RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a recommended treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with obesity, with superiority over medical therapy. While diabetes remission is achieved initially in 60-90% of patients following surgery, many may experience relapse of diabetes on the long-term. Data on long-term follow-up of bariatric surgery is scarce. We report this 12-year follow-up study of glycaemic control following RYGB. METHODS: Two hundred seventeen patients with obesity (109 diabetic, 108 matched nondiabetic) who underwent RYGB between 2000 and 2008 were identified. Data was recorded prospectively for these patients at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. The long-term data was obtained via direct contact with the patients cross-checked with our hospital/national patients' electronic databases. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 88% (initial age 44 ± 9 years, female 79%). The mean (± SD) percentage total weight loss was 28% (± 15%) and 27% (± 17%) at 2 years and 12 years, respectively. Diabetes remission rate was 69% at 2 years, but decreased to 36% at 12 years following surgery. The 12-year incidence of new-onset T2DM in the control group was 4.3%. On univariate analysis, age, preoperative duration of diabetes and use of insulin were associated with less chance of diabetes remission at long-term (p value 0.06, 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). However, on multivariate regression analysis, only the duration of diabetes preoperatively remained significant (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: This study shows a high relapse of diabetes 12-year post-RYGB despite the durability of weight loss. This affects preoperative counselling and indicates a need for a longer follow-up to detect relapse.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
It is widely believed that infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus triggers a disproportionate immune response which causes a devastating systemic injury, particularly in individuals with obesity, itself a chronic, multi-organ inflammatory disease. Immune cells accumulate in visceral adipose tissue and together with paracrine adipocytes release a wide range of biologically active cytokines (including IL-1ß, IL5, IL6 and IL8) that can result in both local, pulmonary and systemic inflammation. A more intense 'cytokine storm' is postulated as the mechanism behind the extreme immune response seen in severe COVID-19. It is striking how dangerous the combination of obesity and COVID-19 is, resulting in a greater risk of ICU admission and a higher mortality. Furthermore, patients from a BAME background appear to have increased mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection; they also have a higher prevalence of central obesity and its metabolic complications. In the absence of an effective vaccine, the therapeutic potential of immune-modulating drugs is a priority, but the development of new drugs is expensive and time-consuming. A more pragmatic solution would be to seek to repurpose existing drugs, particularly those that might suppress the heightened cytokine activity seen in obesity, the major risk factor for a poor prognosis in COVID-19. Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist licensed to treat asthma and allergic rhinitis. It has been shown to diminish pulmonary response to antigen, tissue eosinophilia and IL-5 expression in inflammatory cells. It has also been shown to decrease elevated levels of IL-1ß and IL8 in humans with viral upper respiratory tract infections compared with placebo-treated patients. In addition, in silico studies have demonstrated a high binding affinity of the montelukast molecule to the terminal site of the virus's main protease enzyme which is needed for virus RNA synthesis and replication. Montelukast, which is cheap, safe and widely available would appear to have the potential to be an ideal candidate drug for clinical trials, particularly in early stage disease before irreparable tissue damage has already occurred. HYPOTHESIS: Through a direct anti-viral effect, or by suppression of heightened cytokine release in response to SARS-CoV-2, montelukast will reduce the severity of immune-mediated multiorgan damage resulting from COVID-19, particularly in patients with central obesity and metabolic syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/enzimología , COVID-19 , Proteasas 3C de Coronavirus , Ciclopropanos , Cisteína Endopeptidasas , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/etiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Sulfuros , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/antagonistas & inhibidores , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With population ageing, more older patients would benefit from the reduced comorbidities associated with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). However, health care providers are still reluctant to offer bariatric surgery to older obese patients due to the perceived increased risk and possible reduced benefit. Here, we report the outcomes of first UK series of LRYGB in patients (> 60 years) with emphasis on quality of life (QoL). SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively on all patients aged > 60 years undergoing LRYGB between 2006 and 2011. Patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Data related to weight loss, peri-operative complications and obesity-related morbidity (ORM) was collected. Patients' QoL was assessed by postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a median age of 63 (60-71) underwent LRYGB with a median follow-up of 23 (12-55) months. There was a significant drop in patients' BMI [mean (SD) 47.5 (6.2) to 31.2 (4.4) kg/m2]. Patients had an average 69% (SD 17%) excess weight loss and 34% (SD 10%) total body weight loss. The median hospital stay was 3 (1-16) with 13% peri-operative morbidity and no mortality. There was a 25% (30/123) resolution and 54% (66/123) 'improvement' in ORM. The QoL score increased significantly in several domains particularly physical performance (2.8 to 8.0, p < 0.001), self-esteem (3.6 to 8.3, p < 0.001) and mobility (2.9 to 7.