Comparative analysis of linear- and circular-stapled gastrojejunostomies in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a focus on postoperative morbidity using the comprehensive complication index.

PURPOSE: The linear-stapled (LSA) and the circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) are the two most commonly performed techniques for the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study compared the outcome after both techniques with special focus on postoperative morbidity using the comprehensive complication index (CCI). METHODS: Five hundred eighty-eight patients operated between 01/2010 and 12/2019 were included in the final analysis and divided in two cohorts according to the surgical technique of the GJ (LSA (n = 290) or CSA (n = 298)). Before 09/2016, the CSA was exclusively performed for the GJ, while after 09/2016, the LSA was solely used. RESULTS: The mean CCI for patients with Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ 2 within the first 90 days after RYGB was 31 ± 9.1 in the CSA and 25.7 ± 6.8 in the LSA group (p < 0.001), both values still below the previously published benchmark cutoff (≤ 33.73). The C-reactive Protein (CRP)-levels on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 as well as the use of opioids on POD 1 were significantly higher in the CSA- than in the LSA-group (all p < 0.001). There were significantly more internal herniations in the CSA group during the first 24 postoperative months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients after RYGB with CSA were found to have higher CCI values during the first 90 PODs compared to patients in which the LSA was applied. To achieve optimal outcomes in terms of patient morbidity, the LSA seems to be the superior technique for GJ in RYGB.

Assessing daily energy intake in adult women: validity of a food-recognition mobile application compared to doubly labelled water.

Accurate dietary assessment is crucial for nutrition and health research. Traditional methods, such as food records, food frequency questionnaires, and 24-hour dietary recalls (24HR), have limitations, such as the need for trained interviewers, time-consuming procedures, and inaccuracies in estimations. Novel technologies, such as image-based dietary assessment apps, have been developed to overcome these limitations. SNAQ is a novel image-based food-recognition app which, based on computer vision, assesses food type and volume, and provides nutritional information about dietary intake. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the validity of SNAQ as a dietary assessment tool for measuring energy and macronutrient intake in adult women with normal body weight (n = 30), compared to doubly labeled water (DLW), a reference method for total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). Energy intake was also estimated using a one-day 24HR for direct comparison. Bland-Altman plots, paired difference tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess agreement and relationships between the methods. SNAQ showed a slightly higher agreement (bias = -329.6 kcal/day) with DLW for total daily energy intake (TDEI) compared to 24HR (bias = -543.0 kcal/day). While both SNAQ and 24HR tended to underestimate TDEI, only 24HR significantly differed from DLW in this regard (p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between estimated TDEI and TDEE using SNAQ (R2 = 27%, p = 0.50) or 24HR (R2 = 34%, p = 0.20) and there were no significant differences in energy and macronutrient intake estimates between SNAQ and 24HR (Δ = 213.4 kcal/day). In conclusion, these results indicate that SNAQ provides a closer representation of energy intake in adult women with normal body weight than 24HR when compared to DLW, but no relationship was found between the energy estimates of DLW and of the two dietary assessment tools. Further research is needed to determine the clinical relevance and support the implementation of SNAQ in research and clinical settings. Clinical trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the unique identifier NCT04600596 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04600596).

Burst-pause criterion derivation for drinkometer measurements of ingestive behavior.

The drinkometer is a promising device for the study of ingestive behavior of liquid meals in humans. It can be used to investigate behavior in different target populations. However, ingestive behavior has a great variability across study participants. Therefore, a new analytical approach is required for the extraction and analysis of drinkometer-derived data that could account for this variability. We developed an optimized protocol to predict an optimal burst-pause criterion (PC) for the extraction of PC-dependent microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior. These describe the microstructure of bursts, while PC-independent parameters describe the microstructure of sucks. Therefore, a PC is required to analyze separately two physiologically different parts of behavior. To accomplish this burst-pause criterion derivation (BPCD), a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) was built for estimation of two probability density functions (PDFs). These model the distribution of inter-suck intervals (ISIs) and inter-burst intervals (IBIs), respectively. The PC is defined at the intersection point of the two density functions. A Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed for post-hoc verification of the fit of the predicted optimal PC to the ISI distribution. In this protocol paper, we present a walkthrough of the data analysis of drinkometer-derived data for the measurement of microstructure of ingestive behavior based on previous results published by our group [1].•Standardization of the burst-pause criterion derivation for drinkometer measurements of ingestive behavior.•All codes are publicly available in a repository.•The method can be easily adapted to studies with larger sample size or more than one study stimulus.

