Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862300

RESUMEN

The Asociación Española de Pancreatología (AESPANC), Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG), and Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) have developed a consensus document on the standards and recommendations they consider essential for the organization of pancreas units (PUs) within gastroenterology services (GSs) in order to conduct their activities in an efficient, high-quality manner. The consensus document defines PUs and lays down standards relating to their organization, structure, service portfolio, processes, and teaching and research activities. Standards have been categorized as mandatory (requirements to be met to qualify for certification by the scientific societies responsible for the standards) or recommendations. Standards should be updated at most within five years based on the experience gained in Spanish PUs and the advance of knowledge regarding pancreas disease. Development of health outcome indicators, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), is considered a relevant challenge, as is evidence on the association of PU structure and activity standards with health outcomes.

2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 1162024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835233

RESUMEN

The Asociación Española de Pancreatología (AESPANC), Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG), and Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) have developed a consensus document on the standards and recommendations they consider essential for the organization of pancreas units (PUs) within gastroenterology services (GSs) in order to conduct their activities in an efficient, high-quality manner. The consensus document defines PUs and lays down standards relating to their organization, structure, service portfolio, processes, and teaching and research activities. Standards have been categorized as mandatory (requirements to be met to qualify for certification by the scientific societies responsible for the standards) or recommendations. Standards should be updated at most within five years based on the experience gained in Spanish PUs and the advance of knowledge regarding pancreas disease. Development of health outcome indicators, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), is considered a relevant challenge, as is evidence on the association of PU structure and activity standards with health outcomes.

3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 115(11): 636-643, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37906059

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: the COVID-19 pandemic had a strong impact on the healthcare model. The Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) offered gastroenterology care units (UAAD) an instrument (EFIC_AD) to record and analyze their efficacy and efficiency. Thus, the impact of the pandemic on the activity of UAAD was assessed. METHODS: A descriptive study, based on the EFIC_AD registry for the period 2019-2021, of activity regarding admissions, clinic visits, and endoscopic as well as non-endoscopic tests, and endoscopy room performance. RESULTS: data were collected from up to 42 hospitals (22 with ≥ 500 beds). Overall, activity during 2020 compared to 2019 decreased by 12.30 % for admissions and 40 % for pH-metries (16.70 % for new clinic visits; 14.34 % for referrals from primary care; 24.70 % for gastroscopies; 32.50 % for colonoscopies; 31.00 % for endoscopic ultrasounds; 18.20 % for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs); 38.00 % for manometries; 23.60 % for abdominal ultrasounds; 36.17 % for liver transient elastographies [Fibroscan®]). The levels achieved during 2019 were not fully recovered during 2021 except for digestive motility studies, and virtually for endoscopy room performance rate (88.15 % in 2019; 67.77 % in 2020; 85.93 % in 2021). CONCLUSIONS: during 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic led to a markedly decreased in specific activities at UAAD, which was not fully recovered in 2021 despite endoscopy room performance return to normal.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gastroenterología , Humanos , Pandemias , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Colonoscopía
4.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 115(9): 524-525, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36454080

RESUMEN

Intraluminal erosion of adjustable and non adjustable gastric bands generally occurs years after placement. Different endoscopic techniques have been described for the management of bands that erode the gastric wall, using endoscopic scissors, rigid endoscopic guides wire coupled to a mechanical lithotripter or even less frequently used devices such as the Gastric Band Cutter System to cut it. We present a clinical case in which we used a lithotripsy laser probe to break the band with great effectiveness without complications.


Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia , Litotripsia por Láser , Litotricia , Obesidad Mórbida , Úlcera Gástrica , Humanos , Gastroplastia/efectos adversos , Gastroplastia/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Remoción de Dispositivos
5.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(2): 122-123, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34595930

RESUMEN

A 62-year-old male presented with severe post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) acute pancreatitis. He required admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) twice due to respiratory and renal failure and neurological deterioration. On the hospitalization ward, he presented a fluctuating alteration of the level of consciousness, with bradypsychia, disorientation and somnolence, which persisted after hemodynamic, metabolic and renal stabilization. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed showing focal lesions due to small vessel disease, some with cavitations due to necrosis, and mild to moderate subcortical atrophy. A diagnosis of pancreatic encephalopathy was made given the clinical and radiological findings. The patient recovered full cognitive capacity after one week with adequate nutrition supported by protein supplementation.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Encefalopatías/complicaciones , Encefalopatías/etiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen
6.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(4): 272-275, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222476

