Association of Psychosocial Risk Factors With Quality of Life and Readmissions 1 Year After LVAD Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with advanced heart failure (HF), treatment with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We investigated the association between psychosocial risk factors, HRQOL and outcomes after LVAD implantation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort (n = 9832) of adults aged ≥ 19 years who received durable LVADs between 2008 and 2017 was identified by using the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). Patients were considered to have psychosocial risk factors if ≥ 1 of the following were present: (1) substance abuse; (2) limited social support; (3) limited cognitive understanding; (4) repeated nonadherence; and (5) major psychiatric disease. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between psychosocial risk factors and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 scores from baseline to 1 year, persistently poor HRQOL (KCCQ-12 score < 45 at baseline and 1 year), and 1-year rehospitalization. RESULTS: Among the final analytic cohort, 2024 (20.6%) patients had ≥ 1 psychosocial risk factors. Psychosocial risk factors were associated with a smaller improvement in KCCQ-12 scores from baseline to 1 year (mean ± SD, 29.1 ± 25.9 vs 32.6 ± 26.1; P = 0.015) for a difference of -3.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.88 to -1.13). Psychosocial risk factors were associated with persistently poor HRQOL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.74), and 1-year all-cause readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18). Limited social support, major psychiatric disorder and repeated nonadherence were associated with persistently poor HRQOL, while major psychiatric disorder was associated with 1-year rehospitalization. CONCLUSION: The presence of psychosocial risk factors is associated with lower KCCQ-12 scores and higher risk for readmission at 1 year after LVAD implantation. These associations are statistically significant, but further research is needed to determine whether these differences are clinically meaningful.

Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Safe and Feasible in Patients With Smaller Body Surface Area.

OBJECTIVE: Smaller body surface area (BSA) frequently precludes patients from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We sought to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with small BSA undergoing less invasive LVAD implantation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 216 patients implanted with HeartMate 3 LVAD (Abbott, Chicago, IL) via less invasive surgery at our institution. Patients were dichotomized based on their preimplant BSA for comparison between small BSA (≤1.8 m2) and normal/large BSA (>1.8 m2). We analyzed patient perioperative characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: In our study, small BSA was found in 32 patients (14.8%), while 184 patients (85.2%) had normal/large BSA. Women were more prevalent in the small BSA group (50.0% vs 13.0%, P < 0.001). Preoperative and intraoperative data showed comparable results. Major complications and hospital length of stay did not differ by BSA group. Patients with smaller BSA had significantly decreased pump parameters at discharge, including LVAD flow (4.11 ± 0.49 vs 4.60 ± 0.54 L/min, P < 0.001) and pump speed (5,200 vs 5,400 rpm, P < 0.001). Survival to discharge and within 6 months after implantation were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that less invasive HeartMate 3 implantation can be safely performed and demonstrates equivalent outcomes in patients with smaller body habitus. Randomized trials are required to confirm our data.

Serum Proteomic Analysis of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Reveals Distinctive Dysregulation of Inflammatory and Cholesterol Metabolism Pathways.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and its distinctive biological features remain incompletely understood. High-throughput serum proteomic profiling, a powerful tool to gain insights into the pathophysiology of diseases at a systems biology level, has never been used to investigate PPCM relative to nonischemic cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the pathophysiology of PPCM through serum proteomic analysis. METHODS: Aptamer-based proteomic analysis (SomaScan 7K) was performed on serum samples from women with PPCM (n = 67), women with nonischemic nonperipartum cardiomyopathy (NPCM) (n = 31), and age-matched healthy peripartum and nonperipartum women (n = 10 each). Serum samples were obtained from the IPAC (Investigation of Pregnancy-Associated Cardiomyopathy) and IMAC2 (Intervention in Myocarditis and Acute Cardiomyopathy) studies. RESULTS: Principal component analysis revealed unique clustering of each patient group (P for difference <0.001). Biological pathway analyses of differentially measured proteins in PPCM relative to NPCM, before and after normalization to pertinent healthy controls, highlighted specific dysregulation of inflammatory pathways in PPCM, including the upregulation of the cholesterol metabolism-related anti-inflammatory pathway liver-X receptor/retinoid-X receptor (LXR/RXR) (P < 0.01, Z-score 1.9-2.1). Cardiac recovery by 12 months in PPCM was associated with the downregulation of pro-inflammatory pathways and the upregulation of LXR/RXR, and an additional RXR-dependent pathway involved in the regulation of inflammation and metabolism, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/RXRα signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Serum proteomic profiling of PPCM relative to NPCM and healthy controls indicated that PPCM is a distinct disease entity characterized by the unique dysregulation of inflammation-related pathways and cholesterol metabolism-related anti-inflammatory pathways. These findings provide insight into the pathophysiology of PPCM and point to novel potential therapeutic targets.

