Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 35(40): 5325-5330, 2017 09 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28863867

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess pregnancy outcomes after exposure to AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine (Cervarix, GSK, Belgium) prior to, or during pregnancy, as reported to a pregnancy registry. METHODS: A pregnancy exposure registry was established to collect data in the United Kingdom and the United States. Exposure was defined as vaccination with AS04-HPV-16/18 within 60days before the estimated conception date and delivery. Reporting was voluntary. RESULTS: Between September 2007 and November 2015, 306 pregnancy exposure reports were received of which 181 were prospective, evaluable reports. From these 181 reports, 154 (85.1%) pregnancies resulted in a live birth, 14 (7.7%) in spontaneous abortion, one (0.5%) in stillbirth, and 12 (6.6%) were electively terminated. There was no clustering of outcomes with respect to the timing of exposure. There were 18 infants born with a congenital anomaly of which nine were minor structural defects, seven were major structural defects, one was a hereditary disorder and one was likely the result of a congenital infection. In three cases of structural defect (two minor and one major), there was a temporal association to vaccination during the critical developmental period of gestation. There was no cluster or constellation of congenital anomalies suggestive of possible teratogenesis. CONCLUSION: The pharmacovigilance plan to investigate the effects of inadvertent exposure to AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine during pregnancy included assessment of pregnancy outcomes among women enrolled in clinical trials, evaluation of pregnancy exposure reports from all countries as part of routine passive safety surveillance, a large, well conducted post-authorization observational study, and the pregnancy registry. These registry data complement other data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance showing no evidence that vaccination with AS04-HPV-16/18 during the defined exposure period (within 60days before conception until delivery) increases the risk of teratogenicity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/inmunología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Mortinato , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(12): 3177-3185, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27841725

RESUMEN

This community-randomized controlled trial was initiated to assess the overall and herd effects of 2 different human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization strategies in over 80,000 girls and boys aged 12-15 y in 33 communities in Finland (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00534638). Overall, 14,838 adolescents received HPV-16/18 vaccine (2,440 boys and 12,398 girls) and 17,338 received hepatitis-B virus (HBV) vaccine (9,221 boys and 8,117 girls). In an interim analysis, vaccine safety was assessed by active monitoring and surveillance via health registry linkage. Active monitoring showed that the HPV-16/18 vaccine has acceptable safety and reactogenicity in boys. In all study participants, the observed incidences (per 100,000 person-years) of serious adverse events (SAEs) possibly related to vaccination were 54.3 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 34.0-82.1) in the HPV-16/18 group and 64.0 (95% CI: 43.2-91.3) in the HBV group. During the follow-up period for this interim analysis, the most common new-onset autoimmune diseases (NOADs; with incidence rate ≥15 per 100,000) in any group based on hospital discharge registry (HILMO) download were ulcerative colitis, juvenile arthritis, celiac disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and Crohn's disease. No increased NOAD incidences were observed in HPV-16/18 vaccine recipients compared to HBV vaccine recipients. In both the SAE possibly related- and HILMO-analyses, a lower incidence of IDDM was observed in HPV-16/18 vaccinees compared to HBV vaccinees (relative risks, 0.26 [95% CI: 0.03-1.24] and 0.16 [95% CI: 0.03-0.55], respectively).


Asunto(s)
Hidróxido de Aluminio/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Lípido A/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Hidróxido de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Niño , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Finlandia , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lípido A/administración & dosificación , Lípido A/efectos adversos , Masculino , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(11): 2862-2871, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428517

