Predelivery sonographic predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury among nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: Data available at admission to delivery of nulliparous has rarely been investigated for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). The aim of the present study was to study risk factors for OASI in nulliparous based on information available at admission. METHODS: A retrospective study of all nulliparous women undergoing labor, during March 2011 to January 2021 was performed. We compared women with OASI following delivery to those without by univariate and multivariable regression. RESULTS: A total of 30 262 deliveries were included and 4181 (13.4%) of those were delivered by an emergent cesarean delivery. OASI followed 453 (1.5%) deliveries. Women in the OASI group were younger 29 ± 4.4 versus 30 ± 4.8, P = 0.001. In a multivariable regression analysis, higher sonographic estimated fetal weight was positively associated with OASI occurrence (aOR, 95% CI: 1.13 [1.00-1.29]). Maternal age was inversely associated with OASI occurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 [0.92-0.97]). CONCLUSION: Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an independent risk factor for OASI occurrence that may be available at admission for delivery among nulliparous women.

A dynamic prediction score for obstetric anal sphincter injury among nulliparous women delivering vaginally.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk score for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) occurrence among nulliparous women delivering vaginally, based on data available at admission for delivery and as labor progresses. METHODS: A retrospective study of all nulliparous women who delivered vaginally between March 2011 and January 2021. Characteristics were compared between OASI and no-OASI groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for OASI occurrence. RESULTS: OASI occurred in 453 (1.7%) of 26 081 women who met the inclusion criteria. The following variables were independently associated with OASI: maternal height (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-0.99), hypertensive disorders (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.95), sonographic fetal weight estimation (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00), second-stage duration (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00), occiput posterior position (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.79-4.62), and episiotomy performance (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.84). In a risk score based on variables available at admission for delivery, the presence of two factors was associated with 4.3% OASI risk. Upon incorporating intrapartum variables, the presence of two risk factors was associated with 2.9% OASI rate. CONCLUSION: A dynamic risk score for OASI occurrence based on data available at admission for delivery and as delivery progresses can assist in counseling regarding OASI risk. A dynamic risk score for obstetric anal sphincter injury occurrence based on data available at admission for delivery and intrapartum was developed.

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean.

OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the risks of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) among women who never delivered vaginally undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors and the rate of OASI among women undergoing TOLAC who never delivered vaginally. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing a TOLAC and never delivered vaginally between 3/2011 and 6/2020. Maternal and intrapartum characteristics were compared between OASI and no-OASI groups. We matched groups to earliest gestational age in which OASI has occurred. A further comparison was made between the study cohort and a cohort of primiparous women undergoing a vaginal delivery, including gestational ages at which OASI has occurred in that cohort. RESULTS: During the study period there were 2061 TOLACs among women without prior vaginal delivery. Of these, 76 % (1566/2061) had a successful vaginal delivery. Overall, 22/2061 (1.1 %) cases of OASI occurred. There was no difference in maternal demographic, obstetrical and medical history characteristics between the study groups. The mean gestational age at TOLAC was lower in the OASI group (390/7 ± 12/7 vs. 395/7 ± 12/7, p = 0.012). In multivariable regression analysis, gestational age was negatively associated with OASI [adjusted odds ratio, 95 % (confidence interval) 0.95 (0.91-0.99), for each day increase in gestational age)]. The rate of OASI in the study cohort did not differ from the rate of OASI among primiparous women during the same study period (347/27975, 1.2 %, p = 0.686). CONCLUSION: Gestational age at delivery is the only predictor of OASI among women with no prior vaginal deliveries undergoing a TOLAC. The incidence of OASI in this population is 1.1 % and does not differ from that of primiparous women.

