Radiation response assessment of organoids derived from patients with pancreatic cancer.

Background: The effectiveness of radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer is debated. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) already mimicked clinical radiation response in other cancer types, which could be valuable in pancreatic cancer as well. This study aimed to investigate whether PDOs can be used to model RT response in pancreatic cancer and to explore the presence of a dose-response correlation. Methods: PDOs derived from two pancreatic cancer patients (HUB-08-B2-022A and HUB-08-B2-026B) were irradiated with doses ranging from 0 to 40 Gray. Viability assessments were conducted after seven and 10 days by measuring ATP-levels. Results were normalized, defining the viability at 0 Gray as 100 % and an absolute viability of 0 as 0 %. The relative area under the curve (rAUC) was calculated (0 = total sensitivity, 1 = total resistance). Results: With a readout time of seven days, both HUB-08-B2-022A and HUB-08-B2-026B exhibited viability above 50 % at the highest dose of 12 Gy (rAUC of 0.79 and 0.69, respectively). With a readout time of 10 days, both PDOs showed a dose-response relation although HUB-08-B2-022A was more sensitive than HUB-08-B2-026B (rAUC of 0.37 and 0.51, respectively). Increasing the radiation dose to 40 Gy did not further affect viability, but the dose-response relation remained present (rAUC of 0.13 and 0.26, respectively). In the final experiment with a readout time of 10 days and a maximum dose of 14 Gy, the dose-response correlation was paramount in both PDOs (rAUC 0.28 and 0.45, respectively), with HUB-08-B2-022A being most sensitive. Conclusions: In this setup, both pancreatic cancer PDOs showed an irradiation dose-response correlation. These preliminary findings suggest that pancreatic cancer PDOs are suitable for assessing radiation response in vitro. Further experiments are needed to eventually simulate treatment responses to personalized treatment strategies.

90Y-/166Ho- 'Radiation lobectomy' for liver tumors induces abnormal morphology and impaired drainage of peritumor lymphatics.

Background & Aims: High-dose unilobar radioembolization, or 'radiation lobectomy' (RL), is an induction therapy that achieves contralateral future liver remnant hypertrophy while simultaneously irradiating the tumor. As such, it may prevent further growth, but it is unknown whether RL affects intrahepatic lymphatics, a major route via which liver tumors disseminate. Methods: This was a case-control study conducted at University Medical Center Utrecht. The study compared lymph vessels in livers that had undergone RL (cases) with those in livers that had not undergone RL (controls). Histological samples were acquired from patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between 2017 and 2022. Lymph vessel morphology was analyzed by two researchers using podoplanin, a protein that is expressed in lymphatic endothelium. In vivo liver lymph drainage of radioembolized livers was assessed using intraoperative liver lymphangiography (ILL): during liver surgery, patent blue dye was injected into the liver parenchyma, followed by inspection for staining of perihepatic lymph structures. ILL results were compared to a previously published cohort. Results: Immunohistochemical analysis on post-RL tumor tissues from ten patients with CRLM and nine patients with HCC revealed aberrant morphology of irradiated liver lymphatics when compared to controls (n = 3 per group). Irradiated lymphatics were tortuous (p <0.05), thickened (p <0.05) and discontinuous (p <0.05). Moreover, post-RL lymphatics had larger lumens (1.5-1.7x, p <0.0001), indicating lymph stasis. ILL revealed diminished lymphatic drainage to perihepatic lymph nodes and vessels in irradiated livers when compared to non-radioembolized controls (p = 1.0x10-4). Conclusions: Radioembolization impairs peritumoral lymph vessel function. Further research is needed to evaluate if radioembolization impairs tumor dissemination via this route. Impact and implications: Unilobar radioembolization can serve as an alternative to portal venous embolization for patients who are considered unresectable due to an insufficient future liver remnant. This research suggests that radioembolization impairs the function of peritumoral liver lymph vessels, potentially hindering dissemination via this route. These findings provide support for considering unilobar radioembolization over standard portal venous embolization.

Pre-existing subclones determine radioresistance in rectal cancer organoids.

More than half of all patients with cancer receive radiation therapy, but resistance is commonly observed. Currently, it is unknown whether resistance to radiation therapy is acquired or inherently present. Here, we employed organoids derived from rectal cancer and single-cell whole-genome sequencing to investigate the long-term evolution of subclones in response to radiation. Comparing single-cell whole-genome karyotypes between in-vitro-unirradiated and -irradiated organoids revealed three patterns of subclonal evolution: (1) subclonal persistence, (2) subclonal extinction, and (3) subclonal expansion. Organoids in which subclonal shifts occurred (i.e., expansion or extinction) became more resistant to radiation. Although radioresistant subclones did not share recurrent copy-number alterations that could explain their radioresistance, resistance was associated with reduced chromosomal instability, an association that was also observed in 529 human cancer cell lines. These data suggest that resistance to radiation is inherently present and associated with reduced chromosomal instability.