RESUMEN

To assess the risk of autoimmune disease (AD) in 9-25 year-old women within 1 year after the first AS04-HPV-16/18vaccine dose, a retrospective, observational database cohort study was conducted using CPRD GOLD. From CPRD GOLD 4 cohorts (65,000 subjects each) were retrieved: 1 exposed female cohort (received ≥1 AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine dose between Sep2008-Aug2010) and 3 unexposed cohorts: historical female (Sep2005-Aug2007), concurrent male, and historical male. Co-primary endpoints were confirmed neuroinflammatory/ophthalmic AD and other AD, secondary endpoints were confirmed individual AD. Risk of new onset of AD was compared between cohorts (reference: historical cohort) using Poisson regression. The main analysis using confirmed cases showed no neuroinflammatory/ophthalmic AD cases in the female exposed cohort. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) (95% CI) of other AD was 1.41 (0.86 to 2.31) in female and 1.77 (0.94 to 3.35) in male cohorts when compared to the female and male historical cohort, respectively. Secondary endpoints were evaluated for diseases with >10 cases, which were Crohn's disease (IRR: 1.21 [0.37 to 3.95] for female and 4.22 [0.47 to 38.02] for male cohorts), autoimmune thyroiditis (IRR: 3.75 [1.25 to 11.31] for female and no confirmed cases for male cohorts) and type 1 diabetes (IRR: 0.30 [0.11 to 0.83] for female and 2.46 [1.08 to 5.60] for male cohorts). Analysis using confirmed and non-confirmed cases showed similar results, except for autoimmune thyroiditis in females, IRR: 1.45 (0.79 to 2.64). There was no evidence of an increased risk of AD in women aged 9 to 25 years after AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Hidróxido de Aluminio/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Lípido A/análogos & derivados , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lípido A/administración & dosificación , Lípido A/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
EBioMedicine ; 2(9): 1114-21, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26501109

RESUMEN

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder that typically follows trauma or surgery. Suspected CRPS reported after vaccination with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines led to temporary suspension of proactive recommendation of HPV vaccination in Japan. We investigated the potential CRPS signal in relation to HPV-16/18-adjuvanted vaccine (Cervarix®) by database review of CRPS cases with independent expert confirmation; a disproportionality analysis and analyses of temporality; an observed versus expected analysis using published background incidence rates; systematic reviews of aggregate safety data, and a literature review. The analysis included 17 case reports of CRPS: 10 from Japan (0.14/100,000 doses distributed) and seven from the United Kingdom (0.08/100,000). Five cases were considered by independent experts to be confirmed CRPS. Quantitative analyses did not suggest an association between CRPS and HPV-16/18-adjuvanted vaccine. Observed CRPS incidence after HPV-16/18 vaccination was statistically significantly below expected rates. Systematic database reviews using search terms varying in specificity and sensitivity did not identify new cases. No CRPS was reported during clinical development and no unexpected results found in the literature. There is not sufficient evidence to suggest an increased risk of developing CRPS following vaccination with HPV-16/18-adjuvanted vaccine. Post-licensure safety surveillance confirms the acceptable benefit-risk of HPV-16/18 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/inducido químicamente , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Concesión de Licencias , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/inmunología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Humanos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
5.
Vaccine ; 33(48): 6884-91, 2015 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26206268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We assessed the risk of spontaneous abortion (SA) after inadvertent exposure to HPV-16/18-vaccine during pregnancy using an observational cohort design. METHODS: The study population included women aged 15-25 years registered with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink General Practice OnLine Database in the United Kingdom (UK), who received at least one HPV-16/18-vaccine dose between 1st September 2008 and 30th June 2011. Exposed women had the first day of gestation between 30 days before and 45 days (90 days for the extended exposure period) after any HPV-16/18-vaccine dose. Non-exposed women had the first day of gestation 120 days-18 months after the last dose. SA defined as foetal loss between weeks 1 and 23 of gestation (UK definition). RESULTS: The frequency of SA was 11.6% (among 207 exposed) and 9.0% (632 non-exposed), women: hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age at first day of gestation 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-2.12). Sensitivity analysis per number of doses administered (-30 to +45-day risk period) showed a HR for SA of 1.11 (0.64-1.91) for 18/178 women with one dose during the risk period versus 2.55 (1.09-5.93) in 6/29 women with two doses within a 4-5 weeks period. The proportion of pre-term/full-term/postterm deliveries, small/large for gestational age infants, and birth defects was not significantly different between exposed and non-exposed women. Results were consistent using a (United States) SA definition of foetal loss between weeks 1-19 and/or the extended risk period. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of an increased risk of SA and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in young women inadvertently HPV-16/18-vaccinated around gestation. Nevertheless, women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant are advised to postpone vaccination until completion of pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/inducido químicamente , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Hidróxido de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Aluminio/efectos adversos , Lípido A/análogos & derivados , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Resultado del Embarazo , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lípido A/administración & dosificación , Lípido A/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 13(11): 1297-306, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25219284

