Symptom burden guiding invasive electrophysiological study in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: The believe SVT registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with palpitations clinically suggestive of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) are often managed conservatively until ECG-documentation of the tachycardia, leading to high impact on life quality and healthcare resource utilization. We evaluated results of electrophysiological study (EPS), and ablation when appropriate, among these patients, with special focus on gender differences in management. METHODS: BELIEVE SVT is a European multicenter, retrospective registry in tertiary hospitals performing EPS in patients with palpitations, without ECG-documentation of tachycardia or preexcitation, and considered highly suggestive of PSVT by a cardiologist or cardiac electrophysiologist. We analyzed clinical characteristics, results of EPS and ablation, complications, and clinical outcomes during follow-up. RESULTS: Six-hundred eighty patients from 20 centers were included. EPS showed sustained tachycardia in 60.9% of patients, and substrate potentially enabling AVNRT in 14.7%. No major/permanent complications occurred. Minor/transient complications were reported in 0.84% of patients undergoing diagnostic-only EPS and 1.8% when followed by ablation. During a 3.4-year follow-up, 76.2% of patients remained free of palpitations recurrence. Ablation (OR: 0.34, P < .01) and male gender (OR: 0.58, P = .01) predicted no recurrence. Despite a higher female proportion among patients with recurrence, (77.2% vs 63.5% among those asymptomatic during follow-up, P < .01), 73% of women in this study reported no recurrence of palpitations after EPS. CONCLUSIONS: EPS and ablation are safe and effective in preventing recurrence of nondocumented palpitations clinically suggestive of PSVT. Despite a lower efficacy, this strategy is also highly effective among women and warrants no gender differences in management.

Mejoría clínica, hemodinámica y de marcadores bioquímicos tras estimulación ventricular desde el área de la rama izquierda / Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing

Resumen Introducción: La estimulación ventricular derecha puede provocar insuficiencia cardiaca y disfunción ventricular. La estimulación en el área de la rama izquierda (ERI) permite capturar el sistema His-Purkinje. La ERI se ha estudiado en la estimulación ventricular y en la terapia de resincronización cardiaca. La evolución de los péptidos natriuréticos (NT-proBNP) asociada a la ERI no ha sido estudiada hasta el momento. Métodos: Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos remitidos para implante de marcapasos o terapia de resincronización cardiaca. El implante del electrodo de ERI se realizó siguiendo la técnica descrita por Huang et al. Los pacientes eran sometidos a ecocardiograma y determinación de NT-proBNP antes y cuatro semanas después del procedimiento. Resultados: Se analizaron 50 pacientes con implante exitoso y seguimiento completo. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los umbrales medidos durante el procedimiento y los obtenidos al cabo de 12 semanas. La ERI logró una reducción significativa de la anchura del complejo QRS (148 ± 21 vs. 107 ± 11 ms; p = 0.029). La ERI logró una reducción significativa de la clasificación funcional en el conjunto de la muestra y una reducción significativa de NT-proBNP (2,888.2 ± 510 vs. 1,181 ± 130 pg/ml; p = 0.04). En pacientes con fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) < 50% y asincronía se logró un incremento significativo de la FEVI con la ERI (40.2 ± 7 vs. 55.2 ± 7%; p < 0.001). Conclusiones: La ERI es factible en la mayoría de pacientes y se asocia con una reducción de la duración del complejo QRS. La ERI no condiciona un efecto deletéreo sobre la FEVI a corto-medio plazo; además, en aquellos pacientes con FEVI deprimida y asincronía ventricular permite incrementar la FEVI.

Abstract Background: Right ventricular pacing is associated with risk of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing. The effect of LBBP on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been investigated. Method: Finally, 50 patients referred for pacemaker implantation were included. LBBP was performed as described previously by Huang et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram and NT-proBNP were performed before and four weeks after the procedure. Results: 50 patients were analyzed. There were not differences between ventricular thresholds during the procedure and 3 months later, LBBP significantly reduced QRS complex duration (148 ± 21 vs. 107 ± 11 ms; p = 0.029). LBBP significantly improved NYHA functional class and reduced NT-proBNP concentration (2888.2 ± 510 vs. 1181 ± 130 pg/ml; p = 0.04). In patients showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and ventricular desynchrony LBBP showed a significant LVEF increase (40.2 ± 7 vs. 55.2 ± 7%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: LBBP was feasible and safe in most of patients. LBBP was associated with reduction in QRS width and with increase in LVEF in patients with ventricular desynchrony, while in patients with normal LVEF it remained unchanged during follow-up.