Health-related quality of life after minimal-invasive treatment of aortic valve stenosis in the elderly.

Background: Although transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) offers superior early outcome over open surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the elderly, a comparison of TF-TAVI with surgery performed through partial upper mini sternotomy (PUMS) hasn't yet been validated. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and quality of life of patients subjected to TF-TAVI and open surgical aortic valve replacement through partial upper mini sternotomy (PUMS-SAVR). Methods: Baseline, procedural and post-treatment data of 197 consecutive patients: 137 TF-TAVI and 60 PUMS-SAVR treated at Philipps University of Marburg, were retrospectively collected. The propensity score method was used to create two groups in a 1:1 fashion. Questionnaire assessment (SF36_LQ) of quality of life of the matched patients was carried out at the ambulant routine control presentation. A competing risk regression model is used to evaluate the impact of the clinical outcome on health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Results: After propensity matching, TF-TAVI remained associated with lower procedural time (136±50 vs. 298±36 min, P<0.01), intensive care unit stay (2.68±2.70 vs. 4.29±2.43 days, P<0.01), transfusion of packed red cell units (0.46±2.05 vs. 1.60±2.00 U, P=0.02) and higher heart block (42.86% vs. 0%, P<0.01) and permanent pacemaker implantation rates (14.29% vs. 0%, P=0.05) compared to PUMS-SAVR. TF-TAVI is associated with less complains, superior HrQoL (excellent 40% and very good 60% vs. very good 100% in PUMS). Partial sternotomy is the main predictor of the inferior HrQoL, with the regression coefficient of -1.11 (95% confidential interval, -1.503 to -0.726; R2=0.324, P<0.0001). Transfusion (P=0.26), paravalvular leakage (0.618), pacemaker implantation (P=0.19) and delirium (P=0.92) did not influence HrQoL after the minimal-invasive treatment of aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients. Conclusions: Although PUMS-SAVR offers better technical outcomes with less permanent pacemaker implantation and less paravalvular leakage than TF-TAVI, it is still associated with more need for transfusion, longer ventilation-and intensive care unit-times, and prolonged hospital stay. In the elderly, PUMS-SAVR achieves inferior quality of life compared to TF-TAVI. Partial sternotomy reveals as the strongest risk factor of perceived health-level post-treatment. It remains to be revealed whether fast-track open heart surgery that maintains a fully intact sternum and allows immediate postoperative extubation-as performed through video-assisted mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopic robotic procedures with percutaneous cannulation - should be favored against PUMS-SAVR.

Left ventricular free wall rupture caused by myocardial ischemia without treatable atherosclerotic coronary disease: a case series.

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) varies ranging from uneventful condition to congestive heart failure. Here we report two cases of LVFWR with different clinical presentation and notable outcome. A 53-year-old male presenting emergently with signs of myocardial infarction received immediate coronary angiography and thoracic CT-scan showing occlusion of the first marginal coronary branch without possibility of revascularization and minimal pericardial extravasation. Under ICU surveillance, LVFWR occurred 24 h later and was treated by pericardiocentesis and ECMO support followed by immediate uncomplicated surgical repair. Postoperative therapy-refractory vasoplegia and electromechanical dissociation caused fulminant deterioration and the early death of the patient. The second case is a 76-year old male brought to the emergency room after sudden syncope, clinical sings of pericardial tamponade and suspicion of a type A acute aortic dissection. Immediate CT-angiography excluded aortic dissection and revealed massive pericardial effusion and a hypoperfused myocardial area on the territory of the first marginal branch. Immediate sternotomy under mechanical resuscitation enabled removal of the massive intrapericardial clot and revealed LVFWR. After an uncomplicated surgical repair, an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged with sinus rhythm and good biventricular function. One year after the operation, he is living at home, symptom free. DISCUSSION: Whereas the younger patient, who was clinically stable at hospital admission received delayed surgery and did not survive treatment, the older patient, clinically unstable at presentation, went into immediate surgery and had a flawless postoperative course. Thus, early surgical repair of LVFWR leads to best outcome and treating LVFWR as a high emergency regardless of the symptoms improve survival.