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: caustic ingestion in children is rare but has potentially serious consequences. AIM: to analyze the clinical and endoscopic features and the type of caustic ingested in our population. METHODS: the upper endoscopies performed in this setting, as well as the characteristics of patients and caustics, were analyzed from 2010 to 2018. RESULTS: fifty-one endoscopies were performed (48 cases of witnessed intake or high suspicion and three with a low suspicion) in patients with a mean age of 2.55 years. Alkali ingestion was more frequent (88.2 %) and 56.9 % of the endoscopies were normal, which was more frequent among those who ingested bleach (72 %). Alkali tended to produce more esophageal injuries (31.1 %) and acids tended to produce esophageal (20 %) and esophageal-gastric injuries (20 %). Four patients developed esophageal stenosis during follow-up. DISCUSSION: even though more than half of the studies were normal, endoscopy is important in the diagnosis and prognosis of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Químicas , Cáusticos , Estenosis Esofágica , Quemaduras Químicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Quemaduras Químicas/epidemiología , Quemaduras Químicas/etiología , Cáusticos/toxicidad , Niño , Preescolar , Ingestión de Alimentos , Endoscopía , Estenosis Esofágica/inducido químicamente , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos
7.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(1): 14-22, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: the management of postoperative esophageal leaks is a huge therapeutic challenge. Thanks to the advances in endoscopy, treatment with esophageal stents has been proposed as a valid option. AIMS: the main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of fully covered esophageal metal stents in the treatment of postoperative esophageal leaks. METHODS: a retrospective observational study was performed in patients with postoperative esophageal leaks, treated with fully covered self-expandable metal stents between June 2011 and May 2018. RESULTS: twenty-five patients were evaluated and 34 stents were placed. The closure of the leak was observed in 21 patients after removal of the stent, with an overall technical success rate of 84 %. The mean time with a stent placed for closure of the fistula was 55.7 ± 27.11 days/patient (mean of 39 ± 24.30 days/stent). The most frequent complication was a partial distal stent migration (7/34 stents), followed by five cases of complete migration into the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: endoscopic treatment with fully covered self-expandable metal stents seems to be an effective and safe first-line treatment for postoperative esophageal leaks, according to the experience in our center.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Endoscopía , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 43(6): 332-347, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409107

RESUMEN

The set of measures proposed by SEPD, AEEH, GETECCU and AEG are aimed to help departments in their resumption of usual activity. We have prepared a number of practical recommendations regarding patient management and the stepwise resumption of healthcare activity. These recommendations are based on the sparse, changing evidence available, and will be updated in the future according to daily needs and the availability of expendable materials to suit them; in each department they will be implemented depending upon the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in each region, and the burden the pandemic has represented for each hospital. The general objectives of these recommendations include: (a)To protect our patients against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and to provide them with high-quality care. (b)To protect all healthcare professionals against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2. (c)To resume normal functioning of our departments in a setting of ongoing risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Gastroenterología/organización & administración , Departamentos de Hospitales/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Citas y Horarios , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Técnicas de Diagnóstico del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/terapia , Desinfección , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Trasplante de Hígado , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Equipos de Seguridad , Evaluación de Síntomas , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Precauciones Universales
9.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(5): 397-411, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316737

