Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 64(1): 25-34, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28263041

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Accurate delivery of radiation while reducing dose to organs at risk is essential in prostate treatment. The Calypso motion management system detects and corrects both inter- and intra-fraction motion which offers potential benefits over standard alignment to fiducial markers. The aims of this study were to implement Calypso with Dynamic Edge™ gating and to assess both the motion seen, and interventions required. METHODS: An implementation group was formed which assessed changes needed to standard workflows. Three patients had Calypso beacons inserted into their prostate. All patients were treated using volumetric modulated arc therapy to a dose of 80 Gy in 40 fractions. Standard inter-fraction motion correction using either kilovoltage (kV) orthogonal paired imaging or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image-guided radiotherapy techniques, were used along with the Calypso system to compare accuracy. A gating threshold of >0.5 cm was used during treatment. Workflow variations along with inter- and intra-fraction motion and interventions required were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 116 fractions were treated using Calypso with Dynamic Edge™ gating. There was a strong concordance between aligning beacons using kV orthogonal imaging or CBCT and Calypso (mean variation ≤0.06 cm). The mean intra-fraction motion detected was ≤0.2 cm in all directions with the largest motion recorded being 2.2 cm in the left direction while the treatment beam was off. Prostate rotation was largest in the pitch direction and 28 fractions exceeded the 10° tolerance. A total of 78 couch shift corrections of ≥0.3 cm were required, usually following standard imaging, and before treatment starting. Three gating events due to intra-fraction motion occurred during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-fraction motion monitoring with Calypso was successfully implemented. Greatest movement was seen between time of standard imaging and treatment starting with more than half the treatments requiring a ≥0.3 cm adjustment. This would not have been detected without intra-fraction monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Movimiento , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/instrumentación , Rotación
2.
Med Phys ; 42(1): 354-8, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25563275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM) is a real-time image guidance method that uses widely available radiotherapy technology, i.e., a gantry-mounted x-ray imager. The authors report on the geometric and dosimetric results of the first patient treatment using KIM which occurred on September 16, 2014. METHODS: KIM uses current and prior 2D x-ray images to estimate the 3D target position during cancer radiotherapy treatment delivery. KIM software was written to process kilovoltage (kV) images streamed from a standard C-arm linear accelerator with a gantry-mounted kV x-ray imaging system. A 120° pretreatment kV imaging arc was acquired to build the patient-specific 2D to 3D motion correlation. The kV imager was activated during the megavoltage (MV) treatment, a dual arc VMAT prostate treatment, to estimate the 3D prostate position in real-time. All necessary ethics, legal, and regulatory requirements were met for this clinical study. The quality assurance processes were completed and peer reviewed. RESULTS: During treatment, a prostate position offset of nearly 3 mm in the posterior direction was observed with KIM. This position offset did not trigger a gating event. After the treatment, the prostate motion was independently measured using kV/MV triangulation, resulting in a mean difference of less than 0.6 mm and standard deviation of less than 0.6 mm in each direction. The accuracy of the marker segmentation was visually assessed during and after treatment and found to be performing well. During treatment, there were no interruptions due to performance of the KIM software. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, KIM has been used for real-time image guidance during cancer radiotherapy. The measured accuracy and precision were both submillimeter for the first treatment fraction. This clinical translational research milestone paves the way for the broad implementation of real-time image guidance to facilitate the detection and correction of geometric and dosimetric errors, and resultant improved clinical outcomes, in cancer radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Radiografía/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Algoritmos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Masculino , Movimiento (Física) , Aceleradores de Partículas , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/fisiopatología , Próstata/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radiografía/instrumentación , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Programas Informáticos
3.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 58(4): 511-6, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24580893

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of injecting a temporary spacer between the rectum and the prostate and to quantify the degree of rectal dosimetric improvement that might result. METHODS: Ten patients underwent CT and MRI before and after injection of 10 cc of hydrogel and at completion of radiotherapy. Hydrogel was injected under general anaesthetic using a transperineal approach. The primary endpoints were perioperative toxicity and rectal dosimetry (V80, V75, V70, V65, V40 and V30). Secondary endpoints were acute gastrointestinal toxicity during and 3 months following radiotherapy and the stability of the hydrogel. Treatment for all patients was planned incorporating volumetric modulated arc therapy with a D95 of 80 Gy in 40 fractions to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles on both the pre- and post-hydrogel scans. Toxicity was scored with the Common Terminology Criteria, v. 3.0. RESULTS: In the first 24 h, two patients described an increase in bowel movement frequency. The comparison plans had identical prescription doses. Rectal doses were significantly lower for all hydrogel patients for all dose endpoints (V80 = 7% vs. 0.1%, V75 = 10.3% vs. 1.1%, V70 = 13.2% vs. 2.7%, V65 = 15.8% vs. 4.6%, V40 = 35.2% vs. 23.3%, V30 = 52.6% vs. 38.5%; P < 0.001). Post-treatment MRI showed gel stability. Grade 1 bowel toxicity was reported in six patients during radiotherapy and two patients at 3 months' follow-up. No Grade 2 or Grade 3 acute bowel toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: SpaceOAR hydrogel was successfully injected in 10 patients with minimal side effects. Rectal dosimetry was significantly improved in all patients. This study has been extended to 30 patients with longer follow-up planned.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Radiometría/instrumentación , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/prevención & control , Anciano , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Hidrogeles/efectos de la radiación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis e Implantes , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...