review on clinical management and future directions.

Leptomeningeal metastases are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options and clinical research protocols for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansion in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multi-modality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of leptomeningeal metastases, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of leptomeningeal metastases and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.

Reduced Mortality and Radiation Necrosis After Surgery With Postoperative Stereotactic Radiation in Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although stereotactic radiation has frequently supplanted whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in treating patients with multiple brain metastases, the role of surgery for these patients remains unresolved. No randomized trials have compared surgical resection with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to SRS/SRT alone. Previous studies addressing surgery for patients with multiple brain metastases are often limited by small sample sizes, a lack of appropriate comparison groups, or a focus on patients treated before recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We compared outcomes in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with surgical resection and postoperative SRS/SRT to those treated with SRS/SRT alone. METHODS: We studied 734 patients with multiple newly diagnosed brain metastases (surgery with SRS/SRT, n = 228; SRS/SRT alone, n = 506) from 2011 to 2022 in a retrospective, single-institution cohort. Patients who received upfront whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with postoperative SRS/SRT was associated with decreased all-cause mortality compared with SRS/SRT alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, 95% CI [0.50-0.89], P = 5.56 × 10 -3 ). The association between surgical resection and overall survival was replicated in a subset of the cohort after cardinality matching (HR: 0.64, 95% CI [0.46-0.88], P = 6.68 × 10 -3 ). Patients with melanoma benefited significantly less from surgical resection compared with patients with other tumor types, most notably non-small-cell lung cancer. Compared with definitive SRS/SRT, cavity SRS/SRT was associated with a significantly reduced risk of both symptomatic radiation necrosis (HR: 0.22, 95% CI [0.08-0.59], P = 2.70 × 10 -3 ) and radiographic radiation necrosis (HR: 0.23, 95% CI [0.09-0.57], P = 1.43 × 10 -3 ) in multivariable models. CONCLUSION: In patients with multiple brain metastases, surgical resection before SRS/SRT is associated with reduced mortality and radiation necrosis. Prospective studies may further delineate patient populations that benefit from aggressive local, brain-directed treatment even with significant intracranial disease burden.

Amplification of Wild-Type RET Represents a Novel Molecular Subtype of Several Cancer Types With Clinical Response to Selpercatinib.

PURPOSE: RET rearrangements and RET activating point mutations represent targetable genomic alterations in advanced solid tumors. However, the frequency and clinicopathologic characteristics of wild-type RET amplification in cancer and its potential role as a targetable oncogenic driver are not well-characterized. METHODS: In two institutional cohorts of patients with solid cancers from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), the frequency and clinicopathologic features of wild-type RET amplification in the absence of RET rearrangements or activating mutations was assessed. The findings were validated using merged data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE), and China Pan-Cancer data sets. RESULTS: The frequency of wild-type RET amplification across all solid cancers was 0.08% (26 of 32,505) in the DFCI cohort, 0.05% (26 of 53,152) in the MSKCC cohort, and 0.25% (71 of 28,623) in the cohort from TCGA, GENIE, and China Pan-Cancer. Cancer types with RET amplification included non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), hepatobiliary cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and others. The median RET copy number in RET-amplified cases was 7.5 (range, 6-36) in the DFCI cohort and 5.7 (range, 4-27.7) in the MSKCC cohort. Among 11 RET-amplified NSCLCs, eight had no other concurrent driver mutations. Finally, we report on a 69-year-old man with recurrent NSCLC harboring high-level wild-type RET amplification (22-28 copies) as the only identified putative genomic driver who experienced both a systemic and intracranial confirmed response to the RET inhibitor selpercatinib. CONCLUSION: Amplification of wild-type RET represents a novel, targetable molecular subset of cancer.