Racial differences in clinical characteristics and readmission burden among patients with a left ventricular-assist device.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding racial disparities in outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and the burden of readmissions by race among patients with LVAD. METHODS: The study population included 461 patients implanted with LVADs at the University of Rochester Medical Center, NY from May 2008 to March 2020. Patients were stratified by race as White patients (N = 396 [86%]) and Black patients (N = 65 [14%]). The Anderson-Gill recurrent regression analysis was used to assess the independent association between race and the total number of admissions after LVAD implant during an average follow-up of 2.45 ± 2.30 years. RESULTS: Black patients displayed significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics compared to White patients, including a younger age, a lower frequency of ischemic etiology, and a higher baseline serum creatinine. Black patients had a significantly higher burden of readmissions after LVAD implantation as compared with White patients 10 versus 7 (average number of hospitalizations per patient at 5 years of follow-up, respectively) translated into a significant 39% increased risk of recurrent readmissions after multivariate adjustment (Hazard ratio 1.39, 95% CI; 1.07-1.82, p 0.013). CONCLUSION: Black LVAD patients experience an increased burden of readmissions compared with White patients, after adjustment for baseline differences in demographics and clinical characteristics. Future studies should assess the underlying mechanisms for this increased risk including the effect of social determinants of health on the risk of readmissions in LVAD recipients.

Confirm Rx insertable cardiac monitor for primary atrial fibrillation detection in high-risk heart failure patients (Confirm-AF trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) represent a large population of patients who are at high risk for complications related to undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). However, currently there are limited modalities available for early AF detection in this high-risk population. An implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is inserted subcutaneously and can provide long-term arrhythmia information via remote monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: Confirm-AF is a prospective randomized, nonblinded, two arm, multicenter clinical trial to be performed in the United States, enrolling 477 patients with a history of HF hospitalization and left ventricular ejection fraction >35% from 30 medical sites. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to undergo ICM implant with remote monitoring and symptom-triggered mobile app transmissions versus (vs.) Non-ICM management and follow-up. The primary objective of this trial is to compare the time to first detection of AF lasting > 5 min using an Abbott ICM compared to non-ICM monitoring in symptomatic HF patients. This article describes the design and analytic plan for the Confirm-AF trial. CONCLUSIONS: The Confirm-AF trial seeks to accurately define the burden of AF in high-risk HF patients with LVEF > 35% using an Abbott ICM. A finding showing significantly higher incidence of AF along with improved clinical outcomes with ICM monitoring is expected to have substantial clinical implications and may change the method of monitoring high-risk HF patients.