Sequential composite BIMA grafting for 3v-CAD: factors that predict successful outcome of the one-inflow and two-inflow revascularization techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of one-inflow and two-inflow coronary surgical revascularization techniques inclosing skeletonized double mammary artery (BIMA) as T-graft on outcome is studied. METHODS: Early ad mid-term outcome of complete BIMA revascularization (C-T-BIMA) versus left-sided BIMA with right-sided aorto-coronary bypass (L-T-BIMA + R-CABG) is quantified and analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, Cox-regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis in a series of 204 consecutive patients treated for triple-vessel coronary disease (3v-CAD). RESULTS: The L-T-BIMA + R-CABG technique (n = 104) enables higher number of total (4.02 ± 0.87 vs. 3.71 ± 0.69, p = 0.015) and right-sided (1.21 ± 0.43 vs. 1.02 ± 0.32, p = 0.001) coronary anastomoses, improves total bypass flow (125.88 ± 92.41 vs. 82.50 ± 49.26 ml, p < 0.0001) and bypass flow/anastomosis (31.83 ± 23.9 vs.22.77 ± 14.23, p = 0.001), and enhances completeness of revascularization (84% vs.69%, p = 0.014) compared to C-T-BIMA strategy (n = 100), respectively. Although the incidence of MACCE was comparable in the two groups (8% vs.1.2%, p = 0.055), the progression of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) was significantly lower after L-T-BIMA + R-CABG, then after C-T-BIMA (47% vs.64%, p = 0.017). The use of C-T-BIMA-technique (HR = 4.2, p = 0.01) and preoperative RCA occlusion (HR = 3.006, p = 0.023) predicted FMR progression, whereas L-T-Graft + R-CABG technique protected against it (X2 = 14.04, p < 0.0001) independent of the anatomic and clinical complexity (Syntax score I: HR = 16.2, p = 0.156, Syntax score II: HR = 1.901, p = 0.751), of early- (0.96% vs.2%, p = 0.617) and mid-term mortality (5.8% vs.4%, p = 0.748) when compared to C-T-BIMA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The two-inflow coronary revascularization by L-T-BIMA + R-CABG better protects against FMR progression without increasing MACCE and mortality. Older patients with RCA occlusion and reduced LV-EF benefit most from the two-inflow L-T-BIMA + R-CABG technique. Younger 3v-CAD patients with normal LV-EF can preferentially be managed with the one-inflow C-T-BIMA; however, long-term outcome remains to be revealed.

Outcome of Surgery for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Depends on the Type and Timing of the Coronary Revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair versus MV replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing either prior (PCR) or concomitant coronary revascularization (CCR) by surgery (CABG) or intervention (PCI) are uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 446 patients receiving MV surgery for IMR between July 2006 and December 2010, 125 patients-87 CCR (69.1%) and 38 PCR (30.9%)-were eligible for inclusion in the study. Survival was higher in CCR versus PCR at long-term follow-up (78.83% vs. 57.9%, p = 0.016). The incidence of MACCE was lower in the CCR compared to PCR at both hospital discharge (34.11% vs. 63.57%, p = 0.003) and at follow-up (34.11% vs. 65.79%, p = 0.0008). Patients receiving CABG or CABG with PCI in PCR had higher mortality risks after MV surgery than CCR patients (X2 = 6.029, p = 0.014 and X2 = 6.466, p = 0.011, respectively). Whereas in the PCR group, MV repair and MV replacement achieved similar survival probability (X2 = 1.551, p = 0.213), MV repair in the CCR group led to improved survival compared to MV replacement (X2 = 3.921, p = 0.048). In MV replacement, LAD-CABG improved survival compared to LAD-PCI (U = 15,000.00, Z = -2.373 p = 0.018), and a substantial impact of arterial IMA-LAD grafting was revealed in the Cox-regression analysis (HR 0.334, CI: 0.113-0.989, p = 0.048) as opposed to venous-LAD grafting (HR 0.588, CI: 0.166-2.078, p = 0.410). CONCLUSION: Early treatment of IMR concomitant to coronary revascularization enhances long-term survival compared to delayed MV surgery after PCR. MV repair is not superior to MV replacement when performed late after coronary revascularization; however, MV repair leads to better survival than MV replacement when performed concomitantly with CABG with arterial LAD revascularization.

Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patients' expectations: Study protocol of the randomized controlled ValvEx-trial.

Introduction: Complete recovery after surgery depends on psychological factors such as preoperative information, expectations, and surgery-associated anxiety. Prior studies have shown that even a short preoperative psychological intervention aiming at optimized expectations (EXPECT) can improve postoperative outcomes in coronary artery bypass patients. However, this intervention may benefit only a small subgroup of heart surgery patients since implementing preoperative psychological interventions into the daily clinical routine is difficult due to the additional time and appointments. It is unclear whether the EXPECT intervention can be shortened and whether heart valve patients would also benefit from interventions that optimize patients' expectations. The multicenter ValvEx trial aims (i) to adapt an effective preoperative psychological intervention (EXPECT) to make it brief enough to be easily integrated into the preoperative routine of heart valve patients and (ii) to examine if the adapted preoperative psychological intervention improves the subjectively perceived illness-related disability (PDI) up to 3 months after surgery. Materials and analysis: In two German university hospitals, N = 88 heart valve patients who undergo heart surgery are randomized into two groups [standard of care (SOC) vs. standard of care plus interventional expectation manipulation (SOC and EXPECT)] after baseline assessment. Patients in the EXPECT group additionally to standard of care participate in the preoperative psychological intervention (30-40 min), focusing on optimizing expectations and have two booster-telephone calls (4 and 8 weeks after the surgery, approx. 15 min). Both groups have assessments again on the evening before the surgery, 4 to 6 days, and 3 months after the surgery. Discussion: The trial demonstrates excellent feasibility in the clinical routine and a high interest by the patients. Ethics and dissemination: The Ethics Committees of the Department of Medicine of the Philipps University of Marburg and the Department of Medicine of the University of Giessen approved the study protocol. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at congresses. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04502121.

Differentiated impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcome after left ventricular assist device implantation and tricuspid valve repair.

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on short-term survival after LVAD implantation with or without tricuspid annuloplasty valve repair (TVr) performed to treat regurgitation and avoid RV-failure post-LVAD insertion. Data of 24 patients receiving LVAD-implantation are assessed and compared. The primary outcome is in-hospital survival. Of 24 patients studied, 17 (70.8%) survived hospital stay: age (62.2 ± 12.3 vs 66.1 ± 8.5 years), preoperative LV-EF (15.9 ± 5.3% vs 13.6 ± 3.8%) vs. non-survivors, respectively. Survivors received preoperatively Impella (35.3% vs 0%, p = 0.037), had shorter intubation time (3.3 ± 3.5 vs 11.4 ± 11.1 days, p = 0.0053) and ICU stay (12.4 ± 9.8 vs 34.3 ± 34 days, p = 0.01) versus non-survivors. Non-survivors had more severe PH (37.0 ± 9.6 vs 29.8 ± 12.2 mmHg, p = 0.044) than survivors. Linear regression analysis revealed that cardiac operations performed concomitant with LVAD implantation increased mortality in patients with severe PH (p = 0.04), whereas isolated TVr performed concomitant with LVAD implantation did not increase mortality neither in the entire patient cohort (p = 0.569) nor in patients with severe PH (p = 0.433). LVAD with TVr improved survival in patients suffering from severe PH (vs. moderate PH), however this difference did not reach the level of significance due to the small number of patients (p = 0.08). LVAD-implantation alone improved survival of patients suffering from moderate PH (p = 0.045, vs. severe PH). Surgical correction of tricuspid regurgitation concomitant or before LVAD implantation improves early survival in patients suffering from severe PH when compared to LVAD implantation alone. Patients suffering from severe PH tend to benefit more from TVr than those suffering from moderate PH.