Early Postoperative Exposure to High-Fat Diet Does Not Increase Long-Term Weight Loss or Fat Avoidance After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Rats.

Background: Bariatric surgery alters food preferences in rats and reportedly decreases desire to consume high-fat high-sugar food in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early post-operative exposure to high-fat food could increase body weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) by triggering fat avoidance. Methods: Male Wistar rats underwent either RYGB (n = 15) or sham-operations (n = 16). Preoperatively a standardized 4-choice cafeteria diet [dietary options: low-fat/low-sugar (LFLS), low-fat/high-sugar (LFHS), high-fat/low-sugar (HFLS), high-fat/high-sugar (HFHS)] was offered. First, each option was available for 4 days, thereafter rats were offered the 4 options simultaneously for 3 days preoperatively. Post-surgery, 8 rats in the RYGB- and 8 in the sham-group were exposed to a high-fat content diet (Oatmeal + 30% lard, OM+L) for 10 days, while 7 RYGB rats and 8 sham-rats received OM alone. From the 11th postoperative day, the 4-choice cafeteria diet was reintroduced for 55-days. The intake of all available food items, macronutrients and body weight changes were monitored over 8 weeks. Main outcomes were long-term body-weight and daily change in relative caloric intake during the postoperative cafeteria period compared to the preoperative cafeteria. Results: During the first 12 days of postoperative cafeteria access, RYGB-rats exposed to OM+L had a higher mean caloric intake per day than RYGB rats exposed to OM alone (Δ10 kCal, P adj = 0.004), but this difference between the RYGB groups disappeared thereafter. Consequently, in the last 33 days of the postoperative cafeteria diet, the mean body weight of the RYGB+OM+L group was higher compared to RYGB+OM (Δ51 g, P adj < 0.001). RYGB rats, independently from the nutritional intervention, presented a progressive decrease in daily consumption of calories from fat and increased their daily energy intake mainly from non-sugar carbohydrates. No such differences were detected in sham-operated controls exposed to low- or high fat postoperative interventions. Conclusion: A progressive decrease in daily fat intake over time was observed after RYGB, independently from the nutritional intervention. This finding confirms that macronutrient preferences undergo progressive changes over time after RYGB and supports the role of ingestive adaptation and learning. Early postoperative exposure to high-fat food failed to accentuate fat avoidance and did not lead to superior weight loss in the long-term.

Association between microstructure of ingestive behavior and body weight loss in patients one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most effective procedures in the treatment of obesity. However, the predictive value of the microstructure of ingestion has not been widely investigated in this context. Here, we applied a recently developed drinkometer device to analyze the microstructure of ingestive behavior during a liquid meal in women and investigate whether it correlated with measures of weight loss after RYGB. Macro- and microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior of female patients (n = 24) one year after RYGB were measured in two different test sessions within a period of two weeks using the drinkometer. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed to compare the macro- and microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior with the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), and body mass index (BMI) one year after RYGB, as well as age. A Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.003 was considered significant for the correlation analysis. For all other statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. One year after surgery, a significant body weight loss was achieved in our study population (111.2 ± 15.6 kg vs 73.4 ± 11.7 kg; ***p < 0.001), with a mean%TWL of 33.8% (range: 20.4-48.6%). At the first test session,%TWL correlated with suck duration (r = 0.41, 0.05 > p > 0.003);%EBMIL correlated with both suck duration (r = 0.64, *p < 0.003) and inter-suck intervals (ISIs, r = -0.47, *p < 0.003), and, finally, BMI correlated with suck duration (r = 0.62, *p < 0.003) and ISIs (r = 0.48, *p < 0.003). However, at the second test session, no correlation was found between the body weight loss and the recorded ingestive parameters. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found in microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior between the two test sessions even though meal size decreased by 20% on the second visit (342.6.6 ± 167 kcal vs. 271.8 ± 142.8 kcal). A greater body weight loss of patients one year after surgery seems to be associated with longer suck duration and shorter ISIs, but only when the stimulus is tested for the first time by the study participants. This study contributes to the current knowledge about the ingestive behavior of bariatric patients one year after RYGB in terms of its association with the achieved weight loss. The use of the drinkometer device for the measurement of microstructure of ingestive behavior should be further expanded to different research questions and patient subgroups other than good responders. Its possible applications in clinical and behavioral research need to be included in the agenda of bariatric research.

