30 years of ocular proton therapy, the Nice view.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization. MATERAIAL AND METHODS: MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract). RESULTS: Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice. CONCLUSIONS: Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options.

Head and neck proton therapy in France: A missed opportunity or a challenge in front of us?

Following major advances of the best of photon-techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and, to arrive soon, magnetic resonance (MR)-linac radiotherapy, there are still substantial opportunities in the treatment of head and neck cancers to further reduce the toxicity burden. Proton therapy represents another attractive option in this high-quality and highly competitive precision radiotherapy landscape. Proton therapy holds promises to reduce toxicities and to escalate the dose in radioresistant cases or cases where dose distribution is not satisfactory with photons. However, the selection of patients for proton therapy needs to be done using evidence-based medicine to build arguments in favor of personalized precision radiation therapy. Referral to proton therapy versus IMRT or SBRT should be registered (ProtonShare® platform) and envisioned in a formalized clinical research perspective through randomized trials. The use of an enrichment process using a model-based approach should be done to only randomize patients doomed to benefit from proton. To tackle such great opportunities, the French proton therapy challenge is to collaborate at the national and international levels, and to demonstrate that the extra-costs of treatment are worth clinically and economically in the short, mid, and long-term. In parallel to the clinical developments, there are still preclinical issues to be tackled (e.g., proton FLASH, mini-beams, combination with immunotherapy), for which the French Radiotransnet network offers a unique platform. The current article provides a personal view of the challenges and opportunities with a focus on clinical research and randomized trial requirements as well as the needs for strong collaborations at the national and international levels for PT in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck to date.

Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas.

Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.

(68Ga)-PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of postoperative prostate cancer recurrence: Possible implications on treatment volumes for radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the pattern of relapse of postoperative prostate cancer in patients by using 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ([68Ga]-PSMA PET/CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients received a (68Ga)-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical failure. Following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines, the pelvic clinical target volume has been contoured. Bone metastases were considered as outside the clinical target volume. Two subgroups of patients were defined, patients having relapse: (1) inside, or (2) outside the clinical target volume. RESULTS: Globally, eight patients out of 32 presented with a positive lymph node failure inside the clinical target volume according to RTOG guidelines (25%), 22 patients had nodal relapses outside this clinical target volume (68.75%) and in two patients nodal relapses occurred both inside and outside of the clinical target volume (6.25%). Overall, 36 positive lymph node lesions were identified: of these, 23 nodal relapses were identified within the clinical target volume contoured according to RTOG and/or at the lomboaortic level (63%). To cover 95% of these 23 relapses, a hypothetical clinical target volume should encompass the nodal regions of the RTOG-defined clinical target volume as well as the paraaortic lymph node level up to T12-L1. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients in the present study, presented with distant lymph node and/or bone metastases. Therefore, larger target volumes should be adopted to treat at least 95% of lymph node regions at risk for an occult relapse.