Fractional-Pixel CO2 Laser Treatment in Patients With Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: 1-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vaginal pixelated low power and long pulses (LPLP) CO2 laser has been suggested as an optional treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with many studies reporting short-term improvements. The objective of this study was to assess the 1-year subjective and objective efficacy of vaginal CO2 laser in women with urodynamic SUI. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study. Patients with confirmed urodynamic SUI graded as mild or moderate were included. We used three sessions of fractional pixelated CO2 laser for vaginal application and followed up the patients at 6 and 12 months. We used the following measures at follow-up: 1-hour pad test (ICS protocol), questionnaires including Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and a 3-day urinary diary. The urodynamic assessment was repeated at 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with SUI had three laser treatments, of whom 48 completed a 6-month follow-up and 42 patients completed 12-month follow-up. No serious adverse events were recorded during the study period. A significant reduction on the 1-hour pad test was found from baseline (6.3 ± 1.6 g) to the 12-month follow-up (3.7 ± 1.4 g, P < 0.05) was found. PGI-I showed 75.0%, 61.9%, and 64.3% improvements at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. PFDI improved significantly and consistently from baseline until 12 months (37.2 ± 3.89 to 16.1 ± 3.7, P < 0.05). Similarly, PFIQ showed significant improvements from the first treatment up to 12 months. Urodynamic assessment at 6 months showed that 41.4% of patients had no stress incontinence. CONCLUSION: The vaginal CO2 laser was found to be effective for mild-to-moderate SUI over a follow-up period of 1 year, according to a variety of objective and subjective parameters. The wide range of parameters enables optimal patient consultation and subsequent treatment. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Risk of anal sphincter injury in trial of labor post cesarean section.

INTRODUCTION: We wanted to evaluate whether secundiparas who achieved vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) were at an increased risk for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) compared to primiparas who delivered vaginally, with a stratification by the mode of delivery-spontaneous or operative vaginal delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women who delivered by vacuum-assisted delivery between March 2011 and June 2019. Primiparas delivering vaginally and secundiparas undergoing VBAC were compared. The cohort was further stratified into two categories: spontaneous vaginal delivery and operative vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Overall, 23 822 primiparas who delivered vaginally and 1596 secundiparas who underwent VBAC were analyzed. Operative vaginal delivery was performed in 4561 deliveries. OASI rate did not differ between the VBAC and primipara groups (1.3% vs 1.8%, P = .142). A total of 20 857 women delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery, among them 1180 (5.7%) women were secundiparas and 19 677 (94.3%) were primiparas. OASI rate was comparable between the secundiparas undergoing VBAC and primiparas delivering vaginally (17 [1.4%] vs 338 [1.7%], P = .436). A total of 4561 women delivered by operative vaginal delivery, among them 416 (9.1%) were secundiparas and 4145 (90.9%) were primiparas. The rate of operative vaginal deliveries was higher among the VBAC group compared with the primipara group (6.1% vs 17.4%, P < .001). However, women undergoing successful VBAC had lower rates of OASI compared with primiparas (3 [0.7%] vs 96 [2.3%]; odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.97, P = .032). After multivariate logistic regression including all statistically significant factors, OASI was not associated with VBAC in spontaneous or operative vaginal deliveries (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.40 and 0.39, 95% CI 0.12-1.28, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Secundiparas undergoing VBAC were not at a higher risk of OASI when compared with primiparas delivering vaginally, either in spontaneous or operative vaginal deliveries. This information might aid when counseling women contemplating a trial of labor after cesarean--to address their concerns regarding the risks and benefits of VBAC.

The association between vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and anal sphincter injury.

INTRODUCTION: Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) is considered a major risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, it is difficult to estimate its true contribution to the occurrence of OASIS, as its performance may be confounded by other determinants. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of VAVD with OASIS among primiparous women compared to SVD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all primiparous women who vaginally delivered a cephalic singleton gestation during the years 2011 to 2020. As VAVDs were not performed before 34 gestational weeks, we capped the cohort at this gestational age. Women were allocated into two groups: VAVDs and spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD). We compared women with OASIS to those without and performed a multivariate analysis including factors that were found significant in the univariate analysis. We further divided the whole cohort into different subcategories. The primary outcome was the rate of OASIS in VAVD compared to SVD. RESULTS: Overall, 23,272 primiparous vaginal deliveries were available for evaluation. Of these, 3595 delivered by VAVD and 19,677 delivered spontaneously. OASIS occurred in 421 (1.8%) of the deliveries. OASIS were more common in VAVDs than in SVDs [83 (2.3%) vs. 338 (1.7%), respectively, OR (95% CI) 1.35 (1.06-1.72), p = 0.01]. After multivariate regression analysis, OASIS were not found to be independently associated with the mode of delivery [aOR 1.21 (95% CI) 0.88-1.68, P = 0.23]. In a categorical analysis of OASIS rates by risk factors and mode of delivery, VAVD was not associated with an increase in OASIS among women giving birth to neonates weighing > 3500 g compared to SVD [OR (95% CI) 1.02 (0.65-1.62), P = 0.90]. CONCLUSION: Among primiparous women VAVD did not increase the risk of OASIS compared to SVD.