External validation of three prognostic scores for brain metastasis velocity in patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION: Brain metastasis velocity (BMV) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastases (BMs). In this study, we conducted an external validation and comparative assessment of the performance of all three BMV scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for BM at a single center between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Where possible, all three BMV scores were calculated. Log-rank tests and linear, logistic and Cox regression analysis were used for validation and predictor identification of OS. RESULTS: For 333 of 384 brain metastasis patients, at least one BMV score could be calculated. In a sub-group of 187 patients, "classic" BMV was validated as categorical (p < 0.0001) and continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.02-1.03; p < 0.0001). In a sub-group of 284 patients, "initial" BMV was validated as categorical variable (high-risk vs. low-risk; p < 0.01), but not as continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99-1.04; p = 0.224). "Volume-based" BMV could not be validated in a sub-group of 104 patients. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, iBMV (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.01-3.38; p < 0.05) and cBMV (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.15 4.68; p < 0.05) were predictors for OS for intermediate-risk patients after first SRT and first DBFs, respectively. cBMV proved to be the dominant predictor for OS for high-risk patients (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.30-6.91; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study externally validated cBMV and iBMV as prognostic scores for OS in patients treated with SRT for BMs whereas validation of vBMV was not achieved.

Inaugural Results of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy: A Phase II Platform Trial for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization.

PURPOSE: The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial that uses response adaptive randomization and genomic profiling to efficiently identify novel therapies for phase III testing. Three initial experimental arms (abemaciclib [a cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK]4/6 inhibitor], neratinib [an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor], and CC-115 [a deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor]) were simultaneously evaluated against a common control arm. We report the results for each arm and examine the feasibility and conduct of the adaptive platform design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma were eligible if they had tumor genotyping to identify prespecified biomarker subpopulations of dominant glioblastoma signaling pathways (EGFR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and CDK). Initial random assignment was 1:1:1:1 between control (radiation therapy and temozolomide) and the experimental arms. Subsequent Bayesian adaptive randomization was incorporated on the basis of biomarker-specific progression-free survival (PFS) data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and one-sided P values are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02977780). RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients were treated (71 control; 73 abemaciclib; 81 neratinib; 12 CC-115) in years 2017-2021. Abemaciclib and neratinib were well tolerated, but CC-115 was associated with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicity in 58% of patients. PFS was significantly longer with abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.06; one-sided P = .046) and neratinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.02; one-sided P = .033) relative to the control arm but there was no PFS benefit with CC-115 (one-sided P = .523). None of the experimental therapies demonstrated a significant OS benefit (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The INSIGhT design enabled efficient simultaneous testing of three experimental agents using a shared control arm and adaptive randomization. Two investigational arms had superior PFS compared with the control arm, but none demonstrated an OS benefit. The INSIGhT design may promote improved and more efficient therapeutic discovery in glioblastoma. New arms have been added to the trial.

National Cancer Institute Collaborative Workshop on Shaping the Landscape of Brain Metastases Research: challenges and recommended priorities.

Brain metastases are an increasing global public health concern, even as survival rates improve for patients with metastatic disease. Both metastases and the sequelae of their treatment are key determinants of the inter-related priorities of patient survival, function, and quality of life, mandating a multidimensional approach to clinical care and research. At a virtual National Cancer Institute Workshop in September, 2022, key stakeholders convened to define research priorities to address the crucial areas of unmet need for patients with brain metastases to achieve meaningful advances in patient outcomes. This Policy Review outlines existing knowledge gaps, collaborative opportunities, and specific recommendations regarding consensus priorities and future directions in brain metastases research. Achieving major advances in research will require enhanced coordination between the ongoing efforts of individual organisations and consortia. Importantly, the continual and active engagement of patients and patient advocates will be necessary to ensure that the directionality of all efforts reflects what is most meaningful in the context of patient care.

