Patient experiences of virtual care across specialist neuroscience and psychiatry clinics related to the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Calgary, Alberta.

Purpose: The emergence of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has led to public health restrictions and a shift towards virtual care and telehealth. The aim of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators of virtual care from the perspective of neurological and psychiatric patients. Methods: One-on-one interviews were conducted remotely using telephone and online video teleconferencing. There was a total of 57 participants, and a thematic content analysis was conducted using NVivo software. Results: The two main themes were (1) virtual health service delivery and (2) virtual physician/patient interaction, with subthemes around how virtual care improved accessibility of care for patients and improved patient-centered care; how privacy and technical issues impact patients using virtual care; and the need for relationality and connection between health care providers and patients while using virtual care. Conclusions: This study showed that virtual care can increase accessibility and efficiency for patients and providers, indicating its potential for ongoing use in the delivery of clinical care. Virtual care was found to be an acceptable mode of healthcare delivery from the perspective of patients; however, there is a continued need for relationship-building between care providers and patients.

Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Healthcare Provision and Lived Experiences of Patients with Hydrocephalus.

The emergence of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) led to distancing measures which acutely affected healthcare infrastructure, leading to limited in-person clinical visits and an increased number of virtual appointments. This study aimed to examine the effects this had on adults with hydrocephalus by describing the lived experiences of a cohort of patients at an outpatient hydrocephalus clinic. Between early May and early July of 2020, remote structured interviews were conducted with participants. Interviews were in-depth and open-ended, allowing participants to reflect and expand on the effects of the social distancing mandate on their well-being and quality of care. Three themes emerged: (1) impacts of changes in treatment provision, (2) impacts of changes in mitigating activities, and (3) impacts of changes on personal well-being. The comprehensive understanding of lived experiences may inform the future provision of healthcare services and social policy. Improved approaches to remote care telemedicine have the potential to facilitate high-quality care.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parkinson's Disease: a Single-Centered Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: The public health measure restrictions across the world due to COVID-19 have inadvertently impacted the routines for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their care partners not only in terms of compromised neurological clinical care but also drastically changing the way of life to minimize the risk of becoming infected. This study explores initial PD patients' lived experiences to observe how quality of life and health care has been affected at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and provide insight into the importance of patient engagement and virtual care. METHODS: Twenty-two virtual, in-depth semi-structured interviews with persons diagnosed with PD who usually attend a Movement Disorders specialty clinic in Calgary, Alberta, were completed between April 28 and May 13, 2020, and the care partners that wished to participate. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, after which transcripts were analyzed and coded into relevant themes using NVivo 12. RESULTS: Impacts from the public health measures and COVID-19 results into three main themes: (1) Impacts of COVID-19 on PD Clinical Care; (2) Activities of Daily Living; (3) Attitudes and Perceptions. Participants reported worsening in motor and nonmotor symptoms and had to accommodate to clinical care via virtual means which were associated with limitations and suggestions for improvement of remote care. CONCLUSION: This study provides a unique opportunity for researchers to better understand the lived experiences of PD patients in all aspects of their life suggesting that innovative means are needed for facilitating virtual health care medicine and increased social interaction.

Antidepressants Effects on Pain in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Pain in Parkinson disease (PD) is complex as this symptom can be multifactorial in origin because deficits in dopaminergic but also other neurotransmitters are involved. Pain and depression are increasingly recognized to have clinical importance for the quality of life of people living with PD. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the potential benefit of using prescribed antidepressants for decreasing or controlling pain associated with PD. METHODS: PubMed databases were searched for relevant studies using keywords and our exclusion/inclusion criteria and targeting only randomized placebo-controlled trials for antidepressants in PD. RESULTS: After screening 108 articles, only 3 focused articles were analyzed. Two of the included studies reported were on nortriptyline and paroxetine antidepressants. Unfortunately, included studies did not align in their outcome measures and did not directly compare the drug groups against each other or the placebo. Therefore, the complex nature of the unaligned outcome measures is inadequate for interpreting the efficacy of antidepressants in treating pain symptoms in PD. The third study focused solely on observing the effects of duloxetine but showed no favorable effects of this drug on pain. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective studies with a direct comparison of antidepressants and placebo should be conducted, focusing on pain-related scales and questions to understand further the role of antidepressants in treating pain in PD.