Left atrial appendage exclusion with less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this single-center, pilot, prospective, and historical control study is to evaluate safety and feasibility outcomes associated with left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) concomitant with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation via less invasive surgery (LIS) as a stroke prevention strategy. METHODS: A predefined number of 30 eligible subjects scheduled for LIS LVAD with LAAE were enrolled in the prospective arm between January 2020 and February 2021. Eligible retrospective LIS LVAD patients without LAAE were propensity-matched in a 1:1 ratio with the prospective arm subjects. The primary study objectives were to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the LAAE concomitant with LIS LVAD. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics of patients in the Non-LAAE and LAAE groups were similar. LAAE was successfully excluded in all prospective patients (100%). Primary safety endpoints of chest tube output within the first 24 postoperative hours, Reoperation for bleeding within 48 h, and index hospitalization mortality demonstrated comparable safety of LAAE versus Non-LAAE with LIS LVAD. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that LAAE with LIS LVAD was associated with 37% and 49% reduction in the risk of stroke and disabling stroke, respectively (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Results from our pilot study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of LAAE concomitant with LIS LVAD as a stroke prevention strategy. This is the first prospective study describing LAAE performed concomitantly to less invasive LVAD implantation. The efficacy of LAAE in long-term stroke prevention needs to be confirmed in future prospective randomized clinical trials.

Cognitive Change After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion is a potential mechanism that causes cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure. Cognitive impairment in this population is associated with an increased mortality and poorer quality of life. Understanding the etiopathogenesis of cognitive impairment is crucial to developing effective treatment. A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a durable mechanical circulatory support device that restores systemic perfusion in patients with heart failure, potentially reversing cerebral hypoperfusion and cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: This case series and systematic review examines the effect of LVAD implantation on cognition in patients with heart failure. METHODS: We report a case series of 4 LVAD recipients at a tertiary academic center who underwent preimplant and postimplant cognitive testing. We also conducted a systematic review of studies with adult recipients of a continuous-flow LVAD whose cognition was measured before and after implantation. We searched Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane library (start of database to July 16, 2021) for longitudinal, peer-reviewed studies written in English. RESULTS: Cognitive improvement after LVAD implantation was observed in the case series, with improvement on phonemic fluency and digit symbol coding assessments. Two out of 4 cases in the case series improved on Clinical Dementia Rating: one from moderate dementia to mild cognitive impairment and another from mild cognitive impairment to unimpaired. Seven studies were included in the systematic review and were heterogeneous regarding cognitive tests employed, follow-up period, and measured outcomes. Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Trail-Making Test Part B were used most commonly. Cognitive improvement was reported in all 7 studies with at least 1 study reporting statistically significant improvements in each the following cognitive domains: delayed and immediate recall, executive function, visuospatial function, verbal function, attention, and processing speed. Most studies had small sample sizes and lacked a control group. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD implantation appears to be associated with improved cognition. Adequately powered, prospective studies are needed to examine the effect of LVAD on cognitive function in patients with heart failure. Additionally, studies that directly examine cerebral blood flow in conjunction with cognitive assessment are needed to establish the relationship between the reversal of cerebral hypoperfusion and improved cognition.

Impact of surgical approach for left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative invasive hemodynamics and right ventricular failure.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to compare immediate postoperative invasive hemodynamics and the risk of RVF following two different surgical approaches: less invasive surgery (LIS) versus full sternotomy (FS). METHODS: The study population comprised all 231 patients who underwent implantation of a HeartMate 3 (Abbott) LVAD at our institution from 2015 to 2020, utilizing an LIS (n = 161; 70%) versus FS (n = 70; 30%) surgical approach. Outcomes included postoperative invasive hemodynamic parameters, vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), RVF during index hospitalization, and 6-month mortality. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that LIS, compared with FS, was associated with the improved cardiac index (CI) at the sixth postoperative hour (p = .036) and similar CI at 24 h, maintained by lower VIS at both timepoints (p = .002). The LIS versus FS approach was also associated with a three-fold lower incidence of in-hospital severe RVF (8.7% vs. 28.6%, p < .001) and need for RVAD support (5.0% vs. 17.1%, p = .003), and with 68% reduction in the risk of 6-month mortality after LVAD implantation (Hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.13-0.78; p = .012). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LIS, compared with FS, is associated with a more favorable hemodynamic profile, as indicated by similar hemodynamic parameters maintained by lower vasoactive-inotropic support during the acute postoperative period. These findings were followed by a reduction in the risk of severe RVF and 6-month mortality in the LIS group.

