Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Minerva Surg ; 79(3): 303-308, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the clinical outcomes of surgical interventions performed for the management of colonoscopy-related perforations and to compare these outcomes with those of matched colorectal surgeries performed in elective and emergency settings. METHODS: We included patients with endoscopic colonic perforation who underwent surgical intervention from the 2014-2017 National Surgery Quality Improvement Program participant use data colorectal targeted procedure file. The primary outcome in this study was short term surgical morbidity and mortality. Patients (group 1) were matched with 1:2 ratio to control patients undergoing same surgical interventions for other indications on an elective (group 2) or emergency basis (group 3). Bivariate analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables between the three groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the surgical indication and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients were included. The average age of the patients was 66.5±13.6 with female gender predominance (381, 64.6%) The majority of patients underwent open colectomy (365, 61.9%) while the rest had suturing (140, 23.7%) and laparoscopic colectomy (85, 14.4%). Overall mortality occurred in 4.1% and no statistically significant difference in mortality was found between the three techniques (P=0.468). Composite morbidity occurred in 163 patients (27.6%). It was significantly lower in laparoscopic colectomy (14.1%) compared to 30.2% and 29.4% in open colectomy and suturing approaches (P=0.014). Patients undergoing colectomy for iatrogenic colonic perforation had less mortality, infection rates and sepsis, as well as bleeding episodes compared to those who had colectomy on an emergent basis. Outcomes were comparable between the former group and patients undergoing elective colectomy for other indications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of colonoscopy related perforations is safe and effective with outcomes that are similar to that of patients undergoing elective colectomy.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colonoscopía , Perforación Intestinal , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Colon/cirugía , Colon/lesiones , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA