Sex Differences in TB Clinical Presentation, Drug Exposure, and Treatment Outcomes in India.

BACKGROUND: The role of sex differences in clinical presentation, TB drug pharmacokinetic variables, and treatment outcomes is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect of sex on TB disease severity, drug exposure, and treatment outcome? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study conducted in India. It assessed TB disease severity; risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes (failure, recurrence, and death) according to sex; and risk factors for unfavorable outcomes stratified according to sex. Effects of sex on the pharmacokinetic variables (maximum concentration and area under the curve) of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide were estimated by using noncompartmental analyses. RESULTS: Of 1,541 people with microbiologically confirmed TB, 567 (37%) were women. Women had a lower risk of high mycobacterial burden (smear grade ≥ 2 and/or time to detection < 7 days) with an adjusted OR of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.87). Among the 744 participants who were followed up prospectively, 261 (35%) were women. Women had a lower risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes (adjusted incidence risk ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), mostly because recurrence was lower (adjusted incidence risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.86). Isoniazid (but not rifampicin and pyrazinamide) maximum concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher among women (P < .01) than men. Among women, unfavorable outcomes were more likely among those with cavitary disease, but among men, increased risk of unfavorable outcomes was associated with alcohol use, higher BMI, and lower glycated hemoglobin level. INTERPRETATION: Women present with lower mycobacterial burden, achieve higher TB drug exposure, and are less likely to have unfavorable treatment outcomes than men. Strategies to improve TB treatment success should take into account sex differences in risk factors for unfavorable outcomes.

Rifampicin effect on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide.

OBJECTIVES: Tenofovir alafenamide produces lower plasma tenofovir and higher intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (DP) concentrations than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate but it is likely a victim of interactions with rifampicin. We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine with rifampicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers received tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine at 25/200 mg once daily, followed by tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin daily followed by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Plasma tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir, emtricitabine and intracellular tenofovir-DP and emtricitabine triphosphate pharmacokinetics and genetic polymorphisms were assessed. RESULTS: Tenofovir alafenamide exposure decreased when tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin was used compared with tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI): 0.45 (0.33-0.60)]. Plasma tenofovir and intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations decreased with rifampicin [GMR (90% CI): 0.46 (0.40-0.52) and 0.64 (0.54-0.75), respectively]. GMR (90% CI) of intracellular tenofovir-DP AUC0-24 for tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine + rifampicin versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was 4.21 (2.98-5.95). Rifampicin did not affect emtricitabine pharmacokinetics. CYP3A4*22 rs35599367 was associated with higher plasma tenofovir alafenamide AUC0-24 at day 56. CONCLUSIONS: Following tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine administration with rifampicin, intracellular tenofovir-DP concentrations were still 4.21-fold higher than those achieved by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, supporting further study during HIV/TB co-infection.

Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tuberculosis Treatment.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) are two common diseases with increasing geographic overlap and clinical interactions. The effect of DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of anti-TB drugs remains poorly characterized. Newly diagnosed TB patients with and without DM starting fixed-dose, thrice-weekly treatment underwent sampling for PK assessments (predose and 0.5, 2, and 6 h postdose) during the intensive and continuation phases of treatment. The effect of DM and HbA1c values on the maximum concentration (Cmax) of rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide and the association between drug concentrations and microbiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Of 243 patients, 101 had DM. Univariate analysis showed significant reductions in the Cmax of pyrazinamide and isoniazid (but not rifampin) with DM or increasing HbA1c values. After adjusting for age, sex, and weight, DM was associated only with reduced pyrazinamide concentrations (adjusted geometric mean ratio = 0.74, P = 0.03). In adjusted Cox models, female gender (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] = 1.75, P = 0.001), a lower smear grade with the Xpert assay (aHR = 1.40, P < 0.001), and the pyrazinamide Cmax (aHR = 0.99, P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sputum culture conversion to negative. Higher isoniazid or rifampin concentrations were associated with a faster time to culture conversion in patients with DM only. A pyrazinamide Cmax above the therapeutic target was associated with higher unfavorable outcomes (treatment failure, relapse, death) (odds ratio = 1.92, P = 0.04). DM and higher HbA1c values increased the risk of not achieving therapeutic targets for pyrazinamide (but not rifampin or isoniazid). Higher pyrazinamide concentrations, though, were associated with worse microbiologic and clinical outcomes. DM status also appeared to influence PK-PD relationships for isoniazid and rifampin.

Rifampin vs. rifapentine: what is the preferred rifamycin for tuberculosis?

INTRODUCTION: One-third of the world's population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb.). Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can progress to tuberculosis disease, the leading cause of death by infection. Rifamycin antibiotics, like rifampin and rifapentine, have unique sterilizing activity against M.tb. What are the advantages of each for LTBI or tuberculosis treatment? Areas covered: We review studies assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), drug interaction risk, safety, and efficacy of rifampin and rifapentine and provide basis for comparing them. Expert commentary: Rifampin has shorter half-life, higher MIC against M.tb, lower protein binding, and better distribution into cavitary contents than rifapentine. Drug interactions for the two drugs maybe similar in magnitude. For LTBI, rifapentine is effective as convenient, once-weekly, 12-week course of treatment. Rifampin is also effective for LTBI, but must be given daily for four months, therefore, drug interactions are more problematic. For drug-sensitive tuberculosis disease, rifampin remains the standard of care. Safety profile of rifampin is better-described; adverse events differ somewhat for the two drugs. The registered once-weekly rifapentine regimen is inadequate, but higher doses of either drugs may shorten the treatment duration required for effective management of TB. Results of clinical trials evaluating high-dose rifamycin regimens are eagerly awaited.