RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The historical standard of care for Ph+ ALL is chemotherapy plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Recently chemotherapy-free regimens have shown promising efficacy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy-free regimens for Ph+ ALL. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for chemotherapy-free regimens for Ph+ ALL published between January 2000 and October 2023. Of the 5,348 articles screened, 9 nonrandomized clinical trials enrolling 413 patients were included. Two trials (N = 117) included treatment with 3 agents (blinatumomab, TKI, and steroid) and 7 trials (N = 248) included treatment with 2 agents (TKI and steroids). R software was used to conduct the meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023482439). RESULTS: The pooled complete molecular response (CMR) rate of patients receiving a TKI, blinatumomab, and steroids was 81% (95%CI, 69%-89%). TKIs plus blinatumomab were nearly 6 times as likely to have CMR (odds ratio [OR], 5.98; 95%CI, 2.99-11.96) and more than 5 times as likely to be alive at 1-year (OR, 5.1; 95%CI, 1.74-14.9) as compared to TKIs alone. Patients receiving ponatinib were about twice as likely as those receiving dasatinib to achieve CMR (OR, 2.51; 95%CI, 0.72-8.72). CONCLUSION: Adding blinatumomab to TKIs and steroids significantly improved Ph+ ALL patients' response and survival rates. Regimens with ponatinib elicited higher molecular response rates than those with other TKIs. The high response and survival rates achieved with blinatumomab plus TKIs and steroids suggest that further studies are required to assess the need for intensive treatments such as chemotherapy or stem cell transplant in these patients.
RESUMEN
Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have an increased likelihood of venous thromboembolism (VTE) owing to factors such as acquired protein C and S deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and heightened levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This case report highlights an exceptionally uncommon occurrence of deep venous thrombosis in an HIV-infected patient receiving a therapeutic dose of enoxaparin. This underscores the need for cautious consideration of the risk of VTE in HIV-infected individuals, even with preventive or therapeutic anticoagulant treatment. Further research is recommended to investigate HIV as a potential risk factor of prophylactic anticoagulation.
RESUMEN
RET proto-oncogene encodes receptor tyrosine kinase. Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are the only RET-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved by FDA in RET-altered tumors. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, WOS, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Objective-response, complete-response, and partial-response were 60-89%, 0-11%, and 55-89%, respectively, with the use of RET-specific drugs. ≥Grade 3 adverse events were seen in 28-53% of the patients, with hypertension, change in ALT, QT prolongation, neutropenia, and pneumonitis among the common side effects. Hence, selpercatinib and pralsetinib were effective and well tolerated by most of the patients with RET-altered tumors.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Hipertensión , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias , Neutropenia , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-ret/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy due to anomalous differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with myeloid blast buildup. Induction chemotherapy is considered the first line of treatment in most patients with AML. However, targeted therapy in the form of FLT-3, IDH, BCL-2, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, can be considered as the first line depending on their molecular profile, resistance to chemotherapy, comorbidities, etc. This review aims to assess the tolerability and efficacy of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in AML. METHODS: We searched Medline, WOS, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. PRISMA guidelines were followed in this systematic review. 3327 articles were screened, and 9 clinical trials (N = 1119) were included. RESULTS: In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), objective response (OR) was reported in 63-74% of the patients with IDH inhibitors + azacitidine as compared to 19-36 % of the patients with azacitidine monotherapy in newly diagnosed (ND) medically unfit patients. Survival rates were significantly improved with the use of ivosidenib. OR was reported in 39.1-46 % of the patients who relapsed/refractory to chemotherapy. ≥Grade 3 IDH differentiation syndrome and QT prolongation were reported in 3.9-10 % and 2-10 % of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib for IDH-1 and enasidenib for IDH-2) are safe and effective in treating ND medically unfit or relapsed refractory patients with IDH mutation. However, no survival benefit was reported with enasidenib. More randomized multicenter double-blinded clinical studies are needed to confirm these results and compare them with other targeting agents.
