RESUMEN
Background: Research efforts can produce practice-changing results with widespread implications for patient care. While critical to the advancement of the field, such efforts do not often provide direct compensation. However, a researcher's academic productivity may facilitate industry relationships, either as the impetus for the affiliation or a result of collaboration. Methods: Queries of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services publicly available Open Payments System allowed for extraction of industry compensation data for orthopedic surgeons in 7 categories, including royalties and licensing fees, consulting fees, gifts, honoria, and 3 unique speaking fees delineations. This system identifies physicians by taxonomy identifications; however, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services does not have a unique code for shoulder and elbow surgeons. Therefore, identification of shoulder and elbow surgeons proceeded utilizing the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) society 2019 membership directory. Cross-referencing this membership list with extracted Open Payments data provided industry funding information for all ASES members. Physicians then underwent an academic productivity assessment. Queries of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar User Profile databases provided the Hirsch index (h-index) and m-index for each surgeon. Bivariate and multivariate analyses produced statistical results. Results: From 2016 to 2020, 631,130, 158, and 72 ASES members earned mean annual industry compensation <$1000, between $1001 and $10,000, between $10,001 and $100,000, and >$100,000, respectively. Royalties (91.5%) predominated in the top earning group, compared with consulting fees (58.0%, 55.0%) in the 2 middle-tier groups. H-index and m-index correlated positively with total compensation (h-index: r = 0.18, P < .001; m-index: r = 0.10, P < .001). The highest income group (>$100,000) had higher h-index and m-index scores than either intermediate ($1001-$10,000, $10,001-$100,000) or lowest (<$1000) compensation groups (From lowest to highest income bracket-h-index: 14.8 vs. 16.4 vs. 19.4 vs. 32, P < .001; m-index: 0.79 vs. 0.85 vs. 0.91 vs. 1.18, P = .003). Multivariable analysis of factors associated with increased industry compensation identified only h-index (B = 8046, P < .001) as having a significant association with physician compensation, with each single unit increase in h-index associated with an 18% increase in industry funding. Conclusion: Among a group of academic shoulder and elbow surgeons, industry compensation correlates positively with academic productivity metrics, with an associated $8046/yr increase in industry funding for each single-unit increase in h-index over 9. Future studies may focus on more clearly defining the causal directionality of these results.
RESUMEN
Gantzer muscles are variant muscles in the anterior forearm inserting into the flexor pollicis longus or, less often, the flexor digitorum profundus. The presence of Gantzer muscles can cause a compressive neuropathy affecting the anterior interosseous nerve (Kiloh-Nevin syndrome). These muscles must also be considered when anterior forearm fasciotomies are performed for the management of acute compartment syndrome. In this case report, a novel Gantzer muscle originated from the flexor digitorum superficialis as well as the investing fascia of the brachialis muscle; the latter site is a novel proximal attachment not previously reported. In addition, the Gantzer muscle possessed rare characteristics because it (1) possessed a split tendinous distal insertion into both the flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus, (2) exhibited a triangular morphology, and (3) was innervated by the median nerve. Most importantly, the dual origin of this Gantzer muscle formed a tunnel containing branches of the median nerve; therefore, this report documents a unique anatomical scenario in which the Gantzer muscle may compress and cause entrapment of aspects of the median nerve.
