Knowledge and experience of dentists with patients with trigeminal neuralgia: A prospective, cross-sectional survey study.

OBJECTIVE: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and orofacial pain (OFP) patients frequently refer to dentists. It is often confused with odontogenic pain and dental procedures are performed. In this study, the authors aimed to reveal the knowledge and experience of dentists about TN. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that includes dentists who participate in volunteering via an online questionnaire. The questionnaire form contains demographic data, TN treatment, and diagnosis consisting of 18 questions. RESULTS: The data of 229 dentists were examined. Almost 82% of the participants reportedly knew the diagnostic criteria of TN and 61.6% reported that they had previously referred patients with TN. The most frequently confused diagnosis was odontogenic pains (45.9%). CONCLUSION: TN diagnostic criteria should be included more often in the education of dentists. Thus, it is possible to prevent unnecessary dental procedures. There is a need to increase knowledge on this subject with further studies involving dental students.

[Othering in the context of migration: how Others emerge from social categories]. / Othering am Beispiel von Migration: Wie aus sozialen Kategorien die Anderen entstehen.

'Migrants' and 'refugees' are often categorized as Other, in a process called Othering. Using the example of forced migration, we develop a definition of Othering to make it useful for the analysis of health inequalities. We consider Othering as a social process that constructs and classifies differences in such a way that certain groups become socially visible as essential Others. On one hand, the process of Othering operates through a discursive practice that constructs differences, thereby transforming individuals into visible Others. On the other hand, it is based on a power asymmetry that enables the categorization of people, thereby marking them as different.Othering is not solely based on negative attitudes of individuals or groups. Rather, Othering is the result of a broad and historically evolved system of beliefs that gain credibility through power relations. Thus, we understand Othering as a powerful process that goes substantially beyond concepts of discrimination based on mere categorization processes. The concept of Othering stands out from other concepts of inequality by including the epistemic level as a key factor for inequality. Othering not only produces the Other epistemologically, but at the same time establishes a discursive legitimation for the unequal treatment of the Other.Drawing upon our understanding of Othering, we present practice-related findings on the consequences of Othering for the healthcare of 'migrants' and 'refugees'.

Why Othering should be considered in research on health inequalities: Theoretical perspectives and research needs.

•Othering is relevant to public health as an analytical lens that helps to understand the link between minority status and health inequalities.•To investigate health inequalities caused by Othering, it is necessary to include the semantic-symbolic construction of Others.•Othering operates as a discursive practice and occurs on multiple levels.•Research on Othering requires consideration of intersectionality and power structures derived from socially and historically grown hierarchies.•Interventions against Othering require deconstructive concepts - this means deconstructing the institutionalized and embodied normality of the We.

Factors associated with early improvement after intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with early neurological improvement (ENI) in patients who experienced acute ischemic stroke and were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rt-PA), and determine the relationship with the outcome at the first control. METHOD: : This study included 377 patients who were treated with IV rt-PA in Izmir Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between January 2010 and October 2018. ENI was defined as a 4 or more improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the first hour, the twenty-fourth hour and the seventh day when compared to the pretreatment phase. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 score was defined as 'very good outcome'. RESULTS: : The basal NIHSS (p=0.003, p=0.003, p=0.022) was high in the first hour, twenty-fourth hour, and seventh day ENI groups. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level was low in the first- and twenty-fourth-hour ENI groups (p=0.007, p=0.020). Furthermore, admission glucose was low at the twenty-fourth hour and on the seventh day ENI groups (p=0.005, p=0.048). A high infarct volume was observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the twenty-fourth hour and on the seventh day non-ENI groups (p= <0.001, p= <0.001). CONCLUSION: : Management of factors associated with ENI and determination of treatment strategies accordingly are important for obtaining a better clinical outcome. It can help quickly select patients, who, even though they will not respond to rt-PA, may be appropriate candidates for bridging therapy.

Cluster headache: a single tertiary center study.

OBJECT: The characteristics of cluster headache (CH) patients in many countries and the diagnostic and therapeutic approach have been described in several publications, but so far no clinical data have been published from Turkey. MATERIAL METHODS: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that includes all patients who were diagnosed with CH and referred to our headache clinic, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Neurology Department from 1991 to January 2018. RESULTS: We included 114 patients (24 females and 90 males) in our study. The mean age at onset was 31.68 ± 12.72 (range 13-68). Eighty-six (78.18%) patients had episodic cluster headache (ECH) and 24 (21.82%) patients had chronic cluster headache (CCH). The age at onset was significantly higher in the patients with CCH than with ECH (p = 0.002). The most common location was orbitotemporal for both genders. The most common accompanying symptoms were lacrimation (80.73%). The male:female ratio in all patients was 3:7, 3.8:1 in those with CCH and 4:1 in those with ECH. Eighty-nine (87.25%) patients had prophylactic treatment and 60 of them received verapamil. CONCLUSION: In our study, some clinical features of our patients were similar to those of Europe and America or the Asian countries and some of them not. There are regional differences in cluster headache patients. With more awareness of cluster headache and research from many countries, clinical differences can be revealed more objectively in the future.

Correction to: ASPHER statement on racism and health: racism and discrimination obstruct public health's pursuit of health equity.

Authors would like to correct the error in author names spotted in their original publication. Naomi Limaro corrected to Naomi Limaro NATHAN and Rhanjeet Dhonkal corrected to Ranjeet Dhonkal by this correction article.