RESUMEN
Introduction The use of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS) has been growing in surgical specialties. It allows surgeons to perform higher-quality operations with fewer complications, mortality, and morbidity. However, there are a lot of misconceptions about RAS among patients. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, awareness, and future expectations of RAS in patients attending surgical clinics. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) surgical clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All participants <18 years of age were excluded. The questionnaire was distributed to 304 patients attending surgical clinics with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. Cluster sampling was used since the respondents were from multiple surgical specialties. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to assess participants' preference for robotic surgery. Results Most participants (58.6%, n=178) were between 21 and 40 years old, and males were 52% of the participants. Many respondents thought a robot did not do the surgery. 70.7% of respondents had not heard of robotic surgery, with the media being the most common source of information. Internal damage was the prevalent concern (51.0%, n= 155) in malfunctions of robotic surgery. A significant relationship was found between participants from 21 to 40 years of age and a stronger preference for robotic surgery (p=.027). Respondents who preferred robotic surgery were discovered to have a significant relationship with participants who thought robotic surgery was safer and had better results (p<.001). 13.9% of participants who did not prefer robotic surgery also took cost into account significantly (χ2=28.93, p<.001, Cramer's V=.22). 67.2% (n=43) of respondents who preferred robotic surgery believed it might eventually replace present practices. Conclusion Our study concluded that the majority did not favor or were unsure whether to undergo robotic surgeries or not. However, most participants had some misconceptions and a lack of awareness about robotic surgeries. Raising awareness among patients can improve the mutual decision-making between them and their treating physician.
RESUMEN
Background: Colon cancer is a serious public health issue and a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, including Saudi Arabia. Knowledge of genes associated with colon cancer development and progression is essential for identifying new cancer-specific biomarkers to improve the diagnosis of colon cancer. Methods: The expression levels of FTHL17, PRM2, CABYR, CPXCR1, ADAM29, and CABS1 in 15 adjacent colon cancer and normal colon tissue samples from male patients were investigated using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays. qRT-PCR analysis was also used to determine whether reducing DNA methyltransferase (via 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment) or histone deacetylation (via trichostatin treatment) increased the expression levels of the tested genes. Results: The analysis of the 15 colon cancer and adjacent normal colon tissue samples revealed that all six genes were expressed in both groups, but their expression levels were significantly higher in the colon cancer group. Furthermore, the mRNA expression levels of the FTHL17, PRM2, CABYR, CPXCR1, and ADAM29 genes were considerably upregulated after treatment of HCT116 and Caco-2 cells with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin. However, the CABS1 gene was activated only with trichostatin treatment. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that FTHL17, PRM2, CABYR, CPXCR1, ADAM29, and CABS1 are suitable candidate biomarkers of colon cancer and their expressions are regulated by hypomethylation and hyperacetylation.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common worldwide, and surgery is one of the main treatments. Postoperative complications are a concern. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether elevated body mass index (BMI), the presence of comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and the type of surgery are associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications such as wound infections, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, venous thromboembolism (VTE), bowel obstruction, and incisional hernia. The secondary objective is to describe the characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with different BMI groups. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a non-probability sampling technique at a tertiary National Guard Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This study involved 122 patients aged 18 years or more who underwent elective or emergency surgery for colorectal cancer between the years 2015 and 2022. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used for quantitative variables, while qualitative variables were presented as percentages and frequencies. Non-parametric tests were applied to compare qualitative variables. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Significance was established at a p-value of 0.05. Ethical considerations were followed throughout the study. Prior to conducting the study, ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) (approval number: IRB/1598/23). RESULTS: High BMI scores were observed in patients with postoperative complications. A statistically significant variation in BMI scores (p-value < 0.05) was found between patients with complications and without complications. This observation suggests that factors beyond excessive body weight might contribute to the onset of postoperative complications. Moreover, elevated BMI scores were more prevalent in males and were associated with reduced hemoglobin (Hgb) levels, underscoring the potential influence of physiological variables on the emergence of postoperative complications (p-value < 0.05). Tumors located in the rectum or rectosigmoid regions, as well as partial colectomy procedures, exhibited a higher risk of postoperative complications (p-value < 0.05). However, no significant connections were identified between the presence of comorbidities and the occurrence of postoperative complications (p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of BMI on postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. Higher BMI was associated with unfavorable postoperative outcomes, such as an increased risk of VTE and fluid collection. However, no significant differences in mortality rates or length of hospital stay (LOS) were observed across various BMI categories. Factors beyond BMI, including tumor characteristics, the type of surgical intervention, and preoperative care, play a significant role in determining postoperative outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to adopt a comprehensive approach that considers multiple factors when managing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer patients, particularly those with higher BMI.
RESUMEN
Background: Resection surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is associated with potential complications, including surgical site infection (SSI). Objectives: To estimate the prevalence rate of SSI, identify the common pathogens responsible for SSI, and determine potential risk factors for SSI development in a cohort from Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: Patients with CRC who underwent bowel resection surgery at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were retrospectively included. Demographics, comorbidities, surgical procedure data, and the results of preoperative laboratory tests were retrospectively collected from medical records through the health information system. The study population was divided into two groups: those who developed SSI and those who did not. Results: A total of 92 patients with CRC who underwent resection surgery were included, of which 54 (58.7%) were males. The median age was 65 (IQR 55.5-75.0) years. SSI was observed in 25 (27.2%) patients. The most frequently isolated organisms were Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Three E. coli isolates were producers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and two K. pneumoniae isolates exhibited a multidrug resistance profile. Low preoperative serum albumin level was identified as a significant independent risk factor for developing SSI (AOR = 0.853, 95% CI = 0.748-0.973, P = 0.0181). Conclusion: The study found a notable prevalence of SSI among the included patients. Gram-negative bacteria were more involved in SSI events and were also associated with drug-resistance patterns. Gut microbiota bacteria were most commonly involved in SSIs. Low preoperative serum albumin levels predicted the development of postoperative SSI, and thus its close monitoring and management before surgery could reduce the SSIs.
RESUMEN
Background Incisional hernia post organ transplant increases morbidity and impacts quality of life among patients undergoing abdominal organ transplants. Objectives To estimate the incidence rate of incisional hernia and the factors associated with incisional hernia among patients who underwent liver and kidney transplants. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study in which all patients from 2015 to 2020 who underwent liver and/or kidney transplants and met inclusion criteria were involved. Results A total of 424 patients who received transplantation surgery were included. Out of them, 287 patients (67.6%) underwent kidney transplants while 132 patients (31.1%) underwent a liver transplant. Additionally, five patients (1.1%) received both liver and kidney transplantation. Fourteen patients (3.3%) experienced incisional hernia across all samples. A higher incidence rate was noticed among patients with liver transplants compared to kidney transplants (6.81% in the liver group vs 1.7% in the kidney group), which showed a statistical significance between the two groups (P-value= 0.007). In multivariate analysis, surgical site infection (SSI), donor type, acute organ rejection, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and diabetes were all not predictors of incisional hernia among the patients. Conclusion Incisional hernia incidence in between the groups was within the global range of incisional hernia incidence among abdominal organ transplant patients, with a higher incidence among liver transplant patients. All factors associated with incisional hernia, such as SSI, DM, and old age, didn't show significance as predictors to incisional hernia formation among the samples.