A genomic score to predict local control among patients with brain metastases managed with radiation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors of local recurrence following radiation among patients with brain metastases (BrM) provide limited explanatory power. We developed a DNA-based signature of radiotherapeutic efficacy among patients with BrM to better characterize recurrence risk. METHODS: We identified 570 patients with 1487 BrM managed with whole-brain (WBRT) or stereotactic radiation therapy at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (2013-2020) for whom next-generation sequencing panel data (OncoPanel) were available. Fine/Gray's competing risks regression was utilized to compare local recurrence on a per-metastasis level among patients with versus without somatic alterations of likely biological significance across 84 genes. Genes with a q-value ≤ 0.10 were utilized to develop a "Brain-Radiation Prediction Score" ("Brain-RPS"). RESULTS: Genomic alterations in 11 (ATM, MYCL, PALB2, FAS, PRDM1, PAX5, CDKN1B, EZH2, NBN, DIS3, and MDM4) and 2 genes (FBXW7 and AURKA) were associated with decreased or increased risk of local recurrence, respectively (q-value ≤ 0.10). Weighted scores corresponding to the strength of association with local failure for each gene were summed to calculate a patient-level RPS. On multivariable Fine/Gray's competing risks regression, RPS [1.66 (1.44-1.91, P < .001)], metastasis-associated edema [1.60 (1.16-2.21), P = .004], baseline size [1.02 (1.01-1.03), P < .001] and receipt of WBRT without local therapy [4.04 (2.49-6.58), P < .001] were independent predictors of local failure. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a genomic score to quantify local recurrence risk following brain-directed radiation. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study to systematically correlate DNA-based alterations with radiotherapeutic outcomes in BrM. If validated, Brain-RPS has potential to facilitate clinical trials aimed at genome-based personalization of radiation in BrM.

Minimizing Intracranial Disease Before Stereotactic Radiation in Single or Solitary Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in multiple fractions (typically ≤5) can effectively treat a wide range of brain metastases, including those less suitable for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Prior prospective studies on surgical resection with stereotactic radiation have focused exclusively on SRS, and retrospective studies have shown equivocal results regarding whether surgery is associated with improved outcomes compared with SRT alone. We compared resection with postoperative cavity SRT or SRS to SRT alone in patients with 1 brain metastasis, while including patients receiving SRS alone as an additional reference group. METHODS: We studied 716 patients in a retrospective, single-institution cohort diagnosed with single or solitary brain metastases from 2007 to 2020. Patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with cavity SRT/SRS was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39, 95% CI [0.27-0.57], P = 1.52 × 10 -6 ) compared with SRT alone, along with lower risk of neurological death attributable to intracranial tumor progression (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.22-0.94], P = 3.32 × 10 -2 ) and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.15, 95% CI [0.06-0.36], P = 3.28 × 10 -5 ). Surgery with cavity SRS was also associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.35-0.78], P = 1.46 × 10 -3 ), neurological death (HR: 0.30, 95% CI [0.10-0.88], P = 2.88 × 10 -2 ), and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.03-0.74], P = 2.07 × 10 -2 ) compared with SRS alone. Surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and neurological death in cardinality-matched subsets of the cohort. Among surgical patients, gross total resection was associated with extended overall survival (HR: 0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.98], P = 4.02 × 10 -2 ) along with lower risk of neurological death (HR: 0.31, 95% CI [0.17-0.57], P = 1.84 × 10 -4 ) and local failure (HR: 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.75], P = 7.08 × 10 -3 ). CONCLUSION: In patients with 1 brain metastasis, minimizing intracranial disease specifically before stereotactic radiation is associated with improved oncologic outcomes.

Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.

The management of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BMs) is exquisitely multidisciplinary. Patients presenting with a symptomatic BM may be offered neurosurgical resection, followed by radiation. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in most patients presenting with a limited number of BMs, whereas WBRT with hippocampal-sparing and concomitant memantine is preferred for patients with multiple BMs. There is a growing role for systemic therapy, in some cases in lieu of local therapy, particularly in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

Phase I study of a novel glioblastoma radiation therapy schedule exploiting cell-state plasticity.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastomas comprise heterogeneous cell populations with dynamic, bidirectional plasticity between treatment-resistant stem-like and treatment-sensitive differentiated states, with treatment influencing this process. However, current treatment protocols do not account for this plasticity. Previously, we generated a mathematical model based on preclinical experiments to describe this process and optimize a radiation therapy fractionation schedule that substantially increased survival relative to standard fractionation in a murine glioblastoma model. METHODS: We developed statistical models to predict the survival benefit of interventions to glioblastoma patients based on the corresponding survival benefit in the mouse model used in our preclinical study. We applied our mathematical model of glioblastoma radiation response to optimize a radiation therapy fractionation schedule for patients undergoing re-irradiation for glioblastoma and developed a first-in-human trial (NCT03557372) to assess the feasibility and safety of administering our schedule. RESULTS: Our statistical modeling predicted that the hazard ratio when comparing our novel radiation schedule with a standard schedule would be 0.74. Our mathematical modeling suggested that a practical, near-optimal schedule for re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma patients was 3.96 Gy × 7 (1 fraction/day) followed by 1.0 Gy × 9 (3 fractions/day). Our optimized schedule was successfully administered to 14/14 (100%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: A novel radiation therapy schedule based on mathematical modeling of cell-state plasticity is feasible and safe to administer to glioblastoma patients.