Impact of the underlying aortic pathology on postimplantation syndrome after endovascular thoracic aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment option of choice for almost all pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of aortic pathology on the occurrence of postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after TEVAR. METHODS: Seventy-four patients undergoing TEVAR for aortic dissection (TAD, 25), aortic aneurysm (TAA, 26), and aortic rupture or perforated ulcer (TAR/PAU, 23) were included in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome measures were persistent inflammation at hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: PIS was assessed in 22.97% of all patients, predominantly in the TAD group (P=0.03). CRP increased after TEVAR (156.6±94.5, P<0.001; 108.1±57.7, P<0.01 and 117.8±70.4, P<0.05) vs. baseline (58.1±77.5, 31.94±52.1 and 31.9±52.1 mg/L, in TAD, TAA and TAR/PAU, respectively) and this increase was more accentuated in TAD group (P<0.05). Stent-length was similar in all groups (P=0.226) but correlated with postoperative CRP only in TAD (R=0.576, P=0.013). Fresh parietal thrombus correlated with CRP (R=0.4507, P=0.0005) and is (OR=1.0883, P=0.0001), together with the pathology of aortic dissection (OR=6.2268, P=0.0288), a predictor of PIS after TEVAR. Whereas mortality (5.4%) did not correlate with PIS (P=0.38) either with aortic pathology (P=0.225), hospital stay after TEVAR was significantly prolonged by PIS (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic dissection is associated with more inflammation after TEVAR than aortic aneurysm, rupture or perforated ulcer, with the amount of fresh parietal thrombus playing the most significant role in the occurrence of PIS. Importantly, PIS prolongs hospital stay but not mortality after TEVAR.

Pre-surgery optimization of patients' expectations to improve outcome in heart surgery: Study protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center PSY-HEART-II trial.

The PSY-HEART-I trial indicated that a brief expectation-focused intervention prior to heart surgery improves disability and quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, to investigate the clinical utility of such an intervention, a large multi-center trial is needed to generalize the results and their implications for the health care system. The PSY-HEART-II study aims to examine whether a preoperative psychological intervention targeting patients' expectations (EXPECT) can improve outcomes 6 months after CABG (with or without heart valve replacement). EXPECT will be compared to Standard of Care (SOC) and an intervention providing emotional support without targeting expectations (SUPPORT). In a 3-arm multi-center randomized, controlled, prospective trial (RCT), N = 567 patients scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC and EXPECT or SOC and SUPPORT. Patients will be randomized with a fixed unbalanced ratio of 3:3:1 (EXPECT: SUPPORT: SOC) to compare EXPECT to SOC and EXPECT to SUPPORT. Both psychological interventions consist of 2 in-person sessions (à 50 minute), 2 phone consultations (à 20 minute) during the week prior to surgery, and 1 booster phone consultation post-surgery 6 weeks later. Assessment will occur at baseline approx. 3-10 days before surgery, preoperatively the day before surgery, 4-6 days later, and 6 months after surgery. The study's primary end point will be patients' illness-related disability 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be patients' expectations, subjective illness beliefs, quality of life, length of hospital stay and blood sample parameters (eg, inflammatory parameters such as IL-6, IL-8, CRP). This large multi-center trial has the potential to corroborate and generalize the promising results of the PSY-HEART-I trial for routine care of cardiac surgery patients, and to stimulate revisions of treatment guidelines in heart surgery.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium after cardiac surgical procedures with cardioplegic arrest.

