Condylar Resorption After Orthognathic Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors With a Proposed Algorithm of Treatment.

This study aimed to critically reanalyze systematic reviews of patients suffering from condylar resorption (CR) and summarize the current scientific pieces of evidence with a focus on a possible relationship between CR and orthognathic surgery (OS). The work followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol" guidelines and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42020168660). The search strategy produced 143 articles. After reading the abstracts, 113 articles were excluded, and the full-text articles in English of the remaining 30 studies were separately examined for eligibility by 2 authors, with 20 of them being excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 10 systematic reviews were processed for critical evaluation. Young female patients with a high mandibular plane angle, diminished posterior facial height, posteriorly inclined condylar neck, and a counter-clockwise jaw rotation, are more likely to develop CR after OS. The most common procedure associated with CR in the included systematic reviews was the bimaxillary OS followed by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Hence, extreme caution and surgical modification should be used in these high-risk conditions. There is still a need for more evidence on the risks of OS or iatrogenic factors during the fixation of various osteosynthesis devices because it is still inconclusive and requires further justification.

Pseudoaneurysms and Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and a Proposed Algorithm of Treatment.

This study aimed to gather existing evidence regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of pseudoaneurysms (PA) after orthognathic surgery, identify the common blood vessels involved in PA, and propose a treatment algorithm based on current evidence. The protocol for this study was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under the registration number CRD42020205479. Although these are rare, oral and maxillofacial surgeons should consider PA as a possible diagnosis, specifically in the maxillary artery of patients with epistaxis, severe facial edema, and swelling following LeFort I osteotomy.

Maxillofacial trauma in the gulf countries: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The objective of this review was to determine the prevalence, major causative factors and the most common sites of Maxillofacial Trauma in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. METHODS: All articles that were published in the English language in the databases such as Google Scholar, EBSCO, PubMed, NCBI, Medline, COCHRANE, ELSEVIER and SCOPUS were reviewed for MFT from GCC during the last 23 years. RESULTS: A total of 19,151 patients (16,567 males and 2584 females) (86-14%) with an age range between 0 and 97 years were included in the study. In all of the Gulf countries males outnumber females in terms of maxillofacial injuries with a ratio of 6.4:1. The mandible was the most common site of trauma followed by the maxilla. Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) was the most common cause of injury in the GCC followed by falls. CONCLUSION: Maxillofacial injuries are highly prevalent, distributed among the Gulf countries, and is mainly caused by RTAs especially among males who are highly prone to MFT in the gulf. The reasons are due to lack of road safety culture and weak enactment of traffic legislation, other possible factors include intrinsic car safety features, high speed driving and the amount/use of highways in these societies.