Validation of the Wexner scale in a Hebrew-speaking population.

INTRODUCTION: The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, known as the Wexner Score (WS), is a simple, disease-specific questionnaire for anal incontinence (AI) assessment. We aimed to translate and validate a Hebrew version of the WS. METHODS: Between November 2018 and December 2019, the WS was back translated and reviewed by a multidisciplinary pelvic floor team. The questionnaire was filled out by patients visiting the urogynecology and surgical pelvic floor clinics. Two weeks after completion, the patients were contacted using telephone surveys to assess the test-retest reliability examination. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the WS to the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 (CRADI-8), a part of the validated Hebrew version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaire (PFDI-20). RESULTS: Overall, 91 female patients completed the WS questionnaire. Eighty-five percent (n = 78) responded to the re-test WS questionnaire. A high intraclass coefficient of 0.87 was found in the WS total score, with a range from 0.82 to 0.86 for its subscales. A significant positive relationship between the Hebrew versions of the WS and CRADI-8 scores was established (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A new, Hebrew-translated version of the WS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing AI.

The role of fetal head circumference in the formation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following vacuum deliveries among primiparous women.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of sonographic fetal head circumference (HC) with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurrence among primiparous women who underwent vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD). METHODS: A retrospective study of all primiparous women who delivered at term by VAD between 2011 and 2019 and underwent ultrasound with fetal biometry within 1 week prior to delivery. Women who suffered OASIS were compared to women without OASIS. RESULTS: Overall, 74 of 3222 (2.3%) primiparous women suffered an OASIS. As compared with control, women with OASIS were younger (median 28 vs. 30 years, p = 0.001), had higher BMI (median 28.2 vs. 26.9 kg/m2, p = 0.03), and had a longer second stage of labor (median 190 vs. 168 min, p = 0.01). Fetal head circumference was larger in the OASIS group (mean 334 vs. 330 mm, p = 0.03), occiput posterior fetal head position was more prevalent (12 (16%) vs. 232 (7.4%), OR [95% CI]: 2.43 (1.29-4.57), p = 0.004), and the rate of mediolateral episiotomy performed was lower (58 (78.0%) vs. 2777 (88.2%), OR [95% CI]: 0.48 (0.27-0.85), p = 0.01). Multivariate regression modeling identified higher fetal HC (aOR [95% CI] 1.03 (1.001-1.06), p = 0.04) and occiput posterior (aOR [95% CI] 2.5 (1.16-5.71), p = 0.01) as independently positively associated with OASIS. Mediolateral episiotomy and maternal age were independently negatively associated with an OASIS (aOR [95% CI] 0.39 (0.18-0.85), p = 0.01); aOR [95% CI] 0.4 (0.17-0.60), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic large fetal HC is associated with OASIS occurrence during VAD. The only modifiable predictor of OASIS detected was mediolateral episiotomy, found to be protective against OASIS.

Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery.