OBJECTIVES: The pathophysiology of delirium after cardiac surgery is complex. The present study aims to determine perioperative risk factors and construct a scoring system for postoperative delirium based on the type of surgery. METHODS: Three hundred patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 150) or valve and/or aortic surgery ± CABG (n = 150) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of delirium (32%) was similar in subgroups (28.7% and 33.33%, P = 0.384). Delirium patients were older [71.3 (standard deviation: 8.5) vs 66.6 (standard deviation: 9.5), P < 0.001; 70.0 (standard deviation: 9.6) vs 62.5 (standard deviation: 12.6), P < 0.001] and required more packed red blood cell units [2.1 (standard deviation: 2.1) vs 4.2 (standard deviation: 4.0), P < 0.001; 2.4 (standard deviation: 3.3) vs 5.4 (standard deviation: 5.9), P < 0.001] and fresh frozen plasma units [6.1 (standard deviation: 2.9) vs. 8.0 (standard deviation: 4.2), P < 0.001; 6.3 (standard deviation: 3.4) vs 10.8 (standard deviation: 7.2), P < 0.001] in CABG and valve/aortic subgroups, respectively. Delirium was associated with longer operation time [298.3 (standard deviation: 98.4) vs 250.6 (standard deviation: 67.8) min, P < 0.001], cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time [171.5 (standard deviation: 54.9) vs 140.98 (standard deviation: 45.8) min, P < 0.001] and cardiac arrest time [112 (standard deviation: 35.9) vs 91.9 (standard deviation: 28.6), P < 0.001] only in the valve/aortic group (versus non-delirium). Multivariate regression analysis identified an association between delirium and age [odds ratio: 1.056 (95% confidence interval: 1.002-1.113), P = 0.041], CPB time [odds ratio: 1.1014 (95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.025), P = 0.007], fresh frozen plasma transfusion [odds ratio: 1.127 (95% confidence interval: 1.006-1.262), P = 0.039] and atrial fibrillation [odds ratio: 4.801 (95% confidence interval: 1.844-12.502), P < 0.001] after valve/aortic surgery (area under the curve 0.835, P < 0.001) and between delirium and age [odds ratio: 1.089 (95% confidence interval: 1.023-1.160), P = 0.007] and ventilation time [odds ratio: 1.068 (95% confidence interval: 1.026-1.113), P = 0.001] after isolated CABG (area under the curve 0.798, P < 0.001). The cross-validation of the results by k-fold logistic regression revealed for the entire patient cohort an overall average accuracy of the prediction model of 0.764, with a false-positive rate of 0.052 and a false-negative rate of 0.18. CONCLUSIONS: Age, CPB time, ventilation, transfusion and atrial fibrillation are differently associated with delirium depending on the operative characteristics. Optimization of intraoperative parameters and use of risk calculators may enable early institution of pharmacotherapy and improve overall outcome after cardiac surgery.

Video-assisted minimal access surgery for complicated mitral valve endocarditis, tricuspid valve insufficiency and progressive coronary disease after previous CABG - in the time of COVID-19: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The timing for heart surgery following cerebral embolization after cardiac valve vegetation is vital to postoperative recovery being uneventful, additionally Covid-19 may negatively affect the outcome. Minimally invasive methods and upgraded surgical instruments maximize the benefits of surgery also in complex cardiac revision cases with substantial perioperative risk. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68 y.o. patient, 10 years after previous sternotomy for OPCAB was referred to cardiac surgery on the 10th postoperative day after neurosurgical intervention for intracerebral bleeding with suspected mitral valve endocarditis. Mitral valve vegetation, tricuspid valve insufficiency and coronary stenosis were diagnosed and treated by minimally invasive revision cardiac surgery on the 14th postoperative day after neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: The present clinical case demonstrates for the first time that the minimally invasive approach via right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be safely used for concomitant complex mitral valve reconstruction, tricuspid valve repair and aorto-coronary bypass surgery, even as a revision procedure in the presence of florid endocarditis after recent neurosurgical intervention. The Covid-19 pandemic and prophylactic patient isolation slow down the efficacy of pulmonary weaning and mobilisation and prolong the need for ICU treatment, without adversely affecting long-term outcome.