Asunto(s)
Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Adulto , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Antígeno B7-H1/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an acquired antibody or cell-mediated platelet damage or decreased platelet production. Steroids, IV immunoglobulins (IVIG), and Rho-anti-D antibodies are the commonly used initial treatments for ITP. However, many ITP patients either do not respond or do not maintain a response to initial therapy. Splenectomy, rituximab, and thrombomimetics are the commonly used second-line treatment. More treatment options include tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKI), including spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. This review aims to assess the safety and efficacy of TKIs. Methods: Literature was searched on PubMed, Embase, WOS, and clinicaltrials.gov using keywords, "tyrosine kinase" and "idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura". PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results: In total, 4 clinical trials were included with 255 adult patients with relapsed/refractory ITP. In all, 101 (39.6%) patients were treated with fostamatinib, 60 (23%) patients with rilzabrutinib, and 34 (13%) with HMPL-523. Patients treated with fostamatinib achieved a stable response (SR) and overall response (OR) in 18/101 (17.8%) and 43/101 (42.5%) of the patients, respectively, while SR and OR were achieved in 1/49 (2%) and 7/49 (14%) of the patients, respectively, in the placebo group. Patients treated with HMPL-523 (300 mg dose expansion) achieved an SR and OR in 5/20 (25%) and 11/20 (55%) of the patients, respectively, while SR and OR were achieved in 1/11 (9%) of the patients treated with the placebo. Patients treated with rilzabrutinib achieved an SR in 17/60 (28%) patients. Dizziness (1%), hypertension (2%), diarrhea (1%), and neutropenia (1%) were serious adverse events in fostamatinib patients. Rilzabrutinib or HMPL-523 patients did not require a dose reduction due to drug-related adverse effects. Conclusions: Rilzabrutinib, fostamatinib, and HMPL-523 were safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory ITP.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), also termed as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a lethal complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Various factors put patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT at an increased risk for VOD. Thrombomodulin (TM) is an important factor which has a wide range of effects, including anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, and protective effect, on endothelial cells. It plays a role in preventing excessive coagulation and thrombosis by binding with thrombin and inhibiting the coagulation cascade. There are a limited number of options for the prevention of this fatal complication. Recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), an endothelial anticoagulant co-factor, as prophylactic therapy might be able to prevent veno-occlusive complications after stem cell transplantation. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. We used the following Mesh terms and Emtree terms, "Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Diseases" OR "Sinusoidal Obstruction" OR "Stem Cell Transplantations " AND "Thrombomodulin" from the inception of data up to April 1, 2021. The PICO (Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) framework was used for the literature search. RESULTS: For the VOD incidence after HSCTstem cell transplantation, the result was in favor of rTM with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.53 (I2 = 0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.89). The incidence of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) after HSCT was reduced in rTM group. The RR for incidence of TA-TMA was 0.48 (I2 = 62%, 95% CI = 0.20-1.17) favoring rTM. The RR for incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was also lower in rTM group, 0.48 (I2 = 64%, 95% CI = 0.32-0.72). CONCLUSION: In our meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTM in the prevention of SOS after HSCT. According to our results, rTM use led to a significant reduction in SOS episodes, TA-TMA, and GvHD after HSCT.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática , Trombosis , Humanos , Células Endoteliales , Trombosis/etiología , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/etiología , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/prevención & control , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. BRAF mutation is present in about 10% of CRC patients and is associated with a poor response to chemotherapy. These patients have a relatively poor prognosis. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutated CRC patients. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, and clinical trials relevant to BRAF inhibitors in CRC were included. Data were extracted for efficacy and safety variables. Two randomized clinical trials (n = 765) and eight non-randomized trials (n = 281) were included based on inclusion criteria. In RCTs, an overall response was reported in 23% of the patients treated with BRAF inhibitor-based regimens compared to 2.5% with control regimens. The hazard ratio of overall survival was also significantly better with triplet encorafenib therapy at 0.52 (95% CI = 0.39-0.70). In single-arm trials, ORR was 17% and 34% in two-drug and three-drug regimens, respectively. BRAF inhibitor-based regimens were safe and effective in the treatment of BRAF-mutated CRC. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to find a suitable population for each regimen. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023471627.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonists in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the MeSH and Emtree terms "leiomyoma" and "gonadotropin-releasing hormone." STUDY SELECTION: All clinical trials that provided efficacy and safety data in clinical terms (i.e., reduction in menstrual bleeding and discomfort, changes in the size of leiomyoma and uterine volume, etc.) were included. We excluded all preclinical studies, case reports, meta-analyses, review articles, and clinical studies irrelevant to the study question. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors extracted data from 9 clinical studies. The extracted data included the study's characteristics, participants' baseline characteristics, treatment drugs, efficacy measures, and toxicity. CONCLUSION: Among oral GnRH antagonists, relugolix, elagolix, and linzagolix were safe in patients with uterine fibroids. These drugs, alone and in combination with E2/NETA (estradiol/norethindrone acetate), showed significantly better efficacy than placebo in improving bleeding, discomfort, uterine/leiomyoma sizes, and quality of life in premenopausal patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. However, more randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials are needed to confirm these results and to see long-term benefits.
