Viabahn endoprosthesis for femoropopliteal aneurysm repair: safety, success rates, and long-term patency.

BACKGROUND: The Viabahn endoprosthesis has become a vital option for endovascular therapy, yet there is limited long-term data on its effectiveness for peripheral aneurysm repair. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical and clinical success, and long-term patency of the Viabahn endoprosthesis for treating femoropopliteal aneurysms. METHODS: This retrospective tertiary single-center study analyzed patients who underwent a Viabahn endoprosthesis procedure for femoropopliteal aneurysm repair from 2010 to 2020. Intraoperative complications, technical and clinical success rates, and major adverse events (MAE, including acute thrombotic occlusion, major amputation, myocardial infarction, and device- or procedure-related death) at 30 days were assessed. Incidence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation (cdTLR) was noted. Patency rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 19 patients (mean age, 72 ± 12 years; 18 male, 1 female) who underwent aneurysm repair using the Viabahn endoprosthesis, there were no intraoperative adverse events, with 100% technical and clinical success rates. At the 30-day mark, all patients (19/19, 100%) were free of MAE. The median follow-up duration was 1,009 days [IQR, 462-1,466]. Popliteal stent graft occlusion occurred in 2/19 patients (10.5%) after 27 and 45 months, respectively. Consequently, the primary patency rates were 100%, 90%, 74% at 12, 24, and 36-72 months, respectively. Endovascular cdTLR was successful in both cases, resulting in sustained secondary patency at 100%. CONCLUSION: The use of Viabahn endoprostheses for femoropopliteal aneurysm repair demonstrated technical and clinical success rates of 100%, a 0% 30-day MAE rate, and excellent long-term patency.

Dynamic Radial MR Imaging for Endoleak Surveillance after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Inconclusive CT Angiography: A Prospective Study.

Background/Objectives: To assess free-breathing, dynamic radial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for detecting endoleaks post-endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in cases with inconclusive computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods: This prospective single-center study included 17 participants (mean age, 70 ± 9 years; 13 males) who underwent dynamic radial MRI (Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel-Volumetric Interpolated BrEath-hold, GRASP-VIBE) after inconclusive multiphasic CT for the presence of endoleaks during the follow-up of EVAR-treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. CT and MRI datasets were independently assessed by two radiologists for image quality, diagnostic confidence, and the presence/type of endoleak. Statistical analyses included interrater and intermethod agreement, and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC)). Results: Subjective image analysis demonstrated good image quality and interrater agreement (k ≥ 0.6) for both modalities, while diagnostic confidence was significantly higher in MRA (p = 0.03). There was significantly improved accuracy for detecting type II endoleaks on MRA (AUC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.87, 1.0]) compared to CTA (AUC 0.66 [95% CI: 0.41, 0.91]; p = 0.03). Although MRA demonstrated higher values for sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and interrater agreement, none of the other types nor the overall detection rate for endoleaks showed differences in the diagnostic performance over CT (p ≥ 0.12). CTA and MRA revealed slight to moderate intermethod concordance in endoleak detection (k = 0.3-0.64). Conclusions: The GRASP-VIBE MRA characterized by high spatial and temporal resolution demonstrates clinical feasibility with good image quality and superior diagnostic confidence. It notably enhances diagnostic performance in detecting and classifying endoleaks, particularly type II, compared to traditional multiphase CTA with inconclusive findings.

Intramural hematoma in the proximal sealing zone of the thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: frequency and safety in acute and subacute type B dissections.

