RESUMEN
Objectives: The study's aim was to assess and compare the values of the sagittal condylar angle (SCA), the Bennett angle (BA), and the immediate side shift (ISS) between fully dentate and partially dentate patients, male and female patients, and Saudi and non-Saudi patients. The study also aimed to statistically analyze the correlation of the different condylar movements with tooth loss and tooth wear. Materials and Methods: Using the electronic pantograph (Cadiax Compact II), the SCA, BA, and ISS were recorded at a 10-mm condylotrack distance in dentate and partially dentate patients, from both genders, older than 20 years, medically stable, and with normal temporomandibular joint movements and normal activity of masticatory muscles. The recorded average values were compared between the groups using an unpaired t-test. Results: The average condylar movements between dentate (n = 57) and partially dentate (n = 39) groups revealed no significant differences concerning right SCA, left SCA, right BA, right ISS, and left ISS. However, the left BA showed significant differences (P = 0.011) in the dentate compared with the partially dentate group. Gender (male: n = 24, female: n = 72) showed no statistical significance between groups when measuring SCA, BA, or ISS. When comparing Saudi (n = 78) with non-Saudi patients (n = 18), it was found that the mean right SCA was significantly higher in Saudi than in non-Saudi patients (P = 0.024). Condylar inclination values in relation to tooth wear showed no statistical significance (P > 0.05), except left ISS, which was significantly higher among those who had tooth wear (P = 0.040). Conclusion: Tooth loss had a major impact on the left BA, while patients with tooth wear had a significantly increased ISS on the left side.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), dental anxiety (DA), and other factors among pregnant women. METHODS: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were used to evaluate GAD and DA, respectively. Hard copies of self-administered questionnaires were distributed among 780 pregnant women attending hospitals/health centers in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: About 31.7% of the participants demonstrated minimal anxiety, 37.9% mild anxiety, 19.7% moderate anxiety, and 10.6% severe anxiety. The mean GAD score of the sample was 7.53 ± 5.16 which differed significantly among women in the first (7.74 ± 5.47), second (6.82 ± 4.64), and third trimesters (8.13 ± 5.37) (P=0.029). Pregnant women who performed routine dental visits demonstrated lower GAD (6.98 ± 5.23) than those who visited dentists for consultation, pain, or treatment (7.58 ± 5.07). The mean GAD score was significantly higher among participants with dental pain or discomfort during the last 12 months (8.12 ± 5.05) than among those without pain or discomfort (7.02 ± 5.2) (P 0.003). Similarly, the participants with DA showed a significantly higher mean GAD score (7.69 ± 5.17) than those without DA (5.93 ± 4.71) (P 0.006). Multivariate linear regression showed that GAD significantly correlated with DA (B = 0.225, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the present study, GAD was common among pregnant women which significantly correlated with DA. Pregnant women with DA and dental pain demonstrated high GAD. Preventive and therapeutic measures should be taken to reduce GAD and DA during pregnancy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Access to oral care during pregnancy is important for the maintenance of optimal oral health. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate dental anxiety (DA) and its association with previous dental visits and sociodemographic factors amongst pregnant women. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted (June through August 2019) amongst pregnant women (N = 825) attending hospitals and health centres in Dhahran, Khobar, and Dammam cities in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) was used to assess DA and the World Health Organization Oral Health Survey for Adults was administered to evaluate patterns of dental attendance. RESULTS: DA was found in 90.9% of the pregnant women. The mean DA score of the sample was 12.53 ± 5.33 (range, 5 to 25) and it was significantly higher amongst non-Saudi (13.21 ± 5.24) vs Saudi women (12.15 ± 5.34) (P = .006), those who had negative dental experience (13.99 ± 5.62) vs those without such experience (12.2 ± 5.21) (P < .001), and those with dental pain or discomfort (13.18 ± 5.46) vs without pain or discomfort (11.94 ± 5.14) (P = .001). The study found a significant relationship between DA and reasons for dental attendance before pregnancy (P = .002) and time since the last dental visit (P = .009). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed significantly increased odds (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.27) of experiencing moderate to extreme DA amongst pregnant women who visited the dentist after a year/never visited compared to those who visited in less than a year. Similarly, participants with negative dental experience were significantly more likely to have moderate to extreme DA (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.20) than those without negative experience after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: DA was highly prevalent amongst pregnant women, which was significantly associated with negative dental experience, dental pain or discomfort, and reasons for and time since the last dental visit.