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LRYGB in patients aged > 60 years can be performed safely and with weight loss comparable to younger patients. There is associated benefit in reducing ORM and substantial improvement in QoL.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/psicología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fluphenazine is one of the first drugs to be classed as an 'antipsychotic' and has been widely available for five decades. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of oral fluphenazine with placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia. To evaluate any available economic studies and value outcome data. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (23 July 2013, 23 December 2014, 9 November 2016 and 28 December 2017 ) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials. There is no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomised controlled trials comparing oral fluphenazine with placebo relevant to people with schizophrenia. Primary outcomes of interest were global state and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For the effects of interventions, a review team inspected citations and abstracts independently, ordered papers and re-inspected and quality assessed trials. We extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were analysed using fixed-effect risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were excluded if more than 50% of people were lost to follow-up, but, where possible, mean differences (MD) were calculated. Economic studies were searched and reliably selected by an economic review team to provide an economic summary of available data. Where no relevant economic studies were eligible for inclusion, the economic review team valued the already-included effectiveness outcome data to provide a rudimentary economic summary. MAIN RESULTS: From over 1200 electronic records of 415 studies identified by our initial search and this updated search, we excluded 48 potentially relevant studies and included seven trials published between 1964 and 1999 that randomised 439 (mostly adult participants). No new included trials were identified for this review update. Compared with placebo, global state outcomes of 'not improved or worsened' were not significantly different in the medium term in one small study (n = 50, 1 RCT, RR 1.12 CI 0.79 to 1.58, very low quality of evidence). The risk of relapse in the long term was greater in two small studies in people receiving placebo (n = 86, 2 RCTs, RR 0.39 CI 0.05 to 3.31, very low quality of evidence), however with high degree of heterogeneity in the results. Only one person allocated fluphenazine was reported in the same small study to have died on long-term follow-up (n = 50, 1 RCT, RR 2.38 CI 0.10 to 55.72, low quality of evidence). Short-term extrapyramidal adverse effects were significantly more frequent with fluphenazine compared to placebo in two other studies for the outcomes of akathisia (n = 227, 2 RCTs, RR 3.43 CI 1.23 to 9.56, moderate quality of evidence) and rigidity (n = 227, 2 RCTs, RR 3.54 CI 1.76 to 7.14, moderate quality of evidence). For economic outcomes, we valued outcomes for relapse and presented them in additional tables. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know, but they provide quantification to support clinical impression. Fluphenazine's global position as an effective treatment for psychoses is not threatened by the outcome of this review. However, fluphenazine is an imperfect treatment and if accessible, other inexpensive drugs less associated with adverse effects may be an equally effective choice for people with schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Flufenazina/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Acatisia Inducida por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Flufenazina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Esquizofrenia/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis results when tumour cells implant and grow within the peritoneal cavity. Treatment and prognosis vary based on the primary cancer. Although therapy with intention-to-cure is offered to selective patients using cytoreductive surgery with chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor for most of the patients. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a cancer-therapeutic modality where a photosensitiser is administered to patients and exerts a cytotoxic effect on cancer cells when excited by light of a specific wavelength. It has potential application in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the evidence of using PDT to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis in both animals and humans (Medline/EMBASE searched in June 2017). RESULTS: Three human and 25 animal studies were included. Phase I and II human trials using first-generation photosensitisers showed that applying PDT after surgical debulking in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is feasible with some clinical benefits. The low tumour-selectivity of the photosensitisers led to significant toxicities mainly capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation. In animal studies, PDT improved survival by 15-300%, compared to control groups. PDT led to higher tumour necrosis values (categorical values 0-4 [4=highest]: PDT 3.4±1.0 vs. control 0.4±0.6, p<0.05) and reduced tumour size (residual tumour size is 10% of untreated controls, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PDT has potential in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is limited by its narrow therapeutic window and possible serious side effects. Recent improvement in tumour-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising, but further development is needed before PDT can be routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Fotoquimioterapia/efectos adversos , PronósticoRESUMEN