Asunto(s)
Leiomioma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Leiomioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Primary cardiac tumors are very rare and are often confused with other conditions due to clinical presentations or initial imaging. Here, we present a rare case of a 56-year-old male with right ventricular mass incidentally found on imaging. Appropriate testing should be conducted to rule out the possibility of a benign tumor. Asymptomatic patients with co-morbidities can be managed without surgery. More research is needed to devise guidelines for the management of these cases.
RESUMEN
The incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has increased in the US in recent decades. These are well-vascularized tumors, but no antiangiogenic drug has been approved for treatment of extra-pancreatic NENs. The aim is to assess efficacy and safety of surufatinib in pancreatic and extra-pancreatic NETs. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical trials and observational studies that provided safety and efficacy data in clinical terms were included. Characteristics of the study, baseline characteristics of participants, treatment drugs, measures of efficacy, and toxicity (≥grade 3 adverse effects) were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed using the "R" programming language. Risk ratio (RR) of objective response (OR)/partial response (PR) was 8.55 (95% CI: 1.68-43.66, I2 = 0) in favor of surufatinib. The hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25-0.92, I2 = 77%) in favor of surufatinib. The risk of ≥grade 3 adverse effects: diarrhea, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, proteinuria, and vomiting were high with the use of surufatinib. Quality of life (QoL) was similar in surufatinib and placebo groups except for the diarrhea that was high with surufatinib. Lack of randomized clinical trials in non-Chinese population. Surufatinib is well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in both pancreatic and extra-pancreatic NETs. More multicenter randomized, double-blinded clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Indoles , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/epidemiología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Pirimidinas , Calidad de Vida , SulfonamidasRESUMEN
Background Multiple patients with prostate cancer become resistant to castration therapies, which is termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Purpose The purpose of this review is to assess the status of efficacy (≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)) and safety (grade 3-4 adverse effects) of monoclonal antibodies in CRPC. Data source We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results Hazard ratios of PFS and OS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69-0.87, I2 = 53%) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.86-1.11, I2 = 40%), respectively, in the favor of monoclonal antibodies as compared to placebo. Risk ratio (RR) of >50% decline in PSA was 1.99 (95% CI = 0.97-4.08, I2 = 53%) in favor of monoclonal antibodies. Pooled incidence of >50% decline in PSA levels was 15% (95% CI = 0.1-0.23, I2 = 83%), 29% (95% CI = 0.14-0.51, I2 = 93%), 63% (95% CI = 0.49-0.76, I2 = 77%), and 88% (95% CI = 0.81-0.93, I2 = 0%) in single, two, three, and four-drug regimens, respectively. Conclusion Monoclonal antibodies are well tolerated and showed better PFS as compared to placebo. However, OS was only improved with ipilimumab. Denosumab delayed skeletal-related adverse events as compared to zoledronic acid. More multicenter double-blind clinical trials may be needed to confirm these results.
RESUMEN
Aortic dissection (AD) is an injury to the innermost layer of the aorta, leading to the formation of a false lumen. AD usually presents with tearing chest pain radiating to the back and is a medical emergency. Other common symptoms include abdominal pain, diaphoresis, loss of consciousness, shortness of breath, stroke-like symptoms, or leg pain. Here, we present a rare case of an incidental finding of asymptomatic AD on computed tomography angiography performed after cardiac catheterization failure. The patient had a history of aortic aneurysm, hypertension, and heart failure. Appropriate imaging should be performed to rule out the possibility of AD in patients with risk factors and cardiac catheterization failure.
RESUMEN
Treatment with a direct acting antiviral (DAA) has revolutionized HCV therapy, as more than 95% of patients achieve a sustained virological response (SVR). Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CryoVas), however, can persist and recur after the HCV cure. In this systematic review, we include data from 19 studies that provided information on the persistence and recurrence of CryoVas after the HCV cure with DAAs. A complete clinical response (CR) was reported in 63.7% to 90.2% of the DAA-treated patients after achieving SVR. Relapse of CryoVas symptoms was reported in 4% to 18% of the patients. Neuropathy, nephropathy, and dermatological complications were the most common manifestations of CryoVas. B-cell clones persisted in 31-40% of the patients and could contribute to CryoVas relapse. INFL3-rs12979860, ARNTL-rs648122, RETN-rs1423096, and SERPINE1-rs6976053 were associated with a higher incidence of persistence and recurrence of CryoVas. Prospective multicenter studies with diverse patient populations are needed to validate these findings for the timely and effective management of this challenging condition.