Incidence proportion and prognosis of leptomeningeal disease among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries. METHODS: We identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries. RESULTS: Among patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P < .001). Development of LMD among initially LMD-naïve patients was also more common among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11], P = .03). Patients with LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries displayed lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 [0.52-0.93], P = .01; median survival: 5.2 vs. 2.4 months, respectively), with a greater numerical difference observed in patients with LMD at intracranial involvement (7.4 vs. 2.6 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.

Incidence, characteristics, and management of central nervous system metastases in patients with inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have a high risk of central nervous system metastasis (mCNS). The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of and identify risk factors for mCNS in patients with IBC. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with IBC between 1997 and 2019. mCNS-free survival time was defined as the date from the diagnosis of IBC to the date of diagnosis of mCNS or the date of death, whichever occurred first. A competing risks hazard model was used to evaluate risk factors for mCNS. RESULTS: A total of 531 patients were identified; 372 patients with stage III and 159 patients with de novo stage IV disease. During the study, there were a total of 124 patients who had mCNS. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year incidence of mCNS was 5%, 9%, and 18% in stage III patients (median follow-up: 5.6 years) and 17%, 30%, and 42% in stage IV patients (1.8 years). Multivariate analysis identified triple-negative tumor subtype as a significant risk factor for mCNS for stage III patients. For patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, visceral metastasis as first metastatic site, triple-negative subtype, and younger age at diagnosis of metastases were risk factors for mCNS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBC, particularly those with triple-negative IBC, visceral metastasis, and those at a younger age at diagnosis of metastatic disease, are at significant risk of developing mCNS. Further investigation into prevention of mCNS and whether early detection of mCNS is associated with improved IBC patient outcomes is warranted.

Retrospective Review of Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease on Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes after radiation therapy for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified patients irradiated to ≤5 progressive lesions while receiving ICI between 2010 and 2020. We excluded patients whose systemic therapy was switched after radiation but before progression. We evaluated predictors of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We screened 1423 patients and identified 120 who were eligible; the most common histologies were lung cancer (n = 59) and melanoma (n = 36). The median number of oligoprogressive lesions was 1. For the median LC of irradiated oligoprogressive lesions, PFS and OS were not reached at 6.41 (4.67-7.66) and 29.80 (22.54-43.33) months, respectively. Tumor histology, radiated site, or radiation modality were not associated with LC, PFS, or OS. Local response to radiation (P < .0001) and radiation of newly developed lesions (P = .02) were associated with LC. Predictors of PFS on univariate and multivariate analyses were best response to radiation (P = .006) and high programmed death ligand 1 tumor proportion score (P = .02). On multivariate analyses, OS was associated with cumulative oligoprogressive lesion volumes (P = .02) and duration of ICI before oligoprogression (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Promising outcomes were observed among patients irradiated for oligoprogression on ICI, especially those with a favorable local response, high tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression, and those receiving ICI for longer periods before oligoprogression. These data can help identify patients well suited for radiation therapy versus those who should switch systemic treatment.

An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Salvage brachytherapy for multiply recurrent metastatic brain tumors: A matched case analysis.