RESUMEN

The HPV types 16/18-AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine, Cervarix(®) (HPV-16/18-vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) was first approved in 2007 and is licensed in 134 countries for the prevention of persistent infection, premalignant cervical lesions and cervical cancer caused by oncogenic HPV. Benefit-risk status requires continual re-evaluation as vaccine uptake increases, as the epidemiology of the disease evolves and as new information becomes available. This paper provides an example of benefit-risk considerations and risk-management planning. Evaluation of the benefit-risk of HPV-16/18-vaccine post-licensure includes studies with a range of designs in many countries and in collaboration with national public agencies and regulatory authorities. The strategy to assess benefit versus risk will continue to evolve and adapt to the changing HPV-16/18-vaccine market.


Asunto(s)
Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Bélgica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología
7.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 23(5): 466-79, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24644063

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to further evaluate the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18-AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HPV-16/18-vaccine Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) through a pooled analysis of data from 42 completed/ongoing clinical studies. METHODS: Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported for 30 days after each dose. Medically significant conditions, serious AEs (SAEs), potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and pregnancy outcomes were captured until study completion. Events leading to subject withdrawal were reviewed. Relative risks compared incidences of spontaneous abortion and pIMDs in controlled studies. RESULTS: Thirty one thousand one hundred seventy-three adolescent girls/women received HPV-16/18-vaccine alone (HPV group), 2166 received HPV-16/18-vaccine coadministered with another vaccine and 24 241 were controls. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 0-113.3). Incidences of unsolicited AEs reported within 30 days after any dose were similar between HPV and Control groups (30.8%/29.7%). During the entire study period, reports of medically significant conditions (25.0%/28.3%) and SAEs (7.9%/9.3%) were also similarly distributed between groups. Deaths were rare: HPV (alone/coadministered) n = 25, controls n = 20 (n = 18 in blinded groups). pIMDs within 1 year were reported by 0.2% of HPV-16/18 vaccinees and controls. For each pIMD event category, no increased relative risks were reported for HPV-16/18 vaccinees versus controls. Coadministration did not change the overall safety profile. Pregnancy outcomes and withdrawal rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of safety data arising from 57 580 subjects and 96 704 HPV-16/18-vaccine doses shows that the incidences and distribution of AEs were similar among HPV-16/18-vaccine recipients and controls. No new safety signals were identified. The data confirm previous findings that HPV-16/18-vaccine has an acceptable benefit-risk profile in adolescent girls and adult women.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 23(5): 456-65, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24644078

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To summarise post-licensure safety surveillance over more than 4 years of routine use of the human papillomavirus-16/18-AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HPV-16/18 vaccine: Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium). METHODS: We describe global post-licensure passive surveillance data based on routine pharmacovigilance from 18 May 2007 until 17 November 2011 and enhanced surveillance implemented during the 2-year national immunisation programme in the UK (school years 2008-2010). RESULTS: Spontaneous reports from countries worldwide showed a similar pattern for the most frequently reported adverse events after HPV-16/18 vaccination. No patterns or trends were observed for potential immune-mediated diseases after vaccination. Observed incidences of Bell's palsy and confirmed Guillain-Barré syndrome were within the expected range in the general population. Outcomes of pregnancy in women who were inadvertently exposed to HPV-16/18 vaccine during pregnancy, were in line with published reports for similar populations. Enhanced surveillance of adverse events in the UK triggered a review of cases of anaphylaxis, angioedema and syncope reports, leading to an update to the prescribing information. CONCLUSION: Collaborative partnerships between industry and national regulatory agencies facilitated rapid notification and transfer of safety information, allowing for rapid responses in the event of a safety signal of adverse event of concern. More than 4 years of post-licensure experience may provide confidence to providers and the public about the safety profile of HPV-16/18 vaccine in routine use. The safety profile appears to be consistent with pre-licensure data reporting that HPV-16/18 vaccine has an acceptable benefit-risk profile in adolescent girls and women.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Vacunación/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...