Introduction: To assess the outcomes after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in the presence of intramural hematoma (IMH) in the proximal sealing zone. Material and methods: Patient data were retrospectively extracted from the hospital records of patients treated with TEVAR for acute and chronic aortic dissection type B in one single center. The initial, preoperative, first postoperative, and last follow-up CT scans were evaluated in the aortic 3D multiplanar reformats and the centerline regarding IMH presence in the proximal sealing zone, anatomical preconditions, and the morphological TEVAR complications including migration and bird-beak. Groups with (IMH) and without IMH (no-IMH) were compared. Results: Overall, 84 patients (IMH:42; no-IMH:42) were treated at the age of 63(55; 72) years, of whom 23/84 (27%), 34/84 (40%), and 27/84 (32%) were in the hyperacute, acute and subacute dissection phases, respectively. The bovine arch was found in 10/84(12%) and the type III arch was most common (43/84;51%). IMH maximum extent was found in zones 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 14/84 (17%), 17/84 (20%), 18/84 (21%), and 6/84 (7%), respectively. Sealing was achieved in zone II in 71/84 (85%) and LSA was revascularized in 66/84 (79%) of the overall cohort. Early mortality and paraplegia were 2/84 (2%) each; stroke rate was 3/84 (4%). During the 22 months median follow-up (22;4;43) no RTAD was observed. Migration ≥10 mm (IMH: 11/82; no-IMH: 10/82; P = 1.0) and bird-beaks (IMH: 10/82; no-IMH: 12/82; P = 0.8036) were comparable in both groups and accompanied by a low aorta related mortality (1/82) in both groups. Conclusion: The presence of the IMH in the proximal TEVAR sealing zone is frequent and may not be relevant for the occurrence of the RTAD, stent-graft migration, or bird-beak formation.

Mid-Term Outcomes of a Pre-Cannulated Iliac Branched Device in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortoiliac Aneurysms: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center.

The aim was to assess the mid-term results of the E-iliac branched device. Baseline and follow-up data of this monocentric retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with aortoiliac aneurysms treated with iliac branched devices between 2016 and 2023 were extracted from the hospital records. Preoperative and follow-up CT scans were analyzed regarding endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac remodeling, and device patency. Overall, 50 devices were implanted in 38 patients with a median age of 69 (IQR 62-78) years, and 1.6 bridging stent grafts per vessel were implanted through transfemoral (22/50; 44%) or upper extremity access (28/50; 56%). Primary technical success and assisted technical success were 97% (37/38) and 100% (38/38), respectively. No migration, no type I or III endoleaks, no stroke, colonic ischemia, aneurysm rupture, or conversion during the early and mid-term follow-ups (11 months, IQR 5-26) were observed. Aneurysm sac enlargement or shrinkage was observed in 0% (0/38) and 16% (6/38) patients, respectively. E-iliac-related re-interventions were seen only during the early follow-up: two thrombectomies with bare-metal stent relining after thrombosis of the iliac limb. Bridging stent graft and E-iliac patency during the mid-term follow-up were 100%. E-iliac showed encouraging mid-term results in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with high technical success and a low re-intervention rate.

Bare Stent Fracture After TEVAR With the Modified Restrictive Bare Stent (RBS) Technique in Type B Aortic Dissections.