RESUMEN

The set of measures proposed by SEPD, AEEH, GETECCU and AEG are aimed to help departments in their resumption of usual activity. We have prepared a number of practical recommendations regarding patient management and the stepwise resumption of healthcare activity. These recommendations are based on the sparse, changing evidence available, and will be updated in the future according to daily needs and the availability of expendable materials to suit them; in each department they will be implemented depending upon the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in each region, and the burden the pandemic has represented for each hospital. The general objectives of these recommendations include: • To protect our patients against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and to provide them with high-quality care. • To protect all healthcare professionals against the risks of infection with SARS-CoV-2. • To resume normal functioning of our departments in a setting of ongoing risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Atención a la Salud/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Gastroenterología/normas , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
10.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(5): 373-379, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32338031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: fecal calprotectin is a selection tool prior to endoscopic studies in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. However, some symptomatic patients with altered fecal calprotectin will not have any endoscopic lesions. The aim of the study was to determine the factors associated with the presence of altered fecal calprotectin in patients with negative endoscopic studies of the colon and small bowel. METHODS: this was an observational, prospective study of patients with digestive symptoms. The association of different clinical factors with elevated fecal calprotectin in the absence of endoscopic lesions of the colon and small bowel were analyzed. RESULTS: 143 patients were included in the study, 98 were female (68.5 %) and the mean age was 40.06 ± 16.42 (15-82) years. Smoking and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake were associated with altered fecal calprotectin in patients with a negative endoscopy of the colon and small bowel (p = 0.029 and p = 0.006). The mean values of fecal calprotectin were significantly higher in smokers, users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and patients with small intestine bacterial overgrowth. Smoking (OR: 3.505; p = 0.028), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake (OR: 3.473; p = 0.021) and small intestine bacterial overgrowth (OR: 3.172; p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for altered fecal calprotectin in the absence of endoscopic lesions. No association was found for any of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: smoking and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are strongly associated with elevated levels of fecal calprotectin in symptomatic patients with a negative colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy of the small bowel. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth is also associated.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análisis , Heces/química , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
11.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(4): 299-308, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32193937

RESUMEN

Within the project "Quality Indicators in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy," under the leadership of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), our goal is to propose the procedures and the structure, process, and outcome indicators required for the application and assessment of quality in enteroscopy. To this end a search was performed for quality indicators in enteroscopy. Quality of evidence was measured by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, and classified as high, moderate, low, and very low. A total of 10 process indicators (one preprocedure, eight procedure, one postprocedure) were identified for enteroscopy, with appropriate indication and choice of most efficient route being most significant.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos
12.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(2): 144-149, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31960697

RESUMEN

The Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology has set a consensus document on the standards and recommendations for gastroenterology units (GU). These standards are considered as relevant in the organization and management of the unit to develop their activities with efficiency and quality. Four key groups of processes have been identified: a) care for the acutely ill adult patient; b) outpatient digestive endoscopy; c) in-hospital support to other services and outpatient clinics; and d) management of patients with chronic complex digestive pathology. Standards for organization and management of the unit were classified within the group of support processes, and training and research as strategic processes. Standards have also been developed for some functional and monographic units such as endoscopy, hepatology and inflammatory bowel disease; as well as for certain procedures including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, colonoscopy and gastroscopy. The standards will be set for other units and procedures as they are developed. The standards developed must be reviewed within a maximum period of five years.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Consenso , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente
13.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(12): 909-913, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31633375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: biliary complications are frequent after orthotopic liver transplantation and the management of these complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is available. The aims of the study were to analyze the experience in the endoscopic management of biliary complications after liver transplantation in a third level center. Furthermore, the factors associated with higher rates of technical and clinical success were determined. METHODS: this was an observational retrospective study of ERCPs performed in patients with biliary complications after liver transplantation between February 2012 and January 2017. The factors analyzed were: demographics, time between transplantation and ERCP, indications for ERCP, strategy of stenting (only plastic stents, only self-expandable metallic stents, plastic followed by metallic stents and metallic followed by plastic stents), technical and clinical success and complications. RESULTS: one hundred and sixty-eight endoscopies were performed in 58 patients. Thirty-three patients (56.9%) presented with early complications. The most frequent indication for ERCP was anastomotic stenosis (57.8%). Technical success in the first ERCP was achieved in 43 patients (74.1%). Early onset of biliary complications was associated with higher rates of technical success (OR: 6.49; p: 0.036). Clinical success was obtained in 36 cases (62.1%). Patients with early complications had a higher probability of having good clinical response (OR: 11.16; p: 0.033). The results were worse in patients with only plastic stents (50% of clinical success). Eleven complications were observed among 168 ERCPs (6.54%), including two pancreatitis, five bleeding events, three cholangitis and one micro-perforation. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is safe and useful in the management of biliary complications after liver transplantation. Early onset of complications is associated with better results. Some patients will need repeated procedures to obtain a good clinical response.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Coledocolitiasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Coledocolitiasis/terapia , Colestasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colestasis/terapia , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica/terapia , Dilatación/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(9): 699-709, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31190549