Online survey on factors influencing patients' motivation to undergo bariatric surgery.

Given the worldwide increasing prevalence of severe obesity and considering the amount of scientific evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery (BS), it is surprising that only a fraction of patients with obesity undergo BS. We therefore conducted an anonymized online survey among individuals with a history of BS to understand factors influencing the deciding process leading to BS. Respondents were recruited on a voluntary basis from obesity-related social media groups between April and June 2020. The self-designed, non-validated questionnaire consisted of 20 questions and was open to any participants with a history of BS. Of 851 participants who started the survey, 665 completed the questionnaire (completion rate of 78.1%). Five years after BS, still 70% of the survey-participants were very satisfied or satisfied with the surgical result. However, the majority (73.3%) would have undergone BS earlier. The main motivation to choose BS was related to health status or quality of life. Important characteristics for a bariatric surgeon to obtain patients' trust are "taking time and listen" (74.7%), empathy (64%) and sympathy (56%). Post-operative satisfaction with the surgical outcome was high and long-lasting in this large cohort of BS patients. However, most participants would retrospectively have undergone BS earlier. The main reason to choose BS as treatment for their obesity were impaired physical health or reduced quality of life. Nearby location to patients' residence and availability of surgeons with empathy were decisive motives for bariatric centre selection.

Microstructural changes in human ingestive behavior after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass during liquid meals.

BACKGROUNDRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) decreases energy intake and is, therefore, an effective treatment of obesity. The behavioral bases of the decreased calorie intake remain to be elucidated. We applied the methodology of microstructural analysis of meal intake to establish the behavioral features of ingestion in an effort to discern the various controls of feeding as a function of RYGB.METHODSThe ingestive microstructure of a standardized liquid meal in a cohort of 11 RYGB patients, in 10 patients with obesity, and in 10 healthy-weight adults was prospectively assessed from baseline to 1 year with a custom-designed drinkometer. Statistics were performed on log-transformed ratios of change from baseline so that each participant served as their own control, and proportional increases and decreases were numerically symmetrical. Data-driven (3 seconds) and additional burst pause criteria (1 and 5 seconds) were used.RESULTSAt baseline, the mean meal size (909.2 versus 557.6 kCal), burst size (28.8 versus 17.6 mL), and meal duration (433 versus 381 seconds) differed between RYGB patients and healthy-weight controls, whereas suck volume (5.2 versus 4.6 mL) and number of bursts (19.7 versus 20.1) were comparable. At 1 year, the ingestive differences between the RYGB and healthy-weight groups disappeared due to significantly decreased burst size (P = 0.008) and meal duration (P = 0.034) after RYGB. The first-minute intake also decreased after RYGB (P = 0.022).CONCLUSIONRYGB induced dynamic changes in ingestive behavior over the first postoperative year. While the eating pattern of controls remained stable, RYGB patients reduced their meal size by decreasing burst size and meal duration, suggesting that increased postingestive sensibility may mediate postbariatric ingestive behavior.TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT03747445; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03747445.FUNDINGThis work was supported by the University of Zurich, the Swiss National Fund (32003B_182309), and the Olga Mayenfisch Foundation. Bálint File was supported by the Hungarian Brain Research Program Grant (grant no. 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00002).