PURPOSE: The aim was to assess the mid-term aortic remodeling and bare-metal stent (BMS) integrity of the restricted bare stent (RBS) technique reconstruction in aortic dissections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included prospectively collected patients treated with the modified RBS technique between 2017 and 2020. The preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scans were analyzed in the centerline at the mid-descending, celiac trunk (CeT), and the mid-abdominal levels for false lumen (FL) patency, aortic diameter, and true lumen (TL) diameter changes. Bare-metal stent integrity was assessed in the 3-dimensional multiplanar reformats. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the cohort (n=17) was 26 (11, 45) months. The procedure was mainly performed with the Relay NBS endograft (15/17; 88%) + E-XL BMS (17/17; 100%). Postoperative mortality, paraplegia, stroke, renovisceral vessel loss, and type I and III endoleaks were not observed. BMS fractured in 6 patients (6/17; 36%), damaged the dissection flap in 4/17 (24%), and led to the reperfusion of the FL and re-interventions with TEVAR (4/17; 24%). Two patients without FL reperfusion showed stable CT follow-ups 13 and 17 months after the fracture diagnosis. The TL expansion was seen at all landmarks and peaked in the thoracic aorta (+10; 6, 15; p<0.001). The FL thrombosis after modified RBS was only relevant in the thoracic aorta (p<0.001) and at CeT (p=0.003). The aortic diameter was stable in the thoracic aorta and increased at distal landmarks (CeT [+5; 1, 10; p=0.001]; mid-abdominal [+3; 1, 5; p=0.004]). CONCLUSION: The modified RBS technique could not stop aortic growth below the diaphragm and prevent new membrane rupture due to the fractures of the BMS and consecutive flap damage with the reperfusion of the FL. CLINICAL IMPACT: The treatment of complicated type B aortic dissections with TEVAR has become a standard. Particularly, patients with true lumen collapse and malperfusion may benefit from a more aggressive treatment strategy including proximal TEVAR and distal bare-metal stent implantation to re-open the true lumen and to prevent distal stent-induced new entry. However, this study reports the challenges of this approach with a high rate of bare-metal stent fractures during the follow-up. The fractures that occurred at the site of vertical nitinol bridges led to the dissection membrane ruptures and the reperfusion of the false lumen with consecutive dilatation. A close follow-up is mandatory to detect this complication and to treat the patients with TEVAR extension.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With AFX Stent-Grafts or Tube Grafts for Sacciform Infrarenal Pathologies in a Narrow Aortic Anatomy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated with tube grafts and AFX stent-graft in the narrow infrarenal aortic anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) or sacciform aneurysms of the infrarenal aorta and an aortic bifurcation diameter ≤20 mm who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with bifurcated AFX or tube stent-grafts (TUBE) between 2012 and 2020 were included. Demographic data and the outcome of the AFX group were compared with the TUBE group. All morphological measurements in the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were performed in the aortic centerline. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (female: 12/51; 29%; median age: 72 years [63, 77]) with a median follow-up of 10 (3, 39) months, were included, of whom 35/51 (69%) had PAUs and 11/51 were symptomatic (22%). The aortic bifurcation diameter was 17 mm (15, 18) with severe calcifications in 25/51 (49%). The distal aortic landing zone was longer in the TUBE group (9 mm vs 24 mm; p<0.001). The technical success was 96% with a median aneurysm shrinkage of 8% (3, 13), which was comparable between the groups (p=0.264). Periprocedural mortality, conversion to open surgery, myocardial infarction, and stroke were not observed. Two type Ia endoleaks (EL) and 2 type Ib EL occurred, all in the TUBE group (Type 1 EL; 19 vs 0%; p=0.013). The limb patency in the AFX group was 100%. One patient with a tube graft developed an infrarenal aortic thrombosis 40 months after the intervention. The reintervention rate in the TUBE group was higher (14 vs 0%; p=0.032) and included 3 aortic cuff implantations and 1 covered endovascular aortic reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB). CONCLUSION: AFX stent-graft showed a lower rate of type I endoleaks and reinterventions in sacciform infrarenal aortic pathologies during the early and midterm follow-up.

Longitudinal morphological changes of the aorta and the endograft position before and after distal stent graft-induced new entry in aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the endograft position and aortic geometry changes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) in distal stent-induced new entry (dSINE) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the baseline demographic and the follow-up data were extracted from the hospital records, and computed tomography scans of dSINE patients after TEVAR or FET between 2011 and 2021 were analysed regarding endograft oversizing, length and migration, taper ratio, aortic diameter at the endograft end, aortic elongation (thoracic inner and outer curvature), wedge apposition angle and tortuosity angle in the distal landing zone. RESULTS: dSINE was found in 22/213 (10%) of TEVAR and 10/31 (32%) of FET patients. The total follow-up time was 45 (27; 59) months. TEVAR was mainly performed with Relay NBS endograft (77%) and FET with Evita open prosthesis (80%). Paraplegia and stroke rates were 3%. dSINE occurred 17 (7; 35) months post-TEVAR and was instantly treated in 18 patients (56%) or followed up for 21 (11; 34) months (n = 14). Migration [+5 mm (1; 11; P < 0.001)], birdbeak angle [+9° (0; 27; P = 0.039)] and aortic diameter +5 mm (1; 11; P < 0.001) increased after dSINE, whereas aortic elongation increased already before [+12 mm (0; 27; P = 0.015)] and peaked after dSINE [+30 mm (9; 38; P < 0.001)]. The aortic elongation was more pronounced in the outer aortic curvature before and after dSINE (before: P = 0.039, after: P = 0.024). Postoperative wedge apposition [17° (12; 20)] increased before dSINE [21° (16; 35; P < 0.001)] and peaked thereafter [31° (21; 40; P < 0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic elongation may influence the endograft position and provoke TEVAR failure in the distal and proximal landing zones.

