Off-pump implantation of left ventricular assist device via minimally invasive left thoracotomy: Our single-center experience.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare our experience of left ventricular assist device implantation via minimally invasive left thoracotomy with off-pump versus on-pump technique. Methods: Between June 2013 and April 2020, nine patients (8 males, 1 female; mean age: 47±11.9 years; range, 30 to 61 years) who underwent off-pump left ventricular assist device implantation and nine patients (8 males, 1 female; mean age: 47±11.4 years; range, 29 to 60 years) who underwent on-pump minimally invasive left thoracotomy were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and mid-term results of both groups were evaluated. Results: Outflow graft was anastomosed to the ascending aorta with J-sternotomy in all patients. The median duration of intubation and intensive care unit stay were one (IQR: 1.5) day and eight (IQR: 6.5) days in the off-pump group, respectively and one (IQR: 0) day and seven (IQR: 7) days in the on-pump group, respectively. Intra-aortic balloon pump was needed during the weaning of cardiopulmonary bypass in one (11%) of the patients in both groups. Postoperative right ventricular failure was observed in two (22%) patients in the offpump group who were treated medically and recovered. There was no need for revision due to bleeding or postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenator implantation in either group. In the off-pump group, three patients underwent heart transplantation after median 854 (IQR: 960) days. Three patients died one month, two and four years after implantation. Three patients were still alive with left ventricular assist device and were being uneventfully followed for 365, 400, and 700 days after implantation. Conclusion: Off-pump technique is safe and feasible option for implantation of left ventricular assist device via minimally invasive left thoracotomy.

Relationship Between Preoperative NT-proBNP and Postoperative Adverse Events in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of preoperative NT-proBNP values with postoperative adverse events in patient left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHOD: Forty-six patients (35 males; mean age 49.4 ± 12.9 years) who underwent LVAD implantation between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated in this study. The analysis was made on the relationship between preoperative NT-proBNP and mortality, postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF), postoperative drainage, duration of intubation, and intensive care unit stay, was examined. The optimal NT-proBNP cut-off values for predicting mortality were determined using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the patients were divided into two groups according to the specified cut-off point. RESULT: Median NT-proBNP was higher in patients who died, had postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and early RVF. The median NT-proBNP was 11,103 pg/ml in patients with IABP, and 2943 pg/ml in patients without IABP, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002). The cut-off point for NT-proBNP was found to be 1725.5 pg/ml (Sensitivity:0.929, Specificity:0.688). Accordingly, when the patients were divided into two groups and analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found between preoperative NT-proBNP below or above 1725.5 and postoperative adverse events. There was no statistically significant correlation between preoperative NT-proBNP and postoperative drainage, duration of intubation time, and duration of ICU stay (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Routine monitoring of preoperative NT-proBNP and comparison with postoperative values are important in terms of patient selection, the timing of surgery, follow-up of postoperative adverse events, and improving outcomes in VAD patients.

Does minimally invasive approach reduce risk of infection after ventricular assist device implantation?

BACKGROUND: We analyzed patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) related and specific infection, and aimed to determine whether surgical technique implantation affect the frequency of infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 99 patients who received LVAD at our department between June 2013 and June 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique. Group A (n = 58) was conventional sternotomy (CS) and group B (n = 41) was on-pump minimally invasive left thoracotomy (MILT). Demographics, preoperative risk factors, LVAD infections, surgical incision site, driveline site, and outcomes were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Mean follow up time was 589 ± 480 (31-2171) days. Infection was detected in 34% (41/99) of LVAD patients. Admission to emergency department and intensive care unit (ICU) in last 6 months were significantly higher in MILT group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of driveline exit site infection (CS: 28%, MILT: 27%) (p > 0.05). Seven (17%) patients had infection in the thoracotomy incision site area in the MILT group. The rate of ICU hospitalization in the last 6 months was seen as the only independent risk factor increasing the frequency of infection (R = 0.30; p = 0.016). Survival analysis at 60 days, 1 year and 2 years showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in pump technology and surgical technique, infection is still an important cause of mortality and morbidity.

Midterm Results of Minimally Invasive Left Thoracotomy Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

The aim of the study is to compare outcomes of the patients who underwent HeartMate3 (HM3) implantation with conventional sternotomy (CS) and minimally invasive thoracotomy technique (MILT). From June 2013 to April 2019, 50 patients who underwent isolated HM3 implantation were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the operative technique; of 50 patients, 28 were implanted with CS and 22 with MILT. All patients were evaluated for mortality, need of inotrope, blood product transfusion, intensive care unit stay, time on mechanical ventilation, and postoperative right ventricular failure. Primary outcomes were early mortality and occurrence of adverse events. Patients characteristics were similar; preoperative central venous pressure (CVP) and the ratio of CVP to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (CVP/PCWP) were significantly higher in the MILT group versus the CS group (p < 0.05). Intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the MILT group (p < 0.05). Incidence of bleeding requiring exploratory sternotomy and postoperative drainage on the first postoperative day were statistically higher in the CS group (p < 0.05). Right ventricular failure was higher in the CS group but was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). There was no significant difference in long-term adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference between the groups (p = 0.66). The HM3 assist system can be successfully implanted with the MILT technique, which has proved to be safe and reproducible and yields good clinical outcomes.

