RESUMEN
Sex and gender-biological and social constructs-significantly impact the prevalence of protective and risk factors, influencing the burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD; amyloid beta and tau) and other pathologies (e.g., cerebrovascular disease) which ultimately shape cognitive trajectories. Understanding the interplay of these factors is central to understanding resilience and resistance mechanisms explaining maintained cognitive function and reduced pathology accumulation in aging and AD. In this narrative review, the ADDRESS! Special Interest Group (Alzheimer's Association) adopted a multidisciplinary approach to provide the foundations and recommendations for future research into sex- and gender-specific drivers of resilience, including a sex/gender-oriented review of risk factors, genetics, AD and non-AD pathologies, brain structure and function, and animal research. We urge the field to adopt a sex/gender-aware approach to resilience to advance our understanding of the intricate interplay of biological and social determinants and consider sex/gender-specific resilience throughout disease stages. HIGHLIGHTS: Sex differences in resilience to cognitive decline vary by age and cognitive status. Initial evidence supports sex-specific distinctions in brain pathology. Findings suggest sex differences in the impact of pathology on cognition. There is a sex-specific change in resilience in the transition to clinical stages. Gender and sex factors warrant study: modifiable, immune, inflammatory, and vascular.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging-based brain-age delta has been shown to be a mediator linking cardiovascular risk factors to cognitive function. We aimed to assess the mediating role of brain-age delta in the association between modifiable risk factors of dementia and longitudinal cognitive decline in middle-aged and older individuals who are asymptomatic, stratified by Alzheimer's disease pathology. We also explored whether the mediation effect is specific to cognitive domain. METHODS: In this cohort study, we included participants from the ALFA+ cohort aged between 45 years and 65 years who were cognitively unimpaired and who had available structural MRI, cerebrospinal fluid ß-amyloid (Aß)42 and Aß40 measurements obtained within 1 year of each other, modifiable risk factors assessment, and cognitive evaluation over 3 years. Participants were recruited from the Barcelonaßeta Brain Research Center (Barcelona, Spain). Included individuals underwent a first assessment between Oct 25, 2016, and Jan 28, 2020, and a follow-up cognitive assessment 3·28 (SD 0·27) years later. We computed brain-age delta and composites of different cognitive function domains (preclinical Alzheimer's cognitive composite [PACC], attention, executive function, episodic memory, visual processing, and language). We used partial least squares path modelling to explore mediation effects in the associations between modifiable risk factors (including cardiovascular, mental health, mood, metabolic or endocrine history, and alcohol use) and changes in cognitive composites. To assess the role of Alzheimer's disease pathology, we computed separate models for Aß-negative and Aß-positive individuals. FINDINGS: Of the 419 participants enrolled in ALFA+, 302 met our inclusion criteria, of which 108 participants were classified as Aß-positive and 194 as Aß-negative. In Aß-positive individuals, brain-age delta partially mediated (percent mediation proportion 15·73% [95% CI 14·22-16·66]) the association between modifiable risk factors and decline in overall cognition (across cognitive domains). Brain-age delta fully mediated (mediation proportion 28·03% [26·25-29·21]) the effect of modifiable risk factors on the PACC, wherein increased values for risk factors correlated with an older brain-age delta, and, consequently, an older brain-age delta was linked to greater PACC decline. This effect appears to be primarily driven by memory decline. Mediation was not significant in Aß-negative individuals (3·52% [0·072-4·17]) on PACC, although path coefficients were not significantly different from those in the Aß-positive group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that brain-age delta captures the association between modifiable risk factors and longitudinal cognitive decline in middle-aged and older people. In asymptomatic middle-aged and older individuals who are Aß-positive, the pathology might be the strongest driver of cognitive decline, whereas the effect of risk factors is smaller. Our results highlight the potential of brain-age delta as an objective outcome measure for preventive lifestyle interventions targeting cognitive decline. FUNDING: La Caixa Foundation, the TriBEKa Imaging Platform, and the Universities and Research Secretariat of the Catalan Government. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Disfunción Cognitiva , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Longitudinales , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Neuroimagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Along with the known effects of stress on brain structure and inflammatory processes, increasing evidence suggest a role of chronic stress in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated the association of accumulated stressful life events (SLEs) with AD pathologies, neuroinflammation, and gray matter (GM) volume among cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals at heightened risk of AD. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort study included 1,290 CU participants (aged 48-77) from the ALFA cohort with SLE, lumbar puncture (n = 393), and/or structural magnetic resonance imaging (n = 1,234) assessments. Using multiple regression analyses, we examined the associations of total SLEs with cerebrospinal fluid (1) phosphorylated (p)-tau181 and Aß1-42/1-40 ratio, (2) interleukin 6 (IL-6), and (3) GM volumes voxel-wise. Further, we performed stratified and interaction analyses with sex, history of psychiatric disease, and evaluated SLEs during specific life periods. RESULTS: Within the whole sample, only childhood and midlife SLEs, but not total SLEs, were associated with AD pathophysiology and neuroinflammation. Among those with a history of psychiatric disease SLEs were associated with higher p-tau181 and IL-6. Participants with history of psychiatric disease and men, showed lower Aß1-42/1-40 with higher SLEs. Participants with history of psychiatric disease and women showed reduced GM volumes in somatic regions and prefrontal and limbic regions, respectively. INTERPRETATION: We did not find evidence supporting the association of total SLEs with AD, neuroinflammation, and atrophy pathways. Instead, the associations appear to be contingent on events occurring during early and midlife, sex and history of psychiatric disease. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:1058-1068.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Péptidos beta-Amiloides , Encéfalo , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias , Proteínas tau , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Cohortes , Encéfalo/patología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias/patología , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/metabolismo , Proteínas tau/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estrés Psicológico , Sustancia Gris/patología , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Interleucina-6/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Fragmentos de Péptidos/líquido cefalorraquídeoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic may worsen the mental health of people reporting subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and therefore their clinical prognosis. We aimed to investigate the association between the intensity of SCD and anxious/depressive symptoms during confinement and the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Two hundred fifty cognitively unimpaired participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and SCD-Questionnaire (SCD-Q) and underwent amyloid-ß positron emission tomography imaging with [18F] flutemetamol (N = 205) on average 2.4 (± 0.8) years before the COVID-19 confinement. During the confinement, participants completed the HADS, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and an ad hoc questionnaire on worries (access to primary products, self-protection materials, economic situation) and lifestyle changes (sleep duration, sleep quality, eating habits). We investigated stress-related measurements, worries, and lifestyle changes in relation to SCD. We then conducted an analysis of covariance to investigate the association of SCD-Q with HADS scores during the confinement while controlling for pre-confinement anxiety/depression scores and demographics. Furthermore, we introduced amyloid-ß positivity, PSS, and BRS in the models and performed mediation analyses to explore the mechanisms explaining the association between SCD and anxiety/depression. RESULTS: In the whole sample, the average SCD-Q score was 4.1 (± 4.4); 70 (28%) participants were classified as SCD, and 26 (12.7%) were amyloid-ß-positive. During the confinement, participants reporting SCD showed higher PSS (p = 0.035) but not BRS scores (p = 0.65) than those that did not report SCD. No differences in worries or lifestyle changes were observed. Higher SCD-Q scores showed an association with greater anxiety/depression scores irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression levels (p = 0.002). This association was not significant after introducing amyloid-ß positivity and stress-related variables in the model (p = 0.069). Amyloid-ß positivity and PSS were associated with greater HADS irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression scores (p = 0.023; p < 0.001). The association of SCD-Q with HADS was mediated by PSS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Higher intensity of SCD, amyloid-ß positivity, and stress perception showed independent associations with anxious/depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 confinement irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression levels. The association of SCD intensity with anxiety/depression was mediated by stress perception, suggesting stress regulation as a potential intervention to reduce affective symptomatology in the SCD population in the face of stressors.