Total transfemoral access in a new off-the-shelf thoracoabdominal inner-branched endograft.

Branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR) is increasingly being performed with the off-the-shelf devices. We evaluated the use of the wire-assisted sheath stabilization technique for the new inner branch-based (iBEVAR), off-the-shelf E-nside endograft in 2 patients. The cannulation of the 8 reno-visceral target vessels and the BSG implantation were successfully performed using the total transfemoral approach. Complications were not observed during the 3-month follow-up. The wire-assisted sheath stabilization technique was shown feasible in an off-the-shelf iBEVAR.

Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system. METHODS: Forty-three patients with thoracic aortic pathology involving the aortic arch have been treated with the Relay Branch system (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL, USA) in 10 centres. We assessed in-hospital mortality, neurological injury, treatment success according to current reporting standards and the need for secondary interventions. In addition, outcome was analysed according to the underlying pathology: non-dissective disease versus residual aortic dissection (RAD) (defined as remaining dissection after previous type A repair, chronic type B aortic dissections). RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 9% (0% in patients with RAD). Disabling stroke occurred in 7% (0% in patients with RAD); non-disabling stroke occurred in 19% (7% in patients with RAD). Early type IA and B endoleak formation occurred in 4%. Median follow-up was 16 ± 18 months. During the follow-up period, 23% of the patients died. Aortic-related deaths were low (3% in patients with RAD). CONCLUSIONS: The results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system in a selected patient population with regard to technical success are good. In-hospital mortality is acceptable, the number of disabling strokes is low and technical success is high. Non-disabling stroke is a major concern, and every effort has to be taken to reduce this to a minimum. The best outcome is seen in patients with underlying RAD. Finally, more data are needed.

Staged Hybrid Treatment with Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of a Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Presence of a Total Infrarenal Aortoiliac Occlusion.

Aortoiliac occlusive disease may limit the use of branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs). Thus, infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion may preclude the use of BEVAR. We present a case involving a 67-year-old patient with a fast-progressing TAAA (diameter: 70 mm) and a concomitant total aortoiliac occlusion. A multi-staged treatment concept included the creation of the access and the distal landing zone for the consecutive endovascular procedures through an aorto-right femoral-left popliteal bypass. At six-week intervals, thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the creation of the proximal landing zone and a 4-vessel BEVAR were accomplished. At 36 months, a type III endoleak occurred due to the fracture of the bridging stent-graft to the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery. It was successfully treated with VBX stent-grafts. This case illustrates the importance of a staged hybrid approach in the management of complex aortic pathologies with poor access and insufficient distal landing zone.

Carotid endarterectomy versus conservative management of the asymptomatic carotid stenosis before coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Our retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the safety of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in comparison to patients with untreated asymptomatic carotid stenosis ≥60% before CABG. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 174 patients with asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis treated between 2004 and 2017 with CABG. Thereof 106 patients had CEA before cardiac surgery either by a simultaneous (n = 62) or staged (n = 44) approach. Patients with untreated carotid stenosis served as control (no-CEA group; n = 68). RESULTS: The mean stenosis grade was higher in the CEA group (CEA 83% (±1), no-CEA 71% (±1) p < 0.0001). The overall stroke rate was 5/174 (3%) and was due to a high incidence of stroke in the no-CEA group (CEA: 0/106 (0%); No-CEA 5/68 (7%) p = 0.0083). The overall mortality was 1% and comparable between the groups (CEA: 2/106 (2%); No-CEA 0/68 (0%) p = 0.5211). Stroke related mortality was not observed. The groups were similar regarding the incidence of myocardial infarction (p = 1.0), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.1931), delirium (p = 0.2106) and IMC/ICU stay (p = 0.1542). No significant difference in the subgroup analysis was found between the simultaneous and staged approach regarding the myocardial infarction (simultaneous: 1/62 (1%); staged: 1/44 (1%); p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: CEA performed as a staged procedure in local anesthesia or a simultaneous procedure in general anesthesia, may reduce the stroke risk prior to CABG.