Supra-aortic interventions for endovascular exclusion of the entire aortic arch.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of endovascular exclusion of the entire aortic arch (proximal landing in zone 0, distal landing in zone III or beyond, after Ishimaru) in which complete surgical debranching of the supra-aortic vessels (I), endovascular supra-aortic revascularization (chimney, fenestrated, or branched grafts) with partial surgical debranching (II), or total endovascular supra-aortic revascularization (III) was additionally performed. METHODS: Publications describing endovascular repair of the aortic arch (2000-2016) were systematically searched and reviewed. RESULTS: From a total of 53 relevant studies including 1853 patients, only 1021 patients undergoing 35 different total aortic arch procedures were found eligible for further evaluation and included in group I, II, or III (429, 190, and 402 patients, respectively). Overall early mortality was higher in group I vs groups II and III (P = .001; 1 - ß = 95.6%) but exceeded in group III (18.6%) and group II (14.0%) vs group I (8.0%; P = .044; 1 - ß = 57.4%) for diseases involving zone 0. Mortality was higher in all subgroups treated for zone 0 disease compared with corresponding subgroups treated for zone I to zone III disease. The incidence of cerebral ischemic events was increased in groups I and II vs group III (7.5% and 11% vs 1.7%; P = .0001) and correlated with early mortality (R2 = .20; P = .033). The incidence of type II endoleaks and endovascular reintervention was similar between groups and correlated with each other (R2 = .37; P = .004). Type Ia endoleak occurred more often in groups II and III than in group I (7.1% and 12.1% vs 5.8%; P = .023) and correlated with midterm mortality (R2 = .53; P = .005). Retrograde type A dissection was low in all groups, whereas aneurysm growth was higher in group III (2.6%, 4.2%, 10.7%; P = .002), correlating with midterm mortality (R2 = .311; P = .009). Surgical revision slightly correlated with surgical complications (R2 = .18; P = .044) but not with mortality (R2 = .10; P = .214). CONCLUSIONS: Because early mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving endovascular treatment for proximal aortic disease, endovascular-based approaches proved to be feasible alternatives to hybrid surgical procedures, especially when they were performed for aneurysms located in the distal aortic arch. Whereas cerebral ischemia accompanies both surgical and endovascular involvement of the supra-aortic vessels, endoleaks and aneurysm growth remain hallmarks of endovascular supra-aortic repair. Because surgical revision had no impact on mortality, complete surgical debranching may become the option of choice for patients with good life expectancy suffering from proximal aortic arch disease, whereas total endovascular procedures could be particularly advantageous in patients with short life expectancy and distal aortic arch disease.

A minimally invasive approach for open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic replacement: experimental concept for a novel surgical procedure.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a simple, reliable, and timesaving technique for the therapy of thoracoabdominal aortic (TAA) aneurysms that are not suitable for endovascular repair. Methods: In this pilot study, we sought to combine the advantages of classic open vascular procedure with the use of endoscopic surgical tools and small skin incisions to develop a minimally invasive approach for TAA replacement. The following procedures were used: endoscopic exposure and closure of the lower intercostal arteries; small posterolateral thoracotomy and left retroperitoneal incisions to expose the anastomotic regions of the aorta; partial anticoagulation; passive bypass and sequential aortic clamping; tunnelling of the graft through the native aortic lumen (endoaneurysmorrhaphy) and open performance of vascular anastomosis. Results: Five mixed-breed dogs (25-35 kg) underwent minimally invasive TAA replacement. All animals survived the operation without blood transfusion (lowest Hb = 5.5 mg/dl). Total operation time was 364 ± 46.3 min. Clamping times were 17.6 ± 3.2 min for proximal anastomosis, 33.2 ± 2.48 min for visceral patch and 11 ± 2.3 min for distal anastomosis. The pull-through procedure of graft through the native aorta was performed during the visceral clamp time. Conclusions: Surgical replacement of the TAA through small transverse incisions of the thoracic and abdominal wall is feasible and allows open performance of all vascular anastomosis with no leakage at any anastomotic site. Further experimental studies and clinical implementation are needed to establish the safety and long-term outcome of minimally invasive TAA replacement as a possible primary therapeutic tool for complex aneurysms that are not suitable for endovascular treatment and require open surgical repair.