Background: Patients with recurrent brain metastases who have exhausted external radiation options pose a treatment challenge in the setting of advances in systemic disease control which have improved quality of life and survival. Brachytherapy holds promise as salvage therapy given its ability to enforce surgical cytoreduction and minimize regional toxicity. This study investigates the role of salvage brachytherapy in maintaining local control for recurrent metastatic lesions. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institution's experience with brachytherapy in patients with multiply recurrent cerebral metastases who have exhausted external radiation treatment options (14 cases). The primary outcome of the study was freedom from local recurrence (FFLR). To capture the nuances of tumor biology, we compared FFLR achieved by brachytherapy to the preceding treatment for each patient. We further compared the response to brachytherapy in patients with lung cancer (8 cases) against a matched cohort of maximally radiated lung brain metastases (10 cases). Results: Brachytherapy treatment conferred significantly longer FFLR compared to prior treatments (median 7.39 vs 5.51 months, P = .011) for multiply recurrent brain metastases. Compared to an independent matched cohort, brachytherapy demonstrated superior FFLR (median 8.49 vs 1.61 months, P = .004) and longer median overall survival (11.07 vs 5.93 months, P = .055), with comparable side effects. Conclusion: Brachytherapy used as salvage treatment for select patients with a multiply recurrent oligometastatic brain metastasis in the setting of well-controlled systemic disease holds promise for improving local control in this challenging patient population.

Frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls among patients with brain metastases: A population- and institutional-level analysis.

Background: Falls in patients with cancer harbor potential for serious sequelae. Patients with brain metastases (BrM) may be especially susceptible to falls but supporting investigations are lacking. We assessed the frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls in patients with BrM using 2 data sources. Methods: We identified 42 648 and 111 patients with BrM utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (2008-2016) and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) institutional data (2015), respectively, and characterized falls in these populations. Results: Among SEER-Medicare patients, 10 267 (24.1%) experienced a fall that prompted medical evaluation, with cumulative incidences at 3, 6, and 12 months of 18.0%, 24.3%, and 34.1%, respectively. On multivariable Fine/Gray's regression, older age (≥81 or 76-80 vs 66-70 years, hazard ratio [HR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.25], P < .001 and HR 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04-1.17], P < .001, respectively), Charlson comorbidity score of >2 vs 0-2 (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13], P = .002) and urban residence (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16], P = .03) were associated with falls. Married status (HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.98], P = .004) and Asian vs white race (HR 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99], P = .03) were associated with reduced fall risk. Identified falls were more common among BWH/DFCI patients (N = 56, 50.4% of cohort), resulting in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, fractures, and intracranial hemorrhage in 33%, 23%, 11%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Falls are common among patients with BrM, especially older/sicker patients, and can have deleterious consequences. Risk-reduction measures, such as home safety checks, physical therapy, and medication optimization, should be considered in this population.

DICER1 mutations in primary central nervous system tumors: new insights into histologies, mutations, and prognosis.

PURPOSE: We sought to characterize clinical outcomes for adult and pediatric patients with primary CNS tumors harboring DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients who were treated between 1995 and 2020 for primary CNS tumors containing DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1 on chromosome 14q, identified by targeted next generation sequencing. Kaplan-Meier plots and log rank tests were used to analyze survival. Cox proportional-hazards model was used for univariate and multivariable analyses for all-cause mortality (ACM). RESULTS: Within our cohort, the most common malignancies were grade 3/4 glioma (61%), grade 1/2 glioma (17%), and CNS sarcoma (6%). Sarcoma and non-glioma histologies, and tumors with biallelic DICER1 mutations or deletions were common in the pediatric population. Mutations occurred throughout DICER1, including missense mutations in the DexD/H-box helicase, DUF283, RNaseIIIa, and RNaseIIIb domains. For patients with grade 3/4 glioma, MGMT methylation (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.16-0.73, p = 0.005), IDH1 R132 mutation (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.41, p = 0.001), and missense mutation in the DexD/H-box helicase domain (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.38, p = 0.003) were independently associated with longer time to ACM on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1 occur in diverse primary CNS tumors, including previously unrecognized grade 3/4 gliomas as the most common histology. While prior studies have described RNaseIIIb hotspot mutations, we document novel mutations in additional DICER1 functional domains. Within the grade 3/4 glioma cohort, missense mutation in the DexD/H-box helicase domain was associated with prolonged survival.