Carotid-axillary bypass as an alternative revascularization method for zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the mid-term results of carotid-axillary bypass (CAB) in the setting of zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair as an alternative method for the left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization. METHODS: Our retrospective, single cohort study included all 69 patients from March 2015 to December 2018 with zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair and CAB for the revascularization of the LSA. Demographics and clinical data were collected. We assessed several clinical outcomes: local complications (hematoma, injury of the brachial plexus, vagus and sympathetic chain nerve palsies, chyle leakage), subclavian steal, arm ischemia, paraplegia, mortality, and stroke. Follow-up computed tomography scans were analyzed for CAB and vertebral artery (VA) patency and the extent of thrombus formation in the LSA. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality was 3% and the perioperative stroke rate was 4%. Permanent paraplegia occurred in 3%. Perioperative morbidity included irritation of the brachial plexus (1%), sympathetic chain nerve palsy (1%), and wound hematoma in 3% of the cases. Phrenic and vagus nerve lesions and chyle leakage were not observed. Bypass patency was 97% at mean follow-up of 333 ± 39 days. VA occlusion was found in 6% of all cases. Strokes did not occur during the follow-up. Morbidity at follow-up included arm claudication (3%) in two patients with bypass thrombosis. Subclavian steal was observed in 3%. The LSA ostium was ligated (44%), plugged (22%), or left open (35%) in patients without a type II endoleak. Subgroup analysis of LSA thrombosis to the level of the VA was more prevalent after surgical ligature (P = .02), but had no negative effects on CAB or VA patency or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: CAB is a safe alternative to classic debranching procedures, with distinctive advantages regarding local complication rates described in the literature.

Comparison of aortic remodelling after conservative treatment or thoracic endovascular repair in type B dissections.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare aortic remodelling in type B dissections after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or conservative treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of computed tomography (CT) data sets at dissection onset and at the last follow-up in a group with conservative (group A) and TEVAR treatment (group B). An additional analysis of the preoperative CT images was performed in patients from group A, who were converted to TEVAR during follow-up. Diameters and lengths of all aortic segments were measured and growth rates were calculated. RESULTS: We included 74 patients: 50 patients in group A (follow-up time: 1625 ± 209 days) and 24 patients in group B (follow-up time: 554 ± 129 days). The mean aortic diameter growth rate was significantly higher in group A than in group B in the mid-descending aorta (A: +7 mm/year; B: -4 mm/year; P = 0.003). Length growth difference was only present in the abdominal aortic segment and was more pronounced in group A (+2 vs ±0 mm/year; P = 0.009). The conversion rate from conservative treatment to TEVAR was 36% (n = 18). A false lumen diameter of >22 mm at baseline was associated with a higher rate of conversion (P = 0.036). After conversion, the mean growth rate in the proximal descending and mid-descending aorta decreased from preoperative +11 and +18 mm/year to postoperative -9 and -14 mm/year, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In acute type B dissections, TEVAR stops aortic enlargement in the thoracic aorta, but promotes distal dilatation compared to the conservative treatment group. After conversion to TEVAR in conservatively pretreated chronic type B dissections, a more pronounced diameter decrease in the descending aorta was observed than in patients treated in the acute phase.

