Impact of tumor subsite on survival outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study from 2000 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is responsible for high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the oral cavity encompasses different anatomical subsites, it is unclear whether subsite localization of carcinoma influences outcome. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and local recurrence-free survival (L-RFS) at different subsites by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of subsite on overall death, locoregional recurrence, and local recurrence. RESULTS: The cohort included 1702 patients treated with curative intent for OSCC according to standardized national guidelines. The 5-year OS was superior in oral tongue to retromolar trigone as well as in both oral tongue and floor-of-mouth (FOM) compared to tumors involving multiple locations. The 3-year RFS in oral tongue and FOM was superior to tumors involving multiple locations, and in FOM compared to retromolar trigone. The 3-year L-RFS in oral tongue and FOM was higher than gingiva, retromolar trigone and tumors involving multiple locations. Adjusting for relevant covariables using oral tongue as reference, tumors involving multiple locations was the only category presenting higher risk for locoregional recurrence, while risk of local recurrence was higher in gingiva, retromolar trigone, hard palate and to tumors involving multiple locations. The study found no difference in risk of death between subsites. CONCLUSION: The study found differences in survival outcomes between subsites. After adjusting for covariables, subsite mainly had significant impact on local recurrence, with no distinct pattern of influence on overall death or locoregional recurrence.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield, Lymph Node Density, and pN in Oral Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate thresholds for lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node density (LND), and pN in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma in relation to previous findings in the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective register-based study. SETTING: Copenhagen Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma database. METHODS: Appropriate thresholds for LNY, LND, and pN were determined by areas under the curve and subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: In total, 413 patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma were included. In the pN0 cohort, no superior/prognostic LNY cutoff values were detected. In the pN+ cohort, areas under the curve determined thresholds of LNY, LND, and pN to be 21 nodes, 5%, and 3 metastases, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 52% for patients with LNY ≥21 vs 38% for patients with LNY <21 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11; P < .05), 60% for patients with LND ≤5% vs 38% for patients with LND >6% (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.57; P < .05), and 43% for patients with pN <3 vs 26% for patients with pN ≥3 (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-2.15; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased nodal yield, decreased LND, and decreasing number of pN were associated with significantly improved survival outcomes. LNY might serve as a prognosticator of survival as well as a surgical quality indicator. LND may have implications as a tool in cancer staging and treatment planning.

The impact of tobacco smoking on survival of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This article aims to evaluate the impact of smoking status, accumulated tobacco exposure (ATE), and smoking cessation on overall- and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with primary OSCC treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2019 in Copenhagen were included (n = 1808). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to compare the survival of patients with different smoking history. Interactions between ATE and (A) tumor subsite and (B) excessive alcohol consumption (EAC) on the survival were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analyses with interaction terms. RESULTS: We included 1717 patients with known smoking status (62.8% males, median age: 64 years (IQR: 57-71 years)), who had a 5-year OS of 53.7% (95%CI: 49.8%-57.9%). Based on fully adjusted multivariable Cox regression analyses, significantly elevated hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DFS were identified for current, but not former smokers, compared to never-smokers. An approximately linear relationship between continuous ATE and survival estimates was identified. ATE analyzed as a categorical variable showed significantly elevated HRs for OS of patients with all categories (060 PYs), however only for DFS of patients with >60 PYs, compared to 0 PYs. Furthermore, an unfavorable long-term prognosis was evident after >3.5 (OS) and >2.5 (DFS) years from diagnosis for patients who continued smoking compared to patients with smoking cessation at diagnosis. The survival estimates of patients with different tumor subsite and alcohol consumption differed with increasing ATE. CONCLUSION: Tobacco smoking (assessed as smoking status and ATE) was associated with inferior survival (OS and DFS) among patients with OSCC. Unfavorable long-term prognosis was significant for patients who continued smoking compared to patients with smoking cessation at diagnosis. The impact of ATE on survival of patients with OSCC may depend on the tumor subsite and/or alcohol consumption.