Understanding information (in)equity: influencing factors and medical information's role in bridging the gap.

Medical Information in the pharmaceutical industry involves the creation and dissemination of evidence-based scientific medical content in response to questions about medicines and therapy areas for patients and healthcare professionals. Health information equity can be broadly defined as the distribution of health information in a way that is accessible and understandable to all users, allowing them to benefit and reach their full potential for health. Ideally, this information would be made available to all those in need across the globe. However, as demonstrated by the COVID-19 pandemic, widespread health discrepancies exist. The World Health Organization defines health inequity as differences in health status or in the distribution of health resources between different population groups. Health inequities are influenced by the social conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. This article explains select key factors influencing health information inequity and addresses opportunities where Medical Information departments can make a difference to improve global public health.

The Medical Information Scientific Process: Define, Research, Evaluate, Synthesize, and Share (DRESS).

Medical information (MI) professionals are primarily responsible for researching and responding to unsolicited requests for information on their company's product(s). In an effort to set a standard for quality, the Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI) created a code of practice for the provision of medical information to healthcare professionals. This code introduced the term "MI science skills" to describe the expertise required to perform the duties of an MI professional. These skills can be summarized by the acronym DRESS. In order to effectively and efficiently respond to an unsolicited request for information, the MI professional essentially follows five steps: define the question, research the topic, evaluate the evidence, synthesize a response, and share the answer. As this approach mirrors the scientific process for data generation, MI scientist may be a more apt description for this role. This paper explains the rationale behind the term MI scientist and the skills associated with each component of the DRESS approach.

Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI) Benchmark Study: Trends, Drivers, Success Factors, and Value of Globalization in Medical Information.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, biopharmaceutical companies have been progressively establishing global frameworks across their capabilities. It is well recognized that the Medical Information (MI) department is a key externally facing function that needs to maintain a consistent focus on optimizing its capabilities of addressing product medical inquiries worldwide. METHODS: In the United States, a consortium named Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information, phactMI, a collaboration of pharmaceutical company MI departments dedicated to supporting health care professionals in their commitment to provide quality patient care, has provided a forum to benchmark and share best practices across the companies. In May 2017, phactMI conducted a survey inclusive of 25 biopharmaceutical companies to gain insight into the globalization of respective MI departments and relevant trends. RESULTS: We found increased trends in various aspects of globalization across large, mid, and small size companies, and identified key drivers for success. Overall, 16 of the 25 companies had globalized their MI department, 5 had only partially globalized, and the remaining 4 had not globalized. CONCLUSION: The findings of this survey will further help inform the MI community as to globalization approaches for a successful outcome.

A Theory on the Relativity of Factors Impacting the Utilization of Medical Information Services From the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Health care providers have many options for obtaining answers to their questions about pharmaceutical products. These options include drug information curators and aggregators such as ePocrates, WebMD, and Wikipedia, as well as professional journals. However, drug information obtained directly from a pharmaceutical company is arguably the best source of information regarding that company's medicine. This is because medical information (MI) professionals from the pharmaceutical industry have the product expertise, technical skills, and access to relevant information that enable current, evidence-based, and scientifically accurate information to be provided. Further, it is reasonable to assume that "good" information leads to better patient decisions and therefore better patient outcomes. Several factors are implicated in the use of a pharmaceutical company's medical information resource. These factors include, but are not limited to, awareness of the availability of the resource, ease of access, and trust of the information. In this paper, the authors discuss the relevance of these factors and propose an integrated relational theory (referred to as the "MI Theory of Relativity") to model the utilization and value of a medical information service.

SNRIs in the management of acute major depressive disorder.

Remission of a patient's index major depressive episode is essential in preventing a recurrent or chronic depressive course. Once remission is established, the subsequent goal is to maintain remission and prevent a relapse of the episode with a minimum of 4 to 9 months of continuation treatment. Common belief suggests that all antidepressants have equivalent efficacy when measured by remission, but this may be a misconception based on limitations in current clinical trial methods. Furthermore, major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex illness with a variety of co-occurring somatic and often painful symptoms. In addition, increasing evidence suggests that, in some depressed patients, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) may provide benefits of treating a broader range of target symptoms than single-acting agents, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Given the available evidence and the importance of remission, the pendulum has swung to consider using agents with dual reuptake inhibition (e.g., SNRIs) as standard and initial treatment for depression.

Treatment of pain syndromes with venlafaxine.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are often accompanied by chronic painful symptoms. Examples of such symptoms are backache, headache, gastrointestinal pain, and joint pain. In addition, pain generally not associated with major depression or an anxiety disorder, such as peripheral neuropathic pain (e.g., diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia), cancer pain, and fibromyalgia, can be challenging for primary care providers to treat. Antidepressants that block reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine, such as the tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline), have been used to treat pain syndromes in patients with or without comorbid MDD or GAD. Venlafaxine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been safe and effective in animal models, healthy human volunteers, and patients for treatment of various pain syndromes. The use of venlafaxine for treatment of pain associated with MDD or GAD, neuropathic pain, headache, fibromyalgia, and postmastectomy pain syndrome is reviewed. Currently, no antidepressants, including venlafaxine, are approved for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. Additional randomized, controlled trials are necessary to fully elucidate the role of venlafaxine in the treatment of chronic pain.