RESUMEN
Background Hemorrhoids are caused by the distal displacement of the hemorrhoidal cushions and venous distention. Hemorrhoidal illness is still a prevalent issue. Hemorrhoidal symptoms affect 5% of the general population and 50% of people over the age of 50. Surgical therapy ensures satisfactory results that are much better than those obtained with conservative treatments, particularly for grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Objectives This study aims to compare postoperative complications of hemorrhoidectomy among patients who live in a high-altitude region (Taif) and a sea-level (low-altitude level) region (Jeddah). Methods This retrospective study was conducted among patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy between January 2019 and January 2022 in Taif and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Simple random sampling was used to select the study population, and data were collected from patient files. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results A total of 135 patients were included in this study. Most of our patients were males (73.3%). Patients from Jeddah represented more than half of the study population, and 45.2% were from Taif. The majority of low-altitude area patients require less than a week to return to normal activities (54.1%), whereas the majority of high-altitude area patients (59%) require more than a week (P = 0.047). 94.1% of participants felt pain on Day 1, and 54.1% had pain on Day 7. According to our findings, approximately one-fourth of patients (25.2%) developed recurrent hemorrhoids, and 27.4% experienced recurrent hemorrhoid symptoms. When we compared low-altitude regions and high-altitude regions in postoperative complications of hemorrhoidectomy, we found that urinary retention was most common in the high-altitude regions (37.7%). Conclusion Our results found that urinary retention was the most common complication in the high-altitude region. Early return to regular activity with less postoperative pain on Day 7 was a significant finding among low-altitude area patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nowadays patients are encouraged to partake in healthcare decision making and patient preferences are given increasing weight. Patient's choice is important to reduce waiting time and to encourage competition between providers, as most patients look for high-quality care while minimizing costs, according to different studies this may not be as simple as the attributes and factors that patients value when selecting a hospital or surgeon. Overall, Saudi Arabia has minimal research on how patients select surgeons or surgical facilities. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to evaluate the criteria Saudi population patients used to select their surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to determine the relative importance of the following aspects that patients may consider when selecting a surgeon: (a) physician-related considerations; (b) elements relating to healthcare service and access; (c) the perspectives of patients on various factors. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study attempts to investigate the criteria that people in Saudi Arabia considered most important while selecting their surgeons. This study was conducted between August and November 2022. The questionnaire is also given in English along with Arabic. RESULTS: Six hundred nine completed the survey with a response rate of 91.6%. Concerning physician-related factors considered when choosing a surgeon attitudes of the physician were the factor most significantly contributed to physician selection rather than reputation or professional experience and physician social media: (84.7%) mentioned that paying attention to patient's needs and opinions is important; sparing enough time for patients is important as reported by 83.9% of the participants; Personal care and hygiene is important for 83.4% of the participants; Communication skills were considered to be important as stated by 82.6% of the participants. Regarding healthcare services/access-related factors considered by patients in physician selection; it was found that patients considered hospital hygiene-cleanliness (91.3 %) as the most significant healthcare service/access-related factor in physician selection and then it comes Ease of obtaining an appointment (89.7%), reasonable scheduling and wait for time (87.7%) and cost of surgery (82.1%). Physician selection was deemed crucial to the success of the therapy by 87.7% of patients, while 88.3% of patients thought it was crucial to research the doctor before contacting her or him for the current admission. CONCLUSION: Patients consider a wide range of variables when selecting their surgeons and the location of their procedure. Depending on sociodemographic, cultural, and other aspects, the conditions surrounding patients' decisions may vary. Overall, the selection of a surgeon by surgery patients appears to be more influenced by the doctor's attitudes than by his or her reputation, professional experience, or social media presence. In order to elicit preferences across a wider range of surgical subspecialties and patient demographics, more study is necessary.