Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Mexico: An Updated Review Amid the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era

ABSTRACT Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most frequent cause of acute flaccid paralysis and if not diagnosed and treated timely, a significant cause of long-term disability. Incidence in Latin America ranges from 0.71 to 7.63 cases/100,000 person-years. Historically, GBS has been linked to infections (mainly gastrointestinal by Campylobacter jejuni) and vaccines (including those against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]); however, a trigger cannot be detected in most cases. Regarding SARS-CoV-2, epidemiological studies have found no association with its development. Acute motor axonal neuropathy is the most common electrophysiological variant in Mexico and Asian countries. Intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchanges are still the treatment cornerstones. Mortality in Mexico can be as high as 12%. Advances in understanding the drivers of nerve injury in GBS that may provide the basis for developing targeted therapies have been made during the past decade; despite them, accurate criteria for selecting patients requiring acute treatment, prognostic biomarkers, and novel therapies are still needed. The newly-developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have raised concerns regarding the potential risk for developing GBS. In the midst of coronavirus disease 2019 and vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2, this review discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of GBS in Mexico.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Mexico: An Updated Review Amid the Coronavirus Disease 2019 ERA.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most frequent cause of acute flaccid paralysis and if not diagnosed and treated timely, a significant cause of long-term disability. Incidence in Latin America ranges from 0.71 to 7.63 cases/100,000 person-years. Historically, GBS has been linked to infections (mainly gastrointestinal by Campylobacter jejuni) and vaccines (including those against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]); however, a trigger cannot be detected in most cases. Regarding SARS-CoV-2, epidemiological studies have found no association with its development. Acute motor axonal neuropathy is the most common electrophysiological variant in Mexico and Asian countries. Intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchanges are still the treatment cornerstones. Mortality in Mexico can be as high as 12%. Avances in understanding the drivers of nerve injury in GBS that may provide the basis for developing targeted therapies have been made during the past decade; despite them, accurate criteria for selecting patients requiring acute treatment, prognostic biomarkers, and novel therapies are still needed. The newly-developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have raised concerns regarding the potential risk for developing GBS. In the midst of coronavirus disease 2019 and vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2, this review discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of GBS in Mexico.

Management of glioblastoma: a perspective from Mexico.

Access to healthcare in Mexico is available to its population via publicly and privately funded institutions. The public sector, administered by both the local and federal government under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health, provides healthcare to the majority of the country's population. Privately funded institutions vary in size and scope of practice, ranging from small clinics focused on family practice, to large tertiary hospitals with capacity for treating patients with complex conditions and performing clinical research. The evaluation and treatment of patients with cancer in Mexico is also available through both sectors. In the country's capital, Mexico City, patients with glioblastoma are primarily treated at the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery and the National Institute of Oncology. Epidemiological data is incomplete due to the lack of a national cancer registry. In the case of neoplasms of the central nervous system, the available information suggests that gliomas represent 33% of all intracranial tumors. The treatment of patients in Mexico diagnosed with glioblastoma has not been standardized owing to the lack of resources in some communities and the expense of antineoplastic agents. Current options range from a biopsy only to maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant treatment with radiation and chemotherapy. Currently, basic science and clinical research is being conducted in academic institutions associated with universities and in private hospitals. Studies include the evaluation of tumor biology, neuroimaging biomarkers and new treatment options such as the use of chloroquine.

Neuromorphometry of primary brain tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging is a technique for the diagnosis and classification of brain tumors. Discrete compactness is a morphological feature of two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects. This measure determines the compactness of a discretized object depending on the sum of the areas of the connected voxels and has been used for understanding the morphology of nonbrain tumors. We hypothesized that regarding brain tumors, we may improve the malignancy grade classification. We analyzed the values in 20 patients with different subtypes of primary brain tumors: astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and glioblastoma multiforme subdivided into the contrast-enhanced and the necrotic tumor regions. The preliminary results show an inverse relationship between the compactness value and the malignancy grade of gliomas. Astrocytomas exhibit a mean of [Formula: see text], whereas oligodendrogliomas exhibit a mean of [Formula: see text]. In contrast, the contrast-enhanced region of the glioblastoma presented a mean of [Formula: see text], and the necrotic region presented a mean of [Formula: see text]. However, the volume and area of the enclosing surface did not show a relationship with the malignancy grade of the gliomas. Discrete compactness appears to be a stable characteristic between primary brain tumors of different malignancy grades, because similar values were obtained from different patients with the same type of tumor.

Utilidad diagnóstica del video-electroencefalograma para el diagnóstico diferencial de epilepsia y eventos paroxísticos no epilépticos de la infancia / Video-encephalogram. Its usefulness for differential diagnosis between epilepsy and non-epileptic paroxistic crisis in childhood

Se trata de un estudio prospectivo que se realizó para determinar la utilidad del video-EEG en el diagnóstico diferencial entre epilepsia y otros desórdenes convulsivos en la infancia. Se estudiaron 21 pacientes que cubrieron los criterios de inclusión. El diagnóstico previo al procedimiento era de epilepsia en 15 casos (71.4 por ciento) y en otros 6 era de crisis paroxísticas no epilépticas.Con el estudio se confirmó que 17 casos realmente tenían epilepsia (80.9 por ciento) y que sólo 4 tenían crisis paroxísticas (19.1 por ciento). El tratamiento previo se continuó sin cambios en 10 de los 17 casos y se modificó en los otros 7. Se eliminó todo tratamiento en los 4 niños cuyo estudio fue negativo. La sensibilidad del estudio fue de un 80 por ciento. En 2 casos sirvió para determinar con precisión la ubicación del foco epileptógeno y se consideran eventualmente candidatos a cirugía. El estudio permitió cumplir con los lineamientos establecidos por la Liga Internacional Contra la Epilepsia.