Home Monitoring of Glaucoma Using a Home Tonometer and a Novel Virtual Reality Visual Field Device: Acceptability and Feasibility.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of iCare HOME tonometer (HT) and Virtual Field (VF) devices in the home monitoring of glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective feasibility and acceptability study. SUBJECTS: Twenty patients (39 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma, open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or suspected glaucoma. METHODS: Patients were trained and instructed to bring 2 devices home for 1 week and use the HT 4 times/day for 4 days and the VF 3 times total. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For acceptability, we conducted satisfaction surveys and semistructured, qualitative interviews with a thematic analysis. Feasibility was assessed by device usage and quality of tests. RESULTS: Most patients (73.7%) felt that the HT was easy to use, and 100% of them found the HT useful. All patients (100%) felt that VF was easy to use, and 94.4% of them found the VF useful. All patients (100%) obtained acceptable intraocular pressure and completed a VF test at home. We identified 4 key themes, with 33 subthemes. The key themes include the following: (1) advantages of home monitoring; (2) difficulties with home monitoring; (3) future considerations in home monitoring; and (4) the experience of patients with glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: The HT and VF were acceptable and feasible in a small cohort of motivated subjects. Patients were able to perform these tests proficiently at home, and they were generally enthused to obtain more data about their intraocular health, as it allowed them a heightened sense of security and insight about their chronic disease, as well as a reduction in foreseeable barriers to care. Home monitoring may also improve upon glaucoma care by enhancing patient empowerment and fostering community bonds. The VF should be further evaluated to ensure validity. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Real-Time Mobile Teleophthalmology for the Detection of Eye Disease in Minorities and Low Socioeconomics At-Risk Populations.

PURPOSE: To examine the benefits and feasibility of a mobile, real-time, community-based, teleophthalmology program for detecting eye diseases in the New York metro area. DESIGN: Single site, nonrandomized, cross-sectional, teleophthalmologic study. METHODS: Participants underwent a comprehensive evaluation in a Wi-Fi-equipped teleophthalmology mobile unit. The evaluation consisted of a basic anamnesis with a questionnaire form, brief systemic evaluations and an ophthalmologic evaluation that included visual field, intraocular pressure, pachymetry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, posterior segment optical coherence tomography, and nonmydriatic fundus photography. The results were evaluated in real-time and follow-up calls were scheduled to complete a secondary questionnaire form. Risk factors were calculated for different types of ophthalmological referrals. RESULTS: A total of 957 participants were screened. Out of 458 (48%) participants that have been referred, 305 (32%) had glaucoma, 136 (14%) had narrow-angle, 124 (13%) had cataract, 29 had (3%) diabetic retinopathy, 9 (1%) had macular degeneration, and 97 (10%) had other eye disease findings. Significant risk factors for ophthalmological referral consisted of older age, history of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, Hemoglobin A1c measurement of ≥6.5, and stage 2 hypertension. As for the ocular parameters, all but central corneal thickness were found to be significant, including having an intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg, vertical cup-to-disc ratio ≥0.5, visual field abnormalities, and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile, real-time teleophthalmology is both workable and effective in increasing access to care and identifying the most common causes of blindness and their risk factors.

Gender Compensation Gap for Ophthalmologists in the First Year of Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: To identify the role of gender and other factors in influencing ophthalmologists' compensation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: U.S. practicing ophthalmologists. METHODS: Between January and March 2020, an anonymous survey was sent to U.S. residency program directors and practicing ophthalmologists who recently completed residency training. Respondents who completed residency ≤ 10 years ago and responded to questions about gender, fellowship training, state of practice, and salary were included. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed with age, academic residency, top residency, fellowship, state median wage, practice type, ethnicity, and number of workdays. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) analysis controlled for additional factors along with the aforementioned variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Base starting salary with bonus (SWB) received in the first year of clinical position was the main outcome measure. A multiplier of 1.2 (20%) was added to the base salary to account for bonus. RESULTS: Of 684 respondents, 384 (56% were female, 44% were male) from 68 programs were included. Female ophthalmologists received a mean initial SWB that was $33 139.80 less than that of their male colleagues (12.5%, P = 0.00). The PSM analysis showed an SWB difference of -$27 273.89 (10.3% gap, P = 0.0015). Additionally, SWB differences were calculated with the number of workdays substituted by operating room (OR) days (-$27 793.67 [10.5% gap, P = 0.0013]) and clinic days (-$23 597.57 [8.90% gap, P = 0.0064]) in separate PSM analyses. The SWB differences between genders were significant using MLR analyses, which also controlled for work, clinic, and OR days separately (-$22 261.49, $-18 604.65, and $-16 191.26, respectively; P = 0.017, P = 0.015, P = 0.002, respectively). Gender independently predicted income in all 3 analyses (P < 0.05). Although an association between gender and the attempt to negotiate was not detected, a greater portion of men subjectively reported success in negotiation (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Female ophthalmologists earn significantly less than their male colleagues in the first year of clinical practice. Salary differences persist after controlling for demographic, educational, and practice type variables with MLR and PSM analyses. These income differences may lead to a substantial loss of accumulated earnings over an individual's career.

Detecting Common Eye Diseases Using the First Teleophthalmology GlobeChek Kiosk in the United States: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the benefit and feasibility of the teleophthalmology GlobeChek kiosk in a community-based program. DESIGN: Single-site, nonrandomized, cross-sectional, teleophthalmologic study. METHODS: Participants underwent comprehensive evaluation that consists of a questionnaire form, brief systemic evaluation, screening visual field (VF), and GlobeChek kiosk screening, which included but not limited to intraocular pressure, pachymetry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, posterior segment optical coherence tomography, and nonmydriatic fundus photography. The results were evaluated by a store-and-forward mechanism and follow-up questionnaires were obtained through phone calls. RESULTS: A total of 326 participatents were screened over 4 months. One hundred thirty-three (40.79%) participants had 1 condition in either eye, and 47 (14.41%) had >1 disease. Seventy (21.47%) had glaucoma, 37 (11.34%) narrow-angles, 6 (1.84%) diabetic retinopathy, 4 (1.22%) macular degeneration, and 43 (13.10%) had other eye disease findings. Age >65, history of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, not having a dental examination >5 years, hemoglobn A1c measurement of ≥5.6, predibates risk score of ≥9, stage 2 hypertension, and low blood pressure were found to be significant risk factors. As for the ocular parameters, all but central corneal thickness, including an intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg, vertical cup to disc ratio >0.7, visual field abnormalities, and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning were found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: GlobeChek kiosk is both workable and effective in increasing access to care and identifying the most common causes of blindness and their risk factors.