Factors Associated with Poor Mental Health in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the prevalence of poor mental health in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and its associated factors in a large sample of patients from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) study from around the globe. METHODS: IMAS is a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) that includes 5557 unselected patients with axSpA worldwide. Mental health was evaluated by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the cut-off point for poor mental health was set at 3. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relationships between the investigated factors and poor mental health (GHQ-12≥3) in patients with axSpA (n=4335). RESULTS: Of 5351 patients, the mean of GHQ-12 was 4.7 and 59.4% were having poor mental health, being 69.9% in South Africa, 63.7% in Latin America, 60.8% in Europe, 54.3% in North America and 51.8% in Asia. Overall, 40.5% and 37.2% of patients experienced anxiety and depression. The factors associated with poor mental health were younger age (OR=0.99), female gender (OR=1.16), being on sick leave or unemployed (OR=1.63), non-physical activity (OR=1.22), smoking (OR=1.20), higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] (OR=1.42), functional limitation (OR=1.02) and shorter symptoms duration (OR=0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Globally, 6 in 10 patients with axSpA had poor mental health, with a higher proportion in South Africa and lower in Asia. The factors associated with poor mental health include domains such as younger age, female gender, employment difficulties, harmful habits, disease burden and symptom duration. A holistic management approach to axSpA should encompass both physical and mental health.

Regional Differences in Diagnosis Journey and Healthcare Utilization: Results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

INTRODUCTION: To assess differences in the diagnosis journey and access to care in a large sample of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) from around the world, included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). METHODS: IMAS was a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5557 unselected patients with axSpA from 27 countries. Across five worldwide geographic regions, the patient journey until diagnosis and healthcare utilization in the last 12 months prior to survey were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable linear regression was used to analyze factors associated with higher healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Of 5557 participants in IMAS, the diagnosis took an average of 7.4 years, requiring more than two visits to HCPs (77.7% general practitioner and 51.3% rheumatologist), and more than two diagnostic tests [67.5% performed human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27), 64.2% x-ray, and 59.1% magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans]. North America and Europe were the regions with the highest number of healthcare professional (HCP) visits for diagnosis, while the lowest number of visits was in the Asian region. In the previous 12 months, 94.9% (n = 5272) used at least one healthcare resource, with an average of 29 uses per year. The regions with the highest healthcare utilization were Latin America, Europe, and North America. In the multiple linear regression, factors associated with higher number of healthcare utilization were younger age (b =  - 0.311), female gender (b = 7.736), higher disease activity (b = 1.461), poorer mental health (b = 0.624), greater functional limitation (b = 0.300), greater spinal stiffness (b = 1.527), and longer diagnostic delay (b = 0.104). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of axSpA usually takes more than two visits to HCPs and at least 7 years. After diagnosis, axSpA is associated with frequent healthcare resource use. Younger age, female gender, higher disease activity, poorer mental health, greater functional limitation, greater spinal stiffness, and longer diagnostic delay are associated with higher healthcare utilization. Europe and North America use more HCP visits and diagnostic tests before and after diagnosis than the other regions.

International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS): results from the perspective of 5557 patients from 27 countries around the globe.

BACKGROUND: The International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) is a global initiative aimed to assess the impact and burden of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the unmet needs from the patient's perspective. METHOD: IMAS is a collaboration between the Axial Spondyloarthritis International Federation (ASIF), the University of Seville, Novartis Pharma AG and steered by a scientific committee. IMAS collected information through an online cross-sectional survey (2017-2022) from unselected patients with axSpA from Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America and Africa who completed a comprehensive questionnaire containing over 120 items. RESULTS: 5557 patients with axSpA participated in IMAS. Mean age was 43.9 ±12.8 years, 55.4% were female, 46.2% had a university education and 51.0% were employed. The mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 ±9.0 years (median: 4.0), and the mean symptom duration was 17.1 ±13.3 years. 75.0% of patients had active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥4), and 59.4% reported poor mental health (12-item General Health Questionnaire ≥3). In the year before the survey, patients had visited primary care physicians 4.6 times and the rheumatologist 3.6 times. 78.6% had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ever, 48.8% biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 43.6% conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients's greatest fear was disease progression (55.9%), while the greatest hope was to be able to relieve pain (54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: IMAS shows the global profile of patients with axSpA, highlighting unmet needs, lengthy delays in diagnosis and high burden of disease in patients with axSpA worldwide. This global information will enable more detailed investigations to obtain evidence on the critical issues that matter to patients around the world to improve their care and quality of life.

