Downstaging with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab: A Case Series.

Background/aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is generally diagnosed at an advanced stage, which limits curative treatment options for these patients. Locoregional therapy (LRT) is the standard approach to bridge and downstage unresectable HCC (uHCC) for liver transplantation (LT). Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) can induce objective responses in nearly one-third of patients; however, the role and outcomes of downstaging using atezobev remains unknown. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included consecutive patients between November 2020 and August 2023, who received atezo-bev with or without LRT and were subsequently considered for resection/LT after downstaging. Results: Of the 115 patients who received atezo-bev, 12 patients (10.4%) achieved complete or partial response and were willing to undergo LT; they (age: 58.5 years; women-17%; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage System B/C:5/7) had received 3-12 cycles of atezo-bev, and 4 of them had received prior LRT. Three patients died before LT, while three were awaiting LT. Six patients underwent curative therapies: four underwent living donor LT after a median of 79.5 (54-114) days following the last atezo-bev dose, one underwent deceased donor LT 38 days after the last dose, and one underwent resection. All but one patient had complete pathologic response with no viable HCC. Three patients experienced wound healing complications, and one required re-exploration and succumbed to sepsis. After a median follow-up of 10 (4-30) months, none of the alive patients developed HCC recurrence or graft rejection. Conclusions: Surgical therapy, including LT, is possible after atezo-bev therapy in wellselected patients after downstaging.

Standard-Volume Is As Effective As High-Volume Plasma Exchange for Patients With Acute Liver Failure.

Background/Aims: Acute liver failure (ALF) is associated with fatal outcomes without liver transplantation. Two randomized studies reported standard volume (SV) and high volume (HV) plasma exchange (PLEX) as effective therapeutic modalities for patients with ALF. However, no studies have compared the safety and efficacy of SV with HV PLEX, which we aimed to assess. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with ALF admitted between March 2021 and March 2023 who underwent PLEX. All patients underwent HV PLEX until May 2022, and then thereafter, SV PLEX was performed. The objectives of the study were to compare transplant-free survival (TFS) at 30 days, efficacy in reducing severity scores, biochemical variables, and adverse events between SV (total plasma volume x 1) and HV (total plasma volume x 1.5-2) PLEX. Results: Forty two ALF patients (median age: 23.5 years; females: 57.1%; MELD Na: 34.67 ± 6.07; SOFA score- 5.24 ± 1.42) underwent PLEX. Of these, 22 patients underwent SV-PLEX, and 20 underwent HV-PLEX. The mean age, sex, etiology distribution, and severity scores were similar between the groups. The median number of PLEX sessions (2) was similar in both groups. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, TFS was 45.5% in SV group and 45% in HV group (P = 0.76). A comparable decline in total bilirubin, PT/INR, ammonia, and MELD Na scores was noted in both groups. The cumulative number of adverse events was similar between the HV group (77.3%) and SV group (54.5%; P = 0.12). Conclusions: SV PLEX is safe and as effective as HV PLEX in patients with ALF. Further randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size are needed to validate these findings.

Antibiotics With or Without Rifaximin for Acute Hepatic Encephalopathy in Critically Ill Patients With Cirrhosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled (ARiE) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients with cirrhosis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are usually on broad-spectrum antibiotics because of suspected infection or as a hospital protocol. It is unclear if additional rifaximin has any synergistic effect with broad-spectrum antibiotics in ICU patients with acute overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE). METHODS: In this double-blind trial, patients with overt HE admitted to ICU were randomized to receive antibiotics (ab) alone or antibiotics with rifaximin (ab + r). Resolution (or 2 grade reduction) of HE, time to resolution of HE, in-hospital mortality, nosocomial infection, and changes in endotoxin levels were compared between the 2 groups. A subgroup analysis of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure was performed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and severity scores were similar among both groups (92 in each group). Carbapenems and cephalosporin with beta-lactamase inhibitors were the most commonly used ab. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 44.6% (41/92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32-70.5) in ab-only arm and 46.7% (43/92; 95% CI, 33.8-63) in ab + r arm achieved the primary objective ( P = 0.84).Time to achieve the primary objective (3.65 ± 1.82 days and 4.11 ± 2.01 days; P = 0.27) and in-hospital mortality were similar among both groups (62% vs 50%; P = 0.13). Seven percent and 13% in the ab and ab + r groups developed nosocomial infections ( P = 0.21). Endotoxin levels were unaffected by rifaximin. Rifaximin led to lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio: 0.39 [95% CI, 0.2-0.76]) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis but not in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (hazard ratio: 0.99 [95% CI, 0.6-1.63]) because of reduced nosocomial infections. DISCUSSION: Reversal of overt HE in those on ab was comparable with those on ab + r.

Managing a Prospective Liver Transplant Recipient on the Waiting List.

The management of a patient in the peri-transplantation period is highly challenging, and it is even more difficult while the patient is on the transplantation waitlist. Keeping the patient alive during this period involves managing the complications of liver disease and preventing the disease's progression. Based on the pre-transplantation etiology and type of liver failure, there is a difference in the management protocol. The current review is divided into different sections, which include: the management of underlying cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension, treatment and identification of infections, portal vein thrombosis management, and particular emphasis on the management of patients of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure in the transplantation waitlist. The review highlights special concerns in the management of patients in the Asian subcontinent also. The review also addresses the issue of delisting from the transplant waitlist to see that futility does not overtake the utility of organs. The treatment modalities are primarily expressed in tabular format for quick reference. The following review integrates the vast issues in this period concisely so that the management during this crucial period is taken care of in the best possible way.