Morphologic performance analysis of the Relay nonbare stent graft in dissected thoracic aorta.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate morphologic changes in dissected aortas after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with the use of the Relay Nonbare stent graft stent graft by focusing on the geometric stent graft's performance in remodeling aortas. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective three-dimensional computed tomography analysis preoperatively, postoperatively, and 6 months after TEVAR in patients with residual dissection after type A and those with acute and chronic type B dissections at two German centers. RESULTS: Thirty-nine acute and 54 chronic aortic dissections were included. Median follow-up was 200 (interquartile range, 109-617) days. TEVAR induced aortic remodeling in both groups. Complete false lumen thrombosis along the stent graft (postoperative, 73%; follow-up, 84%; P < .0001) led to a decrease in aortic diameter at the middle stent graft level (preoperative, 45.9 mm [38.6-56.6] vs follow-up, 43.6 [37.4-52.4] mm; P = .009). True lumen expansion was observed in both groups and peaked in acute dissections in the distal landing zone (acute, +9.3 mm vs chronic, +5.8 mm; P < .0001). Migration was 2 (0-5) mm, and bird-beak and endoleak type IA rates were 20% and 4%, respectively. There was no retrograde type A dissection. Distal stent graft-induced new entry occurred in 15%; the major risk factor for incidence was the stent graft's wedge apposition angle (odds ratio, 1.365 [confidence interval, 1.115-1.671]; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR with the use of the Relay NBS promotes aortic remodeling in acute and chronic dissections, entailing a low risk of migration, type IA endoleaks, and retrograde type A dissections. Wedge apposition was the predominant risk factor for distal stent graft-induced new entry.

Cardiac surgery in the presence of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion.

The aim was to evaluate the incidence of stroke in the setting of cardiac surgery with or without hemodynamically relevant asymptomatic carotid stenosis contralateral to the occlusion. We designed a historical cohorts study, focused on patients with unilateral totally occluded internal carotid arteries who were referred for any cardiac surgery at our center. Isolated unilateral occlusions were assigned to group 1 (n = 60), and those with a contralateral stenosis grade ≥ 60% were included in group 2 (n = 51). A total of 111 patients operated in our center from 1997 to 2016 were included. Patients in group 2 had an asymptomatic contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis with a mean stenosis grade of 71 ± 20%. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was performed in 22 patients from group 2. The overall mortality was 8/111 (7.2%). Carotid-associated mortality was not observed, whereas an overall stroke incidence of 8/111 (7.2%) was detected. The group-related outcome showed comparable results for mortality (group 1: 4/60 (6.7%) vs. group 2: 4/51 (7.8%); p = 1.0). Regarding stroke incidence, group 2 had a higher incidence of overall strokes (2/60 (3.3%) vs. 6/51 (11.8%); p = 0.14) with more contralateral (0/60 (0%) vs. 2/51 (3.9%); p = 0.209) and ipsilateral strokes (2/60 (3.3%) vs. 4/51 (7.8%); p = 0.411). Stroke rate peaked in patients with simultaneous carotid and cardiac surgery (n = 22; 18.2%; p = 0.048). Performing simultaneous CEA during cardiac surgery in the presence of a contralateral occlusion may promote stroke. Asymptomatic contralateral carotid stenosis is a risk factor for stroke in patients with carotid occlusion prior to cardiac surgery.

Hybrid Off-pump Second-Stage Aortic Arch Repair after Type A Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Ascending aorta or hemi-arch repair are common in the acute phase of type A dissection. Postdissection aneurysms can develop with antegrade perfusion of the false lumen in the dissected aortic arch and require reoperation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, we reoperated nine patients with postdissection aneurysms using a hybrid technique without cardiopulmonary bypass. The patients had a EuroSCORE II of 13% and a logistic EuroSCORE I of 45% and were not candidates for frozen elephant trunk surgery. The median interval since the acute ascending repair was 184 (92; 528) days. All patients were treated by median resternotomy, ascending to carotid bypass on a partially clamped ascending graft, and transfemoral endovascular repair with a Relay NBS (nonbare stent) or conformable Gore C-TAG stent graft. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Mean follow-up was 405 (220; 672) days. There was no disabling stroke, endoleak, paraplegia, in-hospital, or late mortality. In all patients, the false lumen was completely thrombosed at the aortic arch level with a median aneurysm shrinkage of 13 mm in the distal arch. There was no bird beak or stent graft migration. Distal stent-induced new entry was observed in one case. Reinterventions were not necessary due to diameter stability. CONCLUSION: Complete debranching with transfemoral thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair showed encouraging results in patients with relevant comorbidities. The used stent grafts performed well in the mid-term follow-up period with no endoleaks or migration.