INTRODUCTION: High birth weight is strongly associated with OASIS; nevertheless, it has not been determined which biometric characteristics most affect OASIS occurrence. We aimed to evaluate the association of estimated fetal head circumference with OASIS occurrence among primiparous women delivering by unassisted vaginal delivery. METHODS: A retrospective study included all primiparous women who delivered at term by spontaneous vaginal delivery from 2011-2019. Women were allocated to two groups: (1) those who experienced OASIS and (2) those who did not experience OASIS. Risk factors for OASIS were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 7646 women were included in the study cohort. Of those, 119/7646 (1.6%; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9%) experienced OASIS. Sonographic head circumference and birth weight did not vary between groups. Prolonged second stage was more common in the OASIS group [23 (19%) vs. 986 (13.3%), 1.58 OR (95% CI 1.003-2.51, p = 0.04)]. Absence of epidural analgesia was more common in the OASIS group [30 (25%) vs. 1197 (15.9%), 1.8 OR (95% CI 1.1-2.7, p = 0.006)]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the lack of epidural analgesia and duration of second stage of labor were both independently positively associated with OASIS [adjusted OR 2.67 (95% CI 1.55-4.62), p < 0.001, adjusted OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.11-1.43), p < 0.001, respectively)]. CONCLUSION: Sonographic head circumference and birth weight are not associated with OASIS occurrence among primiparous women delivering by an unassisted vaginal delivery. Prolonged second stage and the use of epidural analgesia are modifiable risk factors among these women.

Family history associated with pelvic organ prolapse in young women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among young women is a relatively rare disorder with a unique clinical background. The objective of our study was to investigate the relative risk factors for POP and the relationship between family history and POP development in young women. METHODS: In a retrospective longitudinal study we investigated 26 young patients (age <45 years) who underwent POP surgery and compared them to a control group of 26 patients (age >55 years) who underwent similar surgery and were matched with regard to parity. All women were interviewed for family history of POP, POP surgery among first-degree relatives, and hernia repair. RESULTS: Family history of POP was five times more prevalent among women in the study group than in the control group (46 % vs. 8 %, P < 0.01). Moreover, POP surgery among the first-degree relatives was significantly more prevalent in the study group (23.1 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.05). The prevalence of a family history of POP in more than one first-degree relative (11.5 % vs. 3.84 %, p = 0.3) and the family history of hernia repair among first-degree relatives (11.5 % vs. 15.4 %) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A family history of POP is significantly more common in younger affected women than in older affected women. We suggest that future genetic studies should concentrate on this specific population.

Mesh pullout force: comparative study of different deployment techniques in a sheep model.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pullout force of mesh from tissue is one of the important mechanical properties of an implanted mesh to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The EndoFast Reliant™ system kit allows mesh attachment with soft-tissue fasteners. The aim of this study was to compare the pullout force that developed in mesh that was attached by EndoFast Reliant fasteners to mesh that was attached by trocar-based methods (tunnel, pocket) in a sheep model. METHODS: Six sheep underwent mesh attachment with three methods (EndoFast Reliant, tissue pocket, tissue tunnel), and each method was repeated five times in both thighs of the same sheep. The pullout force was measured at different time intervals from surgery: 0, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 45 days. Statistical analysis was performed by using the appropriate one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each time interval and a general linear model for repeated measures using IBM® SPSS® software version 20.0.0. RESULTS: During the immediate postoperative period (0-3 days), pullout force was significantly higher with EndoFast Reliant than with tissue pocket or tissue tunnel. At day 7, this trend continues without statistical significance. Pullout force increased progressively until day 15, when the force caused the mesh to tear; it was similar in all three groups. ANOVA showed significant effect of time and study group. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoFast Reliant system provides significantly stronger attachment in the immediate postoperative period (0-3 days) compared with trocar-based techniques, and this difference disappeared at day 15 postsurgery.

Trocarless system for mesh attachment in pelvic organ prolapse repair--1-year evaluation.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: EndoFast Reliant system is a novel technology for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair that attaches mesh directly with metal fasteners. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study in 20 women who underwent vaginal POP repair to evaluate safety and efficacy. The patients were followed for 12 months, using POP-Q measures, questionnaires on symptoms (PFDI), and sexual function (FSFI). RESULTS: No intraoperative complications occurred. Prolapse has been anatomically resolved (< stage 2) in 85% at 1-year follow-up (17/20 patients). Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) scores showed significant improvement for 1 year in symptoms related to prolapse (4.1-0.7, p < 0.001) and bladder (1.4-0.7, p = 0.06) but not to rectum. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores did not change significantly. One case of mesh exposure was found (5%) and treated conservatively. No migration of fasteners was observed on X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoFast Reliant system was found safe and efficacious. Future studies are needed to evaluate its advantages over techniques using trocars.