Low Blood Pressure Threshold for Adverse Outcomes During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

It has been suggested that maintaining low mean arterial pressure (MAP) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is associated with a reduced risk of stroke/death. However, the lower limit of the optimal MAP range has not been established. We aimed to identify this lower limit in a contemporary cohort of LVAD recipients with frequent longitudinal MAP measurements. We analyzed 86,651 MAP measurements in 309 patients with an LVAD (32% LVADs with full magnetic levitation of the impeller) at a tertiary medical center during a mean follow-up of 1.7 ± 1.1 years. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to study the association of serial MAP measurements with stroke/death within 3 years after index discharge. Multivariate analysis identified MAP ≤75 mm Hg, compared with MAP >75 mm Hg, as the low MAP threshold associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 4.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.85 to 7.87, p <0.001), stroke (HR 2.72;, 95% CI 1.39 to 5.33, p = 0.01), and stroke/death (HR 4.45, 95% CI 2.83 to 6.99, p <0.001). The risk associated with MAP ≤75 mm Hg was consistent in subgroups categorized by age, gender, race, device type, renal function, right-sided heart failure, and blood pressure medications. In conclusion, our findings suggest that maintaining MAP ≤75 mm Hg during long-term follow-up in LVAD recipients is associated with increased risk of stroke/death regardless of risk factors or medical management.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate collection of quality of life measurements for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients is challenging. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a popular tool that has been validated across multiple disciplines, but its applicability to the LVAD population remains unknown. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review included LVAD patients who completed a PROMIS assessment and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) survey at clinical encounters postoperatively. Patients completed computer adaptive PROMIS assessments for physical function, pain interference, and depression. All PROMIS domains are designed to follow a normal distribution (mean T-score 50, SD 10) in the general population. Assessments were aggregated over time and correlation between the KCCQ-12 summary score and each PROMIS domain was assessed individually. RESULTS: A total of 178 LVAD patients were included in the study. The median time between LVAD implantation and PRO collection was 16.5 [interquartile range, 7.9-37.8] months. Patients typically had worse physical function (T-score 38.8 [33.6-44.2]) but comparable pain (51.1 [38.7-59.2]) and depression (49.9 [41.7-57.5]) as the general population. The KCCQ-12 was more strongly correlated to PROMIS physical function (Spearman's ρ = 0.746) than pain (ρ = -0.539) or depression (ρ = -0.591). CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS provides a robust quality of life data collection system that can be implemented in a clinical setting without imposing a significant burden. Using this more holistic system may allow for better patient-centered care in order to address quality of life limitations imposed by LVAD support that are not directly related to heart failure symptoms.

Management of Substance Use Disorders in a Patient With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

We present a case of common challenges in assessment and treatment of substance use disorders in patients with advanced heart failure requiring left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Top experts in the field of consultation-liaison psychiatry, cardiology, and cardiac surgery provide guidance for this commonly encountered clinical case based on their experience and review of the available literature. Key teaching topics include the role of LVAD in heart failure management, the impact of substance use disorder on heart failure and LVAD patient outcomes, and recommendations for assessment and management of substance use disorder in a patient with LVAD. Specifically, we highlight the challenges of assessing for substance use disorder in LVAD candidates and the limited literature available to guide treatment in this challenging patient population.