RESUMEN
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health issue and is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatitis D virus (HDV) requires the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) to replicate. The eradication of HBV, therefore, can also cure HDV. The current therapies for chronic hepatitis B and D are suboptimal and cannot definitely cure the viruses. In order to achieve functional or complete cure of these infections, novel therapeutic agents that target the various sites of the viral replicative cycle are necessary. Furthermore, novel immunomodulatory agents are also essential to achieve viral clearance. Many of these new promising compounds such as entry inhibitors, covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) inhibitors, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), capsid assembly modulators and nucleic acid polymers are in various stages of clinical developments. In this review article, we provided a comprehensive overview of the structure and lifecycle of HBV, the limitations of the current therapies and a summary of the novel therapeutic agents for both HDV and HBV infection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic delay of breast cancer is linked to poor prognosis and survival. It can be caused by patients or healthcare providers. Since there is no quantification of provider delay and total delay in Pakistan, the general picture of breast cancer diagnostic delay is poorly understood. This study was conducted to quantify total delay, provider delay, and patient delay, along with the factors contributing to each type of delay in breast cancer management. METHODS: This was a descriptive study conducted over 3 years at a hospital in Karachi. Convenience sampling was used. Breast cancer patients undergoing treatment were interviewed. Values for diagnostic delays extracted from literature were >12 weeks in seeking care as patient delay and >4 weeks in treatment initiation as provider delay. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included in the analysis. Mean total delay was 56±52 weeks, the median (IQR) patient delay was 4 (0-22) weeks, and the median provider delay was 17 (9-52) weeks. Patient delay was found in 149 (44.6%), and provider delay was found in 269 (80.5%) patients. Believing symptoms to resolve on their own was the most common reason (24.9%) for patient delay. Seeking multiple opinions (43.7%) and misdiagnosis (43.4%) were the most common reasons for provider delay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and providers both caused diagnostic delay in breast cancer treatment. There is a need to increase awareness in the general population and enhance the training of providers regarding timely recognition in all patients presenting with breast-related symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Tardío , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) typically responds better when treated with multiagent chemotherapy in the pediatric and young adolescent populations. Treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) ALL remains a challenge. Even after stem-cell transplantation and intensive chemotherapy, the prognosis of RR-ALL remains grave. The advent of chimeric antigen receptors has demonstrated promising results in RR-ALL. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) and engineered T cells are used to target cancer cells. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved CD19-specific CAR-T (tisagenlecleucel) therapy for RR-B-cell ALL in patients under 25 years old. In this systematic review, we discuss the efficacy and safety of CD19-specific CAR-T therapy in RR-B-cell ALL in the pediatric and young adult population. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials databases. A total of 448 patients received a CD19-specific CAR-T product, and 446 patients had evaluable data. The age range was 0 to 30 years. The incidence rate of complete remission was 82%. The cumulative incidence of relapse after CD19-specific CAR-T therapy is 36%. Similarly, the incidence rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome were 38%, 23%, 18%, 29%, and 19%, respectively. Our subgroup analysis shows the incidence rate of minimal residual negative complete remission was 69% with the CD28z costimulatory domain, 81% with the 4-1BB domain, and 77% with fourth-generation CD19-specific CAR-T therapy.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Antígenos CD19/inmunología , Niño , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/epidemiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inmunología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/epidemiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/inmunología , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Neutropenia/inmunología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/inmunología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidad , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/genética , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Trombocitopenia/epidemiología , Trombocitopenia/inmunología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
A high index of suspicion for pheochromocytoma is necessary during the workup of secondary hypertension as untreated pheochromocytoma may lead to significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients who require any surgical treatment.
RESUMEN
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women. There are a limited number of targeted therapies available for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. Among checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab is the only drug approved for PD-L1+ TNBC patients. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer. We included 15 clinical trials in this review. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated by all patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Pembrolizumab was more effective in the treatment of early-stage TNBC patients as compared to placebo, regardless of PD-L1 status. In advanced-stage breast cancer, pembrolizumab was as effective as single-agent chemotherapy with a better safety profile. Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy showed significantly better median progression free survival as compared to chemotherapy in advanced TNBC.