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disfunción Cognitiva , Péptidos beta-Amiloides , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , PercepciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increased anxious-depressive symptomatology is observed in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer disease (AD), which may accelerate disease progression. We investigated whether ß-amyloid, cortical thickness in medial temporal lobe structures, neuroinflammation, and sociodemographic factors were associated with greater anxious-depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 confinement. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included cognitively unimpaired older adults from the Alzheimer's and Families cohort, the majority with a family history of sporadic AD. Participants performed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) during the COVID-19 confinement. A subset had available retrospective (on average: 2.4 years before) HADS assessment, amyloid [18F] flutemetamol PET and structural MRI scans, and CSF markers of neuroinflammation (interleukin-6 [IL-6], triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels). We performed multivariable linear regression models to investigate the associations of prepandemic AD-related biomarkers and sociodemographic factors with HADS scores during the confinement. We further performed an analysis of covariance to adjust by participants' prepandemic anxiety-depression levels. Finally, we explored the role of stress and lifestyle changes (sleep patterns, eating, drinking, smoking habits, and medication use) on the tested associations and performed sex-stratified analyses. RESULTS: We included 921 (254 with AD biomarkers) participants. ß-amyloid positivity (B = 3.73; 95% CI = 1.1 to 6.36; p = 0.006), caregiving (B = 1.37; 95% CI 0.24-2.5; p = 0.018), sex (women: B = 1.95; 95% CI 1.1-2.79; p < 0.001), younger age (B = -0.12; 95% CI -0.18 to -0.052; p < 0.001), and lower education (B = -0.16; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.042; p = 0.008) were associated with greater anxious-depressive symptoms during the confinement. Considering prepandemic anxiety-depression levels, we further observed an association between lower levels of CSF IL-6 (B = -5.11; 95% CI -10.1 to -0.13; p = 0.044) and greater HADS scores. The results were independent of stress-related variables and lifestyle changes. Stratified analysis revealed that the associations were mainly driven by women. DISCUSSION: Our results link AD-related pathophysiology and neuroinflammation with greater anxious-depressive symptomatology during the COVID-19-related confinement, notably in women. AD pathophysiology may increase neuropsychiatric symptomatology in response to stressors. This association may imply a worse clinical prognosis in people at risk for AD after the pandemic and thus deserves to be considered by clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02485730.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , COVID-19 , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/metabolismo , Ansiedad , Biomarcadores , Depresión , Femenino , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , Humanos , Interleucina-6 , Masculino , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proteínas tau/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms driving primary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PPMS/RRMS) phenotypes are unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies support the involvement of gray matter (GM) in the degeneration, highlighting its damage as an early feature of both phenotypes. However, the role of GM microstructure is unclear, calling for new methods for its decryption. PURPOSE: To investigate the morphometric and microstructural GM differences between PPMS and RRMS to characterize GM tissue degeneration using MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Forty-five PPMS (26 females) and 45 RRMS (32 females) patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T scanner. Three-dimensional (3D) fast field echo T1-weighted (T1-w), 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) T2-w, 3D TSE fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and spin echo-echo planar imaging diffusion MRI (dMRI). ASSESSMENT: T1-w and dMRI data were employed for providing information about morphometric and microstructural features, respectively. For dMRI, both diffusion tensor imaging and 3D simple harmonics oscillator based reconstruction and estimation models were used for feature extraction from a predefined set of regions. A support vector machine (SVM) was used to perform patients' classification relying on all these measures. STATISTICAL TESTS: Differences between MS phenotypes were investigated using the analysis of covariance and statistical tests (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: All the dMRI indices showed significant microstructural alterations between the considered MS phenotypes, for example, the mode and the median of the return to the plane probability in the hippocampus. Conversely, thalamic volume was the only morphometric feature significantly different between the two MS groups. Ten of the 12 features retained by the selection process as discriminative across the two MS groups regarded the hippocampus. The SVM classifier using these selected features reached an accuracy of 70% and a precision of 69%. DATA CONCLUSION: We provided evidence in support of the ability of dMRI to discriminate between PPMS and RRMS, as well as highlight the central role of the hippocampus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.