Elliptical transection for eversion endarterectomy enables efficient external carotid artery desobliteration.

BACKGROUND: Eversion endarterectomy (EEA) of the internal carotid artery requires less distal surgical exposure than conventional patch reconstruction endarterectomy. However, the technical success after EEA was tremendously contradictive especially with respect to the external carotid artery (ECA) patency rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of elliptical EEA on the quality and outcome of external carotid artery desobliteration. METHODS: Clinical outcome and carotid disease progression at one year were evaluated in thirty patients receiving EEA through short transverse skin incision either in general anesthesia (GA, 22 patients) or locoregional anesthesia (LRA, 8 patients). RESULTS: One patient (GA group) required early revision for bleeding. There was no postoperative stroke, nerve damage or death. At one year, ipsilateral systolic peak velocity (SPV) measurements showed no disease progression in the internal (75.30±19.31; 62.88±28.51 cm/s) or in the external carotid artery (118.92±58.30; 79.00±27.15 cm/s, GA; RLA, respectively). The incidence of ipsilateral ECA stenosis >50% decreased from 64% preoperatively to 16 % at one year (P<0.001). On the contralateral side, incidence of ECA stenosis >50% increased from 27% preoperatively to 56% after one year (p=0.018). On the ipsilateral side, all patients in the RLA group had less than 50% stenosis of ECA at one year after the operation (P=0.021 vs. pre-OP), while in the GA group four patients developed 50-74% stenosis and one patient >75% stenosis of ECA (P<0.001 vs. pre-OP). These results were not significantly different between the two groups and demonstrated a total of 96.7% ECA patency at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Elliptical transsection for EEA enables outstanding ECA revascularization with good patency at one year. Type of anesthesia does not affect the quality of the eversion technique.

Transverse small skin incision for carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to determine the feasibility of short transverse skin incision (STI < 4 cm) for eversion (EEA) and patch (PEA) endarterectomy with or without shunt by comparing it with the outcomes after long transverse skin incision (LTI 4-8 cm). METHODS: Of 164 elective consecutive patients (71 ± 2.73% symptomatic) operated at one institution over 24 months, 81 were treated with STI, while 83 patients received LTI. The LTI and STI groups did not differ in terms of age, symptoms, or risk factors. EEA or PEA under locoregional (LRA) or general (GA) anesthesia were performed. RESULTS: STI was associated with shorter operation times (75.19 ± 15.33 vs. 94.87 ± 41 and 99.4 ± 27.36 vs. 132.66 ± 51.32, respectively, P < 0.01) and similar clamping times (26.05 ± 5.71 vs. 26.07 ± 7.14 and 34.04 ± 9.49 vs. 42.5 ± 20.8, respectively) in the EEA and PEA groups that did not receive shunts compared with the corresponding LTI groups, and the operating room stays of the STI patients operated on GA were shorter than that of the corresponding LTI patients (181.11 ± 39.16 vs. 212.5 ± 64, P < 0.001). Nonsignificant differences were found between the corresponding STI and LTI shunt groups. No perioperative deaths occurred. STI was associated with less perioperative complications than LTI. Macroscopically nondistinguishable scar was present in 85% in the STI and 52% in the LTI groups (P < 0.001). Postoperative local irritation and paresthesia occurred similarly in the STI (11%) and LTI (14%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: STIs are feasible for PEA and EEA. STIs produce significantly better cosmetic outcomes and shorter operation times than LTI and have similar rates of complication and similar incidences of local discomfort. Although no neurological consequences of using STIs for PEAs with shunts were revealed, STI should be applied with caution until sufficient patch length and long-term patency of this procedure are demonstrated.