Dose finding study for unilobar radioembolization using holmium-166 microspheres to improve resectability in patients with HCC: the RALLY protocol.

BACKGROUND: High dose unilobar radioembolization (also termed 'radiation lobectomy')-the transarterial unilobar infusion of radioactive microspheres as a means of controlling tumour growth while concomitantly inducing future liver remnant hypertrophy-has recently gained interest as induction strategy for surgical resection. Prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm are lacking. The RALLY study aims to assess the safety and toxicity profile of holmium-166 unilobar radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant. METHODS: The RALLY study is a multicenter, interventional, non-randomized, open-label, non-comparative safety study. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are considered ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant (< 2.7%/min/m2 on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan will be included. A classical 3 + 3 dose escalation model will be used, enrolling three to six patients in each cohort. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated treated non-tumourous liver-absorbed dose (cohorts of 50, 60, 70 and 80 Gy). Secondary objectives are to evaluate dose-response relationships, to establish the safety and feasibility of surgical resection following unilobar radioembolization, to assess quality of life, and to generate a biobank. DISCUSSION: This will be the first clinical study to assess the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm and may serve as a stepping stone towards its implementation in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL8902 , registered on 2020-09-15.

Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. BACKGROUND: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. METHODS: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. RESULTS: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. CONCLUSION: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.

Colorectal liver metastases that survive radioembolization display features of aggressive tumor behavior.

BACKGROUND: Radiation lobectomy is a therapeutic approach that involves targeted radiation delivery to induce future liver remnant hypertrophy and tumor control. In patients with colorectal liver metastases, only 30-40% have complete tumor regression. The importance of tumor biology in treatment response remains elusive. METHODS: Patients with colorectal liver metastases who received radiation lobectomy were selected from surgical pathology files. Using a machine learning scoring protocol, pathological response was correlated to tumor absorbed dose and expression of markers of radioresistance Ki-67 (proliferation), CAIX (hypoxia), Olfm4 (cancer stem cells) and CD45 (leukocytes). RESULTS: No linear association was found between tumor dose and response (ρ < 0.1, P = 0.73 (90Y), P = 0.92 (166Ho)). Response did correlate with proliferation (ρ = 0.56, P = 0.012), and non-responsive lesions had large pools (>15%) of Olfm4 positive cancer stem cells (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0037). Responding lesions (regression grade ≤2) were highly hypoxic compared to moderate and non-responding lesions (P = 0.011). Non-responsive lesions had more tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (3240 cells/mm2 versus 650 cells/mm2), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The aggressive phenotype of a subset of surviving cancer cells emphasizes the importance of prompt resection after radiation lobectomy.

Expression profiling of budding cells in colorectal cancer reveals an EMT-like phenotype and molecular subtype switching.

BACKGROUND: Tumour budding, described as the presence of single cells or small clusters of up to five tumour cells at the invasive margin, is established as a prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the molecular signature of tumour budding cells and the corresponding tumour bulk. METHODS: Tumour bulk and budding areas were microdissected and processed for RNA-sequencing. As little RNA was obtained from budding cells, a special low-input mRNA library preparation protocol was used. Gene expression profiles of budding as compared with tumour bulk were investigated for established EMT signatures, consensus molecular subtype (CMS), gene set enrichment and pathway analysis. RESULTS: A total of 296 genes were differentially expressed with an FDR <0.05 and a twofold change between tumour bulk and budding regions. Genes that were upregulated in the budding signature were mainly involved in cell migration and survival while downregulated genes were important for cell proliferation. Supervised clustering according to an established EMT gene signature categorised budding regions as EMT-positive, whereas tumour bulk was considered EMT-negative. Furthermore, a shift from CMS2 (epithelial) to CMS4 (mesenchymal) was observed as tumour cells transit from the tumour bulk to the budding regions. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding regions are characterised by a phenotype switch compared with the tumour bulk, involving the acquisition of migratory characteristics and a decrease in cell proliferation. In particular, most tumour budding signatures were EMT-positive and switched from an epithelial subtype (CMS2) in the tumour bulk to a mesenchymal subtype (CMS4) in budding cells.