Human albumin infusion is safe and effective even in patients without acute kidney injury and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Human albumin (HA) solution is currently recommended only for patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and acute kidney injury (AKI). However, its use in hospitalized patients is quite frequent. The objective was to compare the outcomes of patients receiving HA in recommended (Gr. A) vs. non-recommended (Gr. B) indications. METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive hospitalized patients who received HA were included. Apart from comparing the proportion of patients achieving resolution of hyponatremia, infection and hepatic encephalopathy among Gr. A and Gr. B, we also compared the in-hospital survival and performed a sub-group analysis of patients with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). RESULTS: Of the 396 hospitalized patients who received HA, 180 had AKI and/or SBP (Gr. A), and 216 received albumin for non-recommended indications (Gr. B). The mean age, sex and etiology distribution were similar. The total dose of HA was higher (88 ± 61.62 g vs. 71.31 ± 488.17 g; p = 0.003) and the duration longer (4 ± 2.37 vs. 3.4 ± 1.82 days; p = 0.005) in Gr. A than B. The resolution of infection and HE was similar among both groups, while hyponatremia resolution was significantly higher in Gr. B (94.7%) than Gr. A (75.6%; p < 0.001). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival was significantly higher in Gr. B (94%) than Gr. A (78.9%; p < 0.001). The incidence of albumin-induced fluid overload was comparable (2.8% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.32). Patients with ACLF were sicker with a higher incidence of microbiologically proven infection, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and hyponatremia than in the DC group. Resolution of infection and hyponatremia and in-hospital survival was significantly lower in the ACLF group (72.5%) than in the DC group (92.7%; p < 0.001). Eighty-six per cent of patients achieved resolution of ACLF. CONCLUSIONS: HA infusion is safe and effective even in patients without AKI and SBP and leads to the resolution of infection, hyponatremia, HE and ACLF.

Midodrine versus Albumin to Prevent Paracentesis Induced Circulatory Dysfunction in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure Patients in the Outpatient Clinic-a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Paracentesis-induced circulatory disturbance (PICD) occurs in 12-20% of patients receiving human albumin for large-volume paracentesis, and can occur at lower than five liter paracentesis in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Albumin infusions are associated with higher costs and more prolonged daycare admissions. The aim of the study was to determine if oral midodrine-hydrochloride can prevent PICD in these patients by increasing the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Methods: This open-labeled randomized controlled trial included ACLF patients undergoing paracentesis between 3 and 5 L, who were randomized to receive either 20% human albumin or midodrine hydrochloride 7.5 mg thrice daily for three days, 2 h before paracentesis. MAP was recorded daily. The primary outcome was the plasma renin activity (PRA) on day six, and a 50% increase from baseline was considered PICD. Results: 183 consecutive patients of ACLF were screened, and 50 patients were randomized to either arms. Alcohol was the most common underlying cause of cirrhosis. On day 6, PRA was non-significantly (P = 0.056) higher in the midodrine group. The absolute change of PRA between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.093). Four (16%) patients in the albumin group and five (20%) in the midodrine group developed PICD. MAP increase was not different between the albumin and midodrine arms (P = 0.851). Midodrine was found to be more cost-effective. Conclusions: Three days of oral midodrine is as effective as a human-albumin infusion in preventing PICD in ACLF patients undergoing paracentesis lesser than that done in large volume paracentesis.

The Pattern of Alcohol Use in Alcohol-Related Cirrhosis in Indian Patients: AUDIT Indian Liver Study.

Background: Alcohol is one of the most common causes of liver cirrhosis. Yet, the pattern of alcohol consumption in cirrhosis is rarely studied. This study aims to study the drinking patterns along with the educational, socioeconomic, and mental health in a cohort of patients with and without liver cirrhosis. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary-care hospital and included patients with harmful drinking. Demographic, alcohol intake history, assessment of socioeconomic and psychological status by modified Kuppuswamy scale and Beckwith Inventory, respectively, were recorded and analyzed. Results: Cirrhosis was present in 38.31% of patients with heavy drinking (64%). Cirrhosis was more among illiterates (51.76%) with early onset (22.4. ± 7.30 yrs P = 0.0001) and longer duration of alcohol (12.5 ± 6.5 vs. 6.8 ± 3.4 P = 0.001). Higher education qualification was associated with lower cirrhosis (P < 0.0001). With the same employment and education qualifications, net income in cirrhosis was lower [USD 298 (175-435) vs. USD 386 (119-739) P = 0.0001]. Whiskey (86.8%) was the commonest drink consumed. Similar median alcoholic drinks per week were consumed by both groups [34 (22-41) vs. 30 (24-40), P = 0.625], while indigenous alcohol was more consumed in cirrhosis [105 (98.5-109.75) vs. 89.5.0 (69.25-110.0) P = 0.0001]. Loss of jobs (12.36%) and partner violence were more in cirrhotic (9.89% vs. 5.80%) with similar borderline depression. Conclusion: Alcohol use disorder-related cirrhosis is present in a quarter of patients with harmful early onset and longer duration of drinking and is inversely related to the education status and affects the socioeconomic, physical, and family health of patients.