Study results suggest less invasive HeartMate 3 implantation is a safe and effective approach for obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Historically, obesity was considered a relative contraindication to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with less invasive surgery (LIS). The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of obese patients who underwent LVAD implantation through LIS with those who received full sternotomy (FS) implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with HeartMate 3 LVAD in our institution between September 2015 and June 2020. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) were included and dichotomized based on surgical approach into the FS or LIS cohort. RESULTS: Of 231 implanted patients, 107 (46%) were obese and included in the study. FS was performed in 26 (24%) patients and LIS approach in 81 (76%) patients. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar between the cohorts. Postoperatively, patients in LIS cohort had less bleeding (p = 0.029), fewer transfusions (p = 0.042), shorter duration of inotropic support (p = 0.049), and decreased incidence of severe RV failure (11.1% vs 30.8%, p = 0.028). Survival to discharge for the obese population was 87.5% overall and did not differ based on an approach (91.4% LIS vs 76.9% FS, p = 0.079). More LIS patients were discharged home (60.0% vs 82.4%, p = 0.041) rather than to rehabilitation center. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the LIS approach in obese patients is associated with fewer postoperative complications and a trend towards better short-term survival. These results suggest that less invasive LVAD implantation is a safe and effective approach for obese patients. Future prospective randomized trials are required to substantiate these results.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Implanted with Left Ventricular Assist Device.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to develop and implement a comprehensive enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this article, we describe our approach to the development and phased implementation of the protocol. Additionally, we reviewed prospectively collected data for patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our institution from February 2019 to August 2020. To compare early outcomes in our patients before and after protocol implementation, we dichotomized patients into two 6-month cohorts (the pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts) separated from each other by 6 months to allow for staff adoption of the protocol. Of the 115 LVAD implants, 38 patients were implanted in the pre-ERAS period and 46 patients in the ERAS period. Preoperatively, the patients` characteristics were similar between the cohorts. Postoperatively, we observed a decrease in bleeding (chest tube output of 1006 vs 647.5 mL, P < .001) and blood transfusions (fresh frozen plasma 31.6% vs 6.7%, P = .04; platelets 42.1% vs 8.7%, P = .001). Opioid prescription at discharge were 5-fold lower with the ERAS approach (P < .01). Furthermore, the number of patients discharged to a rehabilitation facility decreased significantly (20.0% vs 2.4%, P = .02). The index hospitalization length of stay and survival were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS for patients undergoing LVAD implantation is a novel, evidence-based, interdisciplinary approach to care with multiple potential benefits. In this article, we describe the details of the protocol and early positive changes in clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefits of an ERAS protocol in an LVAD population.Lay Summary: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is the implementation of standardized clinical pathways that ensures the use of best practices and decreased variation in perioperative care. Multidisciplinary teams work together on ERAS, thereby enhancing communication among health care silos. ERAS has been used for more than 30 years by other surgical services and has been shown to lead to a decreased length of stay, fewer complications, lower mortality, fewer readmissions, greater job satisfaction, and lower costs. Our goal was to translate these benefits to the perioperative care of complex patients with a left ventricular assist device. Early results suggest that this goal is possible; we have observed a decrease in transfusions, discharge on opioids, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility.

Smoking and the Risk of Stroke in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist device.

There are limited data on the association of smoking with the risk of stroke following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We designed this study to analyze the impact of smoking status at the time of LVAD implantation on stroke. We hypothesized that current smokers are at increased risk of stroke when compared with patients who were former or never smokers. The study population comprised of 369 patients in the University of Rochester Medical Center LVAD database, implanted with an LVAD between 2008 and 2018. Patients were stratified as current smoker (smoking within 30 days before LVAD implantation), former smoker, and never smoker. Stroke was defined as a transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident (hemorrhagic or ischemic). There were 45 current smokers, 198 former smokers, and 125 never smokers. Current smokers were younger (mean age 50 ± 11 years), as compared with former (58 ± 12 years) and never smokers (56 ± 13 years) p < 0.001. At 2 years following LVAD implantation, the cumulative incidence of stroke was significantly higher among current smokers (39%) as compared with former and never smokers (16% and 15%, respectively; p = 0.022 for the overall difference during follow-up). In a multivariate model adjusted for significant clinical variables, current smoking was associated with a significant 88% (p = 0.018) higher risk of stroke when compared with all noncurrent smokers. In conclusion, our data suggest that LVAD candidates who are current smokers experience a significantly higher risk of stroke following device implantation.

