Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Wounds ; 36(5): 170-176, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complex deep surgical site infection in the cardiothoracic surgery patient that reaches the sternum and even the mediastinum, causing osteomyelitis and mediastinitis, is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can aid in achieving favorable outcomes in patients with complex surgical site infections by promoting wound healing and shortening the hospital stay. NPWT is widely recognized for its advantages and has recently been used in both cardiothoracic and non-cardiothoracic settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of NPWT in the management of complex deep surgical site infection after cardiothoracic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all complex cardiothoracic cases admitted to the cardiac and thoracic surgery divisions for surgical intervention to treat postoperative surgical wound infections. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included, with a male-to-female ratio of 5:4. The mean (SD) age was 48.7 (16.5) years. The cases reviewed were complex, and the duration of the NPWT application ranged from 4 days to 120 days, with an average hospital stay of 62.8 days. Seventy-eight percent of patients required antibiotics (or had positive wound cultures); in 55.6% of these patients, polymicrobial infection was detected. No major complications were related to NPWT. CONCLUSION: The study findings show that using NPWT in complex deep sternal and thoracic infections can enhance wound healing, shorten the hospital stay, and decrease morbidity and mortality secondary to wound infection in cardiothoracic patients.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mediastinitis/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Osteomielitis/terapia , Osteomielitis/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35303402

RESUMEN

Objective: Patients with epilepsy are instructed to avoid high-risk situations such as certain occupations and driving to prevent harm to themselves and others. There is considerable variation in standards to decide if a patient with epilepsy is fit to drive among various countries worldwide, and these patients often continue to drive despite being advised not to. The objective of this study was to determine if patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled epilepsy are driving, the awareness of epilepsy patients regarding driving, and whether physicians are advising the patients to stop driving.Methods: A clinic-based study was conducted in Saudi Arabia from June 2018 through January 2019 with structured interviews of consecutively recruited male patients with established epilepsy diagnosis. Demographic factors, employment status, control of seizures, and awareness of driving restrictions were documented.Results: The response rate was 80.6%. Of the 121 participants (mean age of 35.97 years), 110 (90.9%) were driving, and 39% of those patients were married. Also, 76.9% of participants were employed. Of the participants, 48.8% had 1 seizure in the last 6 months, and 88% of those patients were driving; 51.2% had not had a seizure in the last 6 months, and 93% of those patients were driving. Additionally, 17.4% reported a seizure attack while driving. Only 38% of respondents were aware they should stop driving, whereas 62% were unaware of driving restrictions.Conclusions: There is a definite need to establish a driving policy for patients with epilepsy and to optimize the standards of care of epilepsy patients in Saudi Arabia to ensure minimization of harm to both patients and the public.


Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Epilepsia , Adulto , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Hábitos , Humanos , Masculino , Arabia Saudita , Centros de Atención Terciaria
3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 966, 2022 01 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35046454

RESUMEN

Travel-associated malaria is a health hazard, even in non-malaria endemic regions. This is a hospital-based retrospective study of 12,931 febrile patients who presented at King Fahad Hospital of the University (KFHU) from January 2009 to December 2019. Patients either returning from malaria endemic countries and/or for whom malaria was suspected, had blood films microscopically screened for malaria parasites. Malaria prevalence was very low in febrile patients attending KFHU. Out of the 12,931 febrile patients, 0.63% (n = 81) were malaria positive, all travel-related, except for one case of transfusion malaria. Indian nationals were the most infected (29.6%, n = 24), followed by Sudanese nationals (24.7%, n = 20). P. falciparum (47%, n = 38) and P. vivax (42%, n = 24) were the predominant species. The majority of P. falciparum (64.5%, n = 20) cases were from African nationals and the majority of P. vivax (72.7%, n = 24) cases were from Asia. The highest percentage of malaria patients were adult (90%, n = 73), males (85.2%, n = 69), ages ranged from 6 to 65, with a mean of 34.6 years. Most of the malaria cases presented at the emergency room (ER), only 3 required critical care. Only sex, hospitalized in-patient (IP) and attendance at ER were statistically associated with malaria. In the presence of a potential vector, travel-associated malaria in non-malaria endemic areas should be monitored to guide control strategies.Author summary: Malaria is a neglected potentially fatal tropical mosquito-born disease. Travel-associated malaria is a health hazard, even in non-malaria endemic regions. In spite of previous efforts to estimate malaria prevalence, morbidity and mortality in Saudi Arabia in the last decade, there have been no studies that determine the prevalence of malaria in Al-Khobar, Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Malaria prevalence was very low in febrile patients (81/12,931) attending King Fahad Hospital of the University over a decade. Cases were all travel-related, except for one case of transfusion malaria. Indian nationals were the most infected (29.6%), followed by Sudanese nationals (24.7%). P. falciparum (47%) and P. vivax (42%) were the predominant species. The majority of P. falciparum (64.5%) cases were from Africa and the majority of P. vivax (72.7%) cases were from Asia. No patient factors predicted malaria in febrile travelers. In non-malaria endemic areas, in the presence of a potential vector, patients with acute fever coming from endemic areas or having received blood transfusion, should be screened for travel-associated malaria to guide control strategies.


Asunto(s)
Malaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Malaria/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasmodium , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...