Effect of haemodynamic changes on epithelium-related intestinal injury in off-pump coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Intestinal injury is thought to play a central role in the occurrence of multiorgan dysfunction after on-pump coronary surgery. Clinical benefits of off-pump revascularisation remain, however, controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hepatic enzymes and plasmatic IL-6, IL-8 and intestinal-type fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) were determined in 20 patients (age 65-75) undergoing either on-pump (n = 10) or off-pump (n = 10) coronary surgery. Haemodynamic and biochemical parameters, catecholamine and volume therapy were monitored. RESULTS: Central venous pressure (CVP) was significantly higher in the off-pump group during and 12h after operation (9.5 ± 1.35 vs. 6.21 ± 0.63 mmH2O, p = 0.012). Higher GGT and GLDH levels occurred in the off-pump group and correlated with the elevated I-FABP levels at 24h (935.8 ± 83.7 vs. 370.4 ± 67.7 pg/mL, p<0.001). CVP correlated with I-FABP peak values (Pearson's coefficient 0.852). IL-6 and IL-8 were released to a lower extent in the off-pump group compared to on pump (p<0.05) at 24h (139.3 ± 27.7 vs. 279.4 ± 56.2 and 15.3 ± 7.4 vs. 38.5 ± 13.8 pg/mL) and at 72 h post-operatively (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 30.1 ± 12.1 and 7.8 ± 1.2 vs. 17.1 ± 5.2 pg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: While inflammatory activation is reduced with CPB avoidance, elevated CVP during off-pump surgery is followed by temporary postoperative enterocyte damage that may threaten the normal function of the gastrointestinal system and lead - in certain groups of high risk patients--to irrecoverable injury.

A minimally invasive approach for aortobifemoral bypass procedure.

Surgical aortobifemoral bypass procedure for aortoiliac occlusive disease remains the gold standard treatment despite rapidly expanding range of indications for endovascular repair. Besides several disadvantages such as dysparaesthesias, hernias, and unpleasant outcome, transperitoneal exposure of the aorta is also associated with operative autonomic nerve injury. In five male patients, infrarenal aorta was exposed through a small (8 cm) supraumbilical midline incision. Incision of the posterior peritoneum above the infrarenal aorta was limited to 3 cm. A 1 cm infraumbilical incision allowed transperitoneal placement of the distal aortic clamp outside of the operative field. Four centimeters transverse incisions were made over the femoral bifurcations and implantation of the aortobifemoral graft followed. Extubation was performed after an operating time of 200 to 150 minutes with 30 to 20 minutes aortic clamping time. Nonopioids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were intermittently administered during 12 hours of intermediate care unit monitoring. Oral alimentation started 6 hours and complete mobilization at 48 hours postoperatively. Hospital discharge followed on the fourth to tenth postoperative day. This minimally invasive technique allows a precise and controlled open performance of all vascular anastomoses minimizing intraoperative and postoperative complications and significantly decreasing patient discomfort related to standard abdominal surgery.

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury : Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.

The term ischemia-reperfusion injury describes the experimentally and clinically prevalent finding that tissue ischemia with inadequate oxygen supply followed by successful reperfusion initiates a wide and complex array of inflammatory responses that may both aggravate local injury as well as induce impairment of remote organ function. Conditions under which ischemia-reperfusion injury is encountered include the different forms of acute vascular occlusions (stroke, myocardial infarction, limb ischemia) with the respective reperfusion strategies (thrombolytic therapy, angioplasty, operative revascularization) but also routine surgical procedures (organ transplantation, free-tissue-transfer, cardiopulmonary bypass, vascular surgery) and major trauma/shock. Since the first recognition of ischemia-reperfusion injury during the 1970s, significant knowledge has accumulated and the purpose of this review is to present an overview over the current literature on the molecular and cellular basis of ischemia-reperfusion injury, to outline the clinical manifestations and to compile contemporary treatment and prevention strategies. Although the concept of reperfusion injury is still a matter of debate, it is corroborated by recent and ongoing clinical trials that demonstrated ischemic preconditioning, inhibition of sodium-hydrogen-exchange and administration of adenosine to be effective in attenuating ischemia-reperfusion injury.