RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The incidence of diabetes continues to increase across the world. As the number of patients rises, so does the need for educated health care professionals. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains one of the primary complications in diabetes, and screening has proved to be a cost-effective measure to avoid DR-related blindness. Denmark has an established screening programme, but no formal training of the people responsible for analysing retinal images. METHODS: We here present an online learning platform that offers a diabetic eye screening course for health care professionals undertaking screening responsibility in the Region of Southern Denmark. The course is divided into lectures, each focussed on identifying different levels of DR or detecting related lesions. The course is free to use on-demand, contains instructional videos, interactive tests and exercises, and it is concluded with a certification test. The tools on the platform can in addition be used to generate data for research purposes, such as comparing users or experts in detection of lesions or annotating data for the development of machine learning models. RESULTS: More than 150 participants have so far completed the course, and the platform is being adopted for education in other regions of Denmark.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Certificación , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We have previously shown that neural network technology can be used for scoring arthritis disease activity in ultrasound images from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, giving scores according to the EULAR-OMERACT grading system. We have now further developed the architecture of this neural network and can here present a new idea applying cascaded convolutional neural network (CNN) design with even better results. We evaluate the generalisability of this method on unseen data, comparing the CNN with an expert rheumatologist. METHODS: The images were graded by an expert rheumatologist according to the EULAR-OMERACT synovitis scoring system. CNNs were systematically trained to find the best configuration. The algorithms were evaluated on a separate test data set and compared with the gradings of an expert rheumatologist on a per-joint basis using a Kappa statistic, and on a per-patient basis using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: With 1678 images available for training and 322 images for testing the model, it achieved an overall four-class accuracy of 83.9%. On a per-patient level, there was no significant difference between the classifications of the model and of a human expert (p=0.85). Our original CNN had a four-class accuracy of 75.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Using a new network architecture we have further enhanced the algorithm and have shown strong agreement with an expert rheumatologist on a per-joint basis and on a per-patient basis. This emphasises the potential of using CNNs with this architecture as a strong assistive tool for the objective assessment of disease activity of RA patients.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Reumatología/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Articulaciones/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sinovitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
Background: The development of standardised methods for ultrasound (US) scanning and evaluation of synovitis activity by the OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Scoring (OESS) system is a major step forward in the use of US in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with inflammatory arthritis. The variation in interpretation of disease activity on US images can affect diagnosis, treatment and outcomes in clinical trials. We, therefore, set out to investigate if we could utilise neural network architecture for the interpretation of disease activity on Doppler US images, using the OESS scoring system. Methods: Two state-of-the-art neural networks were used to extract information from 1342 Doppler US images from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One neural network divided images as either healthy (Doppler OESS score 0 or 1) or diseased (Doppler OESS score 2 or 3). The other to score images across all four of the OESS systems Doppler US scores (0-3). The neural networks were hereafter tested on a new set of RA Doppler US images (n=176). Agreement between rheumatologist's scores and network scores was measured with the kappa statistic. Results: For the neural network assessing healthy/diseased score, the highest accuracies compared with an expert rheumatologist were 86.4% and 86.9% with a sensitivity of 0.864 and 0.875 and specificity of 0.864 and 0.864, respectively. The other neural network developed to four class Doppler OESS scoring achieved an average per class accuracy of 75.0% and a quadratically weighted kappa score of 0.84. Conclusion: This study is the first to show that neural network technology can be used in the scoring of disease activity on Doppler US images according to the OESS system.