Advanced radiological imaging has largely replaced exploratory operations and has become an essential diagnostic tool clinicians routinely rely on. However, physicians are faced with a lot of radiological findings without histological proof, and assuming a more serious diagnosis may lead to unnecessary investigations and emotional stress for patients. We report an unusual presentation of chronic appendicitis with a synchronous peritoneal nodule on CT in a 76-year-old woman who presented with poor appetite, weight loss and a mass in the right iliac fossa. The coincidental finding of the nodule in addition to the suspicious appearance of the appendix raised concerns for primary appendiceal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. The case illustrates the patient's management and reflects on the learnt lessons with regard to careful use of invasive radiology-guided biopsies and interval imaging, as these could sometimes delay the diagnosis and management of a readily treatable disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
It is important to distinguish between diverticulosis, the presence of asymptomatic diverticula, and diverticular disease which refers to symptomatic cases which can present with acute or chronic symptoms. Chronic symptoms range from mild intermittent abdominal cramps to the more severe picture of chronic abdominal pain and occasional rectal bleeding. In contrast, acute diverticulitis refers to acute inflammation in the diverticula. Low dietary fibre intake is reported to increase the risk of diverticular disease. In the UK, the prevalence rises from approximately 5% of people in their 40s to almost 50% of those above the age of 80. It is estimated that 20% of patients with diverticulosis will develop symptoms at some point in their lifetime. Diverticular disease can be confirmed radiologically or endoscopically. Referral of patients with symptomatic diverticular disease to secondary care is not indicated unless: the symptoms affect their quality of life; the pain is not controlled by paracetamol; new symptoms develop which require further investigation; there are concerns about the possibility of an alternative diagnosis or patients develop red flag symptoms. Even in patients with established diverticulosis, a change in the clinical picture with development of red flag symptoms warrants urgent referral to rule out lower gastrointestinal malignancy. Patients with suspected uncomplicated acute diverticulitis should be assessed according to their level of pain and associated systemic features of sepsis. In those where pain is controlled and there are no signs of systemic sepsis or multiple comorbidities, the patient may be treated in primary care.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colonoscopía , Fibras de la Dieta , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , Diverticulitis del Colon/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
Clostridium difficile infection is linked to antibiotic exposure, with elderly and immunocompromised hospitalised patients being particularly at risk. The symptoms range from mild diarrhoea to life-threatening fulminant colitis. We describe an unusual presentation of C. difficile infection after closure of ileostomy in a healthy 60-year-old man with a history of low anterior resection and defunctioning ileostomy for rectal tumour. On the third day postoperatively, the patient developed left lower abdominal pain and profuse diarrhoea. With worsening symptoms and steadily increasing inflammatory markers over the following few days, concerns were raised about an anastomotic leak with pelvic abscess. CT of the abdomen/pelvis on day 7 surprisingly showed colitis in the neorectum/sigmoid colon. A stool test confirmed C. difficile infection.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Colitis/diagnóstico , Colitis/microbiología , Colon Sigmoide/microbiología , Colon Sigmoide/patología , Diarrea/diagnóstico , Diarrea/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Recto/microbiología , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Social skills programmes (SSP) are treatment strategies aimed at enhancing the social performance and reducing the distress and difficulty experienced by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and can be incorporated as part of the rehabilitation package for people with schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to investigate the effects of social skills training programmes, compared to standard care, for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (November 2006 and December 2011) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials.A further search for studies has been conducted by the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group in 2015, 37 citations have been found and are currently being assessed by review authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all relevant randomised controlled trials for social skills programmes versus standard care involving people with serious mental illnesses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) and 95% CIs. MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 randomised trials (975 participants). These evaluated social skills programmes versus standard care, or discussion group. We found evidence in favour of social skills programmes compared to standard care on all measures of social functioning. We also found that rates of relapse and rehospitalisation were lower for social skills compared to standard care (relapse: 2 RCTs, n = 263, RR 0.52 CI 0.34 to 0.79, very low quality evidence), (rehospitalisation: 1 RCT, n = 143, RR 0.53 CI 0.30 to 0.93, very low quality evidence) and participants' mental state results (1 RCT, n = 91, MD -4.01 CI -7.52 to -0.50, very low quality evidence) were better in the group receiving social skill programmes. Global state was measured in one trial by numbers not experiencing a clinical improvement, results favoured social skills (1 RCT, n = 67, RR 0.29 CI 0.12 to 0.68, very low quality evidence). Quality of life was also improved in the social skills programme compared to standard care (1 RCT, n = 112, MD -7.60 CI -12.18 to -3.02, very low quality evidence). However, when social skills programmes were compared to a discussion group control, we found no significant differences in the participants social functioning, relapse rates, mental state or quality of life, again the quality of evidence for these outcomes was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard care, social skills training may improve the social skills of people with schizophrenia and reduce relapse rates, but at present, the evidence is very limited with data rated as very low quality. When social skills training was compared to discussion there was no difference on patients outcomes. Cultural differences might limit the applicability of the current results, as most reported studies were conducted in China. Whether social skills training can improve social functioning of people with schizophrenia in different settings remains unclear and should be investigated in a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos/rehabilitación , Esquizofrenia/rehabilitación , Habilidades Sociales , Estrés Psicológico/rehabilitación , Adulto , Asertividad , Comunicación , Características Culturales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Psicología del EsquizofrénicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the dissemination of cancer in the peritoneal cavity secondary to abdominal or extra-abdominal malignancies. Accurate assessment of the disease's burden is a challenge because of the complexity of the peritoneal cavity and the small size of the metastatic nodules. Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) is an emerging technology in tumor diagnosis. A photosensitizer is administered, which is preferentially taken up by cancer cells. The photosensitizer emits fluorescence when exposed to a light of a specific wavelength. This helps distinguish cancer from normal tissues. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the evidence for using PDD in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis in both animal and human literature. Both Medline and EMBASE databases were searched (November 2014). The titles and the abstracts of all retrieved citations were inspected, and the full articles of the relevant articles were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 12 human and 18 animal studies were included. Clinical studies have shown PDD to be a safe modality with no significant adverse effects. It increases the detection of malignant peritoneal nodules by 21%-34% in comparison with white light alone. The sensitivity and specificity of PDD were reported at 83%-100% and 95%-100%, respectively. These findings were supported by multiple animal studies, which have shown an increase in the sensitivity of tumor detection when using PDD (72%-91%) in comparison with white light alone (39%). CONCLUSIONS: PDD is a promising modality, which improves the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis lesions. Further research, however, should investigate the impact of PDD on the patients' therapeutic management and final outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes , Animales , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pericyazine is a 3-cyano-10 (3-4'-hydroxypiperidinopropyl) phenothiazine. It is overall pharmacologically similar with chlorpromazine, though particularly sedating. Dopamine receptor subtype analysis has not been performed for pericyazine, but the drug appears to induce greater noradrenergic than dopaminergic blockade. Compared to chlorpromazine, pericyazine reportedly has more potent antiemetic, antiserotonin, and anticholinergic activity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effects and safety of pericyazine in comparison with placebo, typical and atypical antipsychotic agents and standard care for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (February 2013) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant randomised controlled trials focusing on pericyazine for schizophrenia and other types of schizophrenia-like psychoses (schizophreniform and schizoaffective disorders). We excluded quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently from included papers by at least two review authors. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE to judge quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We could only include five studies conducted between 1965 and 1980. Most of the included studies did not report details of randomisation, allocation concealment, details of blinding and we could not assess the impact of attrition due to poor reporting.For the primary outcome of Global state - not improved, the confidence interval was compatible with a small benefit and increased risk of not improving with pericyazine compared with typical antipsychotics (2 RCTs, n = 122, RR 1.24 CI 0.93 to 1.66, very low quality of evidence) or atypical antipsychotics (1 RCT, n = 93, RR 0.97 CI 0.67 to 1.42, very low quality of evidence).When compared with typical antipsychotics relapse was only experienced by one person taking pericyazine (1 RCT, n = 80, RR 2.59 CI 0.11 to 61.75, very low quality of evidence).Pericyazine was associated with more extrapyramidal side effects than typical antipsychotics (3 RCTs, n = 163, RR 0.52 CI 0.34 to 0.80, very low quality of evidence) and atypical antipsychotics (1 RCT, n = 93, RR 2.69 CI 1.35 to 5.36, very low quality of evidence).The estimated risk of leaving the study early for specific reasons was imprecise for the comparisons of pericyazine with typical antipsychotics (2 RCTs, n = 71, RR 0.46 CI 0.11 to 1.90, very low quality of evidence), and with atypical antipsychotics (1 RCT, n = 93, RR 0.13 CI 0.01 to 2.42, very low quality of evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of very low quality evidence we are unable to determine the effects of pericyazine in comparison with typical or atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, there is some evidence that pericyazine may be associated with a higher incidence of extrapyramidal side effects than other antipsychotics, and again this was judged to be very low quality evidence. Large, robust studies are still needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Fenotiazinas/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Acatisia Inducida por Medicamentos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Fenotiazinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Espasmo/inducido químicamente , Temblor/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fluphenazine is one of the first drugs to be classed as an 'antipsychotic' and has been widely available for five decades. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of oral fluphenazine with placebo for the treatment of schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS: We updated searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trials register, which includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the bibliographic databases Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, The Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, LILACS, PSYNDEX, Sociological Abstracts and Sociofile, 15 May, 2012. References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomised controlled trials comparing oral fluphenazine with placebo relevant to people with schizophrenia. Primary outcomes of interest were global state and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We inspected citations and abstracts independently, ordered papers and re-inspected and quality assessed trials. We extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were analysed using fixed-effect risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were excluded if more than 50% of people were lost to follow-up, but, where possible, mean differences (MD) were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: From over 1200 electronic records of 415 studies identified by our initial search and this updated search, we excluded 48 potentially relevant studies and included seven trials published between 1964 and 1999 that randomised 439 (mostly adult participants). No new included trials were identified for this review update. Compared with placebo, global state outcomes of 'not improved or worsened' were not significantly different in the medium term in one small study (n = 50, 1 RCT, RR 1.12 CI 0.79 to 1.58, very low quality of evidence). The risk of relapse in the long term was greater in two small studies in people receiving placebo (n = 86, 2 RCTs, RR 0.39 CI 0.05 to 3.31, very low quality of evidence), however with high degree of heterogeneity in the results. Only one person allocated fluphenazine was reported in the same small study to have died on long-term follow-up (n = 50, 1 RCT, RR 2.38 CI 0.10 to 55.72, low quality of evidence). Short-term extrapyramidal adverse effects were significantly more frequent with fluphenazine compared to placebo in two other studies for the outcomes of akathisia (n = 227, 2 RCTs, RR 3.43 CI 1.23 to 9.56, moderate quality of evidence) and rigidity (n = 227, 2 RCTs, RR 3.54 CI 1.76 to 7.14, moderate quality of evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review confirm much that clinicians and recipients of care already know, but they provide quantification to support clinical impression. Fluphenazine's global position as an effective treatment for psychoses is not threatened by the outcome of this review. However, fluphenazine is an imperfect treatment and if accessible, other inexpensive drugs less associated with adverse effects may be an equally effective choice for people with schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Flufenazina/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Flufenazina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: The primary objective is to investigate the effects of social skills training programmes, compared to standard care, for people with schizophrenia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate remains the drug of choice for both prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but have not yet been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effects of alternative regimens for the administration of magnesium sulphate when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (June 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All four review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 17 studies of which six (866 women) met the inclusion criteria: two trials (451 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia and four (415 women) for women with pre-eclampsia.Treatment of eclampsia: one trial compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy for 24 hours (401 women). There was no clear difference between the groups in the risk ratio (RR) of recurrence of convulsions (RR 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 3.05) or stillbirth (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.92), and the CIs are wide. One trial compared a low dose regimen with a standard dose regimen over 24 hours (50 women). This study was too small for any reliable conclusions about the comparative effects.Prevention of eclampsia: one trial compared intravenous with intramuscular maintenance regimen for 24 hours (17 women). This trial was too small for any reliable conclusions. Three trials compared short maintenance regimens postpartum with continuing for 24 hours after the birth (398 women), even taken together these trials were too small for any reliable conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although strong evidence supports the use of magnesium sulphate for prevention and treatment of eclampsia, trials comparing alternative treatment regimens are too small for reliable conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Eclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Preeclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Polish Medical Bibliography (Polska Bibliografia Lekarska) contains 350 000 records dating from 1979. These records from the fields of medicine, nursing, dentistry, health care systems and preclinical sciences are from nearly 300 biomedical journals published in Poland. METHODS: We systematically searched the Polish Medical Bibliography Part II (1996-2006) CD-ROM (July 2006) using both English and Polish phrases for randomized trials, manually checked results and, for the trials identified in this way, sought these on medline and embase. RESULTS: Systematic searching identified records of 680 randomized trials from all areas of health care. Nearly 40% of these were not found on either medline or embase. CONCLUSIONS: The Polish Medical Bibliography should be of interest to health care information specialists concerned with comprehensive searches for trials.