Comparison between different referral strategies for acute ischemic stroke patients in a hub-spoke emergency stroke network: a real-world experience in south-east Lazio.

AIM: To describe different referral strategies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients in a Hub-Spoke emergency stroke network with their incidence, time metrics and related outcomes. METHODS: Referral paradigms were defined as follows: primary transfer to the comprehensive stroke center (CSC) from a remote region, called mothership (MS); secondary transfer to the CSC from a primary stroke center where intravenous thrombolysis was available, called drip and ship (DS); secondary transfer to the CSC from a community hospital where no reperfusion therapy was available, called ship and drip (SD); primary transfer to the CSC from its catchment area, called direct CSC (dCSC). RESULTS: Among 517 anterior circulation AIS patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy between 2015 and 2020, 16.6% of them were SD, in addition to the well-known referral paradigms of MS (21.8%) and DS (18.1%). This rate grew to 30% when only patients whose place of onset was outside the CSC catchment area were considered. In the SD group, onset to CSC and onset to groin were significantly longer (178±80 min vs. 102±60 min, p<0.001, and 277±77 min vs. 211±61 min, p<0.001, respectively), and the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was significantly higher (OR: 2.514; 95%CI: 1.18-5.35, p=0.017) compared to MS. CONCLUSION: In this hub-spoke stroke network, a high proportion of SD paradigm was found, which was associated with longer times to treatment and higher rates of any ICH. A closer cooperation between hospital stroke physicians, national health system staff, and paramedics is warranted to identify the most appropriate referral strategy for each patient.

CT Angiography ASPECTS Predicts Outcome Much Better Than Noncontrast CT in Patients with Stroke Treated Endovascularly.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noncontrast CT ASPECTS has been investigated as a predictor of outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Our purpose was to investigate whether CTA source images are a better predictor of clinical and radiologic outcomes than NCCT ASPECTS in candidates for endovascular stroke therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of patients (n = 124) were independently evaluated by 2 readers for baseline NCCT and CTA source image ASPECTS and for follow-up ASPECTS. An mRS of ≤2 at 3 months was considered a favorable outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the ability of NCCT and CTA source image ASPECTS to identify patients with favorable outcomes. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to find independent predictors of outcome. RESULTS: Baseline CTA source image ASPECTS correlated better than NCCT ASPECTS with follow-up ASPECTS (r = 0.76 versus r = 0.51; P for comparison of the 2 coefficients < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that baseline CTA source image ASPECTS compared with NCCT ASPECTS can better identify patients with favorable outcome (CTA source image area under the curve = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; NCCT area under the curve = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.77; P < .001). Finally, the stepwise regression analysis showed that lower age, good recanalization, lower time to recanalization, and good baseline CTA source image ASPECTS, not NCCT ASPECTS, were independent predictors of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CTA source image ASPECTS predicts outcome better than NCCT ASPECTS; this finding suggests CTA rather than NCCT as a main step in the decision-making process for patients with acute ischemic stroke.