Prediction of right ventricular failure after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Prediction of this clinical situation in LVAD patients with different clinical scores is still an enigma. The aim of this study is to analyze the predictive power of clinical parameters and risk scores and their combinations to discriminate RVF after LVAD implantation. METHODS: A retrospective, single center review of 71 patients who underwent continuous flow-LVAD implantation between September 2013 and September 2016, was performed. RVF was defined as need for RVAD and/or administration of inotropic agents more than 14 days after LVAD implantation. Patients with and without RVF were divided into two groups and predictive power of the nine parameters (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), Michigan score, Pennsylvania score, central venous pressure/pulmonary artery wedge pressure ratio (CVP/PCWP), and right ventricular stroke work index, pulmonary artery pulsatility index, CRITT score, ALMA score, European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support (EUROMACS) right heart failure model and their combinations were analyzed to predict postoperative RVF. RESULTS: Of 71 patients, 21 had RVF after implantation. For the variables that can be used to discriminate between RVF and non-RVF groups, the diagnostic performance of the best cut-off points and tests was obtained using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Discrimination analysis was performed to determine the combinations of tests. For all single risk scores and parameters; the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was below 0.7 which is considered to be a poor level of discrimination except EUROMACS score (AUC: 0.789, P < .001) and CRITT score (AUC: 0.739, P = .004). AUC for the combination of TAPSE and Pennsylvania score was 0.722, combination of Michigan and Pennsylvania scores represented AUC of 0.732 in the analysis. The combination of TAPSE + Pennsylvania score was found to have the highest sensitivity (85%), whereas TAPSE + Michigan score + CVP/PCWP appeared as the most specific (97%) combination. CONCLUSION: EUROMACS and CRITT scores predict RVF with high discrimination after LVAD implantation. Although, no other single test predicts RVF ideally, combination of risk scores and parameters discriminate RVF acceptably.

Cerebrovascular events in children on intracorporeal continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) are used more frequently in the pediatric population. One of the major complications of CF-LVAD is cerebrovascular events (CVEs). Limited information is available on this complication in pediatric patients. We hereby present our experience on CVEs in children under CF-LVAD support in our institution. A retrospective, single center review of 21 patients younger than 19 years of age who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between June 2014 and September 2018 was performed. Patients on biventricular support and extracorporeal devices were excluded. Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs)-ischemic or hemorrhagic-were investigated. CVE was confirmed by brain computed tomographic scan. Of 21 pediatric patients, 11 were male. Mean BSA was 1.05 ± 0.41 m2 and mean age was 11.05 ± 4.07 years. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the leading cause of heart failure. The patients were implanted with HeartWare hVAD (n = 19), HeartMate II (n = 1), and HeartMate 3 (n = 1). Mean support time was 421 ± 448 (18-1460) days. Target international normalized ratio was between 2.5 and 3.0. Nine (43%) patients underwent transplantation, one patient recovered with subsequent device explantation. Four (17%) patients were still on support. One patient (5%) died in the early postoperative period and six (28%) patients died on VAD support after a mean duration of 194 days. There were overall five cerebral hemorrhagic strokes in four patients (0.2 events per patient-year). CVA occurred between 250 and 1320 days (mean 600 days). No ischemic stroke was documented. Only one (20%) patient died after hemorrhagic stroke; the other three patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital with minor sequelae. Incidence of CVE in children on CF-LVAD is relatively low compared with adults on VAD and severity of stroke is milder than adult population.

Inhaled Iloprost and Oral Sildenafil Combination Therapy: Is it a Chance for Heart Transplant Candidacy?

BACKGROUND: Severe pulmonary hypertension is a risk factor for mortality, due to increased postoperative right ventricular failure, in a heart transplant patient. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in heart transplant candidates can be reduced using a left ventricular assist device or medical therapy. This study analysed the effect of inhaled iloprost and oral sildenafil combination therapy (ilo-sil) on pulmonary haemodynamic parameters in patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: Between May 2011 and April 2014, 25 patients who were unresponsive to reversibility test and PVR >3.5 Wood units (WU) during right heart catheterisation were included in this study. After 6 months of oral sildenafil (3 × 20 mg/day) and inhaled iloprost (6 × 5 µg/day) combination therapy, second right heart catheterisations were performed and eligibility for heart transplant was evaluated. RESULTS: Repeat right heart catheterisation revealed that there was a significant decrease in the PVR from 5.4 ± 1.6 WU to 3.54 ± 2.5 WU (p<0.001), with trans-pulmonary gradient from 13.7 ± 5.6 to 11.46 ± 6.64 (p=0.042), and mean cardiac index (CI) increasing non-significantly from 1.45 ± 0.51 L/min/m2 to 1.82 ± 0.60 (p=0.157). The mean sPAP was initially 57.54 ± 14.79 mmHg and fell to 52.93 ± 16.83 mm Hg (p=0.03). Twenty (20) (80%) patients were enrolled in the waiting list since their PVR values decreased to <3.5 WU. Of these 20 patients, one had undergone heart transplant and four were bridged to transplant with mechanical circulatory support devices. CONCLUSIONS: After a decrease in PVR with ilo-sil combination therapy for patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, these patients may become candidates for heart transplant without bearing additional risk. Ilo-sil combination therapy could be a viable option with which to evaluate the reversibility of PVR.