Genetic and Phenotypic Landscape of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) occurs in ≈1:2000 deliveries in the United States and worldwide. The genetic underpinnings of PPCM remain poorly defined. Approximately 10% of women with PPCM harbor truncating variants in TTN (TTNtvs). Whether mutations in other genes can predispose to PPCM is not known. It is also not known if the presence of TTNtvs predicts clinical presentation or outcomes. Nor is it known if the prevalence of TTNtvs differs in women with PPCM and preeclampsia, the strongest risk factor for PPCM. METHODS: Women with PPCM were retrospectively identified from several US and international academic centers, and clinical information and DNA samples were acquired. Next-generation sequencing was performed on 67 genes, including TTN, and evaluated for burden of truncating and missense variants. The impact of TTNtvs on the severity of clinical presentation, and on clinical outcomes, was evaluated. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-nine women met inclusion criteria. Of the women with PPCM, 10.4% bore TTNtvs (odds ratio=9.4 compared with 1.2% in the reference population; Bonferroni-corrected P [P*]=1.2×10-46). We additionally identified overrepresentation of truncating variants in FLNC (odds ratio=24.8, P*=7.0×10-8), DSP (odds ratio=14.9, P*=1.0×10-8), and BAG3 (odds ratio=53.1, P*=0.02), genes not previously associated with PPCM. This profile is highly similar to that found in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Women with TTNtvs had lower left ventricular ejection fraction on presentation than did women without TTNtvs (23.5% versus 29%, P=2.5×10-4), but did not differ significantly in timing of presentation after delivery, in prevalence of preeclampsia, or in rates of clinical recovery. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first extensive genetic and phenotypic landscape of PPCM and demonstrates that predisposition to heart failure is an important risk factor for PPCM. The work reveals a degree of genetic similarity between PPCM and dilated cardiomyopathy, suggesting that gene-specific therapeutic approaches being developed for dilated cardiomyopathy may also apply to PPCM, and that approaches to genetic testing in PPCM should mirror those taken in dilated cardiomyopathy. Last, the clarification of genotype/phenotype associations has important implications for genetic counseling.

Prevention of Fibrosis and Pathological Cardiac Remodeling by Salinomycin.

[Figure: see text].

Long-term milrinone therapy as a bridge to heart transplantation: Safety, efficacy, and predictors of failure.

BACKGROUND: Studies of long-term inotrope use in advanced HF have previously provided limited and conflicting results. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term milrinone use and identify predictors of failure to bridge to orthotropic heart transplant (OHT) in a cohort of end-stage heart failure (HF) patients listed for heart transplantation and receiving inotrope therapy. METHODS: The study included 150 adults listed for OHT at a single center from 2001 to 2017 who received milrinone therapy for ≥30 days. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with "failure" (left ventricular assist device, intra-aortic balloon pump, status downgrade due to instability, death) vs. "success" (OHT, recovery) during bridging to OHT. RESULTS: "Failure" occurred in 33 (22%) patients. Factors independently associated with failure included male sex (HR = 7.6; p = 0.004), no implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (HR = 3.8; p = 0.009), and lack of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with a beta-blocker (HR = 7.8; p = 0.002) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (HR = 6.3; p < 0.001). Patients who received fewer guideline-directed medications had a higher cumulative probability of failure. Adverse events included central line-associated bloodstream infection (2.55 per 1000 line-days) and arrhythmia (1.59 per 1000 treatment-days). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that long-term milrinone therapy in selected patients is associated with a high rate of successful bridging to OHT and a low rate of adverse events. Patients intolerant of GDMT are more likely to fail to bridge to OHT without mechanical support. Sex differences in outcomes associated with milrinone therapy should be explored.