RESUMEN

Within the project "Quality indicators in digestive endoscopy", pioneered by the Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases (SEPD), the objective of this research is to suggest the structure, process, and results procedures and indicators necessary to implement and assess quality in the gastroscopy setting. First, a chart was designed with the steps to be followed during a gastroscopy procedure. Secondly, a team of experts in care quality and/or endoscopy performed a qualitative review of the literature searching for quality indicators for endoscopic procedures, including gastroscopies. Finally, using a paired analysis approach, a selection of the literature obtained was undertaken. For gastroscopy, a total of nine process indicators were identified (one preprocedure, eight intraprocedure). Evidence quality was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification scale.


Asunto(s)
Duodenoscopía/normas , Gastroscopía/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Duodenoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/normas , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Esofagoscopía/normas , Gastroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
15.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(7): 530-536, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31140286

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: transit times in the gastric cavity and the small bowel can be easily calculated using capsule endoscopy software. The factors that can influence these times and impact on diagnostic yield have not been completely assessed. AIMS: to analyze the influence of demographic and clinical features on transit times and the impact on diagnostic yield. METHODS: a retrospective, single-center study of examinations between January 2013 and November 2017 was performed. The analyzed features included gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, thyroid disease and indications. The association and correlation between the variables were assessed, as well as the presence of positive and significant findings. RESULTS: six hundred and thirty-one patients were included in the study. Gastric and small bowel transit times were 36.10 ± 48.50 and 251.82 ± 116.42 minutes, respectively. Gastric time was not affected by any of the variables. Small bowel time was longer in males, patients over 60 years of age and diabetics. Prolonged small bowel time, male gender and older age were associated with a higher diagnostic yield. Age over 60 years was the only factor independently associated with positive findings (OR: 1.550 [1.369-1.754]; p: 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: patients over 60 years have a longer small bowel transit time and higher probability of having small bowel lesions. Males and diabetic patients also seem more likely to have longer transit times and higher rates of positive findings.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/patología , Tránsito Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
17.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(10): 658-666, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071737

RESUMEN

The goal of the project encompassing the present paper is to propose useful quality procedures and indicators in order to improve quality in digestive endoscopy units. In this third part outcome procedures and indicators are suggested for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). First, a diagram of pre- and post-ERCP steps was developed. A group of experts in healthcare quality and/or endoscopy, under the shelter of the Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases (Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva - SEPD), carried out a qualitative review of the literature regarding quality indicators for ERCP. Then, a paired analysis was used for the selection of identified references. A total of six specific indicators, apart from the common indicators already described, were identified, all of them process indicators (two pre-procedure and four post-procedure). Evidence quality was analyzed for each indicator using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) classification.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos
18.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 30(5): 499-505, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29489472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first-line investigation in cases of suspected Crohn's disease (CD) of the small bowel, but the factors associated with a higher diagnostic yield remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to develop and validate a scoring index to assess the risk of the patients in this setting on the basis of biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, and other biomarkers from a population of 124 patients with suspected CD of the small bowel studied by CE and included in a PhD study were used to build a scoring index. This was first used on this population (internal validation process) and after that on a different set of patients from a multicenter study (external validation process). RESULTS: An index was designed in which every biomarker is assigned a score. Three risk groups have been established (low, intermediate, and high). In the internal validation analysis (124 individuals), patients had a 10, 46.5, and 81% probability of showing inflammatory lesions in CE in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. In the external validation analysis, including 410 patients from 12 Spanish hospitals, this probability was 15.8, 49.7, and 80.6% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results from the internal validation process show that the scoring index is coherent, and results from the external validation process confirm its reliability. This index can be a useful tool for selecting patients before CE studies in cases of suspected CD of the small bowel.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Endoscopía Capsular/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Heces/química , Femenino , Humanos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
19.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(3): 179-194, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29421912

RESUMEN

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Mucosa Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal/normas , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/normas , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/normas , Humanos , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía
20.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 41(3): 175-190, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29449039

RESUMEN

This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/normas , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...