Regional differences in clinical phenotype of axial spondyloarthritis: results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

OBJECTIVES: To explore differences in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical phenotype around the world in a large sample of patients included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). METHOD: IMAS was a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5,557 unselected axSpA patients from 27 countries. We analysed across five geographic regions the age at symptom onset, diagnostic delay, gender, HLA-B27, family history, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, presence of comorbidities, disease activity (BASDAI), level of spinal stiffness, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 5,557 IMAS participants, 3,493 were from Europe, 770 from North America, 600 from Asia, 548 from Latin America, and 146 from South Africa. Age at symptom onset ranged between 25-30 years and was higher in Latin America. Diagnostic delay was longest in South Africa and lowest in Asia. The lowest HLA-B27 positivity was observed in Latin America and the highest in Asia. Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were the lowest in Europe. Mean disease activity (BASDAI) was 5.4, with highest values in South Africa and lowest in Asia. Most of the patients had used NSAIDs for their condition and less than half had ever taken csDMARDS; both were more frequent in Latin America and South Africa. Almost half of the patients had ever taken bDMARDs, more frequent being in the Americas. CONCLUSIONS: There is great heterogeneity of axSpA clinical phenotype presentation around the world. AxSpA manifests differently in different regions, so further understanding of these differences of phenotypes is needed to achieve early diagnosis and initiation of optimal disease treatment in axSpA in the different regions.

Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of an Immunoassay for Estimating Immunogenicity of Infliximab and Etanercept in Indian Population.

BACKGROUND / OBJECTIVES: Biologic anti-TNFs in India have improved the patient management. Significant proportions of patients lose response over time or do not respond. Possible explanations are suboptimal trough anti-TNFa concentrations or antibodies to anti-TNFs. The aim of this project was to set up and standardize an independent laboratory to test immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologics (infliximab and etanercept). METHODS: Three rheumatologists piloted this project approved by independent ethics committee and carried out in compliance with ICH/GCP guidelines. Pfizer supplied immunogenicity kits (Promonitor® - ELISA) to the independent laboratory (SRL labs). After informed consent, blood (5 mL) was collected before infusion of infliximab (n=8) or injection of etanercept (n=8). RESULTS: Mean age of 16 patients was 42.06 ± 12.89 years. While 4 patients tested negative for infliximab, one patient tested low positive and 3 patients were positive. Anti-infliximab antibody was detected in 1/8 patient (12.5%) and the blood level of infliximab was negligible. DISCUSSION: Anti-infliximab antibodies are found in 12%-44% of patients vis-a`-vis anti-etanercept antibodies (0%-18%). Anti-etanercept antibodies are without apparent effect on effectiveness or adverse events. When anti-TNFa are used, therapeutic drug monitoring is of help for optimal clinical outcomes. It might be more cost effective to adjust anti TNFa dosages according to serum drug concentrations. Clinicians should have access to immunogenicity testing facility in India. The results of the study were as per the observed percentages across the world. CONCLUSIONS: This study met its objective of setting up and standardizing an independent laboratory for immunogenicity testing of anti-TNF biologics in India.

Leprosy & gangrene: a rare association; role of anti phospholipid antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy still remains an important public health problem for many parts of the world. An association of gangrene with leprosy is a rare one & can have a number of causative mechanisms. We present a case with Leprosy & gangrene with positive anti phopholipid antibody titers. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old non-diabetic, non-hypertensive lady presented with 2 months history of progressive gangrene of bilateral toes. She was found to have madarosis & hypopigmented, hypoaesthetic macular lesions on the upper limb & thighs. Bilateral ulnar & popliteal nerves were thickened. A skin biopsy of the lesions revealed borderline tuberculoid leprosy, slit skin smears revealed a bacteriological index of 1+. She did not have any evidence of thromboembolic episode or atherosclerosis. ACLA was positive at presentation & also on another occasion 6 weeks later. ACLAs were of the IgM type on both occasions. Lupus Anticoagulant & beta2 GPI antibody were negative. DOPPLER of the lower limb arteries did not reveal any abnormality. Patient was successfully treated with multi-drug antileprotics & anticoagulants. CONCLUSION: Infectious APLAs should be recognized as a cause of thrombosis in Leprosy